State Bank Of India Clerk Grade Reasoning Ability Quiz

T is the brother of J, who is the mother of L. L is the daughter of Q, and Q is the son of D. Therefore, T is the son-in-law of G.

S is the daughter of T, who is the brother of J. Therefore, S is the niece of J.

Based on the given information, we know that P obtained more marks than only two people. This means that P cannot have obtained the second lowest marks (350 marks) because there are at least two people who obtained lower marks than P. Therefore, the person who obtained 400 marks could be either S or P, as they are the only options left.

The given statements state that C is greater than or equal to O, M is less than U, U is less than or equal to N, and N is less than D. Based on these statements, we can conclude that O is less than D (Conclusion I is true) because O is smaller than U and U is smaller than N, and N is smaller than D. However, we cannot conclude that C is greater than N (Conclusion II is false) because there is no direct relationship given between C and N in the statements. Therefore, the correct answer is "Only conclusion I is true".

The given statements indicate that P is greater than L, L is equal to A, A is greater than or equal to C, and C is equal to E. From these statements, we can conclude that E is less than or equal to L (conclusion I) and P is greater than C (conclusion II). Therefore, both conclusions I and II are true.

The word "well" appears in the sentence "work well best results" and is coded as "jk" in the given code language.

According to the given information, T obtained more marks than only two people. Since the person with the second lowest marks obtained 350 marks, and T obtained more marks than only two people, it is possible that T obtained 500 marks. Therefore, the statement "T possibly obtained 500 marks" is true.

The given statements indicate that S is greater than T and A is less than or equal to T. It is also mentioned that L is greater than or equal to A. From these statements, we can conclude that L is greater than or equal to T (conclusion I). However, we cannot conclude that A is greater than S as there is no direct relationship mentioned between A and S. Therefore, only conclusion I is true.

The given statements state that no remark is a wish and that some wishes are hopes. From these statements, we cannot logically conclude that at least some remarks are hopes (conclusion I) because there is no direct relationship established between remarks and hopes. Additionally, we cannot conclude that all hopes are wishes (conclusion II) because the statements only mention that some wishes are hopes, not all wishes. Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II can be considered true based on the given statements.

In the given code language, the word "prepare" is represented by the code "nt". This can be determined by comparing the different code phrases given in the question. In the first code phrase, "prep ate for your exams" is represented as "xn nt oz wl". By comparing this with the other code phrases, we can see that "xn" represents "ate", "oz" represents "for", and "wl" represents "exams". Therefore, "nt" must represent "prepare".

From statement I, we know that Ritesh appeared for the exam after April but before November and that the month had exactly 30 days. This narrows down the possible months to May, June, July, August, September, and October.

From statement II, we know that Ritesh appeared for the exam after June but before December and that the month did not have 31 days. This narrows down the possible months to July, August, September, and October.

Combining the information from both statements, we can conclude that Ritesh appeared for the exam in either July, August, September, or October. Therefore, the data in both statements I and II together are necessary to answer the question.

The given statements state that all sides are lengths and no length is breadth. From these statements, we can conclude that no breadth is a side, which aligns with conclusion II. However, we cannot conclude that all lengths are sides based on the given statements, so conclusion I is not true. Therefore, the correct answer is that only conclusion II is true.

The person who obtained the third highest marks is S. This can be determined by analyzing the given information. We know that P obtained more marks than only two people, so P cannot be the third highest. Q obtained more marks than S but not the highest, so Q also cannot be the third highest. U obtained more marks than only R, so U cannot be the third highest. This leaves us with S and T. However, we are given that the person with the second lowest marks obtained 350 marks, so T cannot be the third highest. Therefore, the only option left is S.

Based on the given seating arrangement, all the options except M have been mentioned in the information. The information does not provide any specific details about M's position or direction, making it the odd one out. Therefore, M does not belong to the group formed by the other options.

The given statements state that N is less than or equal to U, U is less than M, M is equal to B, B is greater than or equal to E, and E is greater than R. From these statements, we cannot determine the relationship between N and R (conclusion I). Similarly, we cannot determine the relationship between E and U (conclusion II). Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II is true.

The given statements state that some pens are erasers and all sharpeners are pens. From these statements, it can be logically concluded that it is possible for all sharpeners to be erasers, as some pens are erasers and all sharpeners are pens. However, it cannot be concluded that all erasers are pens, as there is no information given about the relationship between erasers and pens other than the fact that some pens are erasers. Therefore, only conclusion I is true.

The word "best" is not directly mentioned in any of the given code language sentences. However, by analyzing the given information, we can see that "work well best results" is written as "ds lu jk ml". Therefore, the code for "best" can be either "ds" or "lu".

M is sitting to the immediate left of P. This can be determined by analyzing the given information. It is stated that the immediate neighbors of P face a direction opposite to that of P. Since S sits fourth to the left of P and faces outside, it can be concluded that M is sitting to the immediate left of P and facing the center.

The person who faces R is sitting in Row-1. According to the given information, the person who faces G sits second to the right of R. Therefore, G is sitting to the immediate right of the person who faces R. Hence, the correct answer is G.

From the given information, we know that the person who faces G sits second to the right of R. Since there are only two people between F and I, and T sits third to the right of the person who faces F, it can be concluded that T faces G. Therefore, H and I must be immediate neighbors of G. Thus, the correct answer is "Both H and I are immediate neighbors of G."

Statement I provides information about the relationship between K, J, D, and N, but it does not provide any direct information about the relationship between M and T. Therefore, statement I alone is not sufficient to determine if M is the aunt of T.

On the other hand, statement II states that L is the father of T, N is the mother of T, and M is married to D. From this information, we can conclude that M is the aunt of T. Hence, statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question.

The code for 'studies for' in the given code language is 'oz sd'. This can be determined by comparing the given sentences and identifying the common words and their corresponding codes. In the sentence 'prepare your studies well', 'studies' is represented by 'oz' and 'for' is represented by 'sd'. Therefore, the code for 'studies for' is 'oz sd'.

The question asks for the position of V from the right end of the line. In statement I, it is mentioned that Q stands on one of the extremes of the line and there are only two people between Q and R. However, there is no information about the position of V. In statement II, it is mentioned that S stands at one of the extreme ends of the line and there are four people between S and T. Again, there is no information about the position of V. Therefore, even when considering both statements together, we cannot determine the position of V.

not-available-via-ai

The person who faces S is H. According to the given information, the person who faces U sits to the immediate left of H. Since U is in Row-1, H must be in Row-2. Therefore, H faces S.

Statement I provides information about the positions of T and P relative to each other, but it does not provide any information about the position of S or the person second to the right of S. Therefore, statement I alone is not sufficient to answer the question.
On the other hand, statement II states that R sits second to the left of S. Since the friends are sitting around a circular table, this information allows us to determine the position of S and the person second to the right of S. Therefore, statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question.

In the given arrangement, S sits fourth to the left of P and faces outside. O sits second to the right of S. Since S faces outside, both the immediate neighbors of S also face outside. Therefore, P and O both face outside. Additionally, the immediate neighbors of P face a direction opposite to that of P, which means they also face outside. So, in total, three people (P, O, and the immediate neighbor of P) face outside.

Based on the given statements, we can determine that S is greater than T and A is equal to I. Additionally, L is greater than or equal to A.

Conclusion I states that S is greater than L. However, this conclusion cannot be determined from the given statements, as there is no direct relationship between S and L. Therefore, conclusion I is not true.

Conclusion II states that I is less than or equal to L. This conclusion can be inferred from the given statements, as A is equal to I and L is greater than or equal to A. Therefore, conclusion II is true.

Hence, the correct answer is "Only conclusion II is true."

Based on the given information, we can determine the schedule of the competitions for each friend. The one who studies in first standard has a competition on Saturday, which means O has a competition on Saturday. S studies in the second standard and has a competition on Wednesday. Therefore, M - Wednesday and S - Monday. R does not have a competition on Thursday, so R - Thursday. N has a competition immediately before Q, and the one who studies in the third standard has a competition immediately after Q. Therefore, N - Tuesday and Q - Wednesday. From this, we can see that P does not fit into the group, as P - Saturday.

The people sitting at the extreme ends of both the rows are J, I, V, and T. According to the given information, T sits third to the right of the person who faces F, and only two people sit between F and I. Therefore, F and I cannot be at the extreme ends. The person who faces U sits to the immediate left of H, and only one person sits between H and J. Since H cannot be at the extreme end, J must be at one of the extreme ends. The one who faces G sits second to the right of R, and H does not face V. Therefore, R cannot be at the extreme end, and V must be at the other extreme end. Hence, the correct answer is J, I, V, T.

R studies in the First standard. The information given states that the one who studies in the first standard has a competition on Saturday. Since R is the only friend left who hasn't been assigned a standard, it can be concluded that R must study in the first standard.

The given question provides a code language where certain phrases are represented by a different set of words. By analyzing the given information, we can determine the code for each word. "prep ate for your exams" is represented as "xn nt oz wl", "hard work for prepare" is represented as "nt ml oz tk", "prepare your studies well" is represented as "sd jk nt xn", and "work well best results" is represented as "ds lu jk ml". From this information, we can deduce that "exams are hard" would be represented as "tk zr wl".

R is sitting fourth to the right of O.

The given statements state that no win is a loss and all losses are victories. From these statements, we can conclude that no victory is a win (Conclusion I), as a win cannot be a loss. Additionally, it is possible for some victories to be wins (Conclusion II), as not all victories have to be losses. Therefore, both conclusions I and II are true.

The given statements state that some names are languages and all languages are names. From these statements, we can conclude that at least some poems are names (conclusion I) because if some names are languages and all languages are names, then it is possible for some poems to be names. We can also conclude that at least some languages are names (conclusion II) because if all languages are names, then it is true that some languages are names. Therefore, both conclusions I and II logically follow from the given statements.

According to the given information, U sits to the immediate left of H and T sits third to the right of the person who faces F. Since there are only five people in each row, U can only sit between S and T. Therefore, the statement "U sits exactly between S and T" is true.

According to the given seating arrangement, it is true that S is one of the immediate neighbors of N. This is because S sits fourth to the left of P, and P is one of the immediate neighbors of N. Therefore, S, being fourth to the left of P, is also one of the immediate neighbors of N.

Based on the given information, we can determine the following:
1. The one who studies in first standard has a competition on Saturday. Therefore, R cannot be in the first standard.
2. S studies in the second standard and has a competition on Wednesday.
3. N has a competition immediately before Q.
4. N does not have a competition on any of the days after S.
5. The one who studies in the seventh standard does not have a competition on any of the days on or before Friday.
6. The one who studies in the third standard has a competition immediately after Q.
7. Q does not study in the fifth standard.
8. The one who studies in the sixth standard does not have a competition immediately before or after S.
9. R does not have a competition on Friday.
10. P does not have a competition on any of the days before M.

From the given answer options, we can see that P is studying in the seventh standard and has a competition on Sunday. This combination satisfies all the given conditions and is therefore definitely correct.

N has his competition on Monday. This can be determined from the given clues: N has a competition immediately before Q and the one who studies in third standard has a competition immediately after Q. Since Q does not study in the fifth standard, N must be in the fourth standard. Therefore, N has his competition on Monday.

Based on the given information, we can deduce that M has a competition on Saturday. However, there is no information provided about Q studying in the sixth standard. All the other statements are not supported by the given information. Therefore, the correct answer is "M has a competition on Saturday."