Adaptors
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Bridgers
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Cognitive Diversity
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Coping Behavior
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Innovators
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Kirton Adaption-Innovation theory
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Level
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
More Adaptive
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Preferred Cognitive Approach
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Problem A
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Problem B
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Style
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Adaptive Thinking
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Ad hominem Fallacy
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Ad populum, Bandwagon Fallacy
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Ambiguity
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Analytical Thinking
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Apophenia and Superstition
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Argument from ignorance
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Assuring Expressions
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Basic Human Limitations
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Communicate
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Confirmation Bias and Selective Thinking
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Create and Develop
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Creative Thinking
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Critical Thinking
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Doublespeak Jargon
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Emotive Content
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Emotional Appeals
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Evading the Issue, Red Herring
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Evaluate
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Fallacy of Dilemma, Either/Or Fallacy
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
False Analogies
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
False Implications
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
False Memories and Confabulation
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Faulty Logic or Perception
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Free-thinker
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Future Thinking
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Innovative Thinking
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Intellectual humility
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Investigate
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Irrelevant Comparisons
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Open-Minded
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Meaningless Comparisons
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Personal Bias and Prejudices
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Physical and Emotional Hindrances
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Poisoning the Well
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Psychological or Sociological Pitfalls
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Pragmatic Fallacy
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Reflective Thinking
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Slippery Slope Fallacy
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Synthesis
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Testimonial Evidence
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Use of Language
Select a Match
The theory sharply distinguishes between level and style of creativity, problem solving, and decision making, therefore the theory is ONLY concerned with style
More adaptive
A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
Making irrelevant emotional appeals to accept a claim, since emotion often influences people more effectively than logical reasoning.
Everyone has personal biases and prejudices resulting from their own unique life experiences and worldview that make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
Criticizing the person making an argument, not the argument itself.
increases the likelihood of coping behavior occurring, when used positively it can also be used to increase the team’s ability to solve Problem B and subsequently solve Problem A.
The process whereby you tend to notice and look for what confirms your beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts your beliefs.
An argument that assumes as adverse chain of events will occur but offers no proof.
More innovative
an intellectual process of peering into the future through creative visioning, speculation, brainstorming, and disciplined research with the intent of deflecting or controlling these events in a desired direction.
refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (i.e. military operation).
This leads to misconceptions, which are the basis of false or mistaken ideas.
Thinking that concentrates on what we know, what we need to know, and how we bridge that gap
Willingness to investigate viewpoints different from your own and ability to recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation.
The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
If one has been accused of wrongdoing, diverting attention to an issue irrelevant to the one at hand.
the ability to present in a cogent and coherent way the results of one’s reasoning.
Thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making
Intentionally restricting the number of alternatives, thereby omitting relevant alternatives from consideration.
Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively in order to gain influence or power.
Erroneous perception of the connections between unrelated events.
ability to combine or compile various pieces of information, ideas, concepts, conclusions, etc. in new and different ways
Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something false.
Being unaware that your memories are often “manufactured” to fill in the gaps in your recollection, or that some memories or facts, over time, can be unconsciously replaced with fantasy.
This is an ‘actual problem’ that two of more individuals come together to solve.
Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that view.
Making illogical analogies to support the validity of a particular claim.
Thinking that requires generative thinking (divergent thinking): the development of ideas
Having an independent mind and being able to restrain yourself from the desire to believe because of social pressures to conform
Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect your ability to think clearly and critically.
Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an argument.
Thinking that results in efficiency, evolutionary, and revolutionary improvements and advancements
is assessing “the credibility of statements or other representations which are accounts or descriptions of a person’s perception, experience, situation, judgment, belief, or opinion; and to assess the logical strength of the actual or intended inferential relationships among statements, descriptions, questions or other forms of representation.”
Perceptions can be misinterpreted due to psychological and sociological influences, and reasoning can be twisted to gain influence and power.
precise terms use to describe the A-I Continuum
Refers to “how we think,” our preferred cognitive approach to problem solving, and decision making.
These limitations remind us that we are not perfect and that our understanding of facts, perceptions, memories, built-in biases, etc., precludes our ability of ever seeing or understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity
It is the cognitive ability to imagine and innovate
Creating a prejudicial atmosphere against the opposition, making it difficult for the opponent to be received fairly.
Preferred method of thinking
Arguing something is true because “it works,” even though the causality between this something and the outcome are not demonstrated.
Critical thinkers use his or her imagination and understanding of a matter to create logical ideas and explore possibilities. While expanding (developing) ideas with all the information gathered, they are constantly on the lookout for patterns, recognizable differences, generalizations, and plausible conclusions and predictable outcomes.
help those being bridged understand each other’s approach through the use of interpersonal skills, active listening, and effective questioning techniques.
A logical fallacy claiming something is true because it has not been proven false.
The choice of words themselves can conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive.
involves identifying the real problem(s), gathering pertinent data, asking appropriate questions, analyzing and judging the value of available information, constructively challenging ideas, and questioning assumptions.
Making a comparison that is irrelevant or inappropriate.
Refers to potential capacity (intelligence or talent) and learned levels (such as management, supervisory and leadership competency).
This encompasses all of the problems (team dynamics, interpersonal skills, communication, collaboration, etc.) that stem from ‘human interactions’ and it steals time and energy from efforts needed to solve Problem A
Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate your own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and occasionally fraudulent.
An appeal to the popularity of the claim as a reason for accepting the claim.
is effort required to do something that is not our preference
adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions and belief and being prepared to examine all new evidence and arguments even if such efforts leads you to discover flaws in your own cherished opinions and beliefs.
Your Rank: #-- / --