Legal Practice Course Assessment Test

Recent Quizzes

Legal Studies Multiple Choice Quiz: Test Your HSC Knowledge!

Welcome to our "Legal Studies Multiple Choice Quiz: Test Your HSC Knowledge!" This interactive quiz is designed to be an engaging and effective way for HSC students and...

Questions: 194 | Attempts: 4932 | Last updated: Oct 26, 2024

Sample Question
Which of the following is NOT a basic feature of human rights?

They are inherent

They are universal

They are inalienable

They are enforceable

Test Your Skillz (random)

Test your skillz (random) explores key concepts in property law, focusing on avtaleekstinksjon, good faith requirements, and legal protection mechanisms. This quiz assesses...

Questions: 6 | Attempts: 764 | Last updated: Mar 21, 2023

Sample Question
Hvilke påstander om avtaleekstinksjon er korrekte?

Det er et gjennomgående vilkår at B er i aktsom god tro om tidligere rettstiftelser i formuesgodet

Det er et gjennomgående vilkår at B er legitimert til å disponere over formuesgodet

Hvis A stjeler et formuesgode fra H, kan B aldri ekstingvere H's rett

Avtaleekstinksjon krever hjemmel i lov

B må gjennomføre en eller annen form for sikringsakt

Reglene om avtaleekstinksjon begrunnes i notoritetshensynet

Reglene om avtaleekstinksjon begrunnes i legitimasjonshensynet

Paralegal CORE Competency Exam Quiz!

The Paralegal CORE Competency Exam (PCCE) was introduced to assess new paralegals' knowledge, skills, and ability. The two main domains covered on the PCCE are Paralegal...

Questions: 10 | Attempts: 839 | Last updated: Mar 21, 2023

Sample Question
What are legal journals and law reviews?

Similar to restatements, but limited to narrow subtopics within an area of law.

Sources of articles, usually written by law professors, that can provide persuasive authority.

Sources of concise summaries of a law or statute.

None of the options.

Certified Paralegal Online Exam: Quiz!

Though many people are working as Paralegals without certification, taking this exam allows you to take your career to the next level. It also gives you an edge over those who...

Questions: 10 | Attempts: 1999 | Last updated: Mar 21, 2023

Sample Question
A court's power to hear a case before any other court is referred to as what?

First Jurisdiction

Supreme Jurisdiction

Original Jurisdiction

Pre-Jurisdiction

Paralegal PACE Practice Test

Do you think you can ace the Paralegal PACE exam? Let’s put that confidence to the test with our Paralegal PACE Practice Test. This quiz is a carefully designed challenge to...

Questions: 10 | Attempts: 1957 | Last updated: Jul 10, 2024

Sample Question
What does the legal principle "stare decisis" stand for?

Rule of four

Case of first impression

To stand by things decided

Judicial activism

Free TOEFL Reading Test 'Current Trends In California Custody Law.'

Please read the following passage. In this free TOEFL reading test there are 12 multiple choice questions which you will need to answer.You will have 20 minutes to complete this...

Questions: 12 | Attempts: 137 | Last updated: Mar 20, 2023

Sample Question
Current Trends in California Custody Law There are two primary approaches to child custody: (1) Judith Wallerstein approach that favors the one psychological parent concept; and (2) Maddis Hetherington approach that recognizes that children bond with both parents not just one. The Hetherington approach stresses: (1) Powerful child-caretaker relationships; (2) Brainpower; (3) Nurtured talent; and (4) Nurtured belief system. Here are some relevant cases illustrating these opposing ideologies. In Young vs. Hector (a Florida case), the Father stayed at home, Mother an attorney was always working and never around. The Court appointed expert recommended custody be awarded to the mother because of her economic stability. The Appellate court reversed the trial court's custody decision and held that the court should preserve the roles the parties themselves established, that is, the stay-at-home Father was “the primary caretaker” and the Mother was the worker/breadwinner. [A] The Appellate Court held that financial stability could be provided via child support. [B] This case, although a Florida case, demonstrates the general inclination that California courts now have. [C] This case is a great example of the gender differences that historically favored the mother, which have now shifted to keep pace with the times. [D] In Wainwright, the parents mutually decided that there would be no drug use while each had custody obligations. However, the couple's 6 year old upon returning to Mom from Dad's house promptly reports that Dad has been smoking marijuana. The Dad in this case did have a prescription for medical marijuana use from his Doctor. Nonetheless, the Mom seeks an order from the court for a hair sample to confirm he was using marijuana. The Court of appeal denied to issue this order because of constitutional privacy issues. In the marriage of Schiffman the issue was which parent has the authority to decide a child's last name (surname). This case adopts the best interest test in this context and placed the burden of proof on the person seeking a name change. The court considered how the name has been used and the symbolic role of the name for the particular family. The court even considered whether the child would be embarrassed because he has a different name than other members of his family. In another case a pregnant mom wanted to give her child her former name. Before the child was born, the dad brought a motion for a pre-custody order and a surname order, mandating that his surname be given to the child. The trial court “split the baby” by ordering a hyphenated name but finding that it was too early to ask for custody. The court of appeal affirmed, holding that the Schiffman case was not controlling. While the court did not approve of the hyphenated name it recognized that the trial court had the authority to make such an order. The important difference for the court between Douglas and Schiffman was that the child was unborn so the best interest test is inapplicable leaving the decision within the Judge's discretion. In our final case law example, Camacho v. Camacho the Mom wanted to end the Father's visitation asserting that he was “emotionally immature”. Mom sought an order mandating Dad to receiving counseling. The trial court granted the counseling order but it was reversed on appeal. The appellate court held that a parent need not be “emotionally mature” to visit his/her children. The court decided that children should be able to have the experience of both parents even if one parent is immature, unless said immaturity is detrimental to their safety. 1. The phrase child custody in paragraph 1 is closest in meaning to

Child imprisonment

Child welfare

Child care

Child legal rights

Legal Practice Course Assessment Test

Legal Practice Course is also known as...

Quiz Preview

Which of these countries offer the legal practice course?

Which of these topics is not a legal practice course curriculum?

Part time students are expected to use how many years to read legal practice?

Which of the following is a course topic in practical skills?

Legal practice course is usually taken after a law degree.

Full time students are expected to use how many years to read legal practice?

Which of the following is not a part of the phases of learning?

The course can be classified into how many phases of learning?

Which of the following is not a course topic in practical skills?