US History Unit 4 Test
-
How many more German immigrants arrived in the United States in 1850 than arrived in 1840?
-
Approximately 90,000
-
Approximately 25,000
-
Approximately 50,000
-
Approximately 100,000
-
.png "US History Unit 4 Test - Quiz")
Directions: Choose the letter of the best answer.
DC Standards: 8.1, 8.1. ES. E, 8.1. PS. C, 8.1. ES. F, 8.4, 8.6. ES. A, 8.5. ES. B
Quiz Preview
- 2.
How would you describe the overall pattern of Irish immigration?
-
Both the number and the percentage decreased from 1840 to 1850
-
The number increased sharply but the percentage declined more
-
The number decreased sharply but the percentage increased
-
Both the number and the percentage increased from 1840 to 1850
Correct Answer
A. The number increased sharply but the percentage declined moreExplanation
The overall pattern of Irish immigration from 1840 to 1850 shows that the number of immigrants increased significantly during this period. However, the percentage of Irish immigrants, in relation to the total population, declined. This suggests that while there was a larger number of Irish immigrants, the overall population also grew during this time, causing the percentage of Irish immigrants to decrease.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
Which source provided a lower percentage of immigrants in 1850 than in 1840?
-
Ireland
-
Other Europeans
-
Germany
-
Ireland, Germany and other Europeans
Correct Answer
A. Ireland, Germany and other EuropeansExplanation
The correct answer is Ireland, Germany, and other Europeans. This answer suggests that the percentage of immigrants from Ireland, Germany, and other European countries in 1850 was lower than in 1840. This implies that there was a decrease in immigration from these regions during that time period.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
What conclusion can you draw about non-European immigration?
-
It did not occur in 1840
-
It was a major portion of immigration in 1850
-
It decreased between 1840 and 1850
-
It increased between 1840 and 1850
Correct Answer
A. It increased between 1840 and 1850Explanation
The conclusion that can be drawn about non-European immigration is that it increased between 1840 and 1850. This is based on the given information that non-European immigration did not occur in 1840 and that it was a major portion of immigration in 1850. Therefore, it can be inferred that there was an increase in non-European immigration during this time period.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
Why might it be said that British immigration grew more than Irish immigration between 1840 and 1850?
-
The percentage of Irish immigration declined
-
The number of British immigrants increased more than the number of Irish
-
The number of Irish immigrants decreased from 1840 to 1850
-
British immigration did not grow more than Irish immigration between 1840 to 1850
Correct Answer
A. The number of British immigrants increased more than the number of IrishExplanation
The correct answer is that the number of British immigrants increased more than the number of Irish. This means that there was a larger growth in the number of British immigrants compared to Irish immigrants during the given time period.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
Judging from the action listed on this time line, which of the following best describes the attitude of President Polk?
-
He was an opponent of manifest destiny
-
He did not concern himself with events in the Southwest
-
He was a supporter of manifest destiny
-
He sought friendly relations with Mexico at any cost
Correct Answer
A. He was a supporter of manifest destinyExplanation
The correct answer is "he was a supporter of manifest destiny." This can be inferred from the actions listed on the timeline, which would suggest that President Polk was actively involved in events related to manifest destiny, rather than being an opponent or not concerned with them.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
Why was General Scott's invasion along Mexico's eastern coast so important?
-
General Taylor's forces needed to rest
-
U.S. forces had already won the land along the Pacific Ocean
-
The U.S. navy now equaled the British navy
-
It attacked southern Mexico, not far from Mexico City
Correct Answer
A. It attacked southern Mexico, not far from Mexico CityExplanation
General Scott's invasion along Mexico's eastern coast was important because it attacked southern Mexico, which was not far from Mexico City. Mexico City was the capital and political center of Mexico, and capturing it would have a significant impact on the outcome of the war. By attacking from the east, General Scott's forces could directly threaten Mexico City and potentially force the Mexican government to surrender. This strategic move put pressure on the Mexican forces and increased the chances of a successful American invasion.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
About how much time passed between Genearl Taylor's troops marched across the Rio Grande and his victory at Buena Vista?
-
About 6 weeks
-
About one year
-
About 10 months
-
Less than 3 weeks
Correct Answer
A. About 10 monthsExplanation
The correct answer is about 10 months. This suggests that there was a significant amount of time that passed between General Taylor's troops marching across the Rio Grande and his victory at Buena Vista. This implies that there may have been various events, battles, or campaigns that took place during this period, which ultimately led to General Taylor's victory after almost a year.Rate this question:
-
- 9.
Which military leader played the key role in winning Mexico's surrender?
-
Genearl Stephen Kearny
-
General Winfield Scott
-
General Zachary Taylor
-
Generals Kearny, Scott & Taylor
Correct Answer
A. General Winfield ScottExplanation
General Winfield Scott played a key role in winning Mexico's surrender. He led the successful campaign known as the "Scott's Anaconda Plan" during the Mexican-American War. Scott devised a strategy to cut off Mexican supply lines and capture key cities, including Mexico City. His troops faced numerous challenges and fought several battles, but ultimately, Scott's leadership and tactical skills led to the surrender of Mexico.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
What event led to the initial clash between Mexican and U.S. troops?
-
General Kearny invaded New Mexico
-
Genearl Taylor wins the battle at Buena Vista
-
President Polk declared war on Mexico
-
Polk ordered U.S. troops into disputed territory
Correct Answer
A. Polk ordered U.S. troops into disputed territoryExplanation
President Polk ordering U.S. troops into disputed territory led to the initial clash between Mexican and U.S. troops. This action by Polk escalated tensions between the two countries and ultimately sparked the Mexican-American War. The disputed territory in question was the area between the Nueces River and the Rio Grande, which both Mexico and the U.S. claimed as their own. Polk's decision to send troops into this territory was seen as a provocation by Mexico, leading to the clash between the two forces.Rate this question:
-
- 11.
How many more electoral votes did Jackson get than Adams?
-
103
-
95
-
85
-
261
Correct Answer
A. 95Explanation
Jackson received 95 more electoral votes than Adams.Rate this question:
-
- 12.
How many more popular votes did Jackson receive than Adams?
-
1,155,350
-
139,222
-
1,143,450
-
143,222
Correct Answer
A. 139,222Explanation
Jackson received 139,222 more popular votes than Adams.Rate this question:
-
- 13.
How many people voted in the election of 1828?
-
139,222
-
1,144,450
-
141,656
-
1,155,350
Correct Answer
A. 1,144,450Explanation
In the election of 1828, the correct answer is 1,144,450. This number represents the total number of people who voted during that election.Rate this question:
-
- 14.
Which two states had the largest number of electoral votes?
-
New York and Pennsylvania
-
Virginia and Pennsylvania
-
Virginia and New York
-
Virginia and West Virginia
Correct Answer
A. New York and PennsylvaniaExplanation
New York and Pennsylvania had the largest number of electoral votes because they are both populous states with a high number of representatives in the Electoral College. The Electoral College is composed of electors from each state, and the number of electors is determined by the state's representation in Congress. Since New York and Pennsylvania have a larger population, they have more representatives in Congress and therefore more electors in the Electoral College.Rate this question:
-
- 15.
In which of the states that splits its electoral votes between the two candidates was the vote most evenly divided?
-
Maine
-
Pennsylvania
-
Maryland
-
New York
Correct Answer
A. MarylandExplanation
The vote in Maryland was most evenly divided among the states that split their electoral votes between the two candidates.Rate this question:
-
- 16.
Why did J.Q. Adams have difficulty accomplishing his goals as president?
-
Adams died shortly after becoming president
-
Henry Clay, his vice-president, was too eager to compromise
-
He did not defend himself against attacks by Jackson
-
Jackson supporters dominated Congress
Correct Answer
A. Jackson supporters dominated CongressExplanation
Jackson supporters dominating Congress would have made it difficult for J.Q. Adams to accomplish his goals as president. Since Congress plays a crucial role in passing legislation and approving the president's agenda, having a majority of Jackson supporters would have hindered Adams' ability to get his policies and initiatives passed. This would have created a significant obstacle for Adams in achieving his goals and advancing his agenda during his presidency.Rate this question:
-
- 17.
What was the central principle of Jacksonian democracy?
-
Easing voting restrictions to include women
-
Practicing the spoils system and supporting industrialization
-
Spreading political power to common people
-
Using tariffs to increase federal revenues
Correct Answer
A. Spreading political power to common peopleExplanation
The central principle of Jacksonian democracy was spreading political power to common people. This means that the movement aimed to give the average citizen a greater voice and influence in the political process. Jacksonian democracy sought to dismantle the power held by elites and establish a more inclusive and participatory form of government. This principle was reflected in various reforms, such as expanding suffrage rights and advocating for the election of officials through popular vote.Rate this question:
-
- 18.
What changed Calhoun into a champion of states' rights?
-
The need to conform to Jackson's program as Jackson's vice-president
-
His concern for the well-being of the South
-
His humble beginnings and his lack of formal education
-
He married a woman from the North Dakota
Correct Answer
A. His concern for the well-being of the SouthExplanation
Calhoun became a champion of states' rights because he was concerned about the well-being of the South. This suggests that his motivation for supporting states' rights was rooted in his desire to protect the interests and autonomy of the southern states.Rate this question:
-
- 19.
What distinguished the Cherokee from other tribes?
-
Sequoya developed a written language
-
The Cherokee had their own constitution
-
Cherokee owned farms and ranches
-
All answer choices are correct
Correct Answer
A. All answer choices are correctExplanation
The Cherokee were distinguished from other tribes by multiple factors. Firstly, Sequoya's development of a written language set them apart, as it allowed for the preservation and communication of their culture and history. Additionally, the Cherokee had their own constitution, which demonstrated their advanced system of governance and self-rule. Furthermore, the ownership of farms and ranches showcased their agricultural and economic independence. All of these factors contributed to the uniqueness of the Cherokee tribe.Rate this question:
-
- 20.
After the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cherokees, Jackson said, "John Marshall has made his decision...Now let him enforce it." What did he mean?
-
That it was up to the Supreme Court to enforce its decisions
-
That it was not the president's job to enforce the rulings of the Court
-
That Jackson was upset that Marshall had made the Court's decision
-
That Jackson did not intend to carry out the Court's ruling
Correct Answer
A. That Jackson did not intend to carry out the Court's rulingExplanation
Jackson's statement, "John Marshall has made his decision...Now let him enforce it," suggests that he did not intend to carry out the Court's ruling. This implies that Jackson was not willing to enforce or support the Supreme Court's decision in favor of the Cherokees. It indicates his disregard for the authority of the Court and his unwillingness to comply with its decisions, highlighting his opposition to the Court's power and his determination to act according to his own agenda.Rate this question:
-
- 21.
Which was NOT a reason why Southerners objected to high tariffs?
-
Tariffs were used to pay for improvements in the Northeast
-
Southerners bought many products from Northeastern manufacturers
-
Southerners believed that tarrifs hurt them to help the Northeast
-
The South's economy depended on trade with Great Britain
Correct Answer
A. Southerners bought many products from Northeastern manufacturersExplanation
Southerners objected to high tariffs because they believed that tariffs hurt them to help the Northeast. They felt that the tariffs were designed to benefit the Northeast at the expense of the South. The fact that Southerners bought many products from Northeastern manufacturers is not a reason why they objected to high tariffs.Rate this question:
-
- 22.
Why would Jackson's Western background shape his dislike of the national bank?
-
As a Westerner, Jackson did not understand how banks worked
-
The national bank was owned by rich investors from the South
-
Westerners wanted easier credit to buy public land
-
Bank supporters were Democrats, but most Westerners were Whig
Correct Answer
A. Westerners wanted easier credit to buy public landExplanation
Jackson's Western background would shape his dislike of the national bank because Westerners wanted easier credit to buy public land. Jackson, being from the West, would have shared this sentiment and believed that the national bank was hindering their ability to obtain credit and purchase land. This would have fueled his opposition to the bank and influenced his decision to veto its recharter.Rate this question:
-
- 23.
Why did Northeasterners oppose Jackson's easy credit policies for land sales?
-
They feared Western crops would compete with Northeastern crops
-
They believed that the West and South would unite against the Northeast
-
They feared that their factory workers would move West to become farmers
-
They feared the national bank would create an inflationary situation
Correct Answer
A. They feared that their factory workers would move West to become farmersExplanation
Northeasterners opposed Jackson's easy credit policies for land sales because they feared that their factory workers would move West to become farmers. This would lead to a shortage of labor in the Northeast and potentially disrupt the region's industrial development. The Northeast relied heavily on its factories and manufacturing industries, and the migration of workers to the agricultural West would threaten their labor force and economic stability.Rate this question:
-
- 24.
How did some Native Americans resist the Removal Act?
-
They left and then returned
-
They challenged the law in the U.S. court system
-
They fought wars against the U.S. government
-
All the answer choices are correct
Correct Answer
A. All the answer choices are correctExplanation
The correct answer is that all the answer choices are correct. Some Native Americans resisted the Removal Act by leaving their lands and then returning, challenging the law in the U.S. court system, and even fighting wars against the U.S. government. These actions were all different forms of resistance against the forced removal of Native Americans from their ancestral lands.Rate this question:
-
- 25.
Why was Daniel Webster featured in newspapers across the country?
-
He was made an eloquent Senate speech attacking Jackson's removal policy
-
He developed the nation's first dictionary
-
He supported John Quincy Adams in the 1824 presidential election
-
He defended the federal government in a Senate debate over nullification
Correct Answer
A. He defended the federal government in a Senate debate over nullificationExplanation
Daniel Webster was featured in newspapers across the country because he defended the federal government in a Senate debate over nullification. This topic was of great importance at the time, as nullification was a controversial issue regarding the rights of states to reject federal laws. Webster's defense of the federal government likely garnered significant attention and sparked public interest, leading to his widespread coverage in newspapers across the country.Rate this question:
-
- 26.
How did the gold rush affect the population of California?
-
Miners deprived many Californios of their legal rights and their land
-
White miners forced nonwhites off their claims
-
Miners hunted down and killed many Native Americans
-
All the answer choices are correct
Correct Answer
A. All the answer choices are correctExplanation
The gold rush in California had a significant impact on the population. Miners deprived many Californios of their legal rights and their land, which led to a decrease in their population. Additionally, white miners forced nonwhites off their claims, resulting in a decrease in the nonwhite population. Furthermore, miners hunted down and killed many Native Americans, leading to a decrease in their population as well. Therefore, all the answer choices are correct in explaining how the gold rush affected the population of California.Rate this question:
-
- 27.
What complicated the process of California becoming a state?
-
African Americans helped Native Americans and the Californios
-
If California were a free state, the slave states would be outnumbered
-
Native Americans and Californios rebelled against the United States
-
There were not enough people to apply for statehood
Correct Answer
A. If California were a free state, the slave states would be outnumberedExplanation
The correct answer suggests that one factor that complicated the process of California becoming a state was the potential imbalance of power between free states and slave states. If California were admitted as a free state, it would tip the scales in favor of the free states, causing concern among the slave states about losing their influence and ability to protect their interests. This issue of maintaining a balance between free and slave states was a significant factor in the debates and negotiations surrounding California's admission to the Union.Rate this question:
-
- 28.
Which action provoked the Mexican War?
-
Mexicans refused to accept the U.S. offer of $10 million for Texas
-
Polk ordered Zachary Taylor to station troops on disputed land
-
All the answer choices are correct
-
U.S. troops ambushed a Mexican outpost near the Rio Grande
Correct Answer
A. Polk ordered Zachary Taylor to station troops on disputed landExplanation
Polk ordering Zachary Taylor to station troops on disputed land provoked the Mexican War. This action was seen as an aggressive move by Mexico, as they considered the land to be their own. The presence of U.S. troops in the disputed territory escalated tensions between the two countries and eventually led to armed conflict.Rate this question:
-
- 29.
What effect did the terms of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo NOT have?
-
The United States protected the Native Americans living in these areas
-
The Mexicans living in the United States became a minority
-
The Southwest became part of the United States
-
Texas became an independent republic
Correct Answer
A. The United States protected the Native Americans living in these areasExplanation
The terms of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo did not have the effect of protecting the Native Americans living in the areas affected by the treaty. The treaty primarily focused on the transfer of land from Mexico to the United States, resulting in the Southwest becoming part of the United States and Mexicans living in the United States becoming a minority. Additionally, the treaty did not have any direct impact on Texas becoming an independent republic.Rate this question:
-
- 30.
Which motive was common to most Americans who went west?
-
They wanted religious freedom
-
They wanted to improve their economic situation
-
They were escaping trouble in the East
-
They already had relatives in the West
Correct Answer
A. They wanted to improve their economic situationExplanation
Most Americans who went west were motivated by the desire to improve their economic situation. This can be inferred from the fact that many people migrated to the western frontier in search of new opportunities and a better life. The West offered the promise of fertile land, natural resources, and economic prospects such as gold mining, farming, and trade. Therefore, the economic motive was a common driving force for Americans to venture westward.Rate this question:
-
- 31.
Which best describes the relationship between Tejanos and Americans in Texas?
-
Tejanos taught Americans Spanish, and Americans taught them English
-
They agreed that Texas should be a self-governing Mexican state
-
Americans and Tejanos agreed to make peace with Native Americans
-
Tejanos supported the Americans' attitude toward Mexican laws
Correct Answer
A. They agreed that Texas should be a self-governing Mexican state -
- 32.
Which national issue was the reason some people opposed the War with Mexico?
-
The fear that the United States was growing too large to govern
-
The fear that slavery would spread into new territories
-
The fear that another war would bankrupt the national government
-
The fear that Spain would enter the war as Mexico's ally
Correct Answer
A. The fear that slavery would spread into new territoriesExplanation
Some people opposed the War with Mexico because they feared that slavery would spread into new territories. This fear stemmed from the ongoing debate over whether new states admitted to the Union would allow slavery or not. The expansion of the United States into new territories raised concerns among those who were against slavery, as they believed it would lead to the further expansion and perpetuation of the institution. This opposition to the war was rooted in the larger national issue of the expansion of slavery and its potential consequences.Rate this question:
-
- 33.
Which was NOT a reason why the admission of Texas as a state was delayed for nearly ten years after Texans gained their independence?
-
Most Texans did not want to become a part of the United States
-
Northerners did not want to upset the slave-nonslave balance in Congress
-
Americans feared that annexing Texas would lead to war with Mexico
-
Some Americans objected to the existence of slavery in Texas
Correct Answer
A. Most Texans did not want to become a part of the United StatesExplanation
Most Texans did not want to become a part of the United States is not a reason why the admission of Texas as a state was delayed for nearly ten years after Texans gained their independence. The delay was caused by other factors such as Northerners not wanting to upset the slave-nonslave balance in Congress, Americans fearing that annexing Texas would lead to war with Mexico, and some Americans objecting to the existence of slavery in Texas.Rate this question:
-
- 34.
What did Stephen Austin and Brigham Young have in common?
-
Both carried and founded new colonies in the West
-
Both were mountain men who traded in furs and exploded the West
-
Both were religious leaders who traveled west to flee persecution
-
Both were military heroes in the Western wars
Correct Answer
A. Both carried and founded new colonies in the WestExplanation
Stephen Austin and Brigham Young both carried and founded new colonies in the West. They were both instrumental in the establishment and development of settlements in the western regions of the United States. Austin is known for founding the first successful American settlement in Texas, while Young played a crucial role in leading the Mormon pioneers to settle in what is now Utah. Both individuals were influential in expanding American settlement and civilization in the western frontier.Rate this question:
-
- 35.
Which was true of mountain men?
-
Mountain men refused to share their knowledge with others
-
Mountain men eventually went into business with land speculators
-
Some mountain men were Native American
-
Their careers declined after men in the East started wearing silk hats
Correct Answer
A. Their careers declined after men in the East started wearing silk hatsExplanation
The careers of mountain men declined after men in the East started wearing silk hats. This suggests that the demand for beaver fur, which was used to make the hats, decreased. As mountain men relied on trapping and trading beaver fur for their livelihood, the decrease in demand would have had a negative impact on their careers.Rate this question:
-
- 36.
Which was NOT an example of a push factor in immigration?
-
Catholics who faced discrimination in Ireland came to the United States
-
Swedes setting on public land in the United States
-
German Jews religious persecution
-
German artisans put out of business by factory-made products
Correct Answer
A. Swedes setting on public land in the United StatesExplanation
The given answer, "Swedes setting on public land in the United States," is not an example of a push factor in immigration because it does not involve any negative or unfavorable conditions or circumstances that would compel individuals to leave their home country. Push factors typically include things like discrimination, religious persecution, or economic hardships, which are not present in the case of Swedes settling on public land in the United States.Rate this question:
-
- 37.
Why did immigrants from Ireland tend to settle in cities?
-
City life reminded them of Dublin
-
They found jobs in the port cities where they had arrived
-
Cities provided free education
-
All answer choices are correct
Correct Answer
A. They found jobs in the port cities where they had arrivedExplanation
The immigrants from Ireland tended to settle in cities because they found jobs in the port cities where they had arrived. Port cities offered employment opportunities, especially in industries such as shipping and trade, which attracted the immigrants. This allowed them to support themselves and their families, making cities a practical choice for settlement.Rate this question:
-
- 38.
Which principle did civil disobedience share with nullification?
-
Government cannot exceed its power
-
All of the answer choices are correct
-
The will of the majority rules
-
An unjust law can be resisted
Correct Answer
A. An unjust law can be resistedExplanation
Civil disobedience and nullification both share the principle that an unjust law can be resisted. Civil disobedience involves intentionally breaking a law to protest against its injustice, while nullification is the idea that states have the right to invalidate federal laws they deem unconstitutional. In both cases, individuals or states are challenging the authority of the government and asserting their right to resist laws they consider unjust or unconstitutional.Rate this question:
-
- 39.
Which of teh following was NOT tru of transcendentalism?
-
It was the basis for a form of protest called civil disobedience
-
It influenced U.S. painters to focus on nature
-
It followers believed that people could learn from nature
-
It taught that people could find the truth within themselves
Correct Answer
A. It influenced U.S. painters to focus on natureExplanation
Transcendentalism did not influence U.S. painters to focus on nature. Transcendentalism was a philosophical movement in the 19th century that emphasized the importance of self-reliance, individualism, and the connection between humans and nature. It believed that people could find truth and knowledge through their own intuition and direct experience with nature. While transcendentalism had a significant impact on literature, philosophy, and social activism, it did not directly influence U.S. painters to focus on nature. However, the movement did share similar ideals with the Hudson River School of painting, which did emphasize the beauty and spirituality of nature.Rate this question:
-
- 40.
Why did white Southerners NOT want slaves to learn to raed?
-
William Lloyd Garrison was criticized for his abolitionist newspaper
-
No colleges accepted African Americans
-
Reading was not a skill slaves would use
-
White Southerners feared that educated slaves would rebel
Correct Answer
A. White Southerners feared that educated slaves would rebelExplanation
White Southerners feared that educated slaves would rebel because education would empower slaves with knowledge and critical thinking skills, making them more aware of their rights and the injustices they faced. They believed that educated slaves would be more likely to question their enslavement and seek freedom, potentially leading to uprisings or rebellions. By keeping slaves illiterate and uneducated, white Southerners aimed to maintain control and prevent any challenges to the institution of slavery.Rate this question:
-
- 41.
Why did some Americans oppose immigration?
-
Immigrants refused to join the Know-Nothing party
-
Some Americans were prejudiced against immigrants
-
Immigrants refused to learn American ways
-
The Pope sent Catholics to the United States to overthrow democracy
Correct Answer
A. Some Americans were prejudiced against immigrantsExplanation
Some Americans opposed immigration because they held prejudiced views against immigrants. These individuals harbored negative attitudes and beliefs towards immigrants, which led to their opposition. This prejudice may have been based on factors such as cultural differences, economic concerns, or fear of competition for jobs and resources. These Americans likely held biased opinions about immigrants and believed that they posed a threat to American society and values.Rate this question:
-
- 42.
Why did Stanton and Mott organize the Seneca Falls Convention?
-
To form an all-female antislavery organization
-
Because male abolitionist were not doing enough to end slavery
-
To win for women the same rights as men
-
To win women's support for more public schools
Correct Answer
A. To win for women the same rights as menExplanation
Stanton and Mott organized the Seneca Falls Convention to win for women the same rights as men. This suggests that they believed women should have equal rights and opportunities as men, and they wanted to advocate for these rights through a convention. By organizing the convention, they aimed to bring attention to the issue and push for legal and social changes that would grant women the same rights and privileges enjoyed by men.Rate this question:
-
- 43.
Which was NOT true about the spread of information and knowledge in America in the mid-1800s?
-
Hundreds of new magazines appeared
-
Abolitionists published antislavery newspapers
-
Newspapers became more affordable for the average American
-
Public schools in the North taught reading to African Americans
Correct Answer
A. Public schools in the North taught reading to African AmericansExplanation
In the mid-1800s, public schools in the North did not teach reading to African Americans. This was due to widespread racial discrimination and segregation during that time period. African Americans faced limited access to education and were often denied the opportunity to learn how to read. Despite the efforts of abolitionists and the spread of knowledge through the rise of new magazines and affordable newspapers, formal education for African Americans was not widely available in the North during this period.Rate this question:
-
- 44.
How did the Industrial Revolution in Europe act as a push factor?
-
Machines increased productivity and salaries
-
Artisans that made expensive goods by hand were put out of work
-
All the answer choices are correct
-
It created many new jobs with better working conditions for laborers
Correct Answer
A. Artisans that made expensive goods by hand were put out of workExplanation
The Industrial Revolution in Europe acted as a push factor because artisans who made expensive goods by hand were put out of work. With the introduction of machines and mass production, the demand for handmade goods decreased, leading to unemployment for artisans who relied on their craftsmanship for a living. This shift in the economy forced them to find alternative sources of income and pushed them to seek new opportunities in other industries.Rate this question:
-
- 45.
What did women reformers achieve in the first half of the nineteenth century?
-
Suffrage
-
Abolition
-
Right to attend college
-
They were not able to achieve suffrage, abolition or the right to attend college
Correct Answer
A. They were not able to achieve suffrage, abolition or the right to attend collegeExplanation
Women reformers in the first half of the nineteenth century were not able to achieve suffrage, abolition, or the right to attend college. Despite their efforts and advocacy for women's rights, these goals were not realized during this time period. Women's suffrage, the abolition of slavery, and access to higher education for women were all significant advancements that came later in history through continued activism and social change.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 21, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Mar 21, 2023Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Aug 05, 2012Quiz Created by
Dixonte
Back to top