Rodin And Piliavin's Bystand Apathy Test!

The given answer "Female" suggests that the observers mentioned in the question were all females. This implies that there were no male observers in the scenario.

The researchers collected both quantitative and qualitative data. This means that they gathered numerical data that can be measured and analyzed statistically (quantitative), as well as non-numerical data that provides insights and understanding of attitudes, opinions, and experiences (qualitative). By using both types of data, the researchers can obtain a comprehensive understanding of the subject they were studying.

The correct answer is a field experiment. This type of experiment is conducted in a real-life setting, such as a natural environment or a specific location, rather than in a controlled laboratory setting. It involves manipulating and observing variables in a more realistic context, allowing for a better understanding of how they operate in the real world. Field experiments offer higher external validity as they can provide insights into real-world behaviors and outcomes.

The cost associated with helping is the risk of harm. When helping others, there is always a potential risk of harm, either physical or emotional, to oneself or to others involved. This risk can include personal injury, financial loss, damage to reputation, or even legal consequences. Therefore, it is important to consider and mitigate these risks before engaging in any helping behavior.

The correct answer is 55% white, 45% black. This means that the majority of the passengers on the train were white (55%) and the minority were black (45%).

Bystander apathy refers to the phenomenon where bystanders fail to offer assistance or ignore a person's need for help in an emergency situation. This can occur due to diffusion of responsibility, where individuals believe that someone else will take action, or due to social influence, where they conform to the inaction of others. Bystander apathy can have serious consequences, as the presence of multiple bystanders can lead to a diffusion of responsibility and a decreased likelihood of intervention.

The question asks for the factor that was not an independent variable in the research. An independent variable is a variable that is manipulated or controlled by the researcher. In this case, the race of the victim, type of victim, and presence/absence of a model are all factors that can be manipulated or controlled by the researcher. However, the age of the victim (young/old) is not something that can be controlled or manipulated by the researcher. Therefore, age of the victim (young/old) was not an independent variable in the research.

The 'drunk' victim received 50% spontaneous help.

The correct answer is 95%. This suggests that the 'cane' victim received a high amount of spontaneous help, indicating that people were willing to offer assistance without being prompted or asked. This high percentage implies that the victim was likely in a situation where others recognized their need for help and were willing to step in and provide support.

The correct answer is 10%. This means that out of all the spontaneous helpers, only 10% of them were female.