1.
Black Americans in Flight, a mural honoring several aviation pioneers, also ------- the 1992 spaceflight of astronaut Mae Jemison.
Correct Answer
D. Commemorates
Explanation
The correct answer is "commemorates." The sentence mentions a mural called "Black Americans in Flight" that honors aviation pioneers. The word "commemorates" suggests that the mural is a tribute or a memorial to these pioneers, indicating that it recognizes and celebrates their contributions to aviation. Additionally, the sentence states that the mural also "------- the 1992 spaceflight of astronaut Mae Jemison." This further supports the idea that the mural is a commemoration, as it acknowledges Jemison's achievement as the first Black woman to go into space.
2.
The new antifungal agent has such ------- uses, from treating Dutch elm disease to rescuing water-damaged works of art from molds, that it is considered one of the more ------- antibiotics.
Correct Answer
D. Varied . . versatile
Explanation
The correct answer is "varied . . versatile". The sentence states that the new antifungal agent has a wide range of uses, from treating Dutch elm disease to rescuing water-damaged works of art from molds. This demonstrates that the agent can be used in different situations and for different purposes, making it versatile.
3.
The child had a tendency toward aggressive behavior, a ------- fighting rather than resolving differences amicably.
Correct Answer
A. Propensity for
Explanation
The correct answer is "propensity for." This means that the child had a natural inclination or tendency towards aggressive behavior, preferring to fight rather than resolving conflicts peacefully.
4.
Physical exercise often has a ------- effect, releasing emotional tension and refreshing the spirit.
Correct Answer
C. Cathartic
Explanation
Physical exercise often has a cathartic effect, meaning it helps to release emotional tension and refresh the spirit. This means that engaging in physical activity can provide a sense of emotional release and relief, allowing individuals to let go of negative emotions and feel rejuvenated.
5.
Because rap and hip-hop offer such ------- commentary on contemporary issues, they are often said to be sharp-edged musical genres.
Correct Answer
B. Trenchant
Explanation
Rap and hip-hop are known for their sharp-edged commentary on contemporary issues, making them powerful and impactful musical genres. The word "trenchant" means incisive or cutting, which accurately describes the commentary offered by rap and hip-hop. Therefore, "trenchant" is the correct answer in this context.
6.
Each passage below is followed by questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in each passage and in any introductory material that may be provided.
“Mechanical pencils rule,” my fifteen-year-old
grandniece, Genevieve, declared when I invited her to
be her generation’s voice on school supplies. “Nobody
sharpens anymore.” Then, continuing with a fashion
(Line 5) maven’s hyperbole and arbitrary imperatives, she gave
a passionate disquisition on types of clickers, new grips,
smaller lead sizes, and other niceties of pencil selection.
As she consigned the yellow-painted wooden pencil to
the wastebasket of history, I felt a rush of nostalgia for
(Line 10) the perfumed sharpener shavings of my youth.
In lines 4-5, the author refers to a “fashion maven’s”
tone primarily in order to
Correct Answer
E. Indicate that Genevieve expresses her opinions with authority and flair
Explanation
The author refers to a "fashion maven's" tone primarily to indicate that Genevieve expresses her opinions with authority and flair. This suggests that she speaks confidently and passionately about her preferences for mechanical pencils, using exaggerated language and making bold claims. The use of the term "maven" implies that Genevieve is knowledgeable and influential in this area, further emphasizing her confident and expressive nature.
7.
Each passage below is followed by questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in each passage and in any introductory material that may be provided.
“Mechanical pencils rule,” my fifteen-year-old
grandniece, Genevieve, declared when I invited her to
be her generation’s voice on school supplies. “Nobody
sharpens anymore.” Then, continuing with a fashion
(Line 5) maven’s hyperbole and arbitrary imperatives, she gave
a passionate disquisition on types of clickers, new grips,
smaller lead sizes, and other niceties of pencil selection.
As she consigned the yellow-painted wooden pencil to
the wastebasket of history, I felt a rush of nostalgia for
(Line 10) the perfumed sharpener shavings of my youth.
The author mentions “sharpener shavings” (line 10)
in order to portray a mood of
Correct Answer
B. Sentimental reminiscence
Explanation
The author mentions "sharpener shavings" in order to evoke a feeling of nostalgia and sentimentality. This phrase suggests a fond memory of the author's youth and the act of sharpening pencils, which is now being replaced by mechanical pencils. The mention of "perfumed" sharpener shavings further emphasizes the sentimental nature of the author's reminiscence.
8.
Each passage below is followed by questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in each passage and in any introductory material that may be provided.
Black holes are the most efficient engines of destruction
known to humanity. Their intense gravity is a one-way
ticket to oblivion, and material spiraling into them can
heat up to millions of degrees and glow brightly. Yet, they
(Line 5) are not all-powerful. Even supermassive black holes are
minuscule by cosmic standards. They typically account for
less than one percent of their galaxy’s mass. Accordingly,
astronomers long assumed that supermassive holes, let
alone their smaller cousins, would have little effect beyond
(Line 10) their immediate neighborhoods. So it has come as a surprise
over the past decade that black hole activity is closely
intertwined with star formation occurring farther out in the
galaxy.
Which best describes the function of the statement
in lines 10-13 (“So it . . . galaxy”) ?
Correct Answer
C. It introduces a new view of information presented earlier in the passage.
Explanation
The statement in lines 10-13 introduces a new view of information presented earlier in the passage. The passage initially discusses the destructive nature of black holes and their limited impact on their surroundings. However, the statement in lines 10-13 contradicts this assumption by stating that black hole activity is closely intertwined with star formation occurring farther out in the galaxy. This introduces a new perspective on the influence of black holes and expands the understanding of their effects beyond their immediate neighborhoods.
9.
Each passage below is followed by questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in each passage and in any introductory material that may be provided.
Black holes are the most efficient engines of destruction
known to humanity. Their intense gravity is a one-way
ticket to oblivion, and material spiraling into them can
heat up to millions of degrees and glow brightly. Yet, they
(Line 5) are not all-powerful. Even supermassive black holes are
minuscule by cosmic standards. They typically account for
less than one percent of their galaxy’s mass. Accordingly,
astronomers long assumed that supermassive holes, let
alone their smaller cousins, would have little effect beyond
(Line 10) their immediate neighborhoods. So it has come as a surprise
over the past decade that black hole activity is closely
intertwined with star formation occurring farther out in the
galaxy.
Which of the following most resembles the relationship
between “black hole activity” and “star formation”
(lines 11-12) as described in the passage?
Correct Answer
A. A volcanic eruption on one continent results in higher rainfall totals on another continent.
Explanation
The relationship between "black hole activity" and "star formation" as described in the passage is that they are closely intertwined. This means that black hole activity has an impact on star formation occurring farther out in the galaxy, similar to how a volcanic eruption on one continent can result in higher rainfall totals on another continent.
10.
The following passage is an excerpt from a 1909 novel.
Georgia, the main character, is a reporter in an otherwise
all-male newsroom.
Georgia was to be married. It was the week before
Christmas, and on the last day of the year she would
become Mrs. Joseph Tank. She had told Joe that if
they were to be married at all they might as well get it
(Line 5) over with this year, and still there was no need of being
married any earlier in the year than was necessary. She
assured him that she married him simply because she was
tired of having paper bags waved before her eyes everywhere
she went and she thought if she were once officially
(Line 10) associated with him people would not flaunt his idiosyncrasies
at her that way. And then Ernestine, her best friend,
approved of getting married, and Ernestine’s ideas were
usually good. To all of which Joe responded that she
certainly had a splendid head to figure it out that way.
(Line 15) Joe said that to his mind reasons for doing things weren’t
very important anyhow; it was doing them that counted.
Yesterday had been her last day on the paper. She had
felt queer about that thing of taking her last assignment,
though it was hard to reach just the proper state, for the
(Line 20) last story related to pork-packers, and pork-packing is
not a setting favorable to sentimental regrets. It was just
like the newspaper business not even to allow one a little
sentimental harrowing over one’s exodus from it. But the
time for gentle melancholy came later on when she was
(Line 25) sorting her things at her desk just before leaving, and
was wondering what girl would have that old desk—if
they cared to risk another girl, and whether the other poor
girl would slave through the years she should have been
frivolous, only to have some man step in at the end and
(Line 30) induce her to surrender the things she had gained through
sacrifice and toil.
As she wrote a final letter on her typewriter—she did
hate letting the old machine go—Georgia did considerable
philosophizing about the irony of working for things only
(Line 35) to the end of giving them up. She had waded through snowdrifts
and been drenched in pouring rains, she had been
frozen with the cold and prostrated with the heat, she had
been blown about by Chicago wind until it was strange
there was any of her left in one piece, she had had front
(Line 40) doors—yes, and back doors too—slammed in her face,
she had been the butt of the alleged wit of menials and
hirelings, she had been patronized by vapid women as
the poor girl who must make her living some way, she
had been roasted by—but never mind—she had had
(Line 45) a beat* or two! And now she was to wind it all up by
marrying Joseph Tank, who had made a great deal of
money out of the manufacture of paper bags. This from
her—who had always believed she would end her days
in New York, or perhaps write a realistic novel exposing
50 some mighty evil!
* the area regularly covered by a reporter
Based on information presented in the passage, which
best describes what Georgia was “tired of ” (line 8) ?
Correct Answer
B. Being teased about JosepH Tank
Explanation
In the passage, Georgia expresses that she is tired of having paper bags waved before her eyes everywhere she goes. She believes that if she is officially married to Joseph Tank, people would not flaunt his idiosyncrasies at her. This suggests that Georgia is tired of being teased or mocked about Joseph Tank, which is why she decides to marry him.
11.
The following passage is an excerpt from a 1909 novel.
Georgia, the main character, is a reporter in an otherwise
all-male newsroom.
Georgia was to be married. It was the week before
Christmas, and on the last day of the year she would
become Mrs. Joseph Tank. She had told Joe that if
they were to be married at all they might as well get it
(Line 5) over with this year, and still there was no need of being
married any earlier in the year than was necessary. She
assured him that she married him simply because she was
tired of having paper bags waved before her eyes everywhere
she went and she thought if she were once officially
(Line 10) associated with him people would not flaunt his idiosyncrasies
at her that way. And then Ernestine, her best friend,
approved of getting married, and Ernestine’s ideas were
usually good. To all of which Joe responded that she
certainly had a splendid head to figure it out that way.
(Line 15) Joe said that to his mind reasons for doing things weren’t
very important anyhow; it was doing them that counted.
Yesterday had been her last day on the paper. She had
felt queer about that thing of taking her last assignment,
though it was hard to reach just the proper state, for the
(Line 20) last story related to pork-packers, and pork-packing is
not a setting favorable to sentimental regrets. It was just
like the newspaper business not even to allow one a little
sentimental harrowing over one’s exodus from it. But the
time for gentle melancholy came later on when she was
(Line 25) sorting her things at her desk just before leaving, and
was wondering what girl would have that old desk—if
they cared to risk another girl, and whether the other poor
girl would slave through the years she should have been
frivolous, only to have some man step in at the end and
(Line 30) induce her to surrender the things she had gained through
sacrifice and toil.
As she wrote a final letter on her typewriter—she did
hate letting the old machine go—Georgia did considerable
philosophizing about the irony of working for things only
(Line 35) to the end of giving them up. She had waded through snowdrifts
and been drenched in pouring rains, she had been
frozen with the cold and prostrated with the heat, she had
been blown about by Chicago wind until it was strange
there was any of her left in one piece, she had had front
(Line 40) doors—yes, and back doors too—slammed in her face,
she had been the butt of the alleged wit of menials and
hirelings, she had been patronized by vapid women as
the poor girl who must make her living some way, she
had been roasted by—but never mind—she had had
(Line 45) a beat* or two! And now she was to wind it all up by
marrying Joseph Tank, who had made a great deal of
money out of the manufacture of paper bags. This from
her—who had always believed she would end her days
in New York, or perhaps write a realistic novel exposing
50 some mighty evil!
* the area regularly covered by a reporter
The second paragraph suggests that Georgia believes
the “proper state” (line 19) would be one of
Correct Answer
B. Wistfulness
Explanation
In the second paragraph, Georgia reflects on her last day at the newspaper and expresses her feelings about leaving. She mentions feeling "queer" about taking her last assignment and wonders about the sentimental value of her desk. She also contemplates the future of the girl who will take her place and the sacrifices she has made in her career. These reflections indicate a sense of wistfulness, a feeling of nostalgia or longing for something that is now coming to an end.
12.
The following passage is an excerpt from a 1909 novel.
Georgia, the main character, is a reporter in an otherwise
all-male newsroom.
Georgia was to be married. It was the week before
Christmas, and on the last day of the year she would
become Mrs. Joseph Tank. She had told Joe that if
they were to be married at all they might as well get it
(Line 5) over with this year, and still there was no need of being
married any earlier in the year than was necessary. She
assured him that she married him simply because she was
tired of having paper bags waved before her eyes everywhere
she went and she thought if she were once officially
(Line 10) associated with him people would not flaunt his idiosyncrasies
at her that way. And then Ernestine, her best friend,
approved of getting married, and Ernestine’s ideas were
usually good. To all of which Joe responded that she
certainly had a splendid head to figure it out that way.
(Line 15) Joe said that to his mind reasons for doing things weren’t
very important anyhow; it was doing them that counted.
Yesterday had been her last day on the paper. She had
felt queer about that thing of taking her last assignment,
though it was hard to reach just the proper state, for the
(Line 20) last story related to pork-packers, and pork-packing is
not a setting favorable to sentimental regrets. It was just
like the newspaper business not even to allow one a little
sentimental harrowing over one’s exodus from it. But the
time for gentle melancholy came later on when she was
(Line 25) sorting her things at her desk just before leaving, and
was wondering what girl would have that old desk—if
they cared to risk another girl, and whether the other poor
girl would slave through the years she should have been
frivolous, only to have some man step in at the end and
(Line 30) induce her to surrender the things she had gained through
sacrifice and toil.
As she wrote a final letter on her typewriter—she did
hate letting the old machine go—Georgia did considerable
philosophizing about the irony of working for things only
(Line 35) to the end of giving them up. She had waded through snowdrifts
and been drenched in pouring rains, she had been
frozen with the cold and prostrated with the heat, she had
been blown about by Chicago wind until it was strange
there was any of her left in one piece, she had had front
(Line 40) doors—yes, and back doors too—slammed in her face,
she had been the butt of the alleged wit of menials and
hirelings, she had been patronized by vapid women as
the poor girl who must make her living some way, she
had been roasted by—but never mind—she had had
(Line 45) a beat* or two! And now she was to wind it all up by
marrying Joseph Tank, who had made a great deal of
money out of the manufacture of paper bags. This from
her—who had always believed she would end her days
in New York, or perhaps write a realistic novel exposing
50 some mighty evil!
* the area regularly covered by a reporter
In line 27, “poor” most nearly means
Correct Answer
A. Pitiable
Explanation
In line 27, the word "poor" most likely means "pitiable". This can be inferred from the context of the sentence, where the narrator is wondering if the other girl who takes over her desk will have to sacrifice and toil like she did. The use of the word "poor" suggests that the narrator feels sorry for this potential girl, as she believes that she will have to give up the things she gained through hard work and struggle. Therefore, "poor" in this context means pitiable or deserving of sympathy.
13.
The following passage is an excerpt from a 1909 novel.
Georgia, the main character, is a reporter in an otherwise
all-male newsroom.
Georgia was to be married. It was the week before
Christmas, and on the last day of the year she would
become Mrs. Joseph Tank. She had told Joe that if
they were to be married at all they might as well get it
(Line 5) over with this year, and still there was no need of being
married any earlier in the year than was necessary. She
assured him that she married him simply because she was
tired of having paper bags waved before her eyes everywhere
she went and she thought if she were once officially
(Line 10) associated with him people would not flaunt his idiosyncrasies
at her that way. And then Ernestine, her best friend,
approved of getting married, and Ernestine’s ideas were
usually good. To all of which Joe responded that she
certainly had a splendid head to figure it out that way.
(Line 15) Joe said that to his mind reasons for doing things weren’t
very important anyhow; it was doing them that counted.
Yesterday had been her last day on the paper. She had
felt queer about that thing of taking her last assignment,
though it was hard to reach just the proper state, for the
(Line 20) last story related to pork-packers, and pork-packing is
not a setting favorable to sentimental regrets. It was just
like the newspaper business not even to allow one a little
sentimental harrowing over one’s exodus from it. But the
time for gentle melancholy came later on when she was
(Line 25) sorting her things at her desk just before leaving, and
was wondering what girl would have that old desk—if
they cared to risk another girl, and whether the other poor
girl would slave through the years she should have been
frivolous, only to have some man step in at the end and
(Line 30) induce her to surrender the things she had gained through
sacrifice and toil.
As she wrote a final letter on her typewriter—she did
hate letting the old machine go—Georgia did considerable
philosophizing about the irony of working for things only
(Line 35) to the end of giving them up. She had waded through snowdrifts
and been drenched in pouring rains, she had been
frozen with the cold and prostrated with the heat, she had
been blown about by Chicago wind until it was strange
there was any of her left in one piece, she had had front
(Line 40) doors—yes, and back doors too—slammed in her face,
she had been the butt of the alleged wit of menials and
hirelings, she had been patronized by vapid women as
the poor girl who must make her living some way, she
had been roasted by—but never mind—she had had
(Line 45) a beat* or two! And now she was to wind it all up by
marrying Joseph Tank, who had made a great deal of
money out of the manufacture of paper bags. This from
her—who had always believed she would end her days
in New York, or perhaps write a realistic novel exposing
50 some mighty evil!
* the area regularly covered by a reporter
Which most resembles the “irony” mentioned
in line 34 ?
Correct Answer
C. An athlete earning a starting position on a good team, only to quit in midseason
Explanation
The passage mentions the irony of working hard for something only to give it up in the end. This can be compared to an athlete earning a starting position on a good team, which is a desirable achievement, but then choosing to quit in the middle of the season, which contradicts the initial goal and effort put into earning the position.
14.
The following passage is an excerpt from a 1909 novel.
Georgia, the main character, is a reporter in an otherwise
all-male newsroom.
Georgia was to be married. It was the week before
Christmas, and on the last day of the year she would
become Mrs. Joseph Tank. She had told Joe that if
they were to be married at all they might as well get it
(Line 5) over with this year, and still there was no need of being
married any earlier in the year than was necessary. She
assured him that she married him simply because she was
tired of having paper bags waved before her eyes everywhere
she went and she thought if she were once officially
(Line 10) associated with him people would not flaunt his idiosyncrasies
at her that way. And then Ernestine, her best friend,
approved of getting married, and Ernestine’s ideas were
usually good. To all of which Joe responded that she
certainly had a splendid head to figure it out that way.
(Line 15) Joe said that to his mind reasons for doing things weren’t
very important anyhow; it was doing them that counted.
Yesterday had been her last day on the paper. She had
felt queer about that thing of taking her last assignment,
though it was hard to reach just the proper state, for the
(Line 20) last story related to pork-packers, and pork-packing is
not a setting favorable to sentimental regrets. It was just
like the newspaper business not even to allow one a little
sentimental harrowing over one’s exodus from it. But the
time for gentle melancholy came later on when she was
(Line 25) sorting her things at her desk just before leaving, and
was wondering what girl would have that old desk—if
they cared to risk another girl, and whether the other poor
girl would slave through the years she should have been
frivolous, only to have some man step in at the end and
(Line 30) induce her to surrender the things she had gained through
sacrifice and toil.
As she wrote a final letter on her typewriter—she did
hate letting the old machine go—Georgia did considerable
philosophizing about the irony of working for things only
(Line 35) to the end of giving them up. She had waded through snowdrifts
and been drenched in pouring rains, she had been
frozen with the cold and prostrated with the heat, she had
been blown about by Chicago wind until it was strange
there was any of her left in one piece, she had had front
(Line 40) doors—yes, and back doors too—slammed in her face,
she had been the butt of the alleged wit of menials and
hirelings, she had been patronized by vapid women as
the poor girl who must make her living some way, she
had been roasted by—but never mind—she had had
(Line 45) a beat* or two! And now she was to wind it all up by
marrying Joseph Tank, who had made a great deal of
money out of the manufacture of paper bags. This from
her—who had always believed she would end her days
in New York, or perhaps write a realistic novel exposing
50 some mighty evil!
* the area regularly covered by a reporter
The description in lines 35-45 (“She . . . two!”)
primarily serves to
Correct Answer
E. Show the adversities Georgia had to overcome as a reporter
Explanation
The passage in lines 35-45 describes the various hardships and challenges that Georgia had to face as a reporter. It mentions how she had to endure extreme weather conditions, face rejection and ridicule from others, and be patronized by vapid women. This serves to highlight the adversities that Georgia had to overcome in her profession as a reporter, emphasizing the difficulties she faced and the resilience she demonstrated.
15.
The following passage is an excerpt from a 1909 novel.
Georgia, the main character, is a reporter in an otherwise
all-male newsroom.
Georgia was to be married. It was the week before
Christmas, and on the last day of the year she would
become Mrs. Joseph Tank. She had told Joe that if
they were to be married at all they might as well get it
(Line 5) over with this year, and still there was no need of being
married any earlier in the year than was necessary. She
assured him that she married him simply because she was
tired of having paper bags waved before her eyes everywhere
she went and she thought if she were once officially
(Line 10) associated with him people would not flaunt his idiosyncrasies
at her that way. And then Ernestine, her best friend,
approved of getting married, and Ernestine’s ideas were
usually good. To all of which Joe responded that she
certainly had a splendid head to figure it out that way.
(Line 15) Joe said that to his mind reasons for doing things weren’t
very important anyhow; it was doing them that counted.
Yesterday had been her last day on the paper. She had
felt queer about that thing of taking her last assignment,
though it was hard to reach just the proper state, for the
(Line 20) last story related to pork-packers, and pork-packing is
not a setting favorable to sentimental regrets. It was just
like the newspaper business not even to allow one a little
sentimental harrowing over one’s exodus from it. But the
time for gentle melancholy came later on when she was
(Line 25) sorting her things at her desk just before leaving, and
was wondering what girl would have that old desk—if
they cared to risk another girl, and whether the other poor
girl would slave through the years she should have been
frivolous, only to have some man step in at the end and
(Line 30) induce her to surrender the things she had gained through
sacrifice and toil.
As she wrote a final letter on her typewriter—she did
hate letting the old machine go—Georgia did considerable
philosophizing about the irony of working for things only
(Line 35) to the end of giving them up. She had waded through snowdrifts
and been drenched in pouring rains, she had been
frozen with the cold and prostrated with the heat, she had
been blown about by Chicago wind until it was strange
there was any of her left in one piece, she had had front
(Line 40) doors—yes, and back doors too—slammed in her face,
she had been the butt of the alleged wit of menials and
hirelings, she had been patronized by vapid women as
the poor girl who must make her living some way, she
had been roasted by—but never mind—she had had
(Line 45) a beat* or two! And now she was to wind it all up by
marrying Joseph Tank, who had made a great deal of
money out of the manufacture of paper bags. This from
her—who had always believed she would end her days
in New York, or perhaps write a realistic novel exposing
50 some mighty evil!
* the area regularly covered by a reporter
In context, the phrase “This from her” (lines 47-48)
helps to suggest that a
Correct Answer
C. Certain decision is out of character
Explanation
The phrase "This from her" suggests that the decision of marrying Joseph Tank, who made money out of paper bag manufacturing, is unexpected or out of character for the main character. It implies that the main character had different plans or aspirations for her life, such as ending up in New York or writing a realistic novel exposing some evil. Therefore, the phrase indicates that the decision to marry Joseph Tank is contrary to what the main character had envisioned for herself.
16.
The following passage is adapted from a book about
television and popular culture.
Ridiculing television, and warning about its inherent
evils, is nothing new. It has been that way since the
medium was invented, and television hasn’t exactly
been lavished with respect as the decades have passed.
(Line 5) I suspect, though, that a lot of the fear and loathing
directed at television comes out of a time-honored,
reflexive overreaction to the dominant medium of the
moment. For the past several decades, television has
been blamed for corrupting our youth and exciting
(Line 10) our adults, distorting reality, and basically being a
big, perhaps dangerous, waste of time. Before TV,
radio and film were accused of the same things. And
long before that—in fact, some 2,500 years earlier—
philosophers were arguing that poetry and drama
(Line 15) should be excluded from any ideal city on much the
same grounds.
In Book 10 of the Republic, Plato (428-348 B.C.)
attacks epic poet Homer (c. 850 B.C.) and the tragedians
on several grounds, all of which have a familiar
(Line 20) ring. “Their productions are appearances and not realities,”
he gripes. “Drawing, and in fact all imitation . . . [is] quite
removed from the truth.” The audience, as well as the art
form, troubled Plato, whose remarks are colored by an
implied disdain for the popularity of public performances.
(Line 25) The “common people,” as Plato so charitably calls them,
are drawn to “peevish and diverse” characters—such as
Odysseus and other heroes in the Iliad and the Odyssey—
who (to Plato, anyway) engage in such questionable
displays of emotion as “spinning out a long melancholy
(Line 30) lamentation” or “disfiguring themselves in grief.” To
Plato, baring such intimate sorrows is not to be condoned.
(Clearly, he would have given thumbs down to the central
characters of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth.) “If you
receive the pleasure-seasoned Muse1 of song and epic,”
(Line 35) Plato warns, “pleasure and pain will be kings in your city,
instead of law.” Finally, Plato sums up his anti-arts argument
with the cold, sweeping pronouncement that “poetry
is not to be taken seriously.”
One academic who has studied and written extensively
(Line 40) about both Plato and television suggests that Plato, rather
than being anti-arts, was merely an elitist. Plato wanted
to ban poetry readings and live theater, the argument
goes, because, being free and accessible and raucous and
extremely popular, they were the mass entertainment
(Line 45) of that era. “If, instead of ‘tragedy’ and ‘poetry,’ and
‘Homer’ and ‘Aeschylus,’2 you read ‘mass entertainment’
or ‘popular media,’ you’ll recognize Plato’s arguments as
the ancestor of all the reasons we have today for being
suspicious of television.”
(Line 50) To wit: poetry, by which Plato means drama, confuses
us between appearance and reality. The action it presents
is too extreme and violent. Most important, it’s a corrupting
influence, perverting its audience by bombarding it
with inferior characters and vulgar subjects—and
(Line 55) constituting, in Plato’s own words, “a harm to the mind of
its audience.”
If Plato’s Republic had become reality, it would have
been a republic with a lot of empty libraries, theaters, and
museums—if, indeed, those repositories of the arts would
(Line 60) have survived at all. Plato’s personal utopia never came to
pass—but throughout the centuries, wherever and whenever
a new medium of artistic expression attracted a lot
of people, someone has been ready, waiting, and eager to
attack its content and fear its impact.
1 The Muses inspired poetry and song in Greek mythology.
2 Aeschylus (525-456 B.C.) was a Greek tragic dramatist.
The opening paragraph primarily serves to
Correct Answer
C. Place contemporary criticism of television in a historical context
Explanation
The opening paragraph serves to place contemporary criticism of television in a historical context. It highlights that ridiculing television and warning about its evils is not a new phenomenon and has been happening since the medium was invented. It also mentions that television has been blamed for corrupting youth and distorting reality, similar to how radio, film, poetry, and drama were accused of the same things in the past. This context suggests that the fear and criticism directed at television may be a reflexive overreaction to the dominant medium of the moment, which has been a recurring pattern throughout history.
17.
The following passage is adapted from a book about
television and popular culture.
Ridiculing television, and warning about its inherent
evils, is nothing new. It has been that way since the
medium was invented, and television hasn’t exactly
been lavished with respect as the decades have passed.
5 I suspect, though, that a lot of the fear and loathing
directed at television comes out of a time-honored,
reflexive overreaction to the dominant medium of the
moment. For the past several decades, television has
been blamed for corrupting our youth and exciting
10 our adults, distorting reality, and basically being a
big, perhaps dangerous, waste of time. Before TV,
radio and film were accused of the same things. And
long before that—in fact, some 2,500 years earlier—
philosophers were arguing that poetry and drama
15 should be excluded from any ideal city on much the
same grounds.
In Book 10 of the Republic, Plato (428-348 B.C.)
attacks epic poet Homer (c. 850 B.C.) and the tragedians
on several grounds, all of which have a familiar
20 ring. “Their productions are appearances and not realities,”
he gripes. “Drawing, and in fact all imitation . . . [is] quite
removed from the truth.” The audience, as well as the art
form, troubled Plato, whose remarks are colored by an
implied disdain for the popularity of public performances.
25 The “common people,” as Plato so charitably calls them,
are drawn to “peevish and diverse” characters—such as
Odysseus and other heroes in the Iliad and the Odyssey—
who (to Plato, anyway) engage in such questionable
displays of emotion as “spinning out a long melancholy
30 lamentation” or “disfiguring themselves in grief.” To
Plato, baring such intimate sorrows is not to be condoned.
(Clearly, he would have given thumbs down to the central
characters of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth.) “If you
receive the pleasure-seasoned Muse1 of song and epic,”
35 Plato warns, “pleasure and pain will be kings in your city,
instead of law.” Finally, Plato sums up his anti-arts argument
with the cold, sweeping pronouncement that “poetry
is not to be taken seriously.”
One academic who has studied and written extensively
40 about both Plato and television suggests that Plato, rather
than being anti-arts, was merely an elitist. Plato wanted
to ban poetry readings and live theater, the argument
goes, because, being free and accessible and raucous and
extremely popular, they were the mass entertainment
45 of that era. “If, instead of ‘tragedy’ and ‘poetry,’ and
‘Homer’ and ‘Aeschylus,’2 you read ‘mass entertainment’
or ‘popular media,’ you’ll recognize Plato’s arguments as
the ancestor of all the reasons we have today for being
suspicious of television.”
50 To wit: poetry, by which Plato means drama, confuses
us between appearance and reality. The action it presents
is too extreme and violent. Most important, it’s a corrupting
influence, perverting its audience by bombarding it
with inferior characters and vulgar subjects—and con55
stituting, in Plato’s own words, “a harm to the mind of
its audience.”
If Plato’s Republic had become reality, it would have
been a republic with a lot of empty libraries, theaters, and
museums—if, indeed, those repositories of the arts would
60 have survived at all. Plato’s personal utopia never came to
pass—but throughout the centuries, wherever and whenever
a new medium of artistic expression attracted a lot
of people, someone has been ready, waiting, and eager to
attack its content and fear its impact.
1 The Muses inspired poetry and song in Greek mythology.
2 Aeschylus (525-456 B.C.) was a Greek tragic dramatist.
Which of the following television shows would
be LEAST vulnerable to the criticism expressed
in lines 8-11 (“For . . . time”) ?
Correct Answer
D. A documentary on the state of education in the nation
Explanation
A documentary on the state of education in the nation would be least vulnerable to the criticism expressed in lines 8-11 because it does not fall into the category of entertainment that is often criticized for distorting reality or being a waste of time. Documentaries are typically seen as informative and educational, focusing on real-life issues and providing a more serious and factual approach to storytelling. Therefore, it would be less likely to be criticized for corrupting or exciting its audience.
18.
The following passage is adapted from a book about
television and popular culture.
Ridiculing television, and warning about its inherent
evils, is nothing new. It has been that way since the
medium was invented, and television hasn’t exactly
been lavished with respect as the decades have passed.
(Line 5) I suspect, though, that a lot of the fear and loathing
directed at television comes out of a time-honored,
reflexive overreaction to the dominant medium of the
moment. For the past several decades, television has
been blamed for corrupting our youth and exciting
(Line 10) our adults, distorting reality, and basically being a
big, perhaps dangerous, waste of time. Before TV,
radio and film were accused of the same things. And
long before that—in fact, some 2,500 years earlier—
philosophers were arguing that poetry and drama
(Line 15) should be excluded from any ideal city on much the
same grounds.
In Book 10 of the Republic, Plato (428-348 B.C.)
attacks epic poet Homer (c. 850 B.C.) and the tragedians
on several grounds, all of which have a familiar
(Line 20) ring. “Their productions are appearances and not realities,”
he gripes. “Drawing, and in fact all imitation . . . [is] quite
removed from the truth.” The audience, as well as the art
form, troubled Plato, whose remarks are colored by an
implied disdain for the popularity of public performances.
(Line 25) The “common people,” as Plato so charitably calls them,
are drawn to “peevish and diverse” characters—such as
Odysseus and other heroes in the Iliad and the Odyssey—
who (to Plato, anyway) engage in such questionable
displays of emotion as “spinning out a long melancholy
(Line 30) lamentation” or “disfiguring themselves in grief.” To
Plato, baring such intimate sorrows is not to be condoned.
(Clearly, he would have given thumbs down to the central
characters of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth.) “If you
receive the pleasure-seasoned Muse1 of song and epic,”
(Line 35) Plato warns, “pleasure and pain will be kings in your city,
instead of law.” Finally, Plato sums up his anti-arts argument
with the cold, sweeping pronouncement that “poetry
is not to be taken seriously.”
One academic who has studied and written extensively
(Line 40) about both Plato and television suggests that Plato, rather
than being anti-arts, was merely an elitist. Plato wanted
to ban poetry readings and live theater, the argument
goes, because, being free and accessible and raucous and
extremely popular, they were the mass entertainment
(Line 45) of that era. “If, instead of ‘tragedy’ and ‘poetry,’ and
‘Homer’ and ‘Aeschylus,’2 you read ‘mass entertainment’
or ‘popular media,’ you’ll recognize Plato’s arguments as
the ancestor of all the reasons we have today for being
suspicious of television.”
(Line 50) To wit: poetry, by which Plato means drama, confuses
us between appearance and reality. The action it presents
is too extreme and violent. Most important, it’s a corrupting
influence, perverting its audience by bombarding it
with inferior characters and vulgar subjects—and
(Line 55) constituting, in Plato’s own words, “a harm to the mind of
its audience.”
If Plato’s Republic had become reality, it would have
been a republic with a lot of empty libraries, theaters, and
museums—if, indeed, those repositories of the arts would
(Line 60) have survived at all. Plato’s personal utopia never came to
pass—but throughout the centuries, wherever and whenever
a new medium of artistic expression attracted a lot
of people, someone has been ready, waiting, and eager to
attack its content and fear its impact.
1 The Muses inspired poetry and song in Greek mythology.
2 Aeschylus (525-456 B.C.) was a Greek tragic dramatist.
In line 26, “drawn” most nearly means
Correct Answer
D. Attracted
Explanation
In line 26, the word "drawn" means attracted. This can be inferred from the context that Plato is describing how the "common people" are drawn to characters in poetry and drama who engage in questionable displays of emotion. The word "drawn" implies that the audience is being pulled towards these characters and their actions, indicating an attraction or interest in them.
19.
The following passage is adapted from a book about
television and popular culture.
Ridiculing television, and warning about its inherent
evils, is nothing new. It has been that way since the
medium was invented, and television hasn’t exactly
been lavished with respect as the decades have passed.
(Line 5) I suspect, though, that a lot of the fear and loathing
directed at television comes out of a time-honored,
reflexive overreaction to the dominant medium of the
moment. For the past several decades, television has
been blamed for corrupting our youth and exciting
(Line 10) our adults, distorting reality, and basically being a
big, perhaps dangerous, waste of time. Before TV,
radio and film were accused of the same things. And
long before that—in fact, some 2,500 years earlier—
philosophers were arguing that poetry and drama
(Line 15) should be excluded from any ideal city on much the
same grounds.
In Book 10 of the Republic, Plato (428-348 B.C.)
attacks epic poet Homer (c. 850 B.C.) and the tragedians
on several grounds, all of which have a familiar
(Line 20) ring. “Their productions are appearances and not realities,”
he gripes. “Drawing, and in fact all imitation . . . [is] quite
removed from the truth.” The audience, as well as the art
form, troubled Plato, whose remarks are colored by an
implied disdain for the popularity of public performances.
(Line 25) The “common people,” as Plato so charitably calls them,
are drawn to “peevish and diverse” characters—such as
Odysseus and other heroes in the Iliad and the Odyssey—
who (to Plato, anyway) engage in such questionable
displays of emotion as “spinning out a long melancholy
(Line 30) lamentation” or “disfiguring themselves in grief.” To
Plato, baring such intimate sorrows is not to be condoned.
(Clearly, he would have given thumbs down to the central
characters of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth.) “If you
receive the pleasure-seasoned Muse1 of song and epic,”
(Line 35) Plato warns, “pleasure and pain will be kings in your city,
instead of law.” Finally, Plato sums up his anti-arts argument
with the cold, sweeping pronouncement that “poetry
is not to be taken seriously.”
One academic who has studied and written extensively
(Line 40) about both Plato and television suggests that Plato, rather
than being anti-arts, was merely an elitist. Plato wanted
to ban poetry readings and live theater, the argument
goes, because, being free and accessible and raucous and
extremely popular, they were the mass entertainment
(Line 45) of that era. “If, instead of ‘tragedy’ and ‘poetry,’ and
‘Homer’ and ‘Aeschylus,’2 you read ‘mass entertainment’
or ‘popular media,’ you’ll recognize Plato’s arguments as
the ancestor of all the reasons we have today for being
suspicious of television.”
(Line 50) To wit: poetry, by which Plato means drama, confuses
us between appearance and reality. The action it presents
is too extreme and violent. Most important, it’s a corrupting
influence, perverting its audience by bombarding it
with inferior characters and vulgar subjects—and
(Line 55) constituting, in Plato’s own words, “a harm to the mind of
its audience.”
If Plato’s Republic had become reality, it would have
been a republic with a lot of empty libraries, theaters, and
museums—if, indeed, those repositories of the arts would
(Line 60) have survived at all. Plato’s personal utopia never came to
pass—but throughout the centuries, wherever and whenever
a new medium of artistic expression attracted a lot
of people, someone has been ready, waiting, and eager to
attack its content and fear its impact.
1 The Muses inspired poetry and song in Greek mythology.
2 Aeschylus (525-456 B.C.) was a Greek tragic dramatist.
Which of the following best characterizes Plato’s view
of the heroes mentioned in line 27 ?
Correct Answer
E. Contempt
Explanation
Plato's view of the heroes mentioned in line 27 can be characterized as contempt. Plato criticizes the heroes, such as Odysseus, for engaging in questionable displays of emotion, such as spinning out a long melancholy lamentation or disfiguring themselves in grief. He disapproves of these intimate sorrows being bared and would not condone such behavior. This contemptuous view is evident in Plato's disdain for the popularity of public performances and his belief that poetry and drama should be excluded from any ideal city.
20.
The following passage is adapted from a book about
television and popular culture.
Ridiculing television, and warning about its inherent
evils, is nothing new. It has been that way since the
medium was invented, and television hasn’t exactly
been lavished with respect as the decades have passed.
(Line 5) I suspect, though, that a lot of the fear and loathing
directed at television comes out of a time-honored,
reflexive overreaction to the dominant medium of the
moment. For the past several decades, television has
been blamed for corrupting our youth and exciting
(Line 10) our adults, distorting reality, and basically being a
big, perhaps dangerous, waste of time. Before TV,
radio and film were accused of the same things. And
long before that—in fact, some 2,500 years earlier—
philosophers were arguing that poetry and drama
(Line 15) should be excluded from any ideal city on much the
same grounds.
In Book 10 of the Republic, Plato (428-348 B.C.)
attacks epic poet Homer (c. 850 B.C.) and the tragedians
on several grounds, all of which have a familiar
(Line 20) ring. “Their productions are appearances and not realities,”
he gripes. “Drawing, and in fact all imitation . . . [is] quite
removed from the truth.” The audience, as well as the art
form, troubled Plato, whose remarks are colored by an
implied disdain for the popularity of public performances.
(Line 25) The “common people,” as Plato so charitably calls them,
are drawn to “peevish and diverse” characters—such as
Odysseus and other heroes in the Iliad and the Odyssey—
who (to Plato, anyway) engage in such questionable
displays of emotion as “spinning out a long melancholy
(Line 30) lamentation” or “disfiguring themselves in grief.” To
Plato, baring such intimate sorrows is not to be condoned.
(Clearly, he would have given thumbs down to the central
characters of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth.) “If you
receive the pleasure-seasoned Muse1 of song and epic,”
(Line 35) Plato warns, “pleasure and pain will be kings in your city,
instead of law.” Finally, Plato sums up his anti-arts argument
with the cold, sweeping pronouncement that “poetry
is not to be taken seriously.”
One academic who has studied and written extensively
(Line 40) about both Plato and television suggests that Plato, rather
than being anti-arts, was merely an elitist. Plato wanted
to ban poetry readings and live theater, the argument
goes, because, being free and accessible and raucous and
extremely popular, they were the mass entertainment
(Line 45) of that era. “If, instead of ‘tragedy’ and ‘poetry,’ and
‘Homer’ and ‘Aeschylus,’2 you read ‘mass entertainment’
or ‘popular media,’ you’ll recognize Plato’s arguments as
the ancestor of all the reasons we have today for being
suspicious of television.”
(Line 50) To wit: poetry, by which Plato means drama, confuses
us between appearance and reality. The action it presents
is too extreme and violent. Most important, it’s a corrupting
influence, perverting its audience by bombarding it
with inferior characters and vulgar subjects—and
(Line 55) constituting, in Plato’s own words, “a harm to the mind of
its audience.”
If Plato’s Republic had become reality, it would have
been a republic with a lot of empty libraries, theaters, and
museums—if, indeed, those repositories of the arts would
(Line 60) have survived at all. Plato’s personal utopia never came to
pass—but throughout the centuries, wherever and whenever
a new medium of artistic expression attracted a lot
of people, someone has been ready, waiting, and eager to
attack its content and fear its impact.
1 The Muses inspired poetry and song in Greek mythology.
2 Aeschylus (525-456 B.C.) was a Greek tragic dramatist.
The “academic” (line 39) indicates that Plato was
primarily characterized by his
Correct Answer
E. Snobbishness
Explanation
The passage suggests that Plato's opposition to poetry and drama was not due to a genuine dislike of the arts, but rather because he viewed them as popular and accessible forms of entertainment. The use of the term "elitist" in line 40 supports this interpretation. Plato's desire to ban these forms of entertainment can be seen as a form of snobbishness, as he believed that they were not suitable for his ideal city and preferred a more intellectual and controlled society.
21.
The following passage is adapted from a book about
television and popular culture.
Ridiculing television, and warning about its inherent
evils, is nothing new. It has been that way since the
medium was invented, and television hasn’t exactly
been lavished with respect as the decades have passed.
(Line 5) I suspect, though, that a lot of the fear and loathing
directed at television comes out of a time-honored,
reflexive overreaction to the dominant medium of the
moment. For the past several decades, television has
been blamed for corrupting our youth and exciting
(Line 10) our adults, distorting reality, and basically being a
big, perhaps dangerous, waste of time. Before TV,
radio and film were accused of the same things. And
long before that—in fact, some 2,500 years earlier—
philosophers were arguing that poetry and drama
(Line 15) should be excluded from any ideal city on much the
same grounds.
In Book 10 of the Republic, Plato (428-348 B.C.)
attacks epic poet Homer (c. 850 B.C.) and the tragedians
on several grounds, all of which have a familiar
(Line 20) ring. “Their productions are appearances and not realities,”
he gripes. “Drawing, and in fact all imitation . . . [is] quite
removed from the truth.” The audience, as well as the art
form, troubled Plato, whose remarks are colored by an
implied disdain for the popularity of public performances.
(Line 25) The “common people,” as Plato so charitably calls them,
are drawn to “peevish and diverse” characters—such as
Odysseus and other heroes in the Iliad and the Odyssey—
who (to Plato, anyway) engage in such questionable
displays of emotion as “spinning out a long melancholy
(Line 30) lamentation” or “disfiguring themselves in grief.” To
Plato, baring such intimate sorrows is not to be condoned.
(Clearly, he would have given thumbs down to the central
characters of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth.) “If you
receive the pleasure-seasoned Muse1 of song and epic,”
(Line 35) Plato warns, “pleasure and pain will be kings in your city,
instead of law.” Finally, Plato sums up his anti-arts argument
with the cold, sweeping pronouncement that “poetry
is not to be taken seriously.”
One academic who has studied and written extensively
(Line 40) about both Plato and television suggests that Plato, rather
than being anti-arts, was merely an elitist. Plato wanted
to ban poetry readings and live theater, the argument
goes, because, being free and accessible and raucous and
extremely popular, they were the mass entertainment
(Line 45) of that era. “If, instead of ‘tragedy’ and ‘poetry,’ and
‘Homer’ and ‘Aeschylus,’2 you read ‘mass entertainment’
or ‘popular media,’ you’ll recognize Plato’s arguments as
the ancestor of all the reasons we have today for being
suspicious of television.”
(Line 50) To wit: poetry, by which Plato means drama, confuses
us between appearance and reality. The action it presents
is too extreme and violent. Most important, it’s a corrupting
influence, perverting its audience by bombarding it
with inferior characters and vulgar subjects—and
(Line 55) constituting, in Plato’s own words, “a harm to the mind of
its audience.”
If Plato’s Republic had become reality, it would have
been a republic with a lot of empty libraries, theaters, and
museums—if, indeed, those repositories of the arts would
(Line 60) have survived at all. Plato’s personal utopia never came to
pass—but throughout the centuries, wherever and whenever
a new medium of artistic expression attracted a lot
of people, someone has been ready, waiting, and eager to
attack its content and fear its impact.
1 The Muses inspired poetry and song in Greek mythology.
2 Aeschylus (525-456 B.C.) was a Greek tragic dramatist.
The primary purpose of the statements in lines 39-45 (“One . . . that era”) is to
Correct Answer
A. Provide an interpretation of a viewpoint described in the previous paragrapH
Explanation
The statements in lines 39-45 provide an interpretation of the viewpoint described in the previous paragraph. They suggest that Plato's opposition to poetry readings and live theater was not necessarily due to his disdain for the arts, but rather because they were popular forms of mass entertainment. By substituting "tragedy" and "poetry" with "mass entertainment" and "popular media," the statements demonstrate that Plato's arguments against these forms of entertainment are similar to the reasons people today are suspicious of television. This interpretation helps to explain the historical context and relevance of Plato's viewpoint.
22.
The following passage is adapted from a book about
television and popular culture.
Ridiculing television, and warning about its inherent
evils, is nothing new. It has been that way since the
medium was invented, and television hasn’t exactly
been lavished with respect as the decades have passed.
(Line 5) I suspect, though, that a lot of the fear and loathing
directed at television comes out of a time-honored,
reflexive overreaction to the dominant medium of the
moment. For the past several decades, television has
been blamed for corrupting our youth and exciting
(Line 10) our adults, distorting reality, and basically being a
big, perhaps dangerous, waste of time. Before TV,
radio and film were accused of the same things. And
long before that—in fact, some 2,500 years earlier—
philosophers were arguing that poetry and drama
(Line 15) should be excluded from any ideal city on much the
same grounds.
In Book 10 of the Republic, Plato (428-348 B.C.)
attacks epic poet Homer (c. 850 B.C.) and the tragedians
on several grounds, all of which have a familiar
(Line 20) ring. “Their productions are appearances and not realities,”
he gripes. “Drawing, and in fact all imitation . . . [is] quite
removed from the truth.” The audience, as well as the art
form, troubled Plato, whose remarks are colored by an
implied disdain for the popularity of public performances.
(Line 25) The “common people,” as Plato so charitably calls them,
are drawn to “peevish and diverse” characters—such as
Odysseus and other heroes in the Iliad and the Odyssey—
who (to Plato, anyway) engage in such questionable
displays of emotion as “spinning out a long melancholy
(Line 30) lamentation” or “disfiguring themselves in grief.” To
Plato, baring such intimate sorrows is not to be condoned.
(Clearly, he would have given thumbs down to the central
characters of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth.) “If you
receive the pleasure-seasoned Muse1 of song and epic,”
(Line 35) Plato warns, “pleasure and pain will be kings in your city,
instead of law.” Finally, Plato sums up his anti-arts argument
with the cold, sweeping pronouncement that “poetry
is not to be taken seriously.”
One academic who has studied and written extensively
(Line 40) about both Plato and television suggests that Plato, rather
than being anti-arts, was merely an elitist. Plato wanted
to ban poetry readings and live theater, the argument
goes, because, being free and accessible and raucous and
extremely popular, they were the mass entertainment
(Line 45) of that era. “If, instead of ‘tragedy’ and ‘poetry,’ and
‘Homer’ and ‘Aeschylus,’2 you read ‘mass entertainment’
or ‘popular media,’ you’ll recognize Plato’s arguments as
the ancestor of all the reasons we have today for being
suspicious of television.”
(Line 50) To wit: poetry, by which Plato means drama, confuses
us between appearance and reality. The action it presents
is too extreme and violent. Most important, it’s a corrupting
influence, perverting its audience by bombarding it
with inferior characters and vulgar subjects—and
(Line 55) constituting, in Plato’s own words, “a harm to the mind of
its audience.”
If Plato’s Republic had become reality, it would have
been a republic with a lot of empty libraries, theaters, and
museums—if, indeed, those repositories of the arts would
(Line 60) have survived at all. Plato’s personal utopia never came to
pass—but throughout the centuries, wherever and whenever
a new medium of artistic expression attracted a lot
of people, someone has been ready, waiting, and eager to
attack its content and fear its impact.
1 The Muses inspired poetry and song in Greek mythology.
2 Aeschylus (525-456 B.C.) was a Greek tragic dramatist.
The fourth paragraph (lines 50-56) indicates that
Plato’s principal objection to “poetry” (line 50)
was its
Correct Answer(s)
B. Widespread popularity
D. Influence on people’s morals
Explanation
Plato's principal objection to "poetry" was its widespread popularity and its influence on people's morals. He believed that poetry, which included drama, confused the audience between appearance and reality. He also argued that it presented extreme and violent actions, and corrupted its audience by bombarding them with inferior characters and vulgar subjects. Plato saw poetry as a harm to the mind of its audience. Therefore, his objection to poetry was based on its popularity and its perceived negative impact on society.
23.
The following passage is adapted from a book about
television and popular culture.
Ridiculing television, and warning about its inherent
evils, is nothing new. It has been that way since the
medium was invented, and television hasn’t exactly
been lavished with respect as the decades have passed.
(Line 5) I suspect, though, that a lot of the fear and loathing
directed at television comes out of a time-honored,
reflexive overreaction to the dominant medium of the
moment. For the past several decades, television has
been blamed for corrupting our youth and exciting
(Line 10) our adults, distorting reality, and basically being a
big, perhaps dangerous, waste of time. Before TV,
radio and film were accused of the same things. And
long before that—in fact, some 2,500 years earlier—
philosophers were arguing that poetry and drama
(Line 15) should be excluded from any ideal city on much the
same grounds.
In Book 10 of the Republic, Plato (428-348 B.C.)
attacks epic poet Homer (c. 850 B.C.) and the tragedians
on several grounds, all of which have a familiar
(Line 20) ring. “Their productions are appearances and not realities,”
he gripes. “Drawing, and in fact all imitation . . . [is] quite
removed from the truth.” The audience, as well as the art
form, troubled Plato, whose remarks are colored by an
implied disdain for the popularity of public performances.
(Line 25) The “common people,” as Plato so charitably calls them,
are drawn to “peevish and diverse” characters—such as
Odysseus and other heroes in the Iliad and the Odyssey—
who (to Plato, anyway) engage in such questionable
displays of emotion as “spinning out a long melancholy
(Line 30) lamentation” or “disfiguring themselves in grief.” To
Plato, baring such intimate sorrows is not to be condoned.
(Clearly, he would have given thumbs down to the central
characters of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth.) “If you
receive the pleasure-seasoned Muse1 of song and epic,”
(Line 35) Plato warns, “pleasure and pain will be kings in your city,
instead of law.” Finally, Plato sums up his anti-arts argument
with the cold, sweeping pronouncement that “poetry
is not to be taken seriously.”
One academic who has studied and written extensively
(Line 40) about both Plato and television suggests that Plato, rather
than being anti-arts, was merely an elitist. Plato wanted
to ban poetry readings and live theater, the argument
goes, because, being free and accessible and raucous and
extremely popular, they were the mass entertainment
(Line 45) of that era. “If, instead of ‘tragedy’ and ‘poetry,’ and
‘Homer’ and ‘Aeschylus,’2 you read ‘mass entertainment’
or ‘popular media,’ you’ll recognize Plato’s arguments as
the ancestor of all the reasons we have today for being
suspicious of television.”
(Line 50) To wit: poetry, by which Plato means drama, confuses
us between appearance and reality. The action it presents
is too extreme and violent. Most important, it’s a corrupting
influence, perverting its audience by bombarding it
with inferior characters and vulgar subjects—and
(Line 55) constituting, in Plato’s own words, “a harm to the mind of
its audience.”
If Plato’s Republic had become reality, it would have
been a republic with a lot of empty libraries, theaters, and
museums—if, indeed, those repositories of the arts would
(Line 60) have survived at all. Plato’s personal utopia never came to
pass—but throughout the centuries, wherever and whenever
a new medium of artistic expression attracted a lot
of people, someone has been ready, waiting, and eager to
attack its content and fear its impact.
1 The Muses inspired poetry and song in Greek mythology.
2 Aeschylus (525-456 B.C.) was a Greek tragic dramatist.
The author of the passage would probably agree with
which of the following statements about the “utopia”
referred to in line 60 ?
Correct Answer
B. It would have stifled human creativity.
Explanation
The passage discusses Plato's views on poetry and drama and suggests that he wanted to ban these forms of art because they were free, accessible, and popular. The passage also mentions that Plato believed these art forms to be corrupting and a harm to the mind of its audience. Based on this information, it can be inferred that the author would agree with the statement that the "utopia" referred to in line 60 would have stifled human creativity. This is because the author presents Plato's views as being against popular forms of artistic expression, suggesting that he would not have supported new artistic ventures.
24.
The following passage is adapted from a book about
television and popular culture.
Ridiculing television, and warning about its inherent
evils, is nothing new. It has been that way since the
medium was invented, and television hasn’t exactly
been lavished with respect as the decades have passed.
(Line 5) I suspect, though, that a lot of the fear and loathing
directed at television comes out of a time-honored,
reflexive overreaction to the dominant medium of the
moment. For the past several decades, television has
been blamed for corrupting our youth and exciting
(Line 10) our adults, distorting reality, and basically being a
big, perhaps dangerous, waste of time. Before TV,
radio and film were accused of the same things. And
long before that—in fact, some 2,500 years earlier—
philosophers were arguing that poetry and drama
(Line 15) should be excluded from any ideal city on much the
same grounds.
In Book 10 of the Republic, Plato (428-348 B.C.)
attacks epic poet Homer (c. 850 B.C.) and the tragedians
on several grounds, all of which have a familiar
(Line 20) ring. “Their productions are appearances and not realities,”
he gripes. “Drawing, and in fact all imitation . . . [is] quite
removed from the truth.” The audience, as well as the art
form, troubled Plato, whose remarks are colored by an
implied disdain for the popularity of public performances.
(Line 25) The “common people,” as Plato so charitably calls them,
are drawn to “peevish and diverse” characters—such as
Odysseus and other heroes in the Iliad and the Odyssey—
who (to Plato, anyway) engage in such questionable
displays of emotion as “spinning out a long melancholy
(Line 30) lamentation” or “disfiguring themselves in grief.” To
Plato, baring such intimate sorrows is not to be condoned.
(Clearly, he would have given thumbs down to the central
characters of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth.) “If you
receive the pleasure-seasoned Muse1 of song and epic,”
(Line 35) Plato warns, “pleasure and pain will be kings in your city,
instead of law.” Finally, Plato sums up his anti-arts argument
with the cold, sweeping pronouncement that “poetry
is not to be taken seriously.”
One academic who has studied and written extensively
(Line 40) about both Plato and television suggests that Plato, rather
than being anti-arts, was merely an elitist. Plato wanted
to ban poetry readings and live theater, the argument
goes, because, being free and accessible and raucous and
extremely popular, they were the mass entertainment
(Line 45) of that era. “If, instead of ‘tragedy’ and ‘poetry,’ and
‘Homer’ and ‘Aeschylus,’2 you read ‘mass entertainment’
or ‘popular media,’ you’ll recognize Plato’s arguments as
the ancestor of all the reasons we have today for being
suspicious of television.”
(Line 50) To wit: poetry, by which Plato means drama, confuses
us between appearance and reality. The action it presents
is too extreme and violent. Most important, it’s a corrupting
influence, perverting its audience by bombarding it
with inferior characters and vulgar subjects—and
(Line 55) constituting, in Plato’s own words, “a harm to the mind of
its audience.”
If Plato’s Republic had become reality, it would have
been a republic with a lot of empty libraries, theaters, and
museums—if, indeed, those repositories of the arts would
(Line 60) have survived at all. Plato’s personal utopia never came to
pass—but throughout the centuries, wherever and whenever
a new medium of artistic expression attracted a lot
of people, someone has been ready, waiting, and eager to
attack its content and fear its impact.
1 The Muses inspired poetry and song in Greek mythology.
2 Aeschylus (525-456 B.C.) was a Greek tragic dramatist.
The comment about “a new medium of artistic
expression” (line 62) primarily suggests that
Correct Answer
E. A popular new art form will always receive some form of negative response
Explanation
The comment about "a new medium of artistic expression" suggests that a popular new art form will always receive some form of negative response. This is supported by the statement that whenever a new medium of artistic expression attracts a lot of people, someone is ready to attack its content and fear its impact. This implies that there will always be opposition or criticism towards new art forms, regardless of the society or time period.