Legal Studies Multiple Choice Quiz: Test Your Hsc Knowledge!

Reviewed by Editorial Team
The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Aaron Grosse
A
Aaron Grosse
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 1 | Total Attempts: 4,706
| Attempts: 4,758
SettingsSettings
Please wait...
  • 1/194 Questions

    What is the standard of proof in a criminal case?

    • Mens rea
    • Actus reus
    • Beyond reasonable doubt
    • On the balance of probabilities
Please wait...
About This Quiz

Welcome to our "Legal Studies Multiple Choice Quiz: Test Your HSC Knowledge!" This interactive quiz is designed to be an engaging and effective way for HSC students and anyone interested in legal studies to assess their understanding of key concepts and principles.

Our quiz covers a wide range of topics within legal studies, including areas like criminal law, and human See morerights. You'll find a series of multiple-choice questions that will challenge your knowledge and critical thinking skills. Whether you're preparing for your HSC exams or just want to brush up on your legal studies knowledge, this quiz is an excellent resource.

Why choose a multiple-choice format? It's a practical way to assess your knowledge quickly and efficiently. Plus, you'll receive instant feedback on your performance, allowing you to identify areas where you may need more practice or study.

Don't miss this opportunity to enhance your understanding of legal studies. Take the "Legal Studies Multiple Choice Quiz" and see how well you can apply your knowledge to real-world scenarios. It's an essential tool for HSC success and anyone interested in the field of legal studies. Good luck!

Legal Studies Multiple Choice Quiz: Test Your Hsc Knowledge! - Quiz

Quiz Preview

  • 2. 

    A person is charged with an offence for using obscene language. In which court will the trial most likely take place?

    • Coroner's

    • District

    • Local

    • Supreme

    Correct Answer
    A. Local
    Explanation
    The trial for a person charged with using obscene language will most likely take place in the Local court. The Local court typically handles less serious offences and is responsible for hearing cases related to minor criminal matters, including public order offences like using obscene language. The Coroner's court deals with investigating and determining the cause of death in certain circumstances, while the District court handles more serious criminal cases. The Supreme court is the highest court in the jurisdiction and generally handles the most complex and significant legal matters.

    Rate this question:

  • 3. 

    What is the main role of the jury in a criminal trial?

    • To determine the penalty

    • To represent the views of victim

    • Decides if the accused is guilty

    • Advise the judge on community standards

    Correct Answer
    A. Decides if the accused is guilty
    Explanation
    The main role of the jury in a criminal trial is to decide if the accused is guilty. The jury listens to the evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defense, evaluates the credibility of the witnesses, and then deliberates to reach a verdict. Their decision is crucial as it determines the guilt or innocence of the accused.

    Rate this question:

  • 4. 

    Mary was found to be an accessory before the fact in a bank robbery. Which of the following would have led to this finding?

    • Mary supplied the gun that was used

    • Mary used the gun at the crime scene

    • Mary carried the money out of the bank

    • Mary hid the money taken from the bank

    Correct Answer
    A. Mary supplied the gun that was used
    Explanation
    Mary was found to be an accessory before the fact in a bank robbery because she supplied the gun that was used. This means that she provided the weapon to the perpetrator(s) before the crime took place, indicating her involvement and contribution to the robbery.

    Rate this question:

  • 5. 

    Police recieve information that a suspect's house is being used to manufacture large quantities of drugs for sale interstate. In which of the following situations can police search the suspect's house?

    • A warrant has been granted.

    • A summons has been served.

    • The prosecutor authorises a search.

    • The Public Defender authorises a search.

    Correct Answer
    A. A warrant has been granted.
    Explanation
    The police can search the suspect's house only when a warrant has been granted. A warrant is a legal document issued by a judge or magistrate that gives the police the authority to search a specific location and seize evidence. It is obtained by presenting sufficient evidence to establish probable cause that a crime has been committed and that evidence related to the crime can be found at the location to be searched. A warrant ensures that the search is conducted within the boundaries of the law and protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    A country has been criticised by the United Nations for using capital punishment. Which of the following allows the country to ignore this criticism?

    • State sovereignty

    • Self-determination

    • Division of powers

    • Separation of powers

    Correct Answer
    A. State sovereignty
    Explanation
    State sovereignty allows a country to ignore criticism from the United Nations regarding its use of capital punishment. State sovereignty refers to the principle that a state has the authority to govern itself without interference from external entities. In this case, the country can argue that the decision to use capital punishment is within its sovereign rights and that it is not bound by the criticism or recommendations of the United Nations.

    Rate this question:

  • 7. 

    Which of the following requires a person to attend court?

    • Caution

    • Arrest

    • Summons

    • Infringement notice

    Correct Answer
    A. Summons
    Explanation
    A summons is a legal document that requires a person to appear in court. It is typically issued by a court or a legal authority and serves as a formal notice to the individual that they are required to attend court proceedings. Unlike a caution, arrest, or infringement notice, a summons specifically mandates the person's presence in court. Therefore, the correct answer is summons.

    Rate this question:

  • 8. 

    Which of the following is a mitigating cirumstance in a sentencing decision?

    • The offender is young

    • The offender used a weapon

    • The offender has a prior conviction

    • The offender believed what he or she did was right

    Correct Answer
    A. The offender is young
    Explanation
    In a sentencing decision, the fact that the offender is young can be considered as a mitigating circumstance. This is because youth is often associated with immaturity, lack of life experience, and potential for rehabilitation. The court may take into account the offender's age as a factor that influenced their actions and may consider a more lenient sentence or alternative measures to address their behavior and prevent future offenses.

    Rate this question:

  • 9. 

    A known offender is not released after his sentence has been served. what type of detention is this?

    • Home

    • Periodic

    • Weekend

    • Continued

    Correct Answer
    A. Continued
    Explanation
    "Continued" detention refers to the situation where a known offender is not released after serving their sentence. This means that they are kept in detention beyond their initial sentence, possibly due to various reasons such as pending charges, risk of reoffending, or other legal considerations.

    Rate this question:

  • 10. 

    What is meant by the term state sovereignty?

    • International law recognizes a nation state.

    • A nation state is recognized by other nation states.

    •  International law gives power to nation states to make laws.

    • A nation state can determine its laws without external interference.

    Correct Answer
    A. A nation state can determine its laws without external interference.
    Explanation
    State sovereignty refers to the ability of a nation state to govern itself and make decisions without interference from external entities. This includes the power to determine its own laws and policies without being subject to the authority or control of other nations or international organizations. State sovereignty is a fundamental principle of international law, recognizing the autonomy and independence of nation states in their internal affairs.

    Rate this question:

  • 11. 

    A person is held in custody before trial. What is this called?

    • Bail

    • Parole

    • Remand

    • Protective custody

    Correct Answer
    A. Remand
    Explanation
    Remand refers to the act of holding a person in custody before their trial. It is a legal process where the accused is detained in jail or a correctional facility until their trial date. This is done to ensure that the person does not flee or pose a threat to society while awaiting their trial. Bail, on the other hand, refers to the temporary release of an accused person before their trial, usually with a financial guarantee. Parole and protective custody are not applicable in this context.

    Rate this question:

  • 12. 

    A group of people living within a nation state wants to exercise its collective right to influence legal decisions about the land on which they live.

    • Peace rights

    • Self-determination

    • Environmental rights

    • Limitations on free speech

    Correct Answer
    A. Self-determination
    Explanation
    The concept of self-determination refers to the ability of a group of people to freely determine their political status and make decisions about their own economic, social, and cultural development. In this scenario, the group of people living within the nation state wants to exercise their collective right to influence legal decisions about the land they live on, which aligns with the idea of self-determination. They seek to have a say in the governance and control of their own territory, reflecting their desire for autonomy and self-governance.

    Rate this question:

  • 13. 

    Evidence recorded by camera shows a person committing a crime. At the court hearing, the prosecution does not have to prove the person's intention to commit the crime. For which crime was this person charged?

    • Assaulting a stranger

    • Speeding in a school zone

    • Stealing money from an employer

    • Planning to break into a neighbour's house

    Correct Answer
    A. Speeding in a school zone
    Explanation
    The person was charged with speeding in a school zone. In this case, the evidence recorded by the camera shows the person committing the crime of speeding in a school zone. The question states that the prosecution does not have to prove the person's intention to commit the crime, which implies that the crime of speeding in a school zone does not require proof of intention. Therefore, this is the crime for which the person was charged.

    Rate this question:

  • 14. 

    A government decides to withdraw from its obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and blocks access to the internet for non-government organisations. What is this an example of?

    • The government excercising state sovereignty

    • The government limiting universal suffrage

    • The role of the media in promoting self-determination

    • Non-government organisations excercising statutory powers

    Correct Answer
    A. The government excercising state sovereignty
    Explanation
    This is an example of the government exercising state sovereignty. By withdrawing from its obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and blocking internet access for non-government organizations, the government is asserting its authority and control over its own territory and decision-making processes. This action demonstrates the government's exercise of its sovereign power to determine and enforce its own laws and policies without external interference or obligations.

    Rate this question:

  • 15. 

    Which of the following best describes criminal law in NSW?

    • Public law that uses the advesary system

    • Public law that uses the inquisitorial system

    • Private law that uses the adversary system

    • Private law that uses the inquistorial system

    Correct Answer
    A. Public law that uses the advesary system
    Explanation
    Criminal law in NSW is a type of public law that utilizes the adversary system. In an adversary system, two opposing parties present their arguments and evidence before a neutral judge or jury who then decides the outcome of the case. This system ensures a fair and balanced process where both sides have the opportunity to present their case and challenge the evidence and arguments of the opposing party. Criminal law deals with offenses committed against society as a whole and is enforced by the government through the criminal justice system.

    Rate this question:

  • 16. 

    What is self-determination?

    • The right to vote

    • The right to a jury trial

    • The right to legal representation

    • The right of a group to make decisions for itself

    Correct Answer
    A. The right of a group to make decisions for itself
    Explanation
    Self-determination refers to the right of a group to make decisions for itself. This means that the group has the autonomy and freedom to determine its own political, economic, social, and cultural policies without external interference. It is about empowering a group to have control over its own destiny and to have the ability to shape its own future. Self-determination is often associated with movements for independence, autonomy, and sovereignty, where groups seek to govern themselves and exercise their rights without being subjected to the authority of others.

    Rate this question:

  • 17. 

    What is the standard of proof in a criminal case?

    • Beyond any doubt

    • Beyond reasonable doubt

    • On the balance of possibilities

    • On the balance of probabilities

    Correct Answer
    A. Beyond reasonable doubt
    Explanation
    The standard of proof in a criminal case is "beyond reasonable doubt." This means that the prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt to such an extent that there is no reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors or judge. It is a high standard that requires a high level of certainty before a conviction can be made. The prosecution must present evidence and arguments that are strong enough to convince the trier of fact that the defendant is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt.

    Rate this question:

  • 18. 

    Which court would investigate an unexplaied death?

    • Local

    • District

    • Coroner's

    • Supreme

    Correct Answer
    A. Coroner's
    Explanation
    The correct answer is Coroner's. In cases of unexplained deaths, the Coroner's court would be responsible for conducting an investigation. The Coroner's court is specifically designed to determine the cause and circumstances surrounding unexpected or suspicious deaths. This court is responsible for gathering evidence, conducting autopsies, and interviewing witnesses to establish the cause of death. The Coroner's court plays a crucial role in ensuring that unexplained deaths are thoroughly investigated and the truth is uncovered.

    Rate this question:

  • 19. 

    Which of the following best explains state sovereignty?

    • A head of state can make all laws

    • A head of state can enter into international treaties

    • Nation states are in control of their own domestic affairs

    • Nation states can intervene to protect human rights in other nations

    Correct Answer
    A. Nation states are in control of their own domestic affairs
    Explanation
    State sovereignty refers to the authority and power of a nation state to govern itself and make decisions within its own borders without interference from external forces. This means that nation states have the autonomy to control their own domestic affairs, including making laws and policies that are applicable within their territory. This concept emphasizes the independence and self-determination of nation states, allowing them to exercise their own political, economic, and social systems without external interference.

    Rate this question:

  • 20. 

    Which court would hear a offence of speeding in a school zone when it first becomes a court matter?

    • Drug court

    • Local court

    • District court

    • Supreme court

    Correct Answer
    A. Local court
    Explanation
    The local court would hear an offense of speeding in a school zone when it first becomes a court matter. This is because the local court has jurisdiction over minor offenses and traffic violations that occur within its geographical area. The local court is responsible for handling cases that are of a less serious nature and do not require a higher court's involvement.

    Rate this question:

  • 21. 

    Andrew illegally downloaded music from the internet. What role did Andrew play in committing this offence?

    • Accessory after the fact

    • Accessory before the fact

    • Principal in the first degree

    • Principal in the second degree

    Correct Answer
    A. Principal in the first degree
    Explanation
    Andrew played the role of the principal in the first degree in committing the offence of illegally downloading music from the internet. This means that he directly and actively participated in the illegal act and was the main perpetrator of the offense.

    Rate this question:

  • 22. 

    The separation of powers in the Australian Constituation establishes the independance between?

    • Barristers, Judges and Juries

    • Local, District, and Supreme Courts

    • Judiciary, legislature and executive

    • Local, state and federal governments

    Correct Answer
    A. Judiciary, legislature and executive
    Explanation
    The separation of powers in the Australian Constitution establishes the independence between the judiciary, legislature, and executive. This means that each branch of government has its own distinct powers and responsibilities, ensuring a system of checks and balances. The judiciary is responsible for interpreting and applying the law, the legislature creates laws, and the executive branch enforces laws and manages the day-to-day operations of the government. This separation prevents any one branch from becoming too powerful and helps safeguard against abuses of power.

    Rate this question:

  • 23. 

    Alice has received an official legal document in relation to an offense she has allegedly committed. She is required to attend the local court on a certain date. what is the legal document?

    • An indictment

    • An injuction

    • A summons

    • A warrant

    Correct Answer
    A. A summons
    Explanation
    The correct answer is a summons. A summons is a legal document that requires someone to appear in court on a specific date. In this scenario, Alice has allegedly committed an offense and has received a summons, which means she is legally obligated to attend the local court on the specified date.

    Rate this question:

  • 24. 

    What is the aim of a diversionary program?

    • Imprisonment

    • Incapacitation

    • Rehabilitation

    • Retribution

    Correct Answer
    A. Rehabilitation
    Explanation
    The aim of a diversionary program is rehabilitation. Diversionary programs are alternative sentencing options that aim to divert individuals away from the traditional criminal justice system and towards rehabilitative services. These programs focus on addressing the underlying causes of criminal behavior and providing individuals with the necessary support and resources to reintegrate into society and lead law-abiding lives. The goal is to prevent future criminal behavior by addressing the root causes and promoting positive change.

    Rate this question:

  • 25. 

    A police officer issues a caution instead of an on the spot fine to a person whose car is illegally parked. What is the police officer's action an example of?

    • Discretion

    • Corruption

    • A breach of criminal law

    • A breach of the rule of law

    Correct Answer
    A. Discretion
    Explanation
    The police officer's action of issuing a caution instead of an on the spot fine to a person whose car is illegally parked is an example of discretion. Discretion refers to the ability to make decisions based on one's own judgment and considering the specific circumstances of a situation. In this case, the police officer exercised discretion by choosing to issue a caution instead of imposing a fine, possibly taking into account factors such as the severity of the offense, the person's previous record, or any extenuating circumstances.

    Rate this question:

  • 26. 

    Which of the following is best characterised as transnational crime?

    • Murder

    • Torture

    • Sexual assault

    • People Smuggling

    Correct Answer
    A. People Smuggling
    Explanation
    People smuggling is best characterised as transnational crime because it involves the illegal transportation of individuals across national borders for profit. Unlike the other options, which are crimes that can occur within a single country, people smuggling specifically involves crossing international boundaries. This crime often involves organized criminal networks operating across multiple countries, making it a clear example of transnational criminal activity.

    Rate this question:

  • 27. 

    Police allege a driver was speeding in a school zone. What does the police have to prove if the matter goes to court

    • The driver was speeding.

    • The driver intended to speed.

    • The driver knew it was a school zone.

    • The driver knew the school zone speed limit.

    Correct Answer
    A. The driver was speeding.
    Explanation
    The police have to prove that the driver was speeding if the matter goes to court. This means they need to provide evidence that the driver was driving at a speed higher than the designated limit in the school zone. The other options, such as the driver's intention to speed or their knowledge of it being a school zone or the speed limit, are not relevant in proving the offense of speeding.

    Rate this question:

  • 28. 

    Which of the following is a transnational crime?

    • Treason

    • Sedition

    • Genocide

    • Drug Trafficking

    Correct Answer
    A. Drug Trafficking
    Explanation
    Drug trafficking is considered a transnational crime because it involves the illegal transportation, distribution, and sale of drugs across national borders. This criminal activity often involves organized criminal networks that operate across multiple countries, making it a transnational issue. Drug trafficking not only poses significant health and social risks but also contributes to corruption, violence, and instability in affected regions.

    Rate this question:

  • 29. 

    Which Statement is true of strict liability offences?

    • Mens Rea must be proved

    • Actus reus must be proved

    • Burden of proof is not relevant

    • Standard of proof is not relevant

    Correct Answer
    A. Actus reus must be proved
    Explanation
    In strict liability offenses, the prosecution only needs to prove the actus reus or the guilty act, without having to establish the mens rea or the guilty mind. This means that the defendant can be held liable for the offense even if they did not intend to commit it. Therefore, the statement "Actus reus must be proved" is true for strict liability offenses.

    Rate this question:

  • 30. 

    What is the purpose of diversionary programs?

    • To involve the victim in sentencing

    • To prevent future criminal behaviour

    • To deter crime by increasing penalties

    • To remove potential offenders from society

    Correct Answer
    A. To prevent future criminal behaviour
    Explanation
    Diversionary programs are designed to prevent future criminal behavior. These programs aim to divert individuals away from the criminal justice system and provide them with alternative interventions and support. By addressing the underlying causes of criminal behavior, such as substance abuse or mental health issues, diversionary programs seek to reduce the likelihood of individuals reoffending in the future. These programs often offer rehabilitative services, counseling, education, and other resources to help individuals make positive changes in their lives and avoid further involvement in criminal activities.

    Rate this question:

  • 31. 

    A person who has no previous criminal record commits a minor crime. The judge finds the person guilty of the offence but does not record a conviction. What is this an example of?

    • Judicial error

    • Restorative justice

    • Judicial discretion

    • A suspended sentence

    Correct Answer
    A. Judicial discretion
    Explanation
    This is an example of judicial discretion. Judicial discretion refers to the power of a judge to make decisions based on their own judgment and interpretation of the law, rather than being bound by strict guidelines or mandatory sentences. In this case, the judge exercised their discretion by finding the person guilty of the offence but not recording a conviction, likely taking into consideration the individual's lack of previous criminal record and the minor nature of the crime committed.

    Rate this question:

  • 32. 

    A pedestrian obstructs traffic. What type of offence is this?

    • A driving offence

    • An economic offence

    • A preliminary offence

    • A public order offence

    Correct Answer
    A. A public order offence
    Explanation
    When a pedestrian obstructs traffic, it is considered a public order offence. This is because it disrupts the normal flow of traffic and can potentially cause inconvenience or danger to other road users. Public order offences are typically related to behavior that disturbs public peace and order, and obstructing traffic falls under this category.

    Rate this question:

  • 33. 

    How is statute law made?

    • By courts

    • By custom

    • By parliament

    • By treaties

    Correct Answer
    A. By parliament
    Explanation
    Statute law is made by parliament. Parliament is the legislative body of a country that has the authority to create laws. Statute law refers to laws that are enacted by the parliament and are written down in a formal document. This is different from common law, which is created by courts through their interpretations of previous cases. Custom and treaties may influence the creation of laws, but they are not the primary means by which statute law is made.

    Rate this question:

  • 34. 

    Which of the following is an example of a collective human right?

    • Free speech

    •  Union membership

    • Religious freedom

    • Self-determination

    Correct Answer
    A. Self-determination
    Explanation
    Self-determination is an example of a collective human right because it refers to the right of a group of people to freely determine their political status, pursue their economic, social, and cultural development, and exercise control over their own resources. This right recognizes the importance of allowing communities and nations to govern themselves and make decisions that affect their collective well-being. It is a fundamental principle of international law and is crucial for promoting democracy, equality, and the protection of human rights.

    Rate this question:

  • 35. 

    Which of the following is NOT a basic feature of human rights?

    • They are inherent

    • They are universal

    • They are inalienable

    • They are enforceable

    Correct Answer
    A. They are enforceable
    Explanation
    Human rights are inherent, universal, and inalienable, meaning they belong to every individual by virtue of being human, regardless of any factors such as nationality or race. However, the enforceability of human rights can vary depending on the legal and political systems in place. While human rights should ideally be enforceable through legal mechanisms and institutions, the reality is that in some cases, individuals may face challenges in accessing justice or having their rights protected. Therefore, the statement "They are enforceable" does not accurately reflect a basic feature of human rights.

    Rate this question:

  • 36. 

    Human rights in Australia are best promoted when they are:

    • Promoted by media

    • Incoporated into domestic laws

    • Included in the Charter of Rights

    • Monitored by the United Nations.

    Correct Answer
    A. Incoporated into domestic laws
    Explanation
    Human rights in Australia are best promoted when they are incorporated into domestic laws. This means that when human rights are enshrined and protected by the legal system of the country, they become enforceable and individuals can seek legal remedies if their rights are violated. By incorporating human rights into domestic laws, Australia ensures that these rights are recognized and respected by all branches of government and can be upheld in courts. This provides a strong framework for promoting and protecting human rights within the country.

    Rate this question:

  • 37. 

    Melaine is arrested for assult. A magistrate decides not to release Melanie while she waits for her trial. This means Melanie is on:

    • On bail

    • On Parole

    • On probation

    • On remand

    Correct Answer
    A. On remand
    Explanation
    When a magistrate decides not to release a person while they wait for their trial, it means that the person is held in custody until their trial date. This is known as being "on remand." It is a precautionary measure taken by the court to ensure that the person does not flee or pose a threat to society before their trial.

    Rate this question:

  • 38. 

    How is the European Union best described?

    • As a court

    • As a tribunal

    • As part of the United Nations

    • As an intergovernmental organisation

    Correct Answer
    A. As an intergovernmental organisation
    Explanation
    The European Union is best described as an intergovernmental organization because it is composed of member states that voluntarily cooperate and make decisions together on various issues such as trade, security, and legislation. It is not a court or tribunal, as it does not primarily focus on legal matters or adjudicating disputes. Additionally, while the European Union may work closely with the United Nations on certain issues, it is not considered to be a part of the United Nations.

    Rate this question:

  • 39. 

    An employee of a bank becomes aware of confidential information which will increase the bank's share price. Before the information is publically released, the employee buys shares in the bank. What is this an example of?

    • A conspiracy

    • A preliminary offence

    • An economic offence

    • A public order offence

    Correct Answer
    A. An economic offence
    Explanation
    This scenario is an example of an economic offence. The employee is using insider information to gain an unfair advantage in the stock market by buying shares before the information is made public. This is considered illegal and unethical as it undermines the fairness and integrity of the financial markets.

    Rate this question:

  • 40. 

    Which court has appeallate jurisdiction to hear criminal law matters?

    • Local Court

    • District Court

    • Cororner's Court

    • Children's Court

    Correct Answer
    A. District Court
    Explanation
    The District Court has appellate jurisdiction to hear criminal law matters. This means that individuals who are dissatisfied with the decision made by a lower court can appeal to the District Court for a review of the case. The District Court has the authority to reexamine the evidence, assess the law, and make a new decision on the matter. This allows for a higher level of review and ensures that justice is served in criminal cases.

    Rate this question:

  • 41. 

    A well-known public figure has served his full sentence of 20 years for a violent crime. He has been denied release because of aggressive beheviour in prison. What is this an example of?

    • Periodic detention

    • Protective custody

    • Continued detention

    • Secruity reclassification

    Correct Answer
    A. Continued detention
    Explanation
    This scenario is an example of continued detention. Despite serving his full sentence, the public figure is being denied release due to his aggressive behavior in prison. This suggests that he is still considered a threat to society, leading to the decision to continue detaining him.

    Rate this question:

  • 42. 

    Who has the burden of proof in a criminal case?

    • Jury

    • Plaintiff

    • Defendant

    • Prosecution

    Correct Answer
    A. Prosecution
    Explanation
    In a criminal case, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution. It is their responsibility to present evidence and convince the jury or judge of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution must establish all elements of the crime and demonstrate that the defendant is guilty. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and it is the prosecution's duty to provide sufficient evidence to meet the burden of proof.

    Rate this question:

  • 43. 

    What comes under the jurisdiction of the international criminal court

    • War crimes

    • Cyber terrorism

    • Drug trafficking

    • People smuggling

    Correct Answer
    A. War crimes
    Explanation
    The International Criminal Court has jurisdiction over war crimes, which are serious violations of the laws and customs of war. These crimes include acts such as genocide, crimes against humanity, and war atrocities. The ICC investigates and prosecutes individuals responsible for these crimes, ensuring that they are held accountable for their actions. While cyber terrorism, drug trafficking, and people smuggling are serious crimes, they do not fall under the direct jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.

    Rate this question:

  • 44. 

    Use the following information to answer Question 5-8: 18 year old Alex and 19 year old Dale planned to rob a bank. THe next day Alex drove the car and waited for Dale to rob the bank. Dale robbed the bank and they both drove away. 12 year old Shane was waiting at their house to assist them. What best describes the role played by Shane?

    • Accessory after the fact

    •  Accessory before the fact

    • Principal in the first degree

    • Principal in the second degree

    Correct Answer
    A. Accessory after the fact
    Explanation
    Shane's role as a 12-year-old waiting at their house to assist them indicates that he did not actively participate in the planning or execution of the bank robbery. Instead, he became involved after the fact, potentially providing assistance or shelter to Alex and Dale after they committed the crime. This makes him an accessory after the fact, as he aided or harbored the criminals knowing that they had already committed the crime.

    Rate this question:

  • 45. 

    The prosecution and defence agree an offender will plead guilty to manslaughter instead of being tried for murder. What is this agreement an example of?

    • A partial defence

    • Charge Negotiation

    • A Complete Defence

    • Alternative Sentencing

    Correct Answer
    A. Charge Negotiation
    Explanation
    Charge negotiation is the correct answer because it refers to an agreement between the prosecution and the defense regarding the charges that will be brought against the offender. In this case, the agreement is for the offender to plead guilty to the lesser charge of manslaughter instead of being tried for the more serious charge of murder. This negotiation allows for a resolution to the case without the need for a full trial, saving time and resources for both parties involved.

    Rate this question:

  • 46. 

    During an arguement, Don punches Jack, who later dies. Don is convicted of murder. Which of the following must have been established in court for this finding to be reached

    • Causation

    • Mitigation

    • Provocation

    • Self-defence

    Correct Answer
    A. Causation
    Explanation
    In order for Don to be convicted of murder for punching Jack, the court must have established causation. This means that it must have been proven that Don's actions directly caused Jack's death. The court would have needed to determine that Don's punch was the cause of Jack's fatal injuries, and that without Don's actions, Jack would not have died. Without establishing causation, it would not be possible to hold Don responsible for Jack's death.

    Rate this question:

  • 47. 

    Which of the following describes the fundamental prinicples of human rights?

    • Universal and alienable

    • Universal and inalienable

    • Guaranteed and alienable

    • Guarenteed and inalienable

    Correct Answer
    A. Universal and inalienable
    Explanation
    The fundamental principles of human rights are described as universal and inalienable. Universal means that human rights apply to all individuals, regardless of their nationality, race, gender, or any other characteristic. Inalienable means that these rights cannot be taken away or denied from individuals. This means that every person is entitled to the same basic rights and freedoms, which cannot be violated or revoked by any authority or government.

    Rate this question:

  • 48. 

    Aberia is a colony og Belinia. Aberia wants to form an independent nation. This situation is an example of which type of right?

    • Collective

    • Environmental

    • Peace

    • Positive

    Correct Answer
    A. Collective
    Explanation
    The situation described in the question, where Aberia, a colony of Belinia, wants to form an independent nation, exemplifies the concept of collective rights. Collective rights refer to the rights held by a group or community as a whole, rather than by individuals. In this case, Aberia as a collective entity is asserting its right to self-determination and independence.

    Rate this question:

  • 49. 

    An offender and the victim of the crime attend a meeting to discuss the impact of the crime on the victim. What is this an example of?

    • Retribution

    • Restorative justice

    • Charge negotiation

    • A community service order

    Correct Answer
    A. Restorative justice
    Explanation
    Restorative justice is an approach that focuses on repairing the harm caused by a crime through dialogue and involvement of the offender, victim, and community. In this scenario, the offender and victim attending a meeting to discuss the impact of the crime on the victim aligns with the principles of restorative justice, as it aims to address the needs of the victim and promote accountability and understanding on the part of the offender. This process allows for the possibility of healing, rehabilitation, and reconciliation for all parties involved.

    Rate this question:

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Oct 26, 2024 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Oct 26, 2024
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Aug 18, 2020
    Quiz Created by
    Aaron Grosse

Recent Quizzes

Test your skillz (random) Test your skillz (random)
Paralegal CORE Competency Exam Quiz! Paralegal CORE Competency Exam Quiz!
Certified Paralegal Online Exam: Quiz! Certified Paralegal Online Exam: Quiz!
Paralegal PACE Practice Test Paralegal PACE Practice Test
Legal Practice Course Assessment Test Legal Practice Course Assessment Test
Free TOEFL reading test 'Current trends in California Custody Law.' Free TOEFL reading test 'Current trends in California Custody Law.'
Introduction to Legal Studies Test Introduction to Legal Studies Test
Legal Studies Sac One Revision Legal Studies Sac One Revision
Introduction To Business Law Quiz Part- I Introduction To Business Law Quiz Part- I
Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.