STS 214 Quiz2

The correct answer is "Are alternative modes of democratizing science and technology". In chapter 16, Sismondo argues that there are multiple ways to democratize science and technology, suggesting that there are alternative modes rather than just one single approach.

The correct answer is "centuries old." This suggests that the idea that technology is applied science has been around for a long time, spanning several centuries.

According to sismondo in Chapter 9, it is widely accepted among historians that science owes more to the steam engine than the steam engine owes to science. This implies that the development and advancements in science were influenced and driven by the invention and impact of the steam engine. The steam engine played a significant role in shaping and advancing scientific knowledge and understanding.

In Chapter 9, Sismondo explains that scientific knowledge has been found to have little direct role in the development of many state-of-the-art technologies. This suggests that although scientific knowledge is important, it is not the sole determinant in the advancement of cutting-edge technologies. Other factors such as economic and political considerations also play significant roles in shaping the development of these technologies.

In Chapter 9, Sismondo mentions that the US Department of Defense carried out Project Hindsight in the 1960s to evaluate the significance of scientific research for defense projects. The project's conclusion was that the direct impact of science on defense projects was deemed to be "Very Small."

The correct answer is "Technologies determine social events". This means that according to Sismondo, the perspective of technological determinism suggests that the development and implementation of technologies have a significant impact on shaping and influencing social events. In other words, the advancements in technology drive and determine the changes and developments in society.

The correct answer is "Is very unlike common images of science and technology." This is because in Chapter 16, Sismondo discusses how the book presents a different perspective on science and technology compared to the common images that people typically have. The book challenges the idealized and simplified view of science and technology that is often portrayed in mainstream media and instead presents a more nuanced and complex understanding of these fields.

According to Sismondo in Chapter 9, scientific knowledge is described as a resource for technologists, meaning that it provides valuable information and tools that technologists can utilize in their work. However, it is not considered a driver of technology, suggesting that while scientific knowledge may contribute to technological progress, it is not the sole or primary factor that determines the development of technology. Therefore, the correct answer is "a resource for technologists, but not a driver of technology."

According to Sismondo in Chapter 16, "citizen science" is occasionally seen as the most efficient way of conducting research. This suggests that there are instances where involving the public in scientific research can yield efficient and effective results. However, it does not imply that citizen science is always the most efficient approach or that it is the only way to conduct research.

The given statement suggests that no technology or object can have only one potential use. This means that every technology or object can be utilized in multiple ways, depending on the context and the needs of the users. This implies that the potential uses of a technology or object are not limited to a single application, but can vary and adapt to different situations. Therefore, it emphasizes the versatility and adaptability of technologies and objects in fulfilling various purposes.

The correct answer is "Depend on ideals of deliberative democracy." According to Sismondo in Chapter 16, many visions of increased public participation in science and technology are based on the ideals of deliberative democracy. This means that they rely on the belief that decisions about science and technology should be made through inclusive and informed public deliberation, where diverse perspectives are taken into account. This suggests that the author sees the promotion of deliberative democracy as a key factor in increasing public participation in science and technology.

According to Sismondo in Chapter 16, STS (Science and Technology Studies) undermines some of the sources of authority of science and technology. This means that STS challenges or weakens certain aspects that contribute to the authority or credibility of science and technology. It does not completely reject or repudiate their authority, but rather questions and critiques certain sources or foundations of their authority.

In Chapter 16, Sismondo suggests that journalism informed by STS (Science and Technology Studies) would be unpopular with scientists. This implies that scientists may not appreciate or approve of the approach and perspective taken by STS-informed journalism. It could be because STS often examines the social, cultural, and political aspects of science, which may not align with the traditional views and priorities of scientists. Thus, scientists may find such journalism unappealing or disagree with its emphasis on broader societal implications rather than solely focusing on scientific facts and discoveries.

The correct answer is "via a generally more egalitarian world". In Chapter 16, Sismondo suggests that the broadest but most challenging approach to citizen science and technology is through creating a more equal and fair society. This implies that citizen science and technology can thrive when there is a more level playing field for everyone, regardless of their background or socioeconomic status. This approach would require addressing systemic inequalities and ensuring equal opportunities for all individuals to participate in scientific endeavors.

According to Sismondo in Chapter 16, the popularization of scientific findings is viewed as essential by the scientific community. This suggests that scientists believe it is crucial for scientific information to be widely disseminated and accessible to the general public. By popularizing scientific findings, scientists can increase public understanding and awareness of important scientific discoveries, which can have various benefits such as promoting scientific literacy, fostering public engagement with science, and potentially influencing policy decisions.