This quiz assesses knowledge in government contracting, focusing on the Contracting 7 Level CDCs. It covers key areas such as LPTA source selection, RFP structure, proposal evaluation, and solicitation factors, essential for professionals in contract management.
Payrolls
Progress report.
Preorientation conference.
Material approval submittal.
Rate this question:
Litigation
Congressional inquiry.
Inspector General complaint.
Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Rate this question:
The CO may decline to provide the debriefing.
The CO must limit the debriefing to who received the award and the award amount.
The CO must provide a complete debriefing to all offerors who request one regardless of timeliness.
The CO is required to provide a debriefing in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act.
Rate this question:
Shortfall
Reclama
Relief request
Medical profile
Rate this question:
Identifies training needs
Allows for immediate corrective actions
Promotes effective levels of standardization
Dissolves the need for other compliance inspections
Rate this question:
A reasonable person would consider it to be a bad deal.
The government will exceed its maximum price position.
The negotiations begin to exceed a reasonable amount of time.
The parties cannot agree on price alone, although it is known that a better deal does not exist.
Rate this question:
Sole Source Letter.
Best Value Determination.
Determination and Findings.
Price Negotiation Memorandum.
Rate this question:
The overall evaluated cost or price and technical ratings of all offerors.
The government’s evaluation of the signification weaknesses in the offeror’s proposal.
Names of individuals providing reference information about the offeror’s past performance.
A point by point comparison of the debriefed offeror’s proposal with those of other offerors.
Rate this question:
Support multi-functional teams
Assist with the evaluation of contractor Quality Control Plans
Act as a liaison between contractors and the wing commander
Provide initial and recurring training to contracting officer representatives (COR).
Rate this question:
Determine the contractor non-responsive.
Eliminate the offeror from the competitive range.
Remove pages in excess of the maximum allowed from the back of the proposal.
Accept the proposal “as is” only if determined to be one of the most highly rated proposals.
Rate this question:
Green/Good.
Yellow/Marginal.
Blue/Outstanding.
Purple/Acceptable.
Rate this question:
Minimum price position.
Objective price position.
Median price position.
Maximum price position.
Rate this question:
25%.
35%.
50%.
100%.
Rate this question:
Involving people in the process
Requiring Airmen to draft their own awards
Assigning the unit’s best writers to draft all awards
Provide unit members with a copy of the installation writing guide
Rate this question:
Cost-type contracts.
Non-complex minor construction.
Projects estimated at less than $100K.
Small projects requiring extensive design.
Rate this question:
It requires members to quickly attain the highest possible certification
It is designed to be a progressive program of training, education, and education
Community College of the Air Force (CCAF) course work may be used to receive business hour credits to satisfy Acquisition Professional Development Program (APDP) requirements
Both military and civilians occupying acquisition coded contracting positions must meet education and training standards
Rate this question:
Section C
Section K
Section L
Section M
Rate this question:
Only the top five firms should be included in the competitive range.
A proposal may be included in the competitive range even though it is not among the most highly rated.
Include only those proposals within 20 percent of the most favorable proposal in the competitive range.
Limit the number of proposals to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.
Rate this question:
Using concessions to split any differences.
Threatening to cancel and resolicit the requirement.
Using other non-price factors to take the focus off price alone.
Establishing an opening position that allows room to compromise.
Rate this question:
Final report.
Interim report.
Addendum report.
Annual interim report.
Rate this question:
At least weekly
At least monthly
At least quarterly
At least annually
Rate this question:
Type of funding being used.
Differences in quantities or size.
Use of federal supply schedules.
Differences in contractor business size
Rate this question:
Discussions
Notifications
Clarifications
Communications
Rate this question:
Cardinal change.
Unilateral change.
Restrictive change.
Constructive change.
Rate this question:
Any claim exceeding the micro-purchase threshold.
Any claim exceeding $100,000.
Any claim exceeding $1,000,000.
When the contract is subject to the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA).
Rate this question:
Issue the award using the next fiscal year funds.
Make the award and negotiate after funding is received.
Make the award as long a hold harmless agreement is signed by the contractor.
Obtain a no-cost or hold harmless agreement and process up to the point of award.
Rate this question:
Deployments
Financial issues
Increased workload
Network downtime
Rate this question:
Unit commanders
MAJCOM personnel
Inspector General personnel
The most qualified unit personnel
Rate this question:
No Confidence
Limited Confidence
Unknown Confidence.
Satisfactory Confidence.
Rate this question:
Analyze each offeror’s profit margin.
Only be conducted by the contract officer (CO).
Review each offeror’s experience on similar projects.
Examine the types and quantities of materials proposed.
Rate this question:
For all construction contracts.
For only architect and engineering contracts.
When contracts exceed the SAT and the performance period is greater than 30 days.
When contracts exceed the SAT and the performance period is greater than 60 days.
Rate this question:
Cost analysis.
Price analysis.
Spend analysis.
Portfolio management.
Rate this question:
Is only evaluated when using tradeoffs.
Must be evaluated in every source selection.
May not be used as an evaluation factor when using tradeoffs.
Is only evaluated when an acquisition is subject to the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA).
Rate this question:
Not further consider the offeror for award.
Provide suggestions on how to correct the deficiency.
Identify it and provide the offeror an opportunity to improve the proposal.
Discuss every aspect of the proposal that received less than the maximum possible rating.
Rate this question:
May only be provided via a formal conference.
Is mandatory and must be provided to all government contractors prior to starting work on a military installation.
Is used to validate contractor payrolls and ensure compliance with labor laws.
May be used to issue the Notice to Proceed.
Rate this question:
Within 3 years after accrual of a claim.
Within 3 years after final payment is made.
Within 6 years after accrual of a claim.
Within 6 years after final payment is made.
Rate this question:
Prices are set by law.
Unit price guides and coefficients.
According to Davis-Bacon Act wage determinations.
Negotiation of individual line items in the main SABER contract.
Rate this question:
Negotiated into coefficients.
Built into the unit price guide
Included in non-prepriced items.
Negotiated prior to issuing each task order.
Rate this question:
Physical completion of the entire project.
Initial submission of the progress schedule.
A percentage of completion for projects of 30 calendar days or longer.
A percentage of completion for projects of 60 calendar days or longer.
Rate this question:
Becoming familiar with personnel programs
Encouraging membership in professional organizations
Discussing pros and cons of separating from the Air Force
Encouraging on duty study time for promotions during downtime
Rate this question:
Provide offeror representations and certifications.
Identify previous experience with similar requirements.
Address how it intends to meet the government’s requirement.
Demonstrate the financial capacity to complete the subsequent contract.
Rate this question:
Self-inspection program
Exercise evaluation program
Special interest item program
Compliance inspection program
Rate this question:
Life-cycle requirements
Duties, tasks, and references
An explanation of the plan and how it is used
Identifying each level with its specialty qualifications
Rate this question:
Establishment of grade requirements for cardholders
Separation of duties to ensure conflicts of interest are avoided
Span of control to an appropriate A/OPC to master account ratio
Separation of function for cardholders and personnel receiving, inspecting, and accepting goods
Rate this question:
Is a timed 50 question closed book test
Guarantees a limited contracting officer warrant up to $5M.
Requires candidates to score a minimum of 75% to pass the test
Is required for warrants above the simplified acquisition threshold
Rate this question:
Using discriminators.
Using non-commercial specifications.
Including as many evaluation factors as possible.
Tailoring the evaluation criteria contained in Section K.
Rate this question:
Complexity
Dollar value
Similarity of service/support.
Number of contracts performed.
Rate this question:
Relaxing the announced criteria.
Failure to follow the existing criteria.
Excluding offerors from the competitive range that are not amongst the most highly rated proposals.
Imposing additional unannounced criteria to increase the number of discriminators needed to include only the most highly rated proposals in the competitive range.
Rate this question:
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 20, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.