Week 9- Overview of the Criminal Justice Process

Question 1 / 6

🏆 Rank #-- ▾

Score 0/100

About This Quiz

Explore key stages of the U. S. Criminal justice process in 'Week 9- Overview of the Criminal Justice Process' quiz. Assess your understanding of pre-trial, trial, and post-trial procedures, and landmark Supreme Court decisions affecting plea bargains and jury convictions.

2. What first name or nickname would you like us to use?

You may optionally provide this to label your report, leaderboard, or certificate.

2. The procedure after trial in order are:

Imposition of sentence

Appeal

Habeas Corpus

After a trial, the first step is the imposition of a sentence, which is the act of determining and announcing the punishment for the convicted individual. Once the sentence has been imposed, the convicted person has the right to appeal the decision. Appeal is the process of requesting a higher court to review and potentially overturn the trial court's decision. Finally, Habeas Corpus is a legal action that allows a person who is imprisoned to challenge the legality of their detention, typically on the grounds of unlawful arrest or violation of their constitutional rights.

Explanation

Submit

4. In the U.S. Supreme Court case, v. __, the court held that the defendant has the right to have the plea bargain enforced if the plea was a result of the plea bargain.

Batson v. Kentucky

Wilson v. Arkansas

Santobello v. New York

Payton v. New York

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, Santobello v. New York, the court held that the defendant has the right to have the plea bargain enforced if the plea was a result of the plea bargain.

Explanation

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, Santobello v. New York, the court held that the defendant has the right to have the plea bargain enforced if the plea was a result of the plea bargain.

5. In the U.S. Supreme Court case, _ v. __, the court held that convictions by less than unanimous juries by state courts were allowed when the vote was 10-2.

Tennessee v. Garner

Apodoca v. Oregon

Illinois v. Gates

Brady v. Maryland

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, Apodoca v. Oregon, the court held that convictions by less than unanimous juries by state courts were allowed when the vote was 10-2.

Explanation

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, Apodoca v. Oregon, the court held that convictions by less than unanimous juries by state courts were allowed when the vote was 10-2.

Thank you for your feedback!

Week 9- Overview Of The Criminal Justice Process

1. The procedures during trial in order are:

2.

What first name or nickname would you like us to use?

2. The procedure after trial in order are:

3. The procedures before trial in order are:

4. In the U.S. Supreme Court case, v. __, the court held that the defendant has the right to have the plea bargain enforced if the plea was a result of the plea bargain.

5. In the U.S. Supreme Court case, _ v. __, the court held that convictions by less than unanimous juries by state courts were allowed when the vote was 10-2.

Week 9- Overview Of The Criminal Justice Process

1. The procedures during trial in order are:

2.

What first name or nickname would you like us to use?

2. The procedure after trial in order are:

3. The procedures before trial in order are:

4. In the U.S. Supreme Court case, ____________ v. ______________, the court held that the defendant has the right to have the plea bargain enforced if the plea was a result of the plea bargain.

5. In the U.S. Supreme Court case, ___________ v. ____________, the court held that convictions by less than unanimous juries by state courts were allowed when the vote was 10-2.

4. In the U.S. Supreme Court case, v. __, the court held that the defendant has the right to have the plea bargain enforced if the plea was a result of the plea bargain.

5. In the U.S. Supreme Court case, _ v. __, the court held that convictions by less than unanimous juries by state courts were allowed when the vote was 10-2.