Adaptors
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Bridgers
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Cognitive Diversity
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Coping Behavior
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Innovators
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Kirton Adaption-Innovation theory
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Level
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
More Adaptive
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Preferred Cognitive Approach
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Problem A
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Problem B
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Style
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Adaptive Thinking
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Ad hominem Fallacy
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Ad populum, Bandwagon Fallacy
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Ambiguity
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Analytical Thinking
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Apophenia and Superstition
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Argument from ignorance
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Assuring Expressions
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Basic Human Limitations
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Communicate
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Confirmation Bias and Selective Thinking
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Create and Develop
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Creative Thinking
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Critical Thinking
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Doublespeak Jargon
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Emotive Content
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Emotional Appeals
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Evading the Issue, Red Herring
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Evaluate
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Fallacy of Dilemma, Either/Or Fallacy
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
False Analogies
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
False Implications
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
False Memories and Confabulation
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Faulty Logic or Perception
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Free-thinker
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Future Thinking
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Innovative Thinking
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Intellectual humility
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Investigate
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Irrelevant Comparisons
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Open-Minded
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Meaningless Comparisons
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Personal Bias and Prejudices
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Physical and Emotional Hindrances
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Poisoning the Well
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Psychological or Sociological Pitfalls
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Pragmatic Fallacy
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Reflective Thinking
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Slippery Slope Fallacy
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Synthesis
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Testimonial Evidence
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Use of Language
Select a Match
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Preferred method of thinking
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
More adaptive
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
More innovative
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
Your Rank: #-- / --