.
Contact my Team Leader
"Raise an exception" to let the IB know
Do nothing and award 0 for criterion E
Start with the main body (and mark ABCD)
Start with the RPPF (and mark E)
Either way is possible
3-4
2-3
1-2
2
3
4
Notify my Team Leader
Raise an exception to let the IB know and investigate
Do nothing as the EEs go through Turnitin, so this will be addressed elsewhere
Penalise under criterion D
Penalise the student under criterion D (as the structure/layout is not appropriate, if it includes an abstract)
Count if the overall length includes the abstract or not (if it is does not, the EE could be over 4000 words and I would need to stop reading after 4000 words, probably missing the end of the conclusion)
Do nothing, as the abstract is not a requirement any more, although it can contribute to the overall quality and coherence of the EE.
Inform my Team Leader, as the IB wants to keep track of the number of EEs that include an abstract
Yes, to help IB senior examiners understand the 5 marks I have awarded
No, a holistic comment may be enough
No, but I need to comment on key aspects, for example why I would award D3 (as opposed to D4)
At least 5 tools for B5 and 6 tools for B6
Skillful applications of the tools used (irrespective of their number)
Specific and relevant subject knowledge gained from secondary research
Maximum D3 (as this is part of the presentation of the EE)
Maximum E4 (as this shows poor engagement with research and research skills)
I should refer to the IB if I suspect academic malpractice
29 (as before)
28 (as the total has gone from 36 to 34)
Grade boundaries have not been set yet
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.