The Manchurian Crisis Trivia Quiz

Explanation
In 1931, Japan invaded Manchuria. This aggressive act marked the beginning of Japan's expansionist policies in East Asia. The invasion was prompted by Japan's desire for natural resources and territory. Japan claimed that the invasion was in response to an alleged attack on a Japanese railway, but it was widely believed to be a pretext for territorial expansion. The invasion of Manchuria ultimately led to Japan's full-scale invasion of China and its involvement in World War II.

Explanation
During the 1930s, Japan had trading partnerships with the United States, United Kingdom, and India. These countries were important trading partners for Japan during this time period, as they played a significant role in Japan's economic development and international trade. The United States and United Kingdom were major industrial powers, while India was an important colony of the British Empire with significant economic ties to Japan. These trading partnerships helped Japan in acquiring resources, technology, and markets for its goods, contributing to its economic growth during the 1930s.

Explanation
The main causes of the Manchurian Crisis were the Wall Street crash and Japan becoming overpopulated. The Wall Street crash in 1929 led to a global economic depression, which affected Japan's economy and increased its desire for resources. Japan, facing overpopulation and limited resources, sought to expand its territory in order to secure more resources. This led to the invasion of Manchuria in 1931, triggering the Manchurian Crisis.

Explanation
Manchukuo was the government in Manchuria after Japan invaded. Manchukuo was established by Japan in 1932 as a puppet state, with Puyi, the last emperor of China, installed as the nominal ruler. The Japanese government controlled all aspects of Manchukuo's administration, economy, and military. This government was used by Japan to legitimize their occupation of Manchuria and exploit its resources for their own benefit.

Explanation
John Costello called the League "Toothless" because he believed that they lacked power or influence. This term suggests that the League was ineffective and unable to enforce any meaningful actions or decisions. It implies that they were unable to take strong measures or enforce their authority, making them appear weak and ineffective in their role.