Writing A Grant Proposal: Trivia Quiz!

Approved & Edited by ProProfs Editorial Team
The editorial team at ProProfs Quizzes consists of a select group of subject experts, trivia writers, and quiz masters who have authored over 10,000 quizzes taken by more than 100 million users. This team includes our in-house seasoned quiz moderators and subject matter experts. Our editorial experts, spread across the world, are rigorously trained using our comprehensive guidelines to ensure that you receive the highest quality quizzes.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Cumminsc10
C
Cumminsc10
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 8 | Total Attempts: 5,662
Questions: 19 | Attempts: 1,835

SettingsSettingsSettings
Writing A Grant Proposal: Trivia Quiz! - Quiz

Quiz Description


Questions and Answers
  • 1. 

    Once an idea for a grant proposal is formulated, the next step is to:

    • A.

      Identify a learning theory.

    • B.

      Generate a research question.

    • C.

      Gather baseline data.

    • D.

      Review the literature.

    Correct Answer
    D. Review the literature.
    Explanation
    After formulating an idea for a grant proposal, the next logical step is to review the literature. This involves conducting a comprehensive search and analysis of existing research and publications related to the proposed idea. Reviewing the literature helps in identifying gaps in knowledge, understanding the current state of research in the field, and building a strong theoretical foundation for the proposed study. It also helps in ensuring that the proposed research question is original and contributes to the existing body of knowledge.

    Rate this question:

  • 2. 

    Which of the following is a function of a grant reviewer?

    • A.

      To compare the grant proposal to the sponsor's priorities and criteria

    • B.

      To judge the relative merit of the project and its likelihood for success

    • C.

      To assess whether the project staff and organization will be able to achieve the proposal's goals and objectives

    • D.

      All of these are functions of a grant reviewer.

    Correct Answer
    D. All of these are functions of a grant reviewer.
    Explanation
    A grant reviewer is responsible for comparing the grant proposal to the sponsor's priorities and criteria to ensure that it aligns with the sponsor's goals. They also evaluate the relative merit of the project and its likelihood for success, considering factors such as feasibility, impact, and innovation. Additionally, they assess whether the project staff and organization have the capacity and capabilities to achieve the proposed goals and objectives. Therefore, all of these functions are necessary for a grant reviewer to effectively evaluate and make decisions on grant proposals.

    Rate this question:

  • 3. 

    The purpose of the literature review is to help grant seekers to assess the value of an idea and adjust its focus to more clearly describe their goals.

    • A.

      True

    • B.

      False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    The purpose of a literature review is to evaluate existing research and knowledge on a specific topic. By conducting a literature review, grant seekers can gain insights into the value of their idea and refine their goals accordingly. This process allows them to identify gaps in the existing literature, highlight the significance of their proposed research, and ensure that their goals are clearly articulated. Therefore, the statement that the purpose of a literature review is to help grant seekers assess the value of an idea and adjust its focus to more clearly describe their goals is true.

    Rate this question:

  • 4. 

    The capability section establishes the credibility of the grant seeker and project staff, and the organization's ability to complete the proposed project.

    • A.

      True

    • B.

      False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    The capability section is an important part of a grant application as it demonstrates the credibility and qualifications of the grant seeker and project staff. It provides information about their past experience, skills, and expertise that are relevant to the proposed project. This section helps the grantor assess whether the organization has the necessary capabilities to successfully complete the project. Therefore, the statement that the capability section establishes the credibility of the grant seeker and project staff, and the organization's ability to complete the proposed project is true.

    Rate this question:

  • 5. 

    Successful grant writers tend to be well-read and current with the happenings in their interest areas.

    • A.

      True

    • B.

      False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    Successful grant writers need to be well-read and stay updated with the latest developments in their areas of interest. This is because they need to have a deep understanding of the subject matter and be aware of any new research, trends, or changes in policies that may affect their grant proposals. By staying current, grant writers can ensure that their proposals are relevant, accurate, and compelling, increasing their chances of securing funding. Therefore, it can be concluded that being well-read and up-to-date is a characteristic of successful grant writers.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    A "generic" proposal sent out to several grant sponsors is recommended.

    • A.

      True

    • B.

      False

    Correct Answer
    B. False
    Explanation
    Sending a "generic" proposal to multiple grant sponsors is not recommended. Grant proposals should be tailored to each specific sponsor's requirements and priorities. A generic proposal may not effectively address the specific needs and goals of each sponsor, reducing the chances of securing funding. It is important to thoroughly research each sponsor and customize the proposal to demonstrate a strong alignment between the project and the sponsor's objectives.

    Rate this question:

  • 7. 

    The educational and professional experiences of the grant writers do not factor into the grant application process.

    • A.

      True

    • B.

      False

    Correct Answer
    B. False
    Explanation
    Grant writers' educational and professional experiences do factor into the grant application process. The skills, knowledge, and expertise of grant writers are important in crafting a compelling application that meets the requirements and objectives of the grant. Grantors often consider the qualifications and track record of the grant writers to assess their ability to effectively manage and implement the proposed project. Therefore, the statement that the educational and professional experiences of grant writers do not factor into the grant application process is false.

    Rate this question:

  • 8. 

    Which of the following is especially critical for novice grant seekers or those who are changing their focus?

    • A.

      Knowledge of the credentials of the reviewers

    • B.

      Knowledge of funding priorities

    • C.

      Collaboration with others

    • D.

      Familiarity with the guidelines for writing the proposal

    Correct Answer
    C. Collaboration with others
    Explanation
    Collaboration with others is especially critical for novice grant seekers or those who are changing their focus because it allows them to tap into the expertise and experience of others. By collaborating with more experienced individuals or organizations in the field, they can gain valuable insights, guidance, and support throughout the grant-seeking process. This collaboration can help them navigate the complexities of grant applications, understand funding priorities, and improve the quality of their proposals. Additionally, collaborating with others can also lead to networking opportunities and potential partnerships, which can further enhance their chances of securing funding.

    Rate this question:

  • 9. 

    Which of the following might be a reason that a grant was not funded?

    • A.

      The deadline for submitting the application was not missed.

    • B.

      The proposal was concisely written with a strong evaluation component.

    • C.

      The proposal followed the guidelines.

    • D.

      The proposal did not match the grant sponsor's funding priorities.

    Correct Answer
    D. The proposal did not match the grant sponsor's funding priorities.
    Explanation
    The given answer suggests that the reason a grant was not funded is because the proposal did not align with the funding priorities of the grant sponsor. This means that even though the proposal may have been well-written, concise, and followed the guidelines, it did not meet the specific criteria or objectives set by the grant sponsor for funding. As a result, the grant application was not successful in securing funding.

    Rate this question:

  • 10. 

    The statement below illustrates one of the characteristics of a sound measurement choice. Which characteristic is it? "During the pilot study, the three trained observers and the project director will simultaneously observe the same individuals."

    • A.

      Reliability

    • B.

      Feasibility

    • C.

      Validity

    • D.

      Justifiability

    Correct Answer
    A. Reliability
    Explanation
    The statement indicates that multiple observers will be involved in the measurement process, which is a characteristic of reliability. Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of measurement results when the measurement is repeated under similar conditions. In this case, having multiple trained observers simultaneously observing the same individuals helps ensure that the measurement is reliable, as it allows for comparison and agreement among the observers.

    Rate this question:

  • 11. 

    Universities and hospitals are examples of _____ funding agencies.

    • A.

      Non-profit organizational

    • B.

      Federal

    • C.

      Industry

    • D.

      Institutional

    Correct Answer
    D. Institutional
    Explanation
    Universities and hospitals are examples of institutional funding agencies because they are both organizations that provide funding for specific purposes. They have their own established systems and structures for distributing funds and supporting research, education, and healthcare. These institutions typically have their own sources of funding, such as endowments, grants, and donations, which they use to support their missions and goals.

    Rate this question:

  • 12. 

    Which section of the grant proposal should provide sufficient detail about how the grant seeker will measure the outcomes or impact of the project?

    • A.

      Abstract

    • B.

      Study design

    • C.

      Needs assessment

    • D.

      Budget

    Correct Answer
    B. Study design
    Explanation
    The study design section of the grant proposal should provide sufficient detail about how the grant seeker will measure the outcomes or impact of the project. This section outlines the methodology and approach that will be used to conduct the study, including the data collection methods, sample size, and analysis techniques. It explains how the grant seeker will measure the success of the project and evaluate its impact.

    Rate this question:

  • 13. 

    During which step of the grant writing process do you generate ideas, describe goals, and identify funding sources?

    • A.

      Laying the foundation

    • B.

      Reviewing the grant proposal

    • C.

      Assembling the final product

    • D.

      Building the grant proposal

    Correct Answer
    A. Laying the foundation
    Explanation
    During the step of laying the foundation in the grant writing process, ideas are generated, goals are described, and funding sources are identified. This step involves brainstorming and researching potential project ideas, outlining the objectives and outcomes of the proposed project, and researching and identifying potential funding sources that align with the project goals. It sets the groundwork for the rest of the grant writing process by establishing the project's purpose, objectives, and potential funding avenues.

    Rate this question:

  • 14. 

    When reviewing the literature for supporting evidence, one should review documents for at least the past _____ years.

    • A.

      5

    • B.

      4

    • C.

      3

    • D.

      2

    Correct Answer
    A. 5
    Explanation
    When reviewing the literature for supporting evidence, it is recommended to review documents for at least the past 5 years. This is because newer research and studies are more likely to reflect current knowledge and advancements in the field. Reviewing documents from the past 5 years ensures that the information gathered is up-to-date and relevant.

    Rate this question:

  • 15. 

    Which of the following provides the background information needed to write a compelling needs statement for a grant proposal?

    • A.

      Literature search

    • B.

      Census data

    • C.

      Grant sponsor

    • D.

      Collaborators

    Correct Answer
    A. Literature search
    Explanation
    A literature search provides the background information needed to write a compelling needs statement for a grant proposal. By conducting a literature search, the grant writer can gather relevant information, statistics, and studies related to the issue or problem that the grant proposal aims to address. This helps to establish the significance and urgency of the needs statement, and provides evidence to support the proposed solution or intervention. Additionally, a literature search allows the grant writer to identify any existing programs or initiatives in the field, which can help to inform the development of the grant proposal and demonstrate the unique contribution that the proposed project will make.

    Rate this question:

  • 16. 

    All of the following are examples of federal funding agencies for grants except the:

    • A.

      National Cancer Institute.

    • B.

      American Cancer Society.

    • C.

      Food and Drug Administration.

    • D.

      United States Department of Agriculture.

    Correct Answer
    B. American Cancer Society.
    Explanation
    The American Cancer Society is not a federal funding agency for grants. It is a non-profit organization that raises funds for cancer research, education, and support programs. Unlike federal funding agencies such as the National Cancer Institute, Food and Drug Administration, and United States Department of Agriculture, the American Cancer Society does not receive direct funding from the federal government to distribute grants. Instead, it relies on donations and fundraising efforts to support its initiatives.

    Rate this question:

  • 17. 

    Which of the following might be a potential funding source for an after-school program to enhance the self-esteem and body image issues of young girls?

    • A.

      National Institutes of Health

    • B.

      Department of Education

    • C.

      National Science Foundation

    • D.

      American Federation for Aging Research

    Correct Answer
    B. Department of Education
    Explanation
    The Department of Education might be a potential funding source for an after-school program to enhance the self-esteem and body image issues of young girls because they are responsible for promoting educational excellence and ensuring equal access to education. They may have programs or grants available specifically aimed at supporting initiatives that address the social and emotional well-being of students, such as self-esteem and body image issues.

    Rate this question:

  • 18. 

    The grant narrative includes:

    • A.

      A transmittal letter.

    • B.

      An abstract.

    • C.

      A needs statement.

    • D.

      A reviewer's evaluation guide sheet.

    Correct Answer
    C. A needs statement.
    Explanation
    The grant narrative includes a needs statement. A needs statement is an essential component of a grant proposal as it outlines the specific problem or issue that the project aims to address. It provides a clear and concise explanation of why the project is necessary and identifies the target population or community that will benefit from the proposed project. Including a needs statement helps to demonstrate the relevance and importance of the project to potential funders or reviewers.

    Rate this question:

  • 19. 

    Which of the following is not characteristic of appropriately written goals for grant proposals?

    • A.

      They address important needs.

    • B.

      They are broad in scope.

    • C.

      They match the organization's mission.

    • D.

      They are specific.

    Correct Answer
    B. They are broad in scope.
    Explanation
    Appropriately written goals for grant proposals should be specific, addressing important needs, and aligning with the organization's mission. However, they should not be broad in scope. Broad goals lack clarity and focus, making it difficult for funders to understand the intended impact of the grant. Grant proposals should clearly define the specific outcomes and objectives that the funding will support, ensuring a more targeted and effective use of resources.

    Rate this question:

Quiz Review Timeline +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Mar 22, 2023
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Apr 29, 2014
    Quiz Created by
    Cumminsc10
Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.