English Legal System

Reviewed by Editorial Team

The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.

Learn about Our Editorial Process

| By Sisjo

Sisjo

Community Contributor

Quizzes Created: 1 | Total Attempts: 3,411

| Attempts: 3,421

Questions

Feedback

During the Quiz End of Quiz

Difficulty

Sequential Easy First Hard First

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Whatsapp Share on Pinterest Share on Email Copy to Clipboard Embed on your website

1/8 Questions

Equity preceded the common law
- True
- False

About This Quiz

Explore the foundations of the English Legal System with this quiz. Assess your understanding of legal principles, including the distinction between civil and criminal cases, the role of equity, and standards of proof. Ideal for law students and legal professionals seeking to refine their knowledge.

2.

At common law the only remedy was damages
- True
- False
Correct Answer

A. True

Explanation

At common law, the only available remedy was damages. This means that if someone suffered harm or loss due to another party's actions, the only way to seek compensation was through monetary damages. Other forms of remedies, such as injunctions or specific performance, were not available. This principle was followed in the legal system based on common law traditions. Therefore, the statement "At common law the only remedy was damages" is true.

Rate this question:

4
3.

Public law includes criminal, administrative and intellectual property law
- True
- False
Correct Answer

A. False

Explanation

The statement is false because public law does not include intellectual property law. Public law primarily deals with the relationship between individuals and the government, including criminal law and administrative law. Intellectual property law, on the other hand, is a branch of private law that focuses on protecting intellectual creations such as patents, trademarks, and copyrights. Therefore, intellectual property law falls under the category of private law, not public law.

Rate this question:

2
4.

In criminal cases the case is cited as R v Smith
- True
- False
Correct Answer

A. True

Explanation

In criminal cases, it is common practice to cite the case as R v Smith. This is because "R" stands for "Regina" or "Rex," which means "the Queen" in Latin. The "v" stands for "versus," indicating that the case is between the Crown (represented by the Queen) and the defendant (in this case, Smith). Therefore, the given statement is true.

Rate this question:

1
5.

In civil cases the standard of proof is: beyond reasonable doubt
- True
- False
Correct Answer

A. False

Explanation

In civil cases, the standard of proof is not "beyond reasonable doubt." Instead, the standard of proof in civil cases is "preponderance of the evidence." This means that the plaintiff must prove their case by showing that it is more likely than not that their claims are true. The standard of "beyond reasonable doubt" is used in criminal cases, where the prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt to such a high degree that there is no reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors.

Rate this question:

2
6.

In civil cases the aim is to control behaviour which society disapproves of.
- True
- False
Correct Answer

A. False

Explanation

In civil cases, the aim is not to control behavior that society disapproves of, but rather to resolve disputes between individuals or entities. Civil cases typically involve private matters such as contracts, property disputes, or personal injury claims, where the goal is to provide compensation or a resolution for the parties involved. The statement contradicts this aim, making the correct answer False.

Rate this question:

1
7.

"Obiter dicta" is the legal principle of a case which forms the binding precedent
- True
- False
Correct Answer

A. False

Explanation

The statement is false. "Obiter dicta" refers to the statements made by a judge in a legal case that are not directly relevant to the decision or binding precedent. It is the ratio decidendi, or the legal principle of a case, that forms the binding precedent.

Rate this question:

2
8.

"Ratio decidendi" are the things stated in a judgment which are not necessary for the decision.
- True
- False
Correct Answer

A. False

Explanation

The statement is false because "ratio decidendi" refers to the legal reasoning or principle that forms the basis for the court's decision. It is the essential part of the judgment that is necessary for the decision and sets a precedent for future cases. Therefore, it is incorrect to say that ratio decidendi includes things that are not necessary for the decision.

Rate this question:

3

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 21, 2023 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

Current Version
Mar 21, 2023

Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team
May 04, 2012

Quiz Created by
Sisjo

English Legal System

Equity preceded the common law

Quiz Preview

At common law the only remedy was damages

Public law includes criminal, administrative and intellectual property law

In criminal cases the case is cited as R v Smith

In civil cases the standard of proof is: beyond reasonable doubt

In civil cases the aim is to control behaviour which society disapproves of.

"Obiter dicta" is the legal principle of a case which forms the binding precedent

"Ratio decidendi" are the things stated in a judgment which are not necessary for the decision.