Child Psychology - Qp17

This statement is true because correlation simply measures the relationship between two variables, indicating how they move together. However, it does not indicate whether one variable causes the other. There could be other factors or underlying mechanisms at play that are responsible for the observed correlation. Therefore, a high correlation does not necessarily imply causation.

The survey technique is a disadvantage because it focuses on written reports rather than actual behavior. This means that the information gathered may not accurately reflect how people truly behave or their true opinions. Written reports can be influenced by various factors such as social desirability bias or memory recall bias, leading to inaccuracies in the data collected. Therefore, relying solely on surveys may not provide a complete and accurate understanding of people's behavior and attitudes.

Experimental, correlational, and naturalistic observation are all research methods used in the investigation of child development. Experimental research involves manipulating variables to determine cause and effect relationships. Correlational research examines the relationship between variables without manipulating them. Naturalistic observation involves observing and recording behavior in natural settings without intervention or manipulation. These methods allow researchers to gather data and draw conclusions about child development.

The experimental setting can produce misleading results because it may not accurately reflect real-life situations. Isolating one variable for study is limiting because it may not account for the complex interactions between multiple variables. Subject expectancy can produce misleading results because participants may alter their behavior based on their expectations of the experiment.

Gathering verbal and written reports to acquire data is an example of the survey technique. Surveys involve collecting information from a sample of individuals through interviews, questionnaires, or other methods. In this case, the researcher is relying on reports provided by participants to gather data, which is a common approach in survey research. Naturalistic observation involves observing behavior in its natural setting without intervention, while the correlation technique focuses on examining the relationship between variables.

The single blind technique of control refers to when the experimenter tries to prevent the subject from knowing what the expected behavior is. This technique is used to minimize bias and ensure that the subject's responses are not influenced by their knowledge of the expected outcome. By keeping the subject unaware of the expected behavior, the experimenter can obtain more accurate and unbiased results.

Schools would qualify for naturalistic observational studies because they provide a real-life setting where individuals engage in various activities and behaviors. Observing students in a school environment allows researchers to study their natural behaviors, interactions, and social dynamics, providing valuable insights into their development, learning processes, and socialization. Additionally, schools offer a controlled yet diverse environment, making it easier to collect data and draw meaningful conclusions.

The statement is false because observations made using the experimental method are designed to be repeatable and reproducible. The experimental method involves controlling variables and manipulating conditions to test a hypothesis. By doing so, scientists aim to establish cause-and-effect relationships and develop generalizable knowledge. Therefore, observations made using the experimental method are not specific to one situation but rather provide insights that can be applied to similar situations or used to formulate theories and principles.