Parts Of An Argument

Premises are statements or evidence that support or provide reasons to believe a conclusion. In other words, they are the foundation or basis for accepting a conclusion as true or valid. Therefore, it is correct to say that premises are reasons to believe the conclusion.

The conclusion in the given argument is "I was lucky to find one." This is because the statement "They are rare items" is a premise that supports the conclusion. The speaker states that they were lucky to find one, implying that finding one of these rare items is a fortunate occurrence. Therefore, the conclusion is that the speaker was lucky to find one.

The premise in the given argument is "All cats are mammals". This statement provides the initial information or evidence on which the argument is based. It establishes the fact that every cat belongs to the category of mammals. The conclusion of the argument, "therefore, some cats are mammals", is derived from this premise. It suggests that since all cats are mammals, it is logical to conclude that at least some cats fall under the category of mammals.

The conclusion in the given argument is "You shouldn't have bought that car." This is because it is the main point or final judgment being made based on the reason provided, which is "It's too expensive." The conclusion is a statement that follows from the evidence or reasons given, and in this case, it suggests that the decision to buy the car was a mistake due to its high cost.

The conclusion in the given argument is "Death penalty should be illegal." This is because the statement directly states that the death penalty should not be allowed. The second statement, "Murder is always wrong," supports this conclusion by providing a moral standpoint that killing is always morally unacceptable. However, it does not explicitly state that the death penalty should be illegal. Therefore, the first statement is the main conclusion of the argument.

The correct answer is False. Arguments do not always have explicit premises. While premises are typically stated explicitly to support a conclusion, there are cases where the premises are implied or left unstated. These implicit premises can be inferred from the context or background knowledge. Therefore, arguments can have both explicit and implicit premises.

The given statement is a definition or description of a mammal, rather than an argument. It does not present any claims or reasoning to support a conclusion.

A logical argument is a set of claims offered as reasons to accept another claim. This means that when presenting a logical argument, one provides a series of statements or propositions that are intended to support or justify a particular conclusion. These claims are logically connected and aim to convince the audience that the conclusion is valid based on the provided reasons. In other words, a logical argument is a structured and coherent presentation of evidence and reasoning to persuade others of the validity of a claim.

The common notion of an argument is a disagreement because when people argue, they express differing opinions or points of view on a particular topic. In an argument, individuals present their claims or assertions, supporting them with evidence or reasoning, in order to persuade others to accept their viewpoint. Therefore, the concept of an argument is closely associated with disagreements and conflicting perspectives rather than being a set of claims or none of the above.

An argument does not necessarily need to offer reasons in order to be true. An argument can be true if it presents valid evidence or logical reasoning that supports its conclusion, even if it does not explicitly state the reasons. Therefore, the statement "For an argument to be true, it needs to offer reasons" is false.