An Argument? Or Not An Argument?

Approved & Edited by ProProfs Editorial Team

At ProProfs Quizzes, our dedicated in-house team of experts takes pride in their work. With a sharp eye for detail, they meticulously review each quiz. This ensures that every quiz, taken by over 100 million users, meets our standards of accuracy, clarity, and engagement.

Learn about Our Editorial Process

| Written by Bhsdebateclub

Bhsdebateclub

Community Contributor

Quizzes Created: 1 | Total Attempts: 2,667

Questions: 12 | Attempts: 2,685 | Updated: Mar 21, 2023

Questions

Settings

Create your own Quiz

Read each statement, and then select A. If the statement is An Argument or B. If the
statement is Not An Argument.

An Argument is defined as a controversial statement, frequently called a claim, supported by evidence and a warrant. The standards of a logically good argument include acceptability, relevance, and sufficiency. Definition from www. Idebate. Org

Questions and Answers

1.

People should ride bicycles more, because air pollution is really a problem in the city.
- A.
  
  An Argument.
- B.
  
  Not An Argument.
Correct Answer
A. An Argument.

Explanation
This statement can be classified as an argument because it presents a claim or opinion (people should ride bicycles more) and provides a reason to support it (air pollution is really a problem in the city). The statement is trying to persuade or convince the reader that riding bicycles can help address the issue of air pollution in the city.

Rate this question:

4
0
2.

Survival is the most important and most highly respected human value.
- A.
  
  An Argument.
- B.
  
  Not An Argument.
Correct Answer
B. Not An Argument.

Explanation
This statement is not an argument because it does not present any reasons or evidence to support the claim that survival is the most important and highly respected human value. It simply states a belief without providing any logical or persuasive reasoning.

Rate this question:

2
0
3.

Our awareness of environmental problems is increasing. Already we have reduced the emission of chemicals that destroy the ozone and have banned many pesticides.
- A.
  
  An Argument.
- B.
  
  Not An Argument.
Correct Answer
A. An Argument.

Explanation
The passage presents a statement followed by evidence to support it. It states that our awareness of environmental problems is increasing and then provides examples of actions taken to address these problems, such as reducing ozone-depleting chemicals and banning pesticides. This structure suggests that the passage is presenting an argument, as it is making a claim and providing evidence to support it.

Rate this question:

4
0
4.

My opponent argues that acid rain is destroying the environment, but that is an inaccurate, incomplete, and irrelevant argument.
- A.
  
  An Argument.
- B.
  
  Not An Argument.
Correct Answer
B. Not An Argument.

Explanation
The given statement does not present any logical reasoning or evidence to support the claim that acid rain is not destroying the environment. It simply dismisses the opponent's argument as inaccurate, incomplete, and irrelevant without providing any counterpoints or supporting information. Therefore, it can be concluded that the statement is not an argument.

Rate this question:

2
0
5.

Species loss is at a crisis level. Harvard Biologist Edward Wilson estimates that nearly 140 species are lost every day.
- A.
  
  An Argument
- B.
  
  Not an Argument
Correct Answer
A. An Argument

Explanation
This is an argument because it presents a claim or assertion that species loss is at a crisis level and supports it with evidence from Harvard Biologist Edward Wilson, who estimates that nearly 140 species are lost every day. The statement is trying to persuade or convince the reader of the urgency and seriousness of the issue.

Rate this question:

3
0
6.

The most important action for any of us to take is to protect the environment. Please, take whatever action you can.
- A.
  
  An Argument.
- B.
  
  Not an Argument.
Correct Answer
B. Not an Argument.

Explanation
This statement is not an argument because it does not provide any reasons or evidence to support the claim that protecting the environment is the most important action for any of us to take. It is simply a statement urging individuals to take action without presenting any logical reasoning or persuasive elements.

Rate this question:

1
0
7.

Since all pollution laws have economic consequences, we need to look at this law’s effect on the economy.
- A.
  
  An Argument.
- B.
  
  Not An Argument.
Correct Answer
A. An Argument.

Explanation
The given statement presents a clear argument by stating that because all pollution laws have economic consequences, it is necessary to examine the impact of this specific law on the economy. The statement presents a logical connection between the two factors and implies that understanding the economic effects is crucial in evaluating the law.

Rate this question:

3
0
8.

When a species loses its natural habitat, it is nearly impossible to prevent it from going extinct. There are only a few thousand Giant Panda, for instance, now that their habitat is taken over by development.
- A.
  
  An Argument.
- B.
  
  Not An Argument.
Correct Answer
A. An Argument.

Explanation
The passage presents a clear argument by stating that when a species loses its natural habitat, it becomes nearly impossible to prevent it from going extinct. It supports this claim by providing an example of the Giant Panda, whose population has dwindled due to the loss of their habitat to development. The passage presents a cause-and-effect relationship, highlighting the negative consequences of habitat loss on species survival. Therefore, the correct answer is "An Argument."

Rate this question:

3
0
9.

How can we wait, even a single day, to take action to protect the environment?
- A.
  
  An Argument.
- B.
  
  Not An Argument.
Correct Answer
B. Not An Argument.

Explanation
The given statement does not present any argument or provide any reasons to support a particular viewpoint. It is a rhetorical question that emphasizes the urgency of taking action to protect the environment. It does not present any opposing viewpoints or provide any evidence or logical reasoning. Therefore, it can be categorized as "Not An Argument."

Rate this question:

3
0
10.

The move to a more ecological society will require big changes. The industrial revolution brought with it changes in government, family, and the economy. In the same way, the move to an ecological society will likewise require a fundamental change in our way of living.
- A.
  
  An Argument.
- B.
  
  Not An Argument.
Correct Answer
A. An Argument.

Explanation
The passage presents a clear argument by stating that the move to a more ecological society will require big changes, just like the industrial revolution brought significant changes in government, family, and the economy. It suggests that a fundamental change in our way of living is necessary for the transition to an ecological society. The passage presents a logical connection between the two ideas, making it an argument rather than a simple statement or observation.

Rate this question:

1
0
11.

The affirmative argues that global warming will destroy the world, but they don’t prove that because they present no evidence that global warming is happening in the first place.
- A.
  
  An Argument.
- B.
  
  Not An Argument.
Correct Answer
A. An Argument.

Explanation
The given answer is "An Argument" because it states that the affirmative side is arguing that global warming will destroy the world. This implies that there is a claim being made and a reason being provided to support it. The argument is then countered by stating that the affirmative side fails to prove that global warming is happening, suggesting that the evidence presented is insufficient.

Rate this question:

2
0
12.

The affirmative says that carbon dioxide is harmful to the environment. That is false.
- A.
  
  An Argument.
- B.
  
  Not An Argument.
Correct Answer
A. An Argument.

Explanation
The given statement is an argument because it presents a claim (carbon dioxide is harmful to the environment) and provides a reason to support that claim (the affirmative says so). It is important to note that the statement is being evaluated for its validity, not its truthfulness.

Rate this question:

2
1

An Argument? Or Not An Argument?

People should ride bicycles more, because air pollution is really a problem in the city.

Survival is the most important and most highly respected human value.

Our awareness of environmental problems is increasing. Already we have reduced the emission of chemicals that destroy the ozone and have banned many pesticides.

My opponent argues that acid rain is destroying the environment, but that is an inaccurate, incomplete, and irrelevant argument.

Species loss is at a crisis level. Harvard Biologist Edward Wilson estimates that nearly 140 species are lost every day.

The most important action for any of us to take is to protect the environment. Please, take whatever action you can.

Since all pollution laws have economic consequences, we need to look at this law’s effect on the economy.

When a species loses its natural habitat, it is nearly impossible to prevent it from going extinct. There are only a few thousand Giant Panda, for instance, now that their habitat is taken over by development.

How can we wait, even a single day, to take action to protect the environment?

The move to a more ecological society will require big changes. The industrial revolution brought with it changes in government, family, and the economy. In the same way, the move to an ecological society will likewise require a fundamental change in our way of living.

The affirmative argues that global warming will destroy the world, but they don’t prove that because they present no evidence that global warming is happening in the first place.

The affirmative says that carbon dioxide is harmful to the environment. That is false.