Law Quiz I For Comps

2.

If a teacher is reassigned from secondary to elementary teaching at the same pay

It is a demotion, if the teacher objects.
It is not a demotion.
It is not a demotion if it does not create a problem
It is not considered a demotion if the teacher approves.

Correct Answer

A. It is not a demotion.

Explanation

The correct answer is "It is not a demotion." This is because the question states that the teacher is reassigned from secondary to elementary teaching at the same pay. A demotion typically involves a decrease in pay or a lower position, neither of which is mentioned in the question. Therefore, the teacher being reassigned to elementary teaching at the same pay does not qualify as a demotion.

Rate this question:

3.

An IEP must

Be designed for each child with a disability.
Record in written form for each child.
Measure the specific progress of each child.
All of the above.

Correct Answer

A. All of the above.

Explanation

The correct answer is "All of the above" because an Individualized Education Program (IEP) is a legally mandated document that must be designed for each child with a disability. It is also required to be recorded in written form for each child, outlining their specific goals, accommodations, and services. Additionally, an IEP must measure the specific progress of each child, as it is a dynamic document that is regularly reviewed and updated to ensure the child's educational needs are being met.

Rate this question:

4.

Based on Goss v. Lopez, a fair and impartial hearing is a basic element of

Procedural due process
The school board process
Substantive due process
Not part of due process

Correct Answer

A. Procedural due process

Explanation

In the case of Goss v. Lopez, it was established that a fair and impartial hearing is a fundamental aspect of procedural due process. Procedural due process refers to the legal requirement that the government must follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property. In the context of education, this means that students have the right to a fair hearing before being suspended or expelled from school. Therefore, the correct answer is procedural due process.

Rate this question:

5.

In Martinez v. Bynum, the US Supreme Court ruled that

The state could enforce a residence requirement for students.
The State was required to educate the children of illegal aliens.
The State was required to educate non-resident children.
The state was not required to educate the children of illegal aliens.

Correct Answer

A. The state could enforce a residence requirement for students.

Explanation

In Martinez v. Bynum, the US Supreme Court ruled that the state could enforce a residence requirement for students. This means that the state has the authority to require students to live within a certain geographical area in order to attend public schools. The ruling affirms the state's power to regulate education and determine eligibility criteria for students based on their place of residence.

Rate this question:

6.

In Plyler v. Doe, the court ruled that to deny children of illegal aliens an education

Violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment
Casts a pall of doubt on the child's ability.
Creates a stigma of illiteracy will mark their parents lives.
Is a violation of the state constitutiton.

Correct Answer

A. Violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment

Explanation

The correct answer is "Violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment." In Plyler v. Doe, the court ruled that denying children of illegal aliens an education based on their immigration status violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. This is because the court found that all children, regardless of their immigration status, have a right to receive a public education and should be afforded equal protection under the law.

Rate this question:

7.

A state act pertaining to the establishment of religion is unconstitutional if it

Has a religious purpose
Produces excessive entanglement of government and religion.
Advances or inhibits religion
Any of the above would make the Act unconstitutional

Correct Answer

A. Any of the above would make the Act unconstitutional

Explanation

The given answer states that any of the mentioned conditions would make a state act pertaining to the establishment of religion unconstitutional. This means that if the act has a religious purpose, produces excessive entanglement between government and religion, or advances or inhibits religion, it would be considered unconstitutional. In other words, if any of these conditions are present, the act violates the constitutional principle of separation of church and state.

Rate this question:

8.

If the states are not providing education for a significant part of the nation's population, the Federal government may provide it under the

Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment
Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment
General Welfare Clause of Article 1, section 8
All of the above

Correct Answer

A. General Welfare Clause of Article 1, section 8

Explanation

If the states are not providing education for a significant part of the nation's population, the Federal government may provide it under the General Welfare Clause of Article 1, section 8. This clause gives Congress the power to spend money for the general welfare of the United States. Since education is considered a fundamental aspect of the general welfare, the Federal government can step in and provide education if the states fail to do so. The Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment and the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment do not specifically address the provision of education.

Rate this question:

9.

If a school district purchases liability insurance, it is considered:

To have waived immunity to the extent of the policy
To be free from liability for negligent acts.
To be free of liability regardless of the circumstances.
To be free of liability beyond the policy.

Correct Answer

A. To have waived immunity to the extent of the policy

Explanation

When a school district purchases liability insurance, it is considered to have waived immunity to the extent of the policy. This means that the school district is giving up its protection from being sued for certain claims or damages up to the limit specified in the insurance policy. In other words, by purchasing liability insurance, the school district is accepting responsibility for any liability that falls within the coverage of the policy. However, this does not mean that the school district is completely free from liability or immune to legal action beyond the policy's coverage.

Rate this question:

10.

According to the Connick Rule, a teacher who speaks on a matter of public concern is protected, if the teacher's interest in speaking

Is the only concern of the meeting where the speech is made.
Is weigthier than the state's concern in efficient school operation.
Is not related to the state's concern in efficient school operation.

Correct Answer

A. Is weigthier than the state's concern in efficient school operation.

Explanation

The Connick Rule states that a teacher who speaks on a matter of public concern is protected if their interest in speaking is weightier than the state's concern in efficient school operation. This means that if the teacher's interest in speaking outweighs the state's interest in running the school efficiently, the teacher is protected and cannot be penalized for their speech. This rule ensures that teachers have some freedom of speech while balancing the need for efficient school operation.

Rate this question:

11.

Assault and battery are

Negligent torts
May be criminal acts
Intentional torts.
Both A and B

Correct Answer

A. Intentional torts.

Explanation

Assault and battery are considered intentional torts because they involve intentional harmful actions towards another person. Negligent torts involve unintentional harm caused by a failure to exercise reasonable care, while criminal acts are offenses against the state and can be intentional or unintentional. Therefore, the correct answer is intentional torts.

Rate this question:

12.

Education is a fundamental goal under the

The US Constitution
The 10th Amendment
The Illinois Constitutiton
All of the above

Correct Answer

A. The Illinois Constitutiton

Explanation

The correct answer is "All of the above". This is because education is considered a fundamental goal under the US Constitution, the 10th Amendment, and the Illinois Constitution. These documents recognize the importance of education and its role in society, ensuring that it is protected and promoted as a fundamental right.

Rate this question:

Law Quiz I For Comps

Based on the Tinker case, a school may ban student speech that interferes with the

Quiz Preview

If a teacher is reassigned from secondary to elementary teaching at the same pay

An IEP must

Based on Goss v. Lopez, a fair and impartial hearing is a basic element of

In Martinez v. Bynum, the US Supreme Court ruled that

In Plyler v. Doe, the court ruled that to deny children of illegal aliens an education

A state act pertaining to the establishment of religion is unconstitutional if it

If the states are not providing education for a significant part of the nation's population, the Federal government may provide it under the

If a school district purchases liability insurance, it is considered:

According to the Connick Rule, a teacher who speaks on a matter of public concern is protected, if the teacher's interest in speaking

Assault and battery are

Education is a fundamental goal under the