A test of how much is known about organizational behavior. Just the second exam.
True
False
Rate this question:
Strong organizational identification
Low self-esteem
High self-monitoring
Low self-efficacy
High emotional intelligence
Rate this question:
Has more education and experience
Takes longer breaks
Works as hard as chris
Work less than chris
Needs the money more than chris
Rate this question:
Valence
Equity
Expectancy
Feedback
Instrumentality
Rate this question:
Self-concept
Self-efficacy
Organization-based self-esteem
Cognition
Personality
Rate this question:
Psychologically distort his inputs
Decrease his inputs
Increase his outcomes
Increase his inputs
Decrease his outcomes
Rate this question:
The Big Five personality structure seems to be valid across a number of different cultures
Openness to experience had the strongest positive correlation with job and training performance
Agreeableness was a stronger predictor of job performance across all professions than was extroversion.
Conscientiousness was a weak predictor of job performance
For managers and sales people, emotional stability was associated with job success.
Rate this question:
He has an external locus of control
He is a low self-monitor
He has high self-efficacy
He has low self-esteem
He rates high on the agreeableness dimension
Rate this question:
Selective Attention/Comprehension
Encoding and Simplification
Storage and retention
Retrieval and response
Perception
Rate this question:
Halo
Leniency
Central tendency
Recency effects
Contrast effects
Rate this question:
Extroversion
Agreeableness
Conscientiousness
Emotional stability
Openness to experience
Rate this question:
Self-esteem
Emotional intelligence
Self-efficacy
Locus of control
Personality
Rate this question:
Responsibility
Company Policy
Supervisor relations
Salary
Technical supervision
Rate this question:
Three; five
Five; three
Eight; two
Technical; non-technical
Overt; covert
Rate this question:
Receivers
Benevolent
Entitles
Sensitives
Drivers
Rate this question:
Rare
Commonplace
Empirically justified
Exceptionally effective
Unusual in Canada
Rate this question:
His hard work; his lack of ability
Good luck; bad luck
His ability; his lack of effort
A good boss; task difficulty
His hard work; task difficulty
Rate this question:
Esteem, safety, physiological, self-actualization, love
Physiological, safety, esteem, love, self-actualization
Safety, physiological, esteem, love, self-actualization
Physiological, safety, esteem, self-actualization, love
Physiological, safety, love, esteem, self-actualization
Rate this question:
Prefer extreme difficulty
Prefer situations in which their performance is due to their own efforts
Desire feedback on their failures but not their successes
Desire feedback on their successes but not their failures
Like to compete against people who are much more skilled than they are
Rate this question:
Directing attention.
Regulating effort.
Increasing persistence.
Fostering strategies and action plans
Receiving feedback.
Rate this question:
Contrast effect
Recency effect
Central tendency
Leniency
Halo fallacy
Rate this question:
Find a new comparison outcome
Decrease her inputs
Increase her outcomes
Increase her inputs
Decrease her outcomes
Rate this question:
Emotional labor
Emotional intelligence
Emotional self-management
Emotional self-awareness
Emotional contagion
Rate this question:
Job-security pledges have no motivational impact.
Safety needs can be satisfied using status symbols
A satisfied need may lose its motivational potential
Greater job autonomy satisfies the esteem need.
Greater job responsibility satisfies the love need.
Rate this question:
The Galatea effect
The self-fulfilling prophecy
The fundamental attribution bias
The self-serving bias
The golem effect
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
Cognitive attributions
Cognitive categories
Valid stereotypes
Salient features
Faulty schema
Rate this question:
Behavior models
Persuasion from others
Assessment of one's physical state
Assessment of one's emotional state
Prior experiences
Rate this question:
Low consistency
Low consensus
High consistency
Low distinctiveness
High consensus
Rate this question:
Long hours worked
High levels of effort
Two weeks paid vacation
His master's degree in electrical engineering
Ten years of prior experience
Rate this question:
Goal difficulty
Valence
Instrumentality
Self-esteem
Expectancy
Rate this question:
Expectancy Theory
Positive inequity
Negative inequity
Procedural justice
Distributive justice
Rate this question:
People possess different information in the schemata used for interpretation
our moods and emotions influence our focus of attention and evaluations of others
. people tend to apply recently used cognitive categories during encoding
Individual differences influence encoding events into schema
Cognitive categories are identical for all people
Rate this question:
The Pygmalion effect
Stereotyping
The Galatea effect
The self-serving bias
The Golem effect
Rate this question:
Recognize the few select individuals who have the potential to increase their performance.
Set moderate performance goals.
Help only the best employees advance through the organization.
Positively reinforce employees, even if they do the job only moderately well.
Introduce new employees as if they have outstanding potential.
Rate this question:
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 21, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.