Social Studies - Setting The Scene For The Civil War

The statement is true because the economies of the North and the South in the 1800s were indeed very different. The North had a more industrialized economy, with factories, manufacturing, and a focus on trade and commerce. On the other hand, the South had an agrarian economy, relying heavily on cash crops like cotton and tobacco, and utilizing slave labor on plantations. These economic differences played a significant role in shaping the cultural, social, and political divide between the North and the South during this time period.

The statement suggests that the South had more people living in cities than the North, which is incorrect. The explanation is that while both the North and the South had primarily rural populations, the North had a higher concentration of people living in cities compared to the South. Therefore, the correct answer is False.

The North was upset by a law passed in 1846 that lowered tariffs for goods imported from other countries because they believed it would negatively impact their own industries. The North had a strong manufacturing base and relied on high tariffs to protect their goods from foreign competition. Lowering tariffs would make imported goods cheaper and more competitive, potentially leading to job losses and economic decline in the North.

The statement "Everyone in the South supported slavery" is not true. While it is true that slavery was more prevalent in the South during the time of the American Civil War, it is incorrect to assume that every single person in the South supported it. There were abolitionists and individuals who opposed slavery within the South as well. It is important to avoid generalizations and recognize the diversity of opinions and beliefs within any given region or population.

An abolitionist is indeed someone who wants to abolish or end slavery. This person actively opposes and works towards eradicating the institution of slavery. Abolitionists played a crucial role in the fight against slavery, advocating for its abolition through various means such as political activism, protests, and underground railroad networks. Their efforts were instrumental in bringing about significant social and legal changes that ultimately led to the end of slavery in many parts of the world.

The statement is false because slave owners did not like when their slaves were taught how to read. In fact, they often prohibited slaves from learning how to read as it was seen as a threat to their power and control. Literacy would have given slaves the ability to access information, communicate with others, and potentially organize rebellions or escape attempts. Therefore, slave owners actively discouraged and suppressed any attempts to educate slaves.

The statement "Slaves never rebelled against their owners" is incorrect. Throughout history, there have been numerous instances of slaves rebelling against their owners in various forms, such as organized revolts, individual acts of resistance, and escape attempts. These rebellions were often motivated by the desire for freedom, justice, and improved living conditions. Examples include the Haitian Revolution, the Nat Turner rebellion, and the Spartacus uprising. Therefore, the correct answer is False.

The Underground Railroad was indeed a secret and organized system that operated during the 19th century in the United States. It was a network of routes and safe houses that helped enslaved individuals escape from the Southern states and reach freedom in the North or Canada. Conductors, who were often abolitionists, guided the escapees along these routes, providing them with shelter, food, and transportation. The Underground Railroad played a crucial role in the abolitionist movement and the fight against slavery.

The statement is false because a free state is actually one in which slavery is not allowed. In the context of the question, a free state refers to a state in the United States where slavery was prohibited. This was in contrast to the slave states, where slavery was legal and practiced.

The statement is false because in the Missouri Compromise, Maine was admitted as a Free State and Missouri was admitted as a Slave State. This compromise was reached in 1820 in order to maintain the balance between slave states and free states in the United States. It allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state while Missouri was admitted as a slave state, thus preserving the equilibrium between the North and South.

Henry Clay was not a stubborn man who never compromised about anything. This statement implies that Henry Clay was inflexible and unwilling to reach agreements or find middle ground. However, historical records show that Clay was known for his ability to negotiate and find compromises, earning him the nickname "The Great Compromiser." He played a significant role in mediating and resolving several important political disputes during his career, including the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850. Therefore, the correct answer is False.

The Fugitive Slave Law was indeed a part of the Compromise of 1850. This law required that escaped slaves be returned to their owners, regardless of whether they had reached a free state. This law was highly controversial and sparked outrage among abolitionists and supporters of the Underground Railroad, as it essentially forced individuals in free states to participate in the institution of slavery. The Fugitive Slave Law was one of the factors that contributed to the growing tensions between the North and the South leading up to the American Civil War.

The issue of slavery played a significant role in the formation of the two major political parties in the United States, Republicans and Democrats. The Republican Party was founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery party, while the Democratic Party had a more divided stance on the issue, with some members supporting slavery. The debate over slavery eventually led to the American Civil War, which further solidified the divide between the two parties. Therefore, it is true that the issue of slavery contributed to the formation of the Republicans and Democrats as we know them today.

Abraham Lincoln, a Republican candidate from Illinois, is historically known for his opposition to slavery. He played a crucial role in the abolition of slavery in the United States during his presidency. His stance against slavery was evident in his speeches, actions, and the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared slaves in Confederate states to be free. Therefore, it is true that Abraham Lincoln, the Republican candidate from Illinois, opposed slavery.