Economics
›
Development Economics
›
Finance & Development
›
Capital Formation
Capital Formation Quizzes, Questions & Answers
Explore the world of Capital Formation with our engaging quizzes designed to test your knowledge and understanding of this essential economic concept. Read more
Whether you're a student, a professional, or just curious, our Capital Formation quizzes offer an enjoyable way to learn. Dive in and challenge yourself with questions that cover key principles and real-world applications!
Read less
Top Trending Capital Formation Quizzes
This quiz, titled 'Reading Comprehension_Passage on Economy', assesses understanding of economic development strategies from the 1960s to recent times. It evaluates comprehension of shifts from manufacturing to high-tech...
Questions: 9 | Attempts: 468 | Last updated: Sep 1, 2025
-
Sample Question 1Directions (Q. 1 – 5): The passage given below is followed by a set of five questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question. During the 1960’s and 1970’s the primary economic development strategy of local governments in the United States was to attract manufacturing industries. Unfortunately, this strategy was usually implemented at another community’s expense: many manufacturing facilities were lured away from their moorings elsewhere through tax incentive and slick promotional efforts. Through the transfer to jobs and related revenues that resulted from this practice, one town’s triumph could become another town’s tragedy. In the 1980’s the strategy shifted from this zero-sum game to one called “high-technology development,” in which local governments competed to attract newly formed high-technology manufacturing firms. Although this approach was preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs, it also had its shortcomings: high-tech manufacturing firms employ only a specially trained fraction of the manufacturing workforce, and there simply are not enough high-tech firms to satisfy all geographic areas. Recently, local governments have increasingly come to recognize the advantages of yet a third strategy: the promotion of homegrown small businesses. Small indigenous businesses are created by a nearly ubiquitous resource, local entrepreneurs. With roots in their communities, these individuals are less likely to be enticed away by incentives offered by another community. Indigenous industry and talent are kept at home, creating an environment that both provides jobs and fosters further entrepreneurship. Question: The primary purpose of the passage is to
-
Sample Question 2Passage: During the 1960’s and 1970’s the primary economic development strategy of local governments in the United States was to attract manufacturing industries. Unfortunately, this strategy was usually implemented at another community’s expense: many manufacturing facilities were lured away from their moorings elsewhere through tax incentive and slick promotional efforts. Through the transfer to jobs and related revenues that resulted from this practice, one town’s triumph could become another town’s tragedy. In the 1980’s the strategy shifted from this zero-sum game to one called “high-technology development,” in which local governments competed to attract newly formed high-technology manufacturing firms. Although this approach was preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs, it also had its shortcomings: high-tech manufacturing firms employ only a specially trained fraction of the manufacturing workforce, and there simply are not enough high-tech firms to satisfy all geographic areas. Recently, local governments have increasingly come to recognize the advantages of yet a third strategy: the promotion of homegrown small businesses. Small indigenous businesses are created by a nearly ubiquitous resource, local entrepreneurs. With roots in their communities, these individuals are less likely to be enticed away by incentives offered by another community. Indigenous industry and talent are kept at home, creating an environment that both provides jobs and fosters further entrepreneurship. Question: The passage suggests which of the following about the majority of United States manufacturing industries before the high-technology development era of the 1980’s?
-
Sample Question 3Passage: During the 1960’s and 1970’s the primary economic development strategy of local governments in the United States was to attract manufacturing industries. Unfortunately, this strategy was usually implemented at another community’s expense: many manufacturing facilities were lured away from their moorings elsewhere through tax incentive and slick promotional efforts. Through the transfer to jobs and related revenues that resulted from this practice, one town’s triumph could become another town’s tragedy. In the 1980’s the strategy shifted from this zero-sum game to one called “high-technology development,” in which local governments competed to attract newly formed high-technology manufacturing firms. Although this approach was preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs, it also had its shortcomings: high-tech manufacturing firms employ only a specially trained fraction of the manufacturing workforce, and there simply are not enough high-tech firms to satisfy all geographic areas. Recently, local governments have increasingly come to recognize the advantages of yet a third strategy: the promotion of homegrown small businesses. Small indigenous businesses are created by a nearly ubiquitous resource, local entrepreneurs. With roots in their communities, these individuals are less likely to be enticed away by incentives offered by another community. Indigenous industry and talent are kept at home, creating an environment that both provides jobs and fosters further entrepreneurship. Question: The tone of the passage suggests that the author is most optimistic about the economic development potential of which of the following groups?