To be banned
To be decided by the President
To be decided by popular sovereignty
To be ignored until statehood
To be decided by the Supreme Court
The requirement that fugitive slaves be returned from Canada
The denial of a jury trial to runaway slaves
The denial of the right of runaway slaves to testify on their own behalf
Increased fine and/or imprisonment for people who helped runaway slaves
A reinforcement of Article IV of the Constitution
Slavery in D.C.
Slavery in the territories
The 1820 Compromise
The 1850 Compromise
The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act
Resulted in a southern Democrat as president
Resulted in a split in the Democratic Party
Marked the end of the Whig Party
Marked the first appearance of the Free Soil Party
Resulted in the creation of the Republican Party
Decided by the President
Decided by the Supreme Court
Decided by the Congress
Decided by the residents of those territories
Decided after statehood
Repeal of the Northwest Ordinance
Repeal of the Missouri Compromise
Repeal of the Tariff of Abominations
Repeal of the Wilmot Proviso
Was a first hand account of slavery
Was sold only in the US
Was a romanticized account of slavery
Had little influence on the abolitionist movement
Had a huge political impact
John Brown, Preston Brooks
Stephen Douglas, Andrew Butler
The Lecompton Constitution, the New England Emigrant Aid Society
Harriet Beecher Stowe, Harriet Tubman
Dred Scott, Harriet Scott
Charles Sumner, Andrew Butler
Andrew Butler, Charles Sumner
Charles Sumner, Preston Brooks
Preston Brooks, Charles Sumner
Charles Sumner, John Brown
Was popular sovereignty
Was expansionism
Proslavery
Abolitionism
Nativism
Resulted in a southern Democrat as president
Resulted in a southern Republican as president
Resulted in a northern Republican as president
Showed that the Republican Party was a political force to be contended with
Resulted in a victory for the American Party
Further divided the Democratic Party
Got Kansas admitted as a slave state
Divided the Republican Party
Marked the end of the American Party
None of the above
That Scott had no right to sue
That Scott did not automatically become free when he lived in free territory
That Congress had no right to prohibit slavery in the territories
That Scott was not a citizen
That the President had no right to prohibit slavery in the territories
Douglas's reelection to the Senate
Lincoln's election to the Senate
Douglas's election to the Presidency
Lincoln's election to the House
Lincoln's "House Divided" speech
The election of Buchanan
The Dred Scott decision
The Lincoln-Douglas debates
John Brown's execution
Elijah Lovejoy's murder
Won the Border states of DE, MD, KY, MO
Won a simple majority of the popular votes
Won a few of the slave states
Won every free state
Lost to Douglas
Congress has the right to decide where slavery shall and shall not exist
The settlers in a given territory have the sole right to decide whether or not slavery will be permitted there
Individual citizens can decide for themselves whether or not to hold slaves
The American people shall decide where slavery will exist through a national plebiscite
Individual states have the right to reject congressional decisions pertaining to slavery
It recognized the power of Congress to prohibit slavery in the territories, but refused on technical grounds to free Scott
It stated that all Black people were not citizens of the US
It upheld the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise
It upheld the principle of popular sovereignty
The freed Scott, but not other slaves in circumstances similar to Scott's
Abolition of slavery
Establishment of free public schools
Improvements of factory working conditions
Prohibition of communitarian experiments
Restriction of the rights of immigrants
There were more Black people than White people in the antebellum south
Most southern families held slaves
Most southern families lived rural areas
The southern population was much smaller than that of the North
Slaveholders were an extremely powerful group
The admission of California as a free state
The establishment of the principle of popular sovereignty in the Mexican Cession
The ban on the slave trade in D.C.
The continued protection slavery in D.C.
The strengthened Fugitive Slave Law
Opposition to the further extension of slavery into the territories
Immediate emancipation of the slaves
Repeal of Whig economic policies
Restriction of immigration
Acknowledgement of popular sovereignty as the basis for organizing federal territories
Congress could abolish slavery at will
National legislation could not limit the spread of slavery into the territories
The rights of all people are protected by the Constitution
Slaves residing in a free state automatically became free
Through squatter sovereignty, a territory had the sole right to determine the status of slavery within its territorial limits
Admitted Texas to the Union as a free state
Admitted California to the Union under the principles of popular sovereignty
Prohibited slavery in D.C.
Enacted a stringent fugitive slave law
Adjusted the Texas-Mexico Boundary
They were willing to accept slavery where it existed but opposed further expansion to the territories
The were active supporters of complete abolition
They favored continued importation of slaves from Africa
They advocated expansion of the slave system to provide cheap labor for northern factories
They advocated complete social and political equality for all races in the U.S.
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.