General Session Evaluation - No Self-assessment

41 Questions | Total Attempts: 110

SettingsSettingsSettings
Please wait...
General Session Evaluation - No Self-assessment

The American College of Surgeons has assigned a maximum of 17. 25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ to the course. Your CME certificate will be emailed and available for download immediately after completing the evaluation. The evaluation is required to obtain CME credits. CME ScaleWednesday, February 25 - Maximum CME available: 4. 75 CME creditsScientific Session 1: 2. 0 CME creditsScientific Session 2: 1. 5 CME creditsPoster Presentations: 1. 25 CME creditsThursday, February 26 - Maximum CME available: 4. 5 CME creditsScientific Session 3: 2. 0 CME creditsBest Paper: 0. 5 CME creditsACP Symposium: 1. 5 CME creditsVillavicencio Symposium: 1. 0 CME creditsEugene Strandness Lecture: 1. 0 CME creditsFriday, Februar


Questions and Answers
  • 1. 
    Please explain any specific instance(s) of bias or conflict of interest:
  • 2. 
    List a minimum of two things you are going to change in your practice as a result of what you have learned at this activity. 
  • 3. 
    Describe the barriers anticipated when implementing the above changes: 
  • 4. 
    Do you have any suggestions for future topics to support and/or expand on what you have learned at this activity?
  • 5. 
    Prior to the meeting, did you access the AVF Website for meeting information? If so, did you find the Website useful?
  • 6. 
    What changes would you suggest for the future to make the AVF Annual Meeting more beneficial and useful to you?
  • 7. 
    If you did not participate in the Venous Open Golf Event, please provide fundraiser activities you would be interested in participating in the future.
  • 8. 
    Additional Comments
  • 9. 
    If you are an ACS member, what is your member number?
  • 10. 
    Overall, how would you rate this educational activity?
    • A. 

      Excellent

    • B. 

      Very Good

    • C. 

      Good

    • D. 

      Fair

    • E. 

      Poor

  • 11. 
    Program topics and content met the stated objectives
    • A. 

      Strongly Agree

    • B. 

      Agree

    • C. 

      Neutral

    • D. 

      Disagree

    • E. 

      Strongly Disagree

  • 12. 
    Content was relevant to my educational needs
    • A. 

      Strongly Agree

    • B. 

      Agree

    • C. 

      Neutral

    • D. 

      Disagree

    • E. 

      Strongly Disagree

  • 13. 
    Educational format was conducive to learning
    • A. 

      Strongly Agree

    • B. 

      Agree

    • C. 

      Neutral

    • D. 

      Disagree

    • E. 

      Strongly Disagree

  • 14. 
    Acquired knowledge will be applied in my practice environment
    • A. 

      Strongly Agree

    • B. 

      Agree

    • C. 

      Neutral

    • D. 

      Disagree

    • E. 

      Strongly Disagree

  • 15. 
    I will seek additional information on this subject
    • A. 

      Strongly Agree

    • B. 

      Agree

    • C. 

      Neutral

    • D. 

      Disagree

    • E. 

      Strongly Disagree

  • 16. 
    Answers to self-assessment questions were covered in the presentations.
    • A. 

      Strongly Agree

    • B. 

      Agree

    • C. 

      Neutral

    • D. 

      Disagree

    • E. 

      Strongly Disagree

  • 17. 
    Program was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program
    • A. 

      Strongly Agree

    • B. 

      Agree

    • C. 

      Neutral

    • D. 

      Disagree

    • E. 

      Strongly Disagree

  • 18. 
    Methods used by researchers
    • A. 

      Excellent

    • B. 

      Very Good

    • C. 

      Good

    • D. 

      Fair

    • E. 

      Poor

    • F. 

      Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

  • 19. 
    Access to faculty and presenters
    • A. 

      Excellent

    • B. 

      Very Good

    • C. 

      Good

    • D. 

      Fair

    • E. 

      Poor

    • F. 

      Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

  • 20. 
    Quality of Scientific Sessions
    • A. 

      Excellent

    • B. 

      Very Good

    • C. 

      Good

    • D. 

      Fair

    • E. 

      Poor

    • F. 

      Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

  • 21. 
    Quality of Scientific Symposia
    • A. 

      Excellent

    • B. 

      Very Good

    • C. 

      Good

    • D. 

      Fair

    • E. 

      Poor

    • F. 

      Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

  • 22. 
    Symposia concurrent with Scientific Sessions
    • A. 

      Excellent

    • B. 

      Very Good

    • C. 

      Good

    • D. 

      Fair

    • E. 

      Poor

    • F. 

      Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

  • 23. 
    Presentation of oral abstracts
    • A. 

      Excellent

    • B. 

      Very Good

    • C. 

      Good

    • D. 

      Fair

    • E. 

      Poor

    • F. 

      Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

  • 24. 
    Topics of poster presentations
    • A. 

      Excellent

    • B. 

      Very Good

    • C. 

      Good

    • D. 

      Fair

    • E. 

      Poor

    • F. 

      Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

  • 25. 
    Poster presentations
    • A. 

      Excellent

    • B. 

      Very Good

    • C. 

      Good

    • D. 

      Fair

    • E. 

      Poor

    • F. 

      Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

Back to Top Back to top