Intermediate English Quiz - Only The Top 1% Can Pass IT - 2

The correct answer is "to enjoy" because the phrase "didn't expect" suggests that the speaker had low expectations for enjoying the film. Using the infinitive form "to enjoy" after "didn't expect" indicates that the speaker was surprised by how much they actually enjoyed the film.

The correct answer is "going" because it is used as a gerund in this sentence. The sentence is suggesting that instead of going to the cinema, the speaker wants to watch a film at home. The gerund form of the verb "go" is used to indicate an action or activity.

The correct answer is "to see" because the sentence is expressing surprise at the action of seeing Sherry at the restaurant. The verb "see" is followed by the infinitive "to" to indicate the purpose or intention of the action.

The blank should be filled with "to have" because it indicates the purpose or intention of why the dad went to the doctor. In this case, the dad went to the doctor with the intention of having a surgery.

Young children shouldn't watch TV all day because excessive screen time can negatively impact their development and well-being. It is important for young children to engage in a variety of activities that promote physical, cognitive, and social growth. Spending too much time watching TV can hinder their ability to interact with others, limit their physical activity, and impede their learning and creativity. Therefore, it is advisable for young children to limit their TV viewing and engage in more balanced and enriching activities.

Learning English is a challenging task.

The phrase "did you manage" implies that the speaker is asking if the person was able to successfully complete the task of writing their report. The use of "to finish" after "manage" indicates that the speaker is expecting the person to have completed the action of writing their report. Therefore, the correct answer is "to finish."

In this sentence, the verb "offered" is followed by the pronoun "myself" and the preposition "to." When using the verb "offer" in this context, it is followed by "to + infinitive." Therefore, the correct answer is "to pay."

The correct answer is "to visit" because the sentence is expressing the intention or purpose of arranging something. In this case, the intention was to visit the National Gallery in the afternoon.

The correct answer is "try" because the sentence is suggesting that the person should attempt or experience listening to the radio while driving, as it is a very relaxing activity.

The correct answer is "press" because the sentence is in the present simple tense and the conditional "if" is used to express a condition that needs to be fulfilled in order for the door to unlock. Therefore, the door will unlock only if someone presses the green button.

This question is asking for the correct conditional to complete the sentence. The correct answer is "If you swim in this lake, you'll shiver from cold." This is because the sentence is discussing a hypothetical situation (swimming in the lake) and the result or consequence that would occur (shivering from cold). The conditional "If...then" structure is used to express this cause and effect relationship.

In this sentence, the verb "insisted" is followed by the preposition "on" and the gerund form of the verb "pay". This construction is used to express that someone strongly and firmly requested or demanded something. Therefore, the correct answer is "paying".

The correct answer is "playing." In this sentence, "playing" is used as a gerund, which functions as a noun. The phrase "playing for a first division team" is the subject of the sentence and is the thing that the speaker imagines. It suggests that the speaker believes that being a player for a first division team would be an exciting experience.

The correct answer is "to go" because it follows the structure "too + adjective + infinitive" which is used to express that the subject is too tired to do something. In this case, the subject is too tired to go out, so they stay at home and read magazines instead.

The correct answer is "to hear." In this sentence, the verb "hear" is used in the infinitive form after the preposition "to." The phrase "to hear from you again" indicates that the speaker is pleased or excited about receiving communication from the person they are addressing.

The correct answer is "If you weren't so lazy, you would have passed that test." This answer is correct because the sentence is referring to a past event (failing the test last week) and the condition (not being lazy) is also in the past. The correct verb tense to use in this case is the past perfect tense ("would have passed") to indicate that the action of passing the test should have happened in the past if the person hadn't been lazy.

Ingrid cannot afford to buy a new car because she does not have enough money to make the purchase. The phrase "to buy" indicates the action that Ingrid is unable to afford, which is the act of purchasing a new car.

The correct answer is "switched off" because using the past tense of the verb "switch off" in the conditional sentence "You would save energy if you switched off the lights more often" implies a hypothetical situation. It suggests that if someone were to turn off the lights more frequently, they would be able to conserve energy.

The correct answer is "If Paul hadn't driven too fast, he wouldn't be in trouble with the police." This is the correct answer because it uses the correct verb tense (past perfect) to indicate that the action of driving too fast (which happened in the past) would have prevented the consequence of being in trouble with the police (which is in the present).

The verb "hopes" is followed by the phrase "to get" because it indicates Adam's desire or intention to reach London at 9:00am. In this case, "to get" is used as an infinitive form of the verb "get" to show the purpose or goal of Adam's hope.

The correct answer is "killing." In this sentence, the word "denied" indicates that the guilty man is refusing or contradicting the accusation of killing his boss. The use of the gerund form "killing" is appropriate because it functions as the object of the verb "denied." It shows that the guilty man is denying the act of killing his boss.

The correct answer is "had left". This is because the sentence is referring to a hypothetical situation in the past. The use of "if" indicates a conditional statement, and the past perfect tense "had left" is used to express an action that should have happened before another past action (being in time). Therefore, if he had left home earlier, he would have been in time.

The correct answer is "would understand" because the sentence is expressing a hypothetical situation in the present. It is suggesting that if the person spoke louder, their classmates would be able to understand them. The use of "would" in the conditional form indicates that this is a hypothetical or unreal situation.

The correct answer is "If you'd fixed the roof, it wouldn't be leaking." This answer is correct because it uses the correct conditional structure to express a hypothetical situation in the present. The phrase "If you'd fixed the roof" indicates a past unrealized action, and the phrase "it wouldn't be leaking" shows the consequence of that action in the present.

If Lisa looked in the fridge, she would find the milk. The correct conditional to use in this sentence is the second conditional, which is used to talk about hypothetical or unreal situations in the present or future. In this case, the condition is Lisa looking in the fridge, and the result is her finding the milk.

The correct answer is "would call." In this conditional sentence, we are discussing a hypothetical situation where the speaker is advising someone else on what they should do. The use of "were" is not appropriate in this case because it is used for unreal or unlikely situations in the present or future. "Would call" is the correct form to express the speaker's recommendation in this hypothetical scenario.

Mr. Miles made Steven go home to get his project because he had left it at home.

The correct answer is "If I had a degree, I would have got that job." This answer is correct because it uses the correct verb tense and conditional structure to express a hypothetical situation in the past. The sentence implies that not having a degree was the reason for not getting the job, and it suggests that if the person had a degree, they would have been able to secure the job.

The correct answer is "would have watched." This is because the sentence is talking about a hypothetical situation in the past. The use of "if" indicates that the condition is not true, meaning Peter did buy the theatre tickets. Therefore, the correct conditional to use is the third conditional, which is formed by combining "would" + "have" + past participle verb. In this case, the verb is "watched."

The sentence is in the third conditional form, which is used to talk about a hypothetical situation in the past and its imaginary result. In this case, the speaker is saying that they didn't call because they forgot their phone at home. The correct answer "would have called" is the past perfect form of "call" in the third conditional, indicating that if the speaker had not forgotten their phone, they would have made a call.

The correct answer is "If you had remembered to bring a map, we wouldn't be lost now." This sentence is correct because it uses the correct verb tense (past perfect) to express a hypothetical situation in the past. The use of "had remembered" indicates that the action of remembering to bring a map should have happened before the current time (now), and the result of not being lost would have occurred.

"His prime" refers to the period of time when someone is at their peak or in the best stage of their life or career. In this context, it means that Carles Puyol was at the peak of his abilities and considered the best defender during that time.

The correct answer is "had studied" because it correctly completes the third conditional sentence. The third conditional is used to talk about a hypothetical situation in the past and its imaginary result. In this case, the hypothetical situation is that she didn't study for the exam, and the imaginary result is that she didn't pass the exam. Therefore, the correct form of the verb "study" in this context is "had studied."

The correct answer is "were." In this sentence, the speaker is using the second conditional to express a hypothetical situation. They are imagining a scenario where they are stronger, and in that case, they would be able to help carry the piano. The verb "were" is used instead of "am" or "is" because it is the correct form of the verb "to be" for the subjunctive mood in the past tense.

The given sentence is an example of the third conditional, which is used to talk about hypothetical situations in the past. In this case, the sentence suggests that the person being late in the past caused them to miss the bus. The correct answer "wouldn't have missed" accurately completes the sentence by expressing the result of the hypothetical situation.

The correct answer is "weren't." This is because the sentence is using a mixed conditional structure to express a hypothetical situation in the past. The speaker is suggesting that if the person had not been lazy in the past, they would have passed the exam.

The correct answer is "breakthrough." In this sentence, the phrase "The great breakthrough in her area" suggests that she made a significant new discovery or development. This achievement ultimately led to her promotion, indicating that her breakthrough had a significant impact and was highly valued in her field.

The correct answer is "would have listened." This is a mixed conditional construction, which is used to express a hypothetical situation in the past. The if clause "If you weren't so stubborn" is in the past simple tense, indicating an unreal condition. The main clause "you would have listened to your father's advice and go to college" is in the past perfect tense, indicating the unreal result of the hypothetical situation. It suggests that the person's stubbornness prevented them from following their father's advice and going to college.

The correct answer is "had had". In this sentence, the speaker is talking about a past unreal condition. They are saying that if he had the tools in the past, he would have repaired the car himself. The use of "had had" in the conditional clause indicates that the tools were not available to him in the past.

The phrase "having ups and downs" accurately describes a situation in which there are both good and bad moments. In the context of the business mentioned, it means that there are periods of success and prosperity, as well as periods of challenges and setbacks. Despite these fluctuations, the business is overall achieving positive outcomes, indicating that it is able to navigate through the ups and downs successfully.

The word "outcome" fits in the blank because it refers to the result or consequence of the big effort put into the business. It indicates that the success achieved is directly linked to the hard work and dedication put into the business.

The word "outlook" fits in the blank because it refers to the anticipated or expected future state or condition of something, in this case, the economy. The sentence suggests that the outlook for the economy is positive for the next 2 years, indicating that there is no need to worry.

The correct answer is "hadn't gone." This is because the third conditional is used to talk about hypothetical situations in the past, where the result is dependent on a condition that did not happen. In this case, the condition is "not going to the same university," and the result is "not getting married." Therefore, the correct form of the verb is "hadn't gone," indicating that they did go to the same university and as a result, they did get married.

The correct answer is "looking forward". This word is used to describe the feeling of anticipation and excitement about the future. In the given context, the brother is described as feeling good about starting his new football management career, which implies that he is looking forward to it. The word choice is appropriate because it contrasts with the previous feeling of cynicism and pessimism in his last job.

The phrase "act his age" means to behave in a more mature and responsible manner that is expected of someone of his age. In this context, the person being referred to is described as immature, indicating that he does not behave in a way that is appropriate for his age.

The phrase "at the bright side" is commonly used to express optimism or a positive outlook. In this context, Laura is described as feeling hopeful and believing that everything will turn out fine in the end. This aligns with the meaning of "at the bright side," indicating that Laura is focusing on the positive aspects of the situation rather than dwelling on any potential negatives.

The sentence states that the system in the bank suffered a [Blank], and it seems like they hacked it. The word "breakdown" fits perfectly in this context as it refers to a failure of a system. Therefore, it can be inferred that the correct answer is "breakdown."

The correct answer is "would be." This is because the sentence is using a mixed conditional, which combines elements of the second and third conditionals. The use of "hadn't taken" suggests a past unreal condition, indicating that they did take a taxi. The result of this condition is expressed in the second part of the sentence with "would be late," indicating that if they had not taken a taxi, they would currently be late.

The correct answer is "didn't rain." This is because the sentence is expressing a hypothetical situation using the second conditional. The use of "if" indicates that the statement is conditional, and the verb "didn't rain" is the correct form to use in this context. It suggests that if it does not rain, the speaker and others would be in the garden.