Week 9- Overview Of The Criminal Justice Process

Reviewed by Editorial Team

The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.

Learn about Our Editorial Process

| By William Howel

William Howel

Community Contributor

Quizzes Created: 10 | Total Attempts: 1,514

| Attempts: 134

Quiz Flashcard

Feedback

During the Quiz End of Quiz

Difficulty

Sequential Easy First Hard First

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Whatsapp Share on Pinterest Share on Email Copy to Clipboard Embed on your website

1/5 Questions

The procedures before trial in order are:
- Filing of complaint
- The Arrest
- Booking at the police station
- Initial appearance before a magistrate
- Setting bail
- The preliminary hearing
- The decision to charge
- Indictment Versus an Information
- The Arraignment
- The Plea by the defendant
- Plea Bargains

About This Quiz

Explore key stages of the U. S. Criminal justice process in 'Week 9- Overview of the Criminal Justice Process' quiz. Assess your understanding of pre-trial, trial, and post-trial procedures, and landmark Supreme Court decisions affecting plea bargains and jury convictions.

2.

The procedures during trial in order are:
- The selection of Jurors
- Opening statements by the prosecution
- Opening statement by the Defense
- Presentation for the Prosecution
- Presentation for the Defense
- Rebuttal Evidence
- Closing Arguments
- Defense motions before the verdict
- Instructions to the jury
- Jury Deliberation
- The verdict
Correct Answer(s)

A. The selection of Jurors
A. Opening statements by the prosecution
A. Opening statement by the Defense
A. Presentation for the Prosecution
A. Presentation for the Defense
A. Rebuttal Evidence
A. Closing Arguments
A. Defense motions before the verdict
A. Instructions to the jury
A. Jury Deliberation
A. The verdict

Explanation

The correct answer provides the correct order of procedures during a trial. The selection of jurors is the first step, followed by opening statements by the prosecution and defense. Then, presentations are made by both the prosecution and defense, followed by any rebuttal evidence. Closing arguments are presented, followed by any defense motions before the verdict. Instructions are then given to the jury, who then deliberate before reaching a verdict.

Rate this question:
3.

The procedure after trial in order are:
- Imposition of sentence
- Appeal
- Habeas Corpus
Correct Answer(s)

A. Imposition of sentence
A. Appeal
A. Habeas Corpus

Explanation

After a trial, the first step is the imposition of a sentence, which is the act of determining and announcing the punishment for the convicted individual. Once the sentence has been imposed, the convicted person has the right to appeal the decision. Appeal is the process of requesting a higher court to review and potentially overturn the trial court's decision. Finally, Habeas Corpus is a legal action that allows a person who is imprisoned to challenge the legality of their detention, typically on the grounds of unlawful arrest or violation of their constitutional rights.

Rate this question:
4.

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, ____________ v. ______________, the court held that the defendant has the right to have the plea bargain enforced if the plea was a result of the plea bargain.
- Batson v. Kentucky
- Wilson v. Arkansas
- Santobello v. New York
- Payton v. New York
Correct Answer

A. Santobello v. New York

Explanation

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, Santobello v. New York, the court held that the defendant has the right to have the plea bargain enforced if the plea was a result of the plea bargain.

Rate this question:
5.

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, ___________ v. ____________, the court held that convictions by less than unanimous juries by state courts were allowed when the vote was 10-2.
- Tennessee v. Garner
- Apodoca v. Oregon
- Illinois v. Gates
- Brady v. Maryland
Correct Answer

A. Apodoca v. Oregon

Explanation

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, Apodoca v. Oregon, the court held that convictions by less than unanimous juries by state courts were allowed when the vote was 10-2.

Rate this question:

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): May 8, 2024 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

Current Version
May 08, 2024

Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team
Mar 07, 2017

Quiz Created by
William Howel

Week 9- Overview Of The Criminal Justice Process

The procedures before trial in order are:

Quiz Preview

The procedures during trial in order are:

The procedure after trial in order are:

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, v. __, the court held that the defendant has the right to have the plea bargain enforced if the plea was a result of the plea bargain.

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, _ v. __, the court held that convictions by less than unanimous juries by state courts were allowed when the vote was 10-2.

Week 9- Overview Of The Criminal Justice Process

The procedures before trial in order are:

Quiz Preview

The procedures during trial in order are:

The procedure after trial in order are:

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, ____________ v. ______________, the court held that the defendant has the right to have the plea bargain enforced if the plea was a result of the plea bargain.

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, ___________ v. ____________, the court held that convictions by less than unanimous juries by state courts were allowed when the vote was 10-2.

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, v. __, the court held that the defendant has the right to have the plea bargain enforced if the plea was a result of the plea bargain.

In the U.S. Supreme Court case, _ v. __, the court held that convictions by less than unanimous juries by state courts were allowed when the vote was 10-2.