Leedy And Ormrod Book Research Quiz!

Basic research is research that is conducted to enhance basic knowledge about various aspects of the physical, biological, psychological, or social world. It aims to explore and understand fundamental principles and phenomena without any immediate practical application. This type of research focuses on expanding our understanding of the world and often contributes to the development of theories and concepts. It may also shed light on historical, cultural, or aesthetic phenomena, providing valuable insights into different aspects of human society and culture.

The correct answer represents a research hypothesis because it proposes a relationship between two variables (employing a sports psychologist and proportion of wins) and suggests that one variable (employing a sports psychologist) will have an effect on the other variable (proportion of wins). This hypothesis can be tested through research and data analysis to determine if there is a statistically significant relationship between the two variables.

The correct answer represents a null hypothesis because it states that there will be no difference in the rate of skill improvement between college gymnasts who practice meditation and those who do not. A null hypothesis is a statement that assumes there is no significant relationship or difference between variables being studied. In this case, the null hypothesis assumes that practicing meditation does not have an impact on the rate of skill improvement for college gymnasts.

Applied research is research that is conducted with the intention of addressing issues that are relevant to current practices, procedures, and policies. This type of research focuses on finding practical solutions and applying them to real-world problems. It is different from basic research, which aims to enhance knowledge about the world in general. Applied research is often conducted in collaboration with organizations or industries to directly address their specific needs and challenges.

The best person to select to critique your manuscript is a colleague who does not follow your work closely. This is because they can provide a fresh perspective and unbiased feedback. Colleagues who are very familiar with your work may have preconceived notions or biases that could affect their critique. On the other hand, a stranger off the street may not have the necessary expertise or understanding of your field to provide valuable feedback. Therefore, a colleague who is unfamiliar with your work but still knowledgeable in the field is the ideal choice for a fair and objective critique.

The first three questions can be answered through formal research methods such as conducting experiments, collecting data, and analyzing the results. However, the last question about which general education course is more interesting is subjective and cannot be answered through formal research as it depends on individual preferences and opinions.

The question is asking for a well-written basic research problem, and the answer option "How does the organization of mathematical information in long-term memory differ between 3-year-olds and 13-year-olds?" is the best choice. This question clearly defines the variables being studied (mathematical information and age), and it addresses a specific research problem (differences in organization of mathematical information in long-term memory). It also suggests a clear comparison between two age groups, making it a well-defined research question.

A well-written research problem should not include jargon associated with the field because it may make the problem statement difficult to understand for readers who are not familiar with the specific terminology. The use of jargon can create a barrier to effective communication and hinder the clarity and accessibility of the research problem.

Research problems, as defined in Leedy and Ormrod (2010), are broad, general statements about the incomplete state of understanding in a particular field of inquiry. They are not typically known by novices but are identified by experts in the field. These problems clearly and completely specify important questions that are currently unanswered in the field, indicating the need for further research and investigation. They cannot be addressed solely by compiling and synthesizing existing information, as they require new knowledge and insights to be gained.

The given answer represents a well-written applied research problem because it clearly states the variables being compared (business teams of six or fewer members versus teams of more than six members) and the specific aspect being measured (productivity). This research problem is focused, measurable, and relevant to a real-world context, making it suitable for applied research.

Colloquial expressions and approximations of quantity can reduce word precision and clarity in writing. These types of expressions are often informal and may not convey the exact meaning or precise information that is necessary in academic writing. Using these expressions can lead to ambiguity and confusion for the reader, as they may not fully understand the intended message. Therefore, it is best to avoid such expressions in serious academic writing to maintain clarity and precision of language.

A high-quality research study will articulate either research questions or hypotheses depending on the nature of the study. This means that the researcher should choose whether to use research questions or hypotheses based on the specific goals and objectives of the study. Research questions are typically used when there is a need to explore a topic or phenomenon, while hypotheses are used when there is a need to test specific predictions or relationships. By allowing for the use of either research questions or hypotheses, the researcher can ensure that the study is designed in a way that best fits the research objectives.

Research problems often have implicit assumptions that underlie them. These assumptions are often shared by the researchers and are not explicitly stated in the problem statement. These assumptions can shape the way the problem is framed and the variables that are considered. By recognizing these implicit assumptions, researchers can critically analyze their own biases and potential limitations in their research. Therefore, the correct answer is that research problems implicitly rest on common assumptions.

The question asks about the relationship between the personality characteristic of Need for Structure and prejudicial attitudes towards Asian Americans among social workers. This is a well-stated subproblem because it directly addresses the research problem by examining the specific relationship between these two variables. It focuses on one specific group (Asian Americans) and one specific personality characteristic (Need for Structure), allowing for a more focused and targeted analysis.

The given question is weak because it does not lead to the creation or discovery of new information. It simply asks for the proportion of workers hired by selected factories in Oklahoma between 1995 and 2000 who held four-year college degrees. This question does not prompt any analysis or investigation beyond collecting and reporting existing data. It does not contribute to new knowledge or insights in any way.

The correct answer states that any of the strategies mentioned (writing from an outline, rereading after a delay, asking for critique, and matching strategy to personality/work habits) can be used to improve writing style. However, it excludes option d, which suggests beginning writing close to a deadline to enhance motivation. The explanation emphasizes that the chosen strategy should align with one's personality and work habits, indicating the importance of finding an approach that suits individual preferences and characteristics.

The correct answer is "A clear description of all measurement tools to be used in the research project" because the setting of the research problem refers to the context and background of the study, including the problem statement, research questions, and the theoretical framework. It does not specifically include a detailed description of the measurement tools to be used.

The recommended order of tasks in preparing a research proposal is to first state the problem and subproblems, followed by noting the research questions/hypotheses, then noting the delimitations, defining the terms, and finally noting the assumptions. This order ensures that the researcher first identifies the main problem and subproblems to be addressed, then formulates specific research questions or hypotheses to guide the study. Next, the researcher establishes the boundaries or limitations of the study, defines key terms to avoid ambiguity, and acknowledges any assumptions made in the research. This sequence allows for a logical and systematic approach to developing a research proposal.

The question is asking about the primary reason underemployed U.S. workers identify for their inability to find suitable employment. However, the answer suggests that studying the question as stated is not feasible. This implies that there are practical limitations or challenges in conducting research to directly address this question. It is possible that the question may be difficult to answer due to various factors such as the subjective nature of identifying reasons or the lack of available data on the topic. Therefore, the answer highlights the impracticality of studying the question as it is presented.

The correct answer is that the research problem implies only description of the data, not interpretation. This means that the problem statement focuses solely on gathering information about the correlation between civic-mindedness and years of involvement in local organizations and charities among city council members, without providing any insight or analysis of the findings. It does not aim to interpret the data or draw any conclusions, limiting the potential value and impact of the research.