Unit responsibilities Obviously, the biggest responsibility is for a unit to identify its shortfalls and LIMFACs as soon as they are known. A thorough description of the problem is a must. The unit should also tell what actions they have taken to correct the problem, any workarounds, and if there is a get-well date for the problem.
Explanation
NCONTINGENCY MNGT AND PLANNING
045
All support provided by US forces must be paid for through either replacement in kind (RIK), which is a one for one swap, payment in cash (PIC), or equal value exchange (EVE), which is replacing an item or service with a different item or service of relatively equal value.
A comprehensive plan that addresses all taskings, requirements, and mission objectives should be feasible in terms of unit resource authorizations for manpower, equipment, airframes, etc. Problem areas or limitations due to inadequate authorizations are feasibility problems or limitations. Normally, these types of problems require higher headquarters assistance or action.
Both the IGESP and the ESP have a standard format consisting of two parts. Part I identifies resources and capabilities of a location by functional area and is the focus of the expeditionary site survey. For contingency requirements, Part II of the plan allocates resources identified in Part I, assesses the ability to support the operation, and identifies LIMFACs. It is through these plans that all units operating out of the location become familiar with the existing resource allocations and key tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs).
Reporting Requirements Just like “traditional” support agreements, ACSAs are required to be tracked and funds must be accounted for annually. In order to track or account for ACSAs, MAJCOM ACSA Managers (usually the Support Agreement Manager) will assign IA numbers for specific IAs using the codes outlined in AFI 25–301, Attachment 3.
Normally, LIMFACs involve aircraft generation, launch capability, or major obstacles in other support areas. Examples of LIMFACs are transportation network deficiencies, lack of in-place facilities, malpositioned forces or materiel, and extreme climatic conditions.
ACSAs are international agreements written, negotiated, and concluded under the authority of Chapter 10, US Code Chapter 138. ACSAs are designed to provide an additional legal basis for reimbursable mutual logistics support from/to approved allied forces.
3. Review the ACSA to identify/verify: • Available payment methods. • Available pricing methods & requirements. • Allowed/Prohibited categories of support. • Unique provisions/exclusions (i.e., airlift, POL, munitions, lease/loan). • Coordination requirements.
Feasibility method A comprehensive plan that addresses all taskings, requirements, and mission objectives should be feasible in terms of unit resource authorizations for manpower, equipment, airframes, etc. Problem areas or limitations due to inadequate authorizations are feasibility problems or limitations. Normally, these types of problems require higher headquarters assistance or action.
The expeditionary site planning process produces an IGESP, formerly known as the BSP and an ESP. IGESPs are primarily developed for locations with a permanent Air Force presence, and are fully developed by the collaborative planning efforts of many functional experts with a deliberate planning time line. ESPs are chiefly associated with locations without a permanent Air Force presence and may contain only the minimum data necessary to make initial beddown decisions (quick reaction site survey information in Part I).
ACSAs Definitions ACSAs are international agreements written, negotiated, and concluded under the authority of Chapter 10, US Code Chapter 138. ACSAs are designed to provide an additional legal basis for reimbursable mutual logistics support from/to approved allied forces.
Shortfalls A shortfall is a deficiency in the number or type of personnel, equipment, or facilities available within the time required for the performance of the assigned task. Shortfalls are the difference between resources identified as required and those actually provided to the combatant commander. Remember that shortfalls deal with on-hand assets, not resource authorizations.
Reviewing an Implementing Arrangement (IA) 1. Locate Implementing Arrangement. a. Determine if IA is part of an ACSA or exists as a separate document. b. Coordinate with MAJCOM or other authority if no IA exists or if a new IA is required. 2. Identify IA number. 3. Identify responsible/authorized agency(ies). a. Ordering/Receiving Authority b. Financial Authority 4. Identify peacetime/wartime/contingency applications. 5. Identify required order form/minimum essential data elements). 6. Identify order/receipt/invoice processes. 7. Identify terms, conditions, definitions, and restrictions, if any. 8. Identify duration, interpretation, modification, and termination clauses, as required. 9. Identify procedures for settling disputes/liabilities, as required. 10. Identify payment methods authorized, fund cite information, and pricing/payment procedures.
Capability method On the other hand, well-written plans that are feasible (relating to authorizations), but cannot be supported due to the nonavailability of assets, are capability problems or limitations. These types of problems have a greater potential for unit-level resolution. The logistics plans office develops logistics portions of feasibility and capability studies.
ACSAs are not designed to replace existing authority or agreements, but offer a flexible means to exchange support in emergency situations where no authority exists or existing authority does not apply. There are restrictions on the types of support US forces can provide under ACSA. In addition, unified commands, i.e. USCENTCOM, USEUCOM, etc. may place additional restrictions or requirements on the use of ACSAs during operations.
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 21, 2022 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.