Effective Speaking Chapter 12 - Lhs

When you ask, "Was it good or not?" you are engaged in judgment. Judgment involves forming an opinion or making a decision based on personal evaluation or assessment. In this case, you are evaluating whether something is good or not, indicating that you are engaged in the process of judgment.

Pelias and Shaffer's method of evaluation includes description, justification, and rationale as part of the process. However, feedback is not mentioned as a component of their evaluation method. Feedback is typically provided after the evaluation process to provide suggestions, comments, or recommendations for improvement based on the evaluation results.

The correct answer is "lifelong" because growth and evaluation are ongoing processes that should continue throughout a public speaker's entire life. Public speaking skills can always be improved, and evaluation helps identify areas for growth and development. Therefore, it is important for a public speaker to view growth and evaluation as lifelong processes.

When you ask, "What did I see and hear?" you are engaged in description. Description refers to the act of providing a detailed account or portrayal of something, often focusing on the sensory information such as sight and sound. By asking this question, you are seeking to accurately depict or recount the specific observations you made, without making any judgments or justifications.

Effective evaluation involves describing and justifying the strengths and weaknesses of a particular subject or situation. It also includes elevating or recognizing the positive aspects. However, it does not involve disapproving or criticizing without providing constructive feedback. Disapproving without offering suggestions for improvement can hinder the effectiveness of the evaluation process.

Effective evaluation does not only focus on what needs to be improved, but also on successes and areas that need improvement. Evaluations can enrich your speech making experience by providing feedback and suggestions for improvement. Adapting your speech to the evaluations you receive can help build your view of yourself as a good speaker. Therefore, the statement "Effective evaluation centers only on what needs to be improved" is not true.

Pelias and Shaffer developed a method of evaluation specifically for staged artistic performances. This implies that their method is not suitable for public speeches, employment interviews, or fictional works. The focus on staged artistic performances suggests that their evaluation method is tailored to assess the artistic aspects, such as acting, directing, and production, that are unique to this type of performance.

The process of evaluation begins with listening. Listening is the initial step in the evaluation process as it involves actively paying attention to the information being communicated. It allows the evaluator to gather relevant data, understand the message being conveyed, and analyze it effectively. Without listening, the evaluation process cannot commence as it is essential for comprehending and interpreting the information accurately.

When you ask, "Why was it good or not?" you are engaged in justification. Justification involves providing reasons or evidence to support a claim or belief. In this context, you are seeking to justify whether something is good or not by providing logical reasons or justifications for your judgment.

Evaluation is the process of assessing or judging the value or worth of something based on certain criteria or standards. It involves making a justified judgment about the subject being evaluated. Evaluation goes beyond mere description or analysis by incorporating a critical assessment and forming an opinion. It requires considering the strengths, weaknesses, and overall quality of the subject in question. Therefore, evaluation is the most appropriate term to describe description grounded in a justified judgment.

In the public speaking classroom, evaluations will differ from evaluations in a public forum. This means that the criteria and focus of the evaluations will vary between these two settings. In a public forum, the evaluations aim to help the speaker improve their speaking skills. On the other hand, in the classroom, evaluations solely concentrate on assessing the effectiveness of the speaker's message. Therefore, the emphasis and objectives of evaluations in these two contexts are not the same.

Critical thinking is the mechanism for evaluation because it involves analyzing and evaluating information, arguments, and evidence in a logical and systematic way. It requires individuals to question assumptions, consider different perspectives, and make informed judgments based on evidence and reasoning. Critical thinking helps individuals to assess the validity and reliability of information, make sound decisions, and solve problems effectively. It is an essential skill that promotes intellectual growth, enhances problem-solving abilities, and enables individuals to make well-informed and rational decisions.

When two or more people communicate, they need to evaluate the message in order to make meaning of it. Evaluation involves assessing the information, analyzing its relevance and accuracy, and determining its significance. This process helps individuals understand the message better and form opinions or judgments about it. Evaluation is an essential step in effective communication as it allows for critical thinking and ensures that the intended message is properly interpreted.