Justice Chap 5 And 6

1. The abuse of police authority for personal or organizational gain

Police brutalily

Police corruption

Internal affairs

Police subculture

Police corruption refers to the misuse of power and authority by police officers for personal or organizational gain. This can involve accepting bribes, engaging in illegal activities, or abusing their position to protect criminals or cover up misconduct. It undermines public trust in law enforcement and can have serious consequences for the community. Police corruption can occur at various levels within the police force and is often investigated by internal affairs departments. It is a form of abuse of police authority that can result in a breakdown of justice and fairness.

Explanation

Police corruption refers to the misuse of power and authority by police officers for personal or organizational gain. This can involve accepting bribes, engaging in illegal activities, or abusing their position to protect criminals or cover up misconduct. It undermines public trust in law enforcement and can have serious consequences for the community. Police corruption can occur at various levels within the police force and is often investigated by internal affairs departments. It is a form of abuse of police authority that can result in a breakdown of justice and fairness.

2. What year was the civil suit that was brought under title 42 of the U.S. Code against anyone who denies others thier constitutional right to life, liverty, or property without due process of law

1982

1983

1984

1985

Title 42 of the U.S. Code allows individuals to bring civil suits against anyone who denies their constitutional rights without due process of law. The correct answer, 1983, indicates that the civil suit was brought in that particular year.

Explanation

Title 42 of the U.S. Code allows individuals to bring civil suits against anyone who denies their constitutional rights without due process of law. The correct answer, 1983, indicates that the civil suit was brought in that particular year.

3. The act of taking an adult or juvenile into physical custody by authority of the law for the purpose of charging the person with a criminal pffense, a delinquent act, or a status offense. Technically, it occurs whenever a law enforcement officer curtails a person's freedom to leave

Booking

Trial

Arrest

Miranda rights

Arrest is the correct answer because it aligns with the given definition. Arrest refers to the act of taking someone into custody by law enforcement for the purpose of charging them with a criminal offense, delinquent act, or status offense. It involves curtailing the person's freedom to leave. The other options, such as booking, trial, and Miranda rights, are not the same as the act of physically taking someone into custody.

Explanation

Arrest is the correct answer because it aligns with the given definition. Arrest refers to the act of taking someone into custody by law enforcement for the purpose of charging them with a criminal offense, delinquent act, or status offense. It involves curtailing the person's freedom to leave. The other options, such as booking, trial, and Miranda rights, are not the same as the act of physically taking someone into custody.

4. The understanding, based on the U.S. Suprme Court precedent, that incriminating ingormation must be seized according to constitutional specifications of due process or it will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial

Exclusionary rule

Landmark Case

Miranda Triggers

Probable Cause

The exclusionary rule is the correct answer because it states that incriminating information must be seized according to constitutional specifications of due process or it will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial. This rule was established by the U.S. Supreme Court as a way to deter illegal searches and seizures by law enforcement. It is a key component of protecting individuals' Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Explanation

The exclusionary rule is the correct answer because it states that incriminating information must be seized according to constitutional specifications of due process or it will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial. This rule was established by the U.S. Supreme Court as a way to deter illegal searches and seizures by law enforcement. It is a key component of protecting individuals' Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

5. A precedent setting court decision that produces substantial changes both in the understanding of the requirements of due process and in the practical day-to-day operations of the justice system

Exclusionary rule

Probable cause

Landmark case

Miranda triggers

A landmark case refers to a court decision that has a significant impact on the interpretation of due process requirements and the functioning of the justice system. This type of case sets a precedent and brings about substantial changes in both the theoretical understanding of due process and the practical operations of the justice system. It is a pivotal case that often shapes future legal decisions and influences the development of laws and regulations.

Explanation

A landmark case refers to a court decision that has a significant impact on the interpretation of due process requirements and the functioning of the justice system. This type of case sets a precedent and brings about substantial changes in both the theoretical understanding of due process and the practical operations of the justice system. It is a pivotal case that often shapes future legal decisions and influences the development of laws and regulations.

6. The dual principles of custody and interrogation, both of which are neccesary before an advisment of rights is required

Arrest

Miranda triggers

Miranda Rights

Probable Cause

The correct answer is "Miranda triggers." Miranda triggers refer to the circumstances that require law enforcement officers to inform a suspect of their Miranda rights before conducting a custodial interrogation. These triggers include the suspect being in custody and the intent of law enforcement to interrogate the suspect. Once these triggers are met, law enforcement must inform the suspect of their rights, such as the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. This ensures that the suspect is aware of their constitutional rights during the interrogation process.

Explanation

The correct answer is "Miranda triggers." Miranda triggers refer to the circumstances that require law enforcement officers to inform a suspect of their Miranda rights before conducting a custodial interrogation. These triggers include the suspect being in custody and the intent of law enforcement to interrogate the suspect. Once these triggers are met, law enforcement must inform the suspect of their rights, such as the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. This ensures that the suspect is aware of their constitutional rights during the interrogation process.