War & Peace 1
-
Psychology helps us understand why we behave the way we do - true or false?
-
True
-
False
-
The 'War & Peace 1' quiz explores the psychological and social aspects of conflict resolution. It assesses understanding of human behavior, conflict dynamics, and problem-solving strategies, highlighting the importance of power and perceptions in conflicts.
Quiz Preview
- 2.
Indonesia has had a total of ____ years of war during just 69 years of existence
Explanation
Indonesia has had a significant number of years of war, totaling 89, during its relatively short existence of 69 years. This suggests that the country has experienced a high level of conflict and instability throughout its history. The high number of years of war may have had significant impacts on the country's development and stability, making it an important factor to consider when analyzing Indonesia's history and current situation.Rate this question:
- 3.
Scientific study of behavior and mental process.
-
Humanistic Perspective
-
Critical Thinking
-
Nature-Nurture
-
Psychology
Correct Answer
A. PsychologyExplanation
Psychology is the correct answer because it is the scientific study of behavior and mental processes. It involves understanding and exploring human thoughts, emotions, behaviors, and experiences. By studying psychology, researchers aim to gain insights into various aspects of human behavior and mental processes, including cognition, perception, motivation, and personality. This field uses scientific methods to investigate and understand human behavior, making it the appropriate choice for the given description.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
England fought ____ wars in ____ years. Ave. _____ wars per decade.
-
46 wars in 460 years. Ave. 1 wars per decade.
-
28 wars in 460 years. Ave. 0.6 wars per decade.
-
28 wars in 560 years. Ave. 0.5 wars per decade.
Correct Answer
A. 28 wars in 460 years. Ave. 0.6 wars per decade.Explanation
The correct answer is 28 wars in 460 years. Ave. 0.6 wars per decade. This answer is correct because it accurately reflects the given information. It states that England fought 28 wars in a span of 460 years, and calculates the average number of wars per decade as 0.6.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
Since national independence
-
Indonesia has rarely been involved in a war because it is a great nation of peace lovers
-
Indonesia has the same frequency of war to decade ratio as the colonialist English
-
Indonesia has rarely not been involved in a war (6 in last 70 yrs) ave. 1.16 new war per decade.
Correct Answer
A. Indonesia has rarely not been involved in a war (6 in last 70 yrs) ave. 1.16 new war per decade.Explanation
The given answer states that Indonesia has rarely not been involved in a war, with a total of 6 wars in the last 70 years, averaging 1.16 new wars per decade. This suggests that Indonesia has a relatively low frequency of involvement in wars compared to other nations.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
Between 1740 and 1897, there were ________________”
-
23 wars and revolutions in Europe
-
370 wars and revolutions in Europe
-
125 wars and revolutions in Europe
-
230 wars and revolutions in Europe
Correct Answer
A. 230 wars and revolutions in EuropeExplanation
During the time period between 1740 and 1897, Europe experienced a significant number of wars and revolutions. The correct answer, 230 wars and revolutions in Europe, suggests that there were numerous conflicts and uprisings during this period. This indicates a high level of political and social instability in Europe during that time, with various countries and regions being involved in conflicts and revolutions.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
A conflict is between ____ people, groups or nations?
-
2
-
2 or more
-
3
-
3 or more
-
Any number
Correct Answer
A. 2 or moreExplanation
A conflict is typically defined as a disagreement or clash between two or more individuals, groups, or nations. It involves opposing interests, goals, or values, and often results in tension, hostility, or even violence. Therefore, the correct answer is "2 or more" because conflicts require the involvement of at least two parties.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
Process of objectively evaluating, comparing, analyzing, and synthesizing information.
-
Evolutionary Perspective
-
Critical Thinking
-
Nature-nurture
-
Hypothesis
Correct Answer
A. Critical ThinkingExplanation
Critical thinking is the process of objectively evaluating, comparing, analyzing, and synthesizing information. It involves questioning and examining ideas, arguments, and evidence in a logical and systematic way. Critical thinking allows individuals to make informed decisions, solve problems, and form well-reasoned judgments. It requires the ability to think independently, consider multiple perspectives, and recognize and avoid biases and fallacies. By engaging in critical thinking, individuals can effectively assess the validity and reliability of information, which is essential in today's complex and information-rich world.Rate this question:
-
- 9.
People try to resolve conflict by creative problem solving, which:
-
Assumes everyone can have their important needs met
-
Focuses on interests
-
Focuses on needs and wants
-
Focuses on concerns and fears
-
All of the above
Correct Answer
A. All of the aboveExplanation
The correct answer is "all of the above". When people try to resolve conflict through creative problem solving, they believe that everyone involved can have their important needs met. They focus on the interests of all parties involved, as well as their needs, wants, concerns, and fears. By considering all of these factors, individuals can work towards finding mutually beneficial solutions to conflicts.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
Controversy, ongoing dispute over the relative contributions of nature (heredity) and nurture (environment)
-
Neuroscience/Bio psychology
-
Nature-Nurture
-
Evolutionary Perspective
-
Sample Bias
Correct Answer
A. Nature-NurtureExplanation
The answer "Nature-Nurture" is the most appropriate in this context because the question mentions a dispute over the contributions of nature (heredity) and nurture (environment). The nature-nurture debate is a longstanding controversy in psychology and neuroscience, focusing on the extent to which genetics and environmental factors shape human behavior and development. This answer aligns with the topic of the question and provides a concise explanation.Rate this question:
-
- 11.
We’re made up of selfish genes which demand to be replicated. ...
-
Science of Evolutio theory
-
Science of Biology theory
-
Psychological theory
Correct Answer
A. Science of Evolutio theoryExplanation
The given correct answer is "Science of Evolution theory". This theory suggests that living organisms are driven by their genes to reproduce and pass on their genetic material to future generations. It explains the concept of natural selection, where individuals with advantageous traits are more likely to survive and reproduce, leading to the evolution of species over time. This theory is supported by extensive scientific evidence and is widely accepted in the field of biology.Rate this question:
-
- 12.
Power is potentially demonstrated throughout a conflict by:
-
Armed forces
-
Sanctions
-
Voting
-
All of the above
-
None of the above
Correct Answer
A. All of the aboveExplanation
Power is potentially demonstrated throughout a conflict by armed forces, sanctions, and voting. Armed forces can show power through the use of military strength and the ability to exert force. Sanctions can be a form of power by imposing economic restrictions on a country or entity, causing them to comply with certain demands. Voting can also be a demonstration of power, as it allows individuals or groups to express their preferences and influence decision-making processes. Therefore, all of the above options have the potential to demonstrate power in a conflict.Rate this question:
-
- 13.
The awesome technological power nations could now utilize led to...
-
Warfare in Europe actually became more frequent during 19th and early 20th centuries
-
Warfare in Europe actually became slightly less frequent during 19th and early 20th centuries
Correct Answer
A. Warfare in Europe actually became more frequent during 19th and early 20th centuriesExplanation
The correct answer is "Warfare in Europe actually became more frequent during the 19th and early 20th centuries." This is because the question is asking about the impact of the awesome technological power that nations could now utilize. With the advancements in technology during this time period, nations had access to more powerful weapons and military strategies, leading to an increase in the frequency of warfare in Europe.Rate this question:
-
- 14.
Which of the following is FALSE?
-
Past conflict makes future conflict more likely
-
Expectations of zero-sum outcome causes each to approach competitively
-
Conflict escalation is a self-perpetuating process
-
Most parties consider a lose-lose possibility
-
Each side expects to win
Correct Answer
A. Most parties consider a lose-lose possibilityExplanation
Most parties do not consider a lose-lose possibility. In conflicts, parties typically have their own goals and interests and often believe that they can achieve a win-lose outcome where they come out on top. They may not consider the possibility of both sides losing or reaching a lose-lose outcome. This belief in a potential win for their side can contribute to the escalation of conflicts and the competitive approach taken by each party.Rate this question:
-
- 15.
Which of the following is FALSE?
-
Some conflicts are more amenable to win-win than others
-
Most conflicts do have win-win solutions
-
Most people go into conflict assuming a win-win solution
-
Most conflicts fail to find a win-win solution that is there
Correct Answer
A. Most people go into conflict assuming a win-win solutionExplanation
Most people do not go into conflict assuming a win-win solution. In many conflicts, people tend to have a competitive mindset and prioritize their own interests over finding a mutually beneficial solution. This assumption is false because it does not accurately reflect the common approach to conflicts.Rate this question:
-
- 16.
Men are biologically primed to fight wars because of the large amount of testosterone they contain
-
Science of evolution theory
-
Science of biology theory
-
Psychological theory
Correct Answer
A. Science of evolution theoryExplanation
The correct answer is Science of evolution theory. This theory suggests that men are biologically primed to fight wars due to the large amount of testosterone they contain. According to evolutionary theory, traits that increase an individual's chances of survival and reproduction are more likely to be passed on to future generations. In the context of warfare, aggression and physical strength, which are associated with higher testosterone levels, may have provided an advantage in conflicts throughout human history. Therefore, this theory explains why men may be more inclined to engage in warfare.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 20, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Mar 20, 2023Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Apr 19, 2014Quiz Created by
Be_water_my_frie
Back to top