General Session Evaluation - No Self-assessment

Reviewed by Editorial Team
The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Mia Beans
M
Mia Beans
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 5 | Total Attempts: 966
| Attempts: 220
Quiz Flashcard
SettingsSettings
Please wait...
  • 1/41 Questions

    Overall, how would you rate this educational activity?

    • Excellent
    • Very Good
    • Good
    • Fair
    • Poor
Please wait...
About This Quiz

The American College of Surgeons has assigned a maximum of 17.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ to the course. Your CME certificate will be emailed and available for download immediately after completing the evaluation. The evaluation is required to obtain CME credits.
CME Scale
Wednesday, February 25 - Maximum CME available: 4.75 CME credits
Scientific Session 1: 2.0 CME credits
Scientific Session 2: 1.5 CME credits
Poster Presentations: 1.25 CME credits
Thursday, February 26 - Maximum CME available: 4.5 CME credits
Scientific Session 3: 2.0 CME credits
Best Paper: 0.5 CME credits
ACP Symposium: 1.5 CME credits
Villavicencio Symposium: 1.0 CME credits
Eugene Strandness Lecture: 1.0 CME credits
Friday, February 27 - Maximum CME available: 8.0 CME credits
Scientific Session 4: 1.5 CME credits
Scientific Session 5: 2.0 CME credits
Scientific Session 6: 1.5 CME credits
President's Session: 1.0 CME credits
Specialty Symposium A (Biomechanics & Bioengineering): 3.0 CME credits
Specialty Symposium B (Wound Care, Lymphedema & Compression): 3.0 CME credits
Specialty Symposium C (Deep Venous Disease): 3.0 CME credits
Specialty Symposium D (Vascular Medicine & Thrombosis): 3.0 CME credits
Specialty Symposium E (Allied Health): 3.0 CME credits
Specialty Symposium F (Wound Care, Lymphedema & Compression): 3.0 CME credits
Specialty Symposium G (Superficial Venouse Disease): 3.0 CME credits
Specialty Symposium H (Animal Models in Venous Research): 3.0 CME credits

Education Quizzes & Trivia

Quiz Preview

  • 2. 

    Program topics and content met the stated objectives

    • Strongly Agree

    • Agree

    • Neutral

    • Disagree

    • Strongly Disagree

    Correct Answer
    A. Strongly Agree
    Explanation
    The given answer, "Strongly Agree," suggests that the program topics and content successfully aligned with the stated objectives. This indicates that the program effectively covered the intended subjects and provided relevant information. Participants agreed that the program's content was comprehensive and addressed the desired learning outcomes.

    Rate this question:

  • 3. 

    Content was relevant to my educational needs

    • Strongly Agree

    • Agree

    • Neutral

    • Disagree

    • Strongly Disagree

    Correct Answer
    A. Strongly Agree
    Explanation
    The given answer "Strongly Agree" suggests that the content provided was highly relevant to the educational needs of the individual. This implies that the content aligned well with the person's learning objectives and helped them acquire the necessary knowledge or skills they were seeking. The individual found the content to be highly useful and beneficial in meeting their educational needs.

    Rate this question:

  • 4. 

    Educational format was conducive to learning

    • Strongly Agree

    • Agree

    • Neutral

    • Disagree

    • Strongly Disagree

    Correct Answer
    A. Strongly Agree
    Explanation
    The educational format being conducive to learning means that the format or structure of the educational setting or program was effective in promoting and facilitating learning. When someone strongly agrees with this statement, it implies that they believe the educational format was highly effective in helping them learn and acquire knowledge or skills.

    Rate this question:

  • 5. 

    Acquired knowledge will be applied in my practice environment

    • Strongly Agree

    • Agree

    • Neutral

    • Disagree

    • Strongly Disagree

    Correct Answer
    A. Strongly Agree
    Explanation
    The individual strongly agrees that the acquired knowledge will be applied in their practice environment. This suggests that they have confidence in their ability to utilize the knowledge they have gained in a practical setting. They believe that the information they have learned will be directly applicable and beneficial to their work or professional environment.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    I will seek additional information on this subject

    • Strongly Agree

    • Agree

    • Neutral

    • Disagree

    • Strongly Disagree

    Correct Answer
    A. Strongly Agree
    Explanation
    The given answer "Strongly Agree" indicates that the person strongly believes in seeking additional information on the subject. They are likely to be proactive in their approach towards gaining more knowledge and understanding about the topic at hand. This response suggests a positive attitude towards learning and a willingness to expand their knowledge base.

    Rate this question:

  • 7. 

    Answers to self-assessment questions were covered in the presentations.

    • Strongly Agree

    • Agree

    • Neutral

    • Disagree

    • Strongly Disagree

    Correct Answer
    A. Strongly Agree
    Explanation
    The given answer indicates that the self-assessment questions were indeed covered in the presentations. The respondent strongly agrees with this statement, suggesting that the presentations effectively addressed and discussed the self-assessment questions.

    Rate this question:

  • 8. 

    Program was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program

    • Strongly Agree

    • Agree

    • Neutral

    • Disagree

    • Strongly Disagree

    Correct Answer
    A. Strongly Agree
    Explanation
    The statement suggests that the program was fair and did not show any favoritism towards any product or program. This means that the program treated all products or programs equally and did not show any bias. The answer "Strongly Agree" indicates that the individual strongly believes that the program was fair, objective, and unbiased.

    Rate this question:

  • 9. 

    Methods used by researchers

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Excellent
    Explanation
    The answer "Excellent" suggests that the methods used by researchers were of the highest quality. This indicates that the researchers employed rigorous and reliable techniques in their study, resulting in trustworthy and accurate findings. The use of excellent methods is crucial in ensuring the validity and credibility of research.

    Rate this question:

  • 10. 

    Access to faculty and presenters

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Excellent
    Explanation
    The given answer "Excellent" suggests that the access to faculty and presenters was of a very high quality. This implies that the individuals had ample opportunities to interact with knowledgeable and experienced faculty members and presenters, which likely contributed to a positive and enriching learning experience.

    Rate this question:

  • 11. 

    Quality of Scientific Sessions

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Excellent
    Explanation
    The given answer "Excellent" suggests that the quality of the scientific sessions was of the highest standard. This implies that the sessions were well-organized, informative, and engaging, providing valuable and accurate scientific information. Participants likely found the sessions to be highly beneficial and impactful, contributing significantly to their knowledge and understanding in the field.

    Rate this question:

  • 12. 

    Quality of Scientific Symposia

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Excellent
    Explanation
    The given answer "Excellent" suggests that the quality of the scientific symposia was of very high standard. This implies that the symposia were well-organized, the presentations were informative and engaging, and the overall experience was exceptional. The attendees likely gained valuable knowledge and had a positive experience at the event.

    Rate this question:

  • 13. 

    Symposia concurrent with Scientific Sessions

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Excellent
    Explanation
    The given answer "Excellent" suggests that the symposia concurrent with Scientific Sessions were of high quality and exceeded expectations. Participants likely found the content, presentations, and discussions to be informative, engaging, and valuable. The answer indicates a positive experience and satisfaction with the symposia.

    Rate this question:

  • 14. 

    Presentation of oral abstracts

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Excellent
    Explanation
    The presentation of oral abstracts was of excellent quality.

    Rate this question:

  • 15. 

    Topics of poster presentations

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Excellent
    Explanation
    The given answer "Excellent" suggests that the topic of the poster presentations was of extremely high quality. It implies that the presentations were well-researched, well-presented, and highly informative. The audience likely found the topics to be engaging, relevant, and well-executed. Overall, the answer indicates that the poster presentations were of exceptional standard.

    Rate this question:

  • 16. 

    Poster presentations

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Excellent
    Explanation
    The given answer "Excellent" suggests that the poster presentations were of exceptional quality. This implies that the content, design, and delivery of the presentations were highly impressive and exceeded expectations. The presenters likely demonstrated a deep understanding of the subject matter and effectively communicated their research or findings to the audience. Overall, the poster presentations were of the highest standard and left a lasting positive impression.

    Rate this question:

  • 17. 

    Poster displays

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Excellent
    Explanation
    The correct answer is "Excellent." This suggests that the poster displays are of high quality or meet a high standard.

    Rate this question:

  • 18. 

    Abstract submission process

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given answer "Good" suggests that the abstract submission process was satisfactory. It implies that the process was efficient, well-organized, and met the expectations of the participants. It indicates that the submission process was smooth and without any major issues or complaints. The answer implies a positive experience with the abstract submission process.

    Rate this question:

  • 19. 

    Exhibitor products and services displayed at meeting

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The answer "Good" suggests that the exhibitor products and services displayed at the meeting were of satisfactory quality. While it may not be the highest rating, it indicates that the products and services were still above average and met the expectations of the attendees.

    Rate this question:

  • 20. 

    Abstract submission process

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given answer "Good" suggests that the abstract submission process is of satisfactory quality. It implies that the process meets the required standards and expectations, indicating that it is efficient, well-organized, and effective. This answer indicates that the abstract submission process is above average and generally meets the needs and requirements of the participants.

    Rate this question:

  • 21. 

    Exhibitor hours available to attendees

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The answer "Good" suggests that the exhibitor hours available to attendees were satisfactory or above average. This implies that attendees had ample time and opportunity to visit and interact with exhibitors at the event. It indicates that the event organizers effectively managed and scheduled the exhibitor hours, ensuring that attendees had a positive experience and were able to make the most out of the event.

    Rate this question:

  • 22. 

    Online Preliminary Program

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given answer "Good" suggests that the performance of the online preliminary program was satisfactory. It indicates that the program was above average but not exceptional. This implies that the program met the expectations and requirements to a reasonable extent, providing a positive experience for the attendees.

    Rate this question:

  • 23. 

    Final Program

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given answer "Good" is the appropriate response for the question. It suggests that the final program was satisfactory or above average. This indicates that the program was successful and met the expectations or requirements.

    Rate this question:

  • 24. 

    Mobile App quality

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given answer "Good" suggests that the mobile app quality is satisfactory. It may not be perfect, but it meets the expected standards and provides a decent user experience. The app likely functions well and has few bugs or issues. However, there might be some room for improvement in terms of features, design, or performance. Overall, the app is considered to be of good quality.

    Rate this question:

  • 25. 

    AVF Going Green! (no printed materials)

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given answer "Good" suggests that the AVF event, which aimed to go green by not using any printed materials, was successful. The event was likely well-organized and executed, with participants being able to access all necessary information and resources without the need for physical paper materials. This indicates that the event planners made effective use of digital platforms or other environmentally friendly alternatives to provide attendees with a satisfactory experience.

    Rate this question:

  • 26. 

    Annual Meeting registration process

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given answer "Good" suggests that the annual meeting registration process is satisfactory. It implies that the process is efficient, well-organized, and meets the expectations of the attendees. The registration process may have been smooth, with minimal delays or complications, ensuring a positive experience for the participants. The term "Good" indicates that overall, the registration process was successful and met the required standards.

    Rate this question:

  • 27. 

    AVF Staff

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given answer "Good" suggests that the AVF staff's performance was satisfactory. It implies that they performed well and met the expectations or requirements. This answer indicates that the staff's performance was above average and they delivered a good quality of work.

    Rate this question:

  • 28. 

    Westin Mission Hills facilities

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given answer "Good" suggests that the facilities at Westin Mission Hills are of a satisfactory quality. While it may not be the highest rating available, it indicates that the facilities are above average and meet the expectations of most guests.

    Rate this question:

  • 29. 

    Forum Finale

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given answer "Good" suggests that the overall performance or quality of something or someone is satisfactory or above average. It indicates that the subject being evaluated has met the expected standards and has performed well.

    Rate this question:

  • 30. 

    Venous Open Golf Event

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given answer "Good" suggests that the Venous Open Golf Event was of satisfactory quality. It implies that the event was enjoyable and met the expectations of the attendees. While it may not have been exceptional, it still provided a positive experience overall.

    Rate this question:

  • 31. 

    Silent Auction

    • Excellent

    • Very Good

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    • Did Not Attend or Not Applicable

    Correct Answer
    A. Good
    Explanation
    The given correct answer "Good" is likely a response to a rating or evaluation of the Silent Auction event. It suggests that the event was satisfactory or above average in terms of quality, organization, or overall experience. This rating indicates that the Silent Auction was successful and met the expectations of the attendees.

    Rate this question:

  • 32. 

    Are you an ACS member?

    • Yes

    • No

    Correct Answer
    A. Yes
    Explanation
    The correct answer is "Yes" because the question is asking if the person is an ACS member, and the response "Yes" indicates that they are indeed a member of ACS.

    Rate this question:

  • 33. 

    Please explain any specific instance(s) of bias or conflict of interest:

  • 34. 

    List a minimum of two things you are going to change in your practice as a result of what you have learned at this activity. 

  • 35. 

    Describe the barriers anticipated when implementing the above changes: 

  • 36. 

    Do you have any suggestions for future topics to support and/or expand on what you have learned at this activity?

  • 37. 

    Prior to the meeting, did you access the AVF Website for meeting information? If so, did you find the Website useful?

  • 38. 

    What changes would you suggest for the future to make the AVF Annual Meeting more beneficial and useful to you?

  • 39. 

    If you did not participate in the Venous Open Golf Event, please provide fundraiser activities you would be interested in participating in the future.

  • 40. 

    Additional Comments

  • 41. 

    If you are an ACS member, what is your member number?

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 21, 2023 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Mar 21, 2023
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Mar 03, 2015
    Quiz Created by
    Mia Beans

Popular Topics

+ Show more
Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.