Marking Ee In Business Management

Business Management Extended Essay (EE) students are likely to score marks in the range of 3-4 for Criterion D. This criterion assesses the student's ability to critically evaluate the information collected and analyze its relevance to the research question. Scoring in this range indicates that the student has demonstrated a strong understanding of the information gathered and has provided a comprehensive analysis of its significance in relation to the research question.

If you suspect plagiarism, the best course of action is to raise an exception to let the IB (International Baccalaureate) know and investigate. This is important because plagiarism is a serious academic offense and needs to be addressed appropriately. By raising an exception, you are ensuring that the IB is made aware of the situation and can take the necessary steps to investigate and address the issue. This helps to maintain the integrity of the assessment process and ensures that all students are treated fairly.

The correct answer is that the grade boundaries have not been set yet. This means that the criteria for achieving an A grade in this particular context have not been determined or communicated. It is possible that the grade boundaries will be set at a later time or that the grading system for this particular assessment or course does not use specific grade boundaries.

The correct answer is specific and relevant subject knowledge gained from secondary research. This means that in order to award B5-B6, the individual should demonstrate a deep understanding of the subject matter through the use of secondary research. The number of tools used or the skillful application of those tools is not the main focus for this award.

A typical "glorified HLIA" with primary research methodology and recommendations would score a 2 on Criterion A. This suggests that while the HLIA has incorporated some elements of primary research and recommendations, it lacks depth and sophistication in its approach. It may not fully meet the criteria for higher scores such as 3 or 4, which would require more comprehensive and well-developed primary research and recommendations.

The correct answer suggests that if the individual suspects academic malpractice, they should refer to the IB (International Baccalaureate) for further investigation. This implies that the person should report any instances of suspected academic dishonesty or misconduct to the appropriate authorities in order to maintain the integrity of the educational system.

If there is no RPPF (Reflective Project Process Form), it means that the student has not completed the required reflection on their project. Criterion E of the IB assessment requires the completion of the RPPF, so if it is missing, the student cannot be awarded any marks for this criterion. Therefore, the appropriate action in this situation would be to do nothing and award 0 for criterion E.

The question is asking whether it is better to start with the main body of the Extended Essay (EE) or with the Reflections on Planning and Progress Form (RPPF). The correct answer is that either way is possible. This means that there is no strict rule or guideline on which part to start with first. It ultimately depends on the individual's preference and writing style. Some students may find it easier to begin with the main body and then reflect on their planning and progress, while others may prefer to start with the RPPF and use it as a guide for their main body.

The correct answer is to do nothing, as the abstract is not a requirement anymore, although it can contribute to the overall quality and coherence of the Extended Essay (EE). This means that even if a student includes an abstract, it will not affect their evaluation or result in any penalty. While an abstract can enhance the EE, it is not mandatory, and the absence of an abstract will not be considered a structural or layout issue. Therefore, there is no need to penalize the student or inform the Team Leader about the inclusion of an abstract.

The correct answer is No, but I need to comment on key aspects, for example why I would award D3 (as opposed to D4). This answer suggests that it is not necessary to refer to each criterion individually, but it is important to comment on key aspects of the criteria to explain the marks awarded. Specifically, the answer mentions the importance of explaining why a certain mark was awarded, such as choosing D3 over D4. This shows a deeper understanding of the evaluation process and the need to provide specific justifications for the marks given.