Check In Quiz (Argument And Reading)

Reviewed by Editorial Team
The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Delwoodz
D
Delwoodz
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 2 | Total Attempts: 2,005
| Attempts: 249
SettingsSettings
Please wait...
  • 1/18 Questions

    What are the central goals of written argumentation? 

    • To confuse the reader, to argue without using logic, to win the debate at all cost
    • To attempt to convince a reader to agree with a particular point of view, to make a particular decision, or to pursue a particular course of action
    • To inform the reader of a current problem in their community
    • To divide and classify issues so the reader can understand better what course of action they might take
Please wait...
About This Quiz

A quiz to go over general information on Chapter 21 of Models on Argumentation

Argumentation Quizzes & Trivia

Quiz Preview

  • 2. 

    Usually a persuasive essay does not have a thesis. 

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. False
    Explanation
    A persuasive essay does have a thesis. A thesis is a clear and concise statement that presents the main argument or point of view of the essay. In a persuasive essay, the thesis is essential as it guides the writer in presenting and supporting their argument throughout the essay. Without a thesis, the essay lacks focus and direction, making it less persuasive and effective in convincing the reader of the writer's viewpoint. Therefore, the statement that a persuasive essay does not have a thesis is incorrect.

    Rate this question:

  • 3. 

    "All women are mortal. Jeanne is a woman. Jeanne is mortal." This statement is an example of a syllogism.  

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    This statement is an example of a syllogism because it consists of two premises (All women are mortal, Jeanne is a woman) and a conclusion (Jeanne is mortal). A syllogism is a logical argument that follows a specific structure, where the conclusion is inferred from the two premises. In this case, the conclusion logically follows from the given premises, making the statement true.

    Rate this question:

  • 4. 

    Inductive Reasoning is the most common type of reasoning.

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    Inductive reasoning is the most common type of reasoning because it involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or patterns. It is widely used in scientific research, problem-solving, and everyday life. Inductive reasoning allows us to make predictions and form hypotheses about future events or situations based on past experiences or evidence. This type of reasoning is essential for making informed decisions and understanding the world around us.

    Rate this question:

  • 5. 

    Which type of writing below would be a place where you would most likely NOT see logical appeals being used. 

    • Scientific of philosophical writing

    • Legal decisions

    • A magazine advertisement

    • Technical proposals

    Correct Answer
    A. A magazine advertisement
    Explanation
    Logical appeals are typically used in scientific, philosophical, legal, and technical writing to present reasoned arguments and evidence. However, in a magazine advertisement, the primary goal is to persuade and attract consumers rather than presenting logical arguments. Advertisements often rely on emotional appeals, catchy slogans, and visual imagery to grab the attention of the audience and promote a product or service. Therefore, a magazine advertisement is a place where logical appeals are least likely to be used.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    The statements: "If we can put a man on the moon, we should be able to care the common cold" and "My job sucks, it is basically slavery," are examples of what?  

    • Whining

    • Logos

    • Pathos

    • False analogy

    Correct Answer
    A. False analogy
    Explanation
    The given statements are examples of a false analogy. A false analogy occurs when two things are compared that are not truly comparable. In this case, comparing the ability to put a man on the moon with finding a cure for the common cold is an illogical comparison. The two situations are not similar enough to make a valid analogy. Similarly, comparing a job that is disliked to slavery is also an inappropriate analogy as it diminishes the severity and historical significance of slavery.

    Rate this question:

  • 7. 

    A Thesis can be placed anywhere in an argument. 

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    A thesis can be placed anywhere in an argument because it is the main point or central idea that the argument revolves around. It can be presented at the beginning of the argument to provide a clear focus and guide the reader, or it can be placed later in the argument to build up to a strong conclusion. The placement of the thesis depends on the writer's preference and the effectiveness of the argument structure.

    Rate this question:

  • 8. 

    Which below represents the structure of a syllogism? 

    • Conclusion, Minor Premise, Major Premise.

    • Ethos, Logos, Pathos

    • Introduction, thesis, body, conclusion

    • Major Premise, Minor Premise, Conclusion

    Correct Answer
    A. Major Premise, Minor Premise, Conclusion
    Explanation
    A syllogism is a logical argument that consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion. The major premise is a general statement or principle, the minor premise is a specific statement or example that relates to the major premise, and the conclusion is the logical result or inference drawn from the premises. This structure allows for deductive reasoning, where the conclusion follows logically from the premises. Therefore, the correct answer is "Major Premise, Minor Premise, Conclusion."

    Rate this question:

  • 9. 

    What are the two categories of argumenatation that most people who study argument identify? 

    • Informative and Defining

    • Analogy and narrative

    • Persuasion and Logic

    • Ethos, Pathos, Logos

    Correct Answer
    A. Persuasion and Logic
    Explanation
    Persuasion and Logic are the two categories of argumentation that most people who study argument identify. Persuasion involves using emotional appeals, credibility, and personal beliefs to convince others of a particular viewpoint. Logic, on the other hand, relies on reasoning, evidence, and logical consistency to support a claim. These two categories represent different approaches to constructing and presenting arguments, with persuasion appealing to emotions and beliefs, and logic appealing to reason and evidence.

    Rate this question:

  • 10. 

    The term rhetoric can best be described as...

    • A question that does not have an answer

    • The art of persuasion, including all the strategies that a writer uses to make his/her argument

    • The ability to write clearly and effectively on a topic that the writer knows little about

    • A complex process of analysis that involves deductive reasoning

    Correct Answer
    A. The art of persuasion, including all the strategies that a writer uses to make his/her argument
    Explanation
    The term rhetoric refers to the art of persuasion and encompasses all the strategies that a writer employs to effectively present their argument. It involves using language and communication techniques to influence and convince an audience. Rhetoric is not simply about writing clearly and effectively on a topic, but rather about using persuasive tactics to sway opinions and win over others. It is a skillful process that requires understanding the audience, crafting compelling arguments, and employing various rhetorical devices to make a persuasive case.

    Rate this question:

  • 11. 

    A type of Deductive Reasoning that uses a three-part model consisting of two premises and a conclusion is called...

    • A fallacy

    • An inductive leap

    • A syllogism

    • Ethos, Logos, Pathos

    Correct Answer
    A. A syllogism
    Explanation
    A syllogism is a type of deductive reasoning that uses a three-part model consisting of two premises and a conclusion. In a syllogism, the premises are statements or propositions that are assumed to be true, and the conclusion is logically derived from the premises using deductive logic. This type of reasoning helps to establish logical connections between ideas and allows for the evaluation of arguments based on their validity and soundness. Therefore, the correct answer for this question is a syllogism.

    Rate this question:

  • 12. 

    The strongest and most effective arguments are made up of purely logical appeals .

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. False
    Explanation
    The statement that the strongest and most effective arguments are made up of purely logical appeals is false. While logical appeals are important in constructing a strong argument, effective arguments also rely on other elements such as emotional appeals, credibility, and evidence. By incorporating these additional components, an argument can be more persuasive and resonate with the audience on a deeper level. Therefore, a purely logical appeal may not always be the strongest or most effective approach.

    Rate this question:

  • 13. 

    Which statement below is most likely a type of Inductive Reasoning? 

    • Every time you eat peanuts, your throat swells up and you can't breath. So, you are allergic to peanuts.

    • All of the girls in the class were blond, therefore all girls in this neighborhood are blond.

    • All cats that you have observed purr. Therefore, every cat must purr.

    • All of the above

    Correct Answer
    A. All of the above
    Explanation
    All of the statements provided in the options are examples of inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. In each of the given statements, a general conclusion is drawn based on specific instances or observations. In the first statement, the conclusion that the person is allergic to peanuts is based on the specific observation that their throat swells up and they can't breathe every time they eat peanuts. In the second statement, the conclusion that all girls in the neighborhood are blond is based on the specific observation that all the girls in the class are blond. In the third statement, the conclusion that every cat must purr is based on the specific observation that all the cats observed have purred. Therefore, all of the given options demonstrate inductive reasoning.

    Rate this question:

  • 14. 

    Two basic patterns of thinking and presenting our thought in argumentation are? 

    • Induction and deduction

    • Cause and effect

    • Ethos and logos

    • Argumentation and persuasion

    Correct Answer
    A. Induction and deduction
    Explanation
    The correct answer is induction and deduction. Induction refers to the process of reasoning from specific instances to general principles or conclusions, while deduction involves reasoning from general principles or premises to specific conclusions. These two patterns of thinking and presenting our thoughts in argumentation are fundamental in logic and critical thinking, allowing us to make logical and well-supported arguments based on evidence and reasoning.

    Rate this question:

  • 15. 

    In an Inductive leap, the writer...

    • Switches verb tense to confuse the reader

    • Time travels, similar to a Quantum Leap

    • Makes a leap from the observable evidence to a generalized claim

    • Makes a leap from a general statement to a specific conclusion

    Correct Answer
    A. Makes a leap from the observable evidence to a generalized claim
    Explanation
    In an inductive leap, the writer moves from specific observable evidence to a more general claim. This means that the writer is making a logical jump based on the evidence they have observed, and drawing a broader conclusion or generalization from it. This can be seen as a way of reasoning from specific instances to a more general pattern or principle. The other options, such as switching verb tense or time traveling, do not accurately describe the concept of an inductive leap.

    Rate this question:

  • 16. 

    Ethos is an appeal to what? 

    • Emotions

    • Logic

    • Credibility and character

    • Linear reasoning

    Correct Answer
    A. Credibility and character
    Explanation
    Ethos is an appeal to credibility and character. It is a persuasive technique that relies on the speaker's reputation, expertise, and trustworthiness to convince the audience. By establishing themselves as knowledgeable and trustworthy, speakers can gain the audience's confidence and persuade them to accept their arguments or beliefs. Emotions, logic, and linear reasoning are not specifically related to ethos, although they can be used in conjunction with ethos to strengthen an argument.

    Rate this question:

  • 17. 

    Persuasive appeals are directed at reader's sense of logical reasoning. 

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. False
    Explanation
    Persuasive appeals are not directed at the reader's sense of logical reasoning. Instead, they are aimed at appealing to the reader's emotions, values, or beliefs in order to influence their thoughts or actions. Logical reasoning is more commonly associated with informative or argumentative appeals, where evidence and logical arguments are used to persuade the reader. Therefore, the statement that persuasive appeals are directed at the reader's sense of logical reasoning is false.

    Rate this question:

  • 18. 

    Deductive Reasoning   moves from a set of specific examples to a general statement.

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. False
    Explanation
    Deductive reasoning actually moves from a general statement to specific examples. It starts with a general premise or theory and then applies it to specific situations to draw conclusions. This process involves making logical inferences based on the given information. Therefore, the correct answer is false.

    Rate this question:

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 14, 2023 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Mar 14, 2023
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Apr 05, 2017
    Quiz Created by
    Delwoodz
Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.