Professional Conduct Code Quiz

Students have an obligation to report any known violations of the Professional Conduct Code to the Dean of Students. This means that it is their responsibility to inform the Dean if they are aware of any breaches of the code. By reporting these violations, students contribute to maintaining a professional and ethical environment within the academic institution.

The explanation for the given correct answer is that the Jurisdiction of the Professional Conduct Code applies to all students who are doing work under the law school, regardless of their enrollment status or division within the university. This means that both full-time and part-time students in degree courses, as well as special students like visiting and transient students, are subject to the code. Therefore, the statement "The Jurisdiction of the Professional Conduct Code extends to all students doing work under the aegis of the law school" is true.

The Professional Conduct Code considers the violation of a law of the United States or any State as "unlawful conduct." This means that if someone breaks a law, it can be considered a violation of professional conduct. Therefore, the statement "Violation of a law of the United States or any State can constitute 'unlawful conduct' under the Professional Conduct Code" is true.

If a student in their final semester is accused of a Professional Conduct Code violation, their diploma will be withheld until the resolution of their case. This means that if the accusation is proven true and the student is found guilty of the violation, their diploma will not be awarded until the case is resolved. This is a precautionary measure to ensure that students are held accountable for their actions and that the integrity of the institution is maintained.

If a student forgets to sign the written pledge of the Professional Conduct Code, they are still subject to the rules of the Code. The act of signing the pledge is not what determines whether or not the student is bound by the rules; rather, it is the act of being a student that makes them subject to the Code. Forgetting to sign the pledge does not exempt them from following the rules outlined in the Code.

The Professional Conduct Code covers intentional violations of the administrative policies of Moot Court and Law Journals, Career Services, and the Law Library. This means that individuals who intentionally violate the administrative policies of any of these entities can be subject to disciplinary action under the Professional Conduct Code.

The four core values that characterize and animate the Emory Law School are excellence, integrity, respect, and service. These values reflect the school's commitment to providing high-quality education and maintaining ethical standards. They also emphasize the importance of treating others with respect and serving the community.

The burden of proof required for a conviction at a hearing before the Professional Conduct Court is "Clear and Convincing Evidence." This means that the evidence presented must be highly persuasive and leave no reasonable doubt in the minds of the court members. It is a higher burden of proof than preponderance of evidence, which is the standard used in civil cases. Strict liability and beyond a reasonable doubt are not applicable in this context.

An accused student has the option to avoid a hearing before the Professional Conduct Court by reaching a timely negotiated resolution with the complaining party and the prosecutor. This means that if the accused student can come to an agreement with both the complaining party and the prosecutor, they can resolve the issue without going through a formal hearing process. Therefore, the statement that an accused student may avoid a hearing through a negotiated resolution is true.

The correct answer is "None of the above." This means that none of the mentioned scenarios would make the proceedings before the Professional Conduct Court confidential. In other words, speaking to a potential witness, speaking with student defense counsel, or discussing the situation with a parent or guardian would not prevent the proceedings from being confidential.

A private attorney may not defend an accused student before the Professional Conduct Court. This is because the Professional Conduct Court is a specific court that handles cases involving professional conduct, and it is likely that only certain individuals are allowed to represent clients in this court. Private attorneys may not have the necessary qualifications or be recognized by the court to defend accused students in this particular setting.

not-available-via-ai

The correct answer is "Yes, but only if the offense occurred, or was discovered, any time within 14 days of the beginning of the examination period." This means that if a violation of the Professional Conduct Code happens or is found within 14 days of the start of the examination period, the hearing for the violation can be postponed until the next semester.

If the accused wants to appeal a decision of the Professional Conduct Court, they must notify the Dean in writing within 10 calendar days from the date of the hearing. This means that the statement is true, but it is subject to the condition of notifying the Dean within the specified time frame.

When "minor offenses" occur that do not reach the level of professional misconduct, the faculty member or senior staff person responsible for handling the conduct will inform the Dean of Students about the incident. This allows the Dean of Students to be aware of the situation and take appropriate action if necessary.