Lrw: Legal Analysis Introduction

Reviewed by Editorial Team
The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Freitas
F
Freitas
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 4 | Total Attempts: 2,163
| Attempts: 107
SettingsSettings
Please wait...
  • 1/9 Questions

    Fill in the blank. A legal argument that examines the elements of a statute or case is a(n) _______________ argument.

    • Rule-based
    • Analogy
    • Policy
Please wait...
About This Quiz


Legal analysis is the art of creating reasoned, logical, legal arguments and applying those arguments to a particular set of facts. Mastering legal analysis is an essential component of being a successful lawyer. This quiz will examine your understanding of the process of legal analysis. Select the best answer for each question. You will have 3 minutes to complete each question and will not be able to go back once you have answered.

Lrw: Legal Analysis Introduction - Quiz

Quiz Preview

  • 2. 

    True or False: The most pervasive techniques used in creating legal arguments are (1) rules, (2) analogies, and (3) policies.

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    The most pervasive techniques used in creating legal arguments are rules, analogies, and policies. These techniques are commonly employed by lawyers and judges to support their arguments and interpretations of the law. Rules refer to established legal principles and statutes, analogies involve comparing a current case to a similar precedent, and policies consider the broader societal implications and goals of the law. These three techniques are fundamental in constructing persuasive legal arguments and are widely utilized in the legal field.

    Rate this question:

  • 3. 

    Identify the steps in legal analysis in the proper order:

    • Analyze the law, collect the facts, create logical legal arguments.

    • Create logical legal arguments, collect the facts, analyze the law.

    • Collect the facts, create logical legal arguments, analyze the law.

    • Collect the facts, analyze the law, create logical legal arguments.

    • None of the above.

    Correct Answer
    A. Collect the facts, analyze the law, create logical legal arguments.
    Explanation
    The correct order of steps in legal analysis is to first collect the facts, then analyze the law, and finally create logical legal arguments. This order allows for a systematic approach to understanding the case at hand. By collecting the facts first, one can gather all the relevant information needed to make informed legal arguments. Then, analyzing the law helps to determine the applicable legal principles and precedents. Finally, creating logical legal arguments involves using the collected facts and analyzed law to construct a persuasive case.

    Rate this question:

  • 4. 

    Sound legal analysis will require you to: (select only one)

    • Find the facts

    • Analyze the facts

    • Find the law

    • Analyze the law

    • Find and analyze the facts and the law

    Correct Answer
    A. Find and analyze the facts and the law
    Explanation
    To conduct a sound legal analysis, it is necessary to find and analyze both the facts and the law. This means gathering all relevant information and evidence related to the case, understanding the legal principles and statutes that apply, and then applying the law to the facts to reach a reasoned conclusion. By considering both the facts and the law, a comprehensive analysis can be conducted, ensuring that all relevant aspects are taken into account and a well-supported legal argument is developed.

    Rate this question:

  • 5. 

    Fill in the blank. A legal argument that compares your client's case to a case that has already been decided is a(n) _______________ argument.

    • Rule-based

    • Analogy

    • Policy

    Correct Answer
    A. Analogy
    Explanation
    An analogy argument is a legal argument that compares your client's case to a case that has already been decided. This type of argument uses the similarities between the two cases to support the position or outcome that should be applied to your client's case. By drawing parallels and highlighting the similarities, an analogy argument aims to persuade the court or decision-maker to follow the precedent set by the previous case. This type of argument can be effective in demonstrating the applicability and fairness of a particular legal principle or rule to your client's situation.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    The questions you ask to collect facts should concentrate on: (select all that apply)

    • Understanding the background

    • Understanding the client's story or history

    • Helping find relevant law

    • Nothing, there is no need to concentrate on certain issues.

    Correct Answer(s)
    A. Understanding the background
    A. Understanding the client's story or history
    A. Helping find relevant law
    Explanation
    The questions asked to collect facts should concentrate on understanding the background, understanding the client's story or history, and helping find relevant law. These aspects are important in order to gather all the necessary information and context for the case at hand. By understanding the background, the legal professional can have a comprehensive understanding of the situation. Understanding the client's story or history helps in identifying any relevant details or patterns that may be crucial to the case. Finally, helping find relevant law ensures that the legal professional can apply the appropriate legal principles and precedents to the case.

    Rate this question:

  • 7. 

    To analyze the law, you must: (select all that apply)

    • Identify legal issues

    • Find controlling law

    • Understand the relationship among the various legal branches

    • Apply a variety of legal reasoning techniques to create sound, logical, legal arguments

    Correct Answer(s)
    A. Identify legal issues
    A. Find controlling law
    A. Understand the relationship among the various legal branches
    A. Apply a variety of legal reasoning techniques to create sound, logical, legal arguments
    Explanation
    To analyze the law effectively, it is necessary to identify legal issues, as this helps in determining the specific legal problems that need to be addressed. Finding controlling law is also important as it provides the authoritative legal principles and precedents that govern the given situation. Understanding the relationship among the various legal branches is essential as it helps in comprehending how different areas of law interact and impact each other. Lastly, applying a variety of legal reasoning techniques is crucial in order to develop well-founded, logical, and persuasive legal arguments that can withstand scrutiny.

    Rate this question:

  • 8. 

    Typical sources for lawyers collecting important facts include: (select all that apply)

    • The client

    • Witnesses and experts

    • Documents

    • Objects and other tangible evidence

    • Visiting sites

    Correct Answer(s)
    A. The client
    A. Witnesses and experts
    A. Documents
    A. Objects and other tangible evidence
    A. Visiting sites
    Explanation
    Lawyers typically collect important facts from a variety of sources. The client is an important source as they provide information about the case. Witnesses and experts can provide additional information and perspectives. Documents play a crucial role as they contain evidence and information relevant to the case. Objects and other tangible evidence can also provide important clues or evidence. Visiting sites allows lawyers to gather firsthand information and assess the physical environment related to the case. Therefore, all the options listed are typical sources for lawyers collecting important facts.

    Rate this question:

  • 9. 

    Fill in the blank. A legal argument that shows why an interpretation of the law is consistent or inconsistent with the goals of the rule is a(n) _______________ argument.

    • Rule-based

    • Analogy

    • Policy

    Correct Answer
    A. Policy
    Explanation
    A legal argument that shows why an interpretation of the law is consistent or inconsistent with the goals of the rule is a policy argument. This type of argument focuses on the underlying principles and objectives of the law, and how a particular interpretation aligns or deviates from those goals. It considers the broader societal impact and policy implications of a certain interpretation, and seeks to persuade based on the desired outcomes and consequences.

    Rate this question:

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Nov 20, 2023 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Nov 20, 2023
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Apr 14, 2010
    Quiz Created by
    Freitas
Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.