Adaptors
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Bridgers
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Cognitive Diversity
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Coping Behavior
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Innovators
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Kirton Adaption-Innovation theory
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Level
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
More Adaptive
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Preferred Cognitive Approach
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Problem A
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Problem B
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Style
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Adaptive Thinking
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Ad hominem Fallacy
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Ad populum, Bandwagon Fallacy
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Ambiguity
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Analytical Thinking
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Apophenia and Superstition
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Argument from ignorance
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Assuring Expressions
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Basic Human Limitations
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Communicate
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Confirmation Bias and Selective Thinking
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Create and Develop
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Creative Thinking
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Critical Thinking
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Doublespeak Jargon
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Emotive Content
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Emotional Appeals
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Evading the Issue, Red Herring
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Evaluate
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Fallacy of Dilemma, Either/Or Fallacy
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
False Analogies
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
False Implications
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
False Memories and Confabulation
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Faulty Logic or Perception
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Free-thinker
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Future Thinking
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Innovative Thinking
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Intellectual humility
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Investigate
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Irrelevant Comparisons
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Open-Minded
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Meaningless Comparisons
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Personal Bias and Prejudices
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Physical and Emotional Hindrances
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Poisoning the Well
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Psychological or Sociological Pitfalls
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Pragmatic Fallacy
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Reflective Thinking
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Slippery Slope Fallacy
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Synthesis
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Testimonial Evidence
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Use of Language
Select a Match
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
More innovative
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Preferred method of thinking
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
More adaptive
Your Rank: #-- / --