Rodin And Piliavin's Bystand Apathy Test!
-
What is meant by 'Bystander Apathy'?
-
When bystanders offer help in an emergency situation.
-
When bystanders ignore a persons need for help.
-
When bystanders percieve responsibility to be shared.
-
When bystanders are unable to escape the scene of the emergency.
-
Rodin and Piliavin's bystander apathy test is one that test which tells about how the behavior of humans can change in a minute. This study was done when a murder took place with bystanders watching, and none of them helped or called the police for help. See how much you know about the test by taking up this exciting quiz. See moreAll the best!
Quiz Preview
- 2.
Which of these factors was not an independent variable in the research?
-
Race of the victim (black/white).
-
Type of the victim (drunk/cane).
-
Age of the victim (young/old).
-
Presence/absence of a model.
Correct Answer
A. Age of the victim (young/old).Explanation
The question asks for the factor that was not an independent variable in the research. An independent variable is a variable that is manipulated or controlled by the researcher. In this case, the race of the victim, type of victim, and presence/absence of a model are all factors that can be manipulated or controlled by the researcher. However, the age of the victim (young/old) is not something that can be controlled or manipulated by the researcher. Therefore, age of the victim (young/old) was not an independent variable in the research.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
What type of data was collected by the researchers?
-
Quantitative
-
Qualitative
-
Quantitative & Qualitative
Correct Answer
A. Quantitative & QualitativeExplanation
The researchers collected both quantitative and qualitative data. This means that they gathered numerical data that can be measured and analyzed statistically (quantitative), as well as non-numerical data that provides insights and understanding of attitudes, opinions, and experiences (qualitative). By using both types of data, the researchers can obtain a comprehensive understanding of the subject they were studying.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
What of these is a cost associated with helping?
-
Praise
-
Guilt
-
Risk of harm
-
Social approval
Correct Answer
A. Risk of harmExplanation
The cost associated with helping is the risk of harm. When helping others, there is always a potential risk of harm, either physical or emotional, to oneself or to others involved. This risk can include personal injury, financial loss, damage to reputation, or even legal consequences. Therefore, it is important to consider and mitigate these risks before engaging in any helping behavior.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
The observers were:
-
Male
-
Female
Correct Answer
A. FemaleExplanation
The given answer "Female" suggests that the observers mentioned in the question were all females. This implies that there were no male observers in the scenario.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
Of the spontaneous helpers, how many were female?
-
70%
-
10%
-
90%
-
20%
Correct Answer
A. 10%Explanation
The correct answer is 10%. This means that out of all the spontaneous helpers, only 10% of them were female.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
The experiment was:
-
A lab experiment
-
A field experiment
-
A quasi eperiment
Correct Answer
A. A field experimentExplanation
The correct answer is a field experiment. This type of experiment is conducted in a real-life setting, such as a natural environment or a specific location, rather than in a controlled laboratory setting. It involves manipulating and observing variables in a more realistic context, allowing for a better understanding of how they operate in the real world. Field experiments offer higher external validity as they can provide insights into real-world behaviors and outcomes.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
The average racial composition of the passengers on the train was:
-
50% black , 50% white
-
45% white , 55% black
-
60% white, 40% black
-
55% white, 45% black
Correct Answer
A. 55% white, 45% blackExplanation
The correct answer is 55% white, 45% black. This means that the majority of the passengers on the train were white (55%) and the minority were black (45%).Rate this question:
-
- 9.
How much spontaneous help did the 'cane' victim receive?
-
65%
-
50%
-
95%
-
100%
Correct Answer
A. 95%Explanation
The correct answer is 95%. This suggests that the 'cane' victim received a high amount of spontaneous help, indicating that people were willing to offer assistance without being prompted or asked. This high percentage implies that the victim was likely in a situation where others recognized their need for help and were willing to step in and provide support.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
How much spontaneous help did the 'drunk' victim receive?
-
65%
-
50%
-
95%
-
100%
Correct Answer
A. 50%Explanation
The 'drunk' victim received 50% spontaneous help.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 20, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Mar 20, 2023Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Oct 08, 2011Quiz Created by
Carolinewood
Back to top