Adaptors
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Bridgers
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Cognitive Diversity
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Coping Behavior
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Innovators
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Kirton Adaption-Innovation theory
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Level
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
More Adaptive
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Preferred Cognitive Approach
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Problem A
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Problem B
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Style
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Adaptive Thinking
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Ad hominem Fallacy
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Ad populum, Bandwagon Fallacy
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Ambiguity
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Analytical Thinking
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Apophenia and Superstition
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Argument from ignorance
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Assuring Expressions
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Basic Human Limitations
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Communicate
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Confirmation Bias and Selective Thinking
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Create and Develop
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Creative Thinking
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Critical Thinking
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Doublespeak Jargon
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Emotive Content
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Emotional Appeals
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Evading the Issue, Red Herring
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Evaluate
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Fallacy of Dilemma, Either/Or Fallacy
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
False Analogies
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
False Implications
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
False Memories and Confabulation
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Faulty Logic or Perception
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Free-thinker
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Future Thinking
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Innovative Thinking
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Intellectual humility
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Investigate
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Irrelevant Comparisons
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Open-Minded
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Meaningless Comparisons
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Personal Bias and Prejudices
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Physical and Emotional Hindrances
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Poisoning the Well
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Psychological or Sociological Pitfalls
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Pragmatic Fallacy
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Reflective Thinking
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Slippery Slope Fallacy
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Synthesis
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Testimonial Evidence
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Use of Language
Select a Match
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More adaptive
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Preferred method of thinking
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
More innovative
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
Your Rank: #-- / --