The Racial Contract: An Essay By Charles W. Mills! Trivia Questions Quiz

The correct answer is "The Racial Contract". This is because the question asks which of the given books was written by Charles W. Mills, and "The Racial Contract" is the only option that matches his work. "On Liberty" is a book by John Stuart Mill, and "The Sociological Imagination" is a book by C. Wright Mills, not Charles W. Mills. Therefore, the correct answer is "The Racial Contract".

According to Mills, all white people benefit from the racial contract, which is a social system that privileges white individuals and disadvantages people of color. However, not all white people are directly involved in creating or maintaining this contract. Some white individuals may not actively endorse or participate in the racial contract, but they still benefit from it due to their white privilege. This means that while all white people benefit from the racial contract, not all of them are active participants or signatories.

The correct answer is that the racial contract enables the beneficiaries to profit from the oppression of racialized people. This means that the contract allows certain individuals or groups to benefit economically from the systematic oppression and discrimination faced by racialized individuals. It suggests that there is a deliberate exploitation and advantage taken by those who are privileged by the racial contract.

The correct answer is that white supremacy is an effect of European global domination in the period of modern sojourner and settler colonialism, human trafficking, and empire building, i.e. late 15th century onward. This means that white supremacy emerged as a result of European countries exerting their power and control over other regions through colonization, exploitation, and the establishment of empires. This answer acknowledges the historical context and the systemic nature of white supremacy, tracing its origins back to European dominance and its impact on global inequalities.

The correct answer states that the racial contract emerged during the early modern period in European history and continued to develop throughout the modern period. This means that it is a concept that originated in a specific historical context and evolved over time, acquiring characteristics associated with modern liberalism. This suggests that the racial contract is a product of historical and social development rather than being a form of racism that emerged in the late 20th century or something that Europeans learned from their contact with Indigenous peoples. It also does not imply that the racial contract is progressive or better than forms of slavery in ancient civilizations.

The racial contract, according to Charles Mills, encompasses various aspects such as morality, politics, and epistemology. It is a moral contract because it establishes a framework that determines the moral worth and treatment of individuals based on their race. It is a political contract as it shapes power relations, institutions, and policies that perpetuate racial hierarchies and inequalities. Additionally, it is an epistemological contract as it influences knowledge production and the construction of racial identities and categories. Therefore, the correct answer is "All of the above."

Charles Mills describes the failure of most white philosophers to recognize the distribution of racial privileges and burdens as political as symptomatic of white privilege. He also points out that the belief that the "raceless notions" of contemporary political philosophy adequately reflect political reality and the ignorance of the global and local facts of white supremacy are also indicative of white privilege. Therefore, the correct answer is that each of the above options is symptomatic of white privilege.

The correct answer is "All of the above." This is because the statement in the question is true. In The Racial Contract, Charles Mills presents ten theses on the racial contract. The Racial Contract rests on three simple claims: an existential claim, a conceptual claim, and a methodological claim. Additionally, Mills dedicates The Racial Contract to those who have resisted the Racial Contract and those who have refused it. Therefore, all the statements mentioned in the question are true.

The racial contract, according to Mills, portrays non-white peoples as being outside of civilization or in a defective civilization. This implies that agreement with the social contract is essentially agreement with Whiteness, as it aligns with the racial contract's portrayal of non-white peoples. Additionally, white people who disagree with the racial contract are seen as race traitors and a threat to civilization, as they deviate from the dominant ideology. Lastly, the racial contract views non-white peoples as both a natural resource that can be exploited for civilized projects and a potential threat to civilization. Therefore, each of the statements mentioned in the options is an implication of the racial contract.

According to Mills, the racial contract creates a partitioned social ontology of persons and racial subpersons. This means that the racial contract, which is a set of social and political agreements, enforces a division between individuals based on their race. It establishes a hierarchy where certain racial groups are considered superior and others inferior, leading to unequal treatment and opportunities. Mills argues that this social ontology perpetuates systemic racism and reinforces the subordination of marginalized racial groups.