False. Modern Portfolio Theory has been roundly disavowed as an effective portfolio management system for fundamental managers. The primary issue is MPTs use of volatility to measure risk when a much more important measure of risk is your estimate of potential loss and the probability of that occurring. Value at Risk has had an equally spotty record because covariance is a poor measure of interrelation of asset in extreme environments. When considering the most important measures of risk for a fundamental manager, volatility would probably be 4th or 5th on the list behind potential loss (as measured by fundamental research), liquidity, leverage, and sector exposure.
“The risk-reducing formulas behind portfolio theory rely on a number of demanding and ultimately unfounded premises. First, they suggest that price changes are statistically independent from one another…The second assumption is that price changes are distributed in a pattern that conforms to a standard bell curve. Do financial data neatly conform to such assumptions? Of course, they never do.” – Benoit Mandelbrot, mathematician, A Multifractal Walk down Wall Street
VaR was “relatively useless as a risk-management tool and potentially catastrophic when its use creates a false sense of security among senior managers and watchdogs. This is like an air bag that works all the time, except when you have a car accident.” – David Einhorn, Founder of Greenlight Capital
“As far as I know neither (Paul) Samuelson nor (Robert) Merton nor indeed Ophir has challenged the basic principle imbedded in the geometric mean principle (Kelly Criterion) for long-run portfolio selection. If they or he wishes to adopt a significantly different policy and I follow the geometric policy, in the long-run I become almost certain to have more wealth than they. This hardly seems an erroneous or trivial proposition.” – Henry Latane, professor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
“I am extremely skeptical of more automated , algorithmic, Value at Risk, and other business school sanctioned approaches to risk management. None of these approaches saved Lehman, Bear Stearns, Fannie, Freedie, AIG, WaMu, Wachovia or any of the other institutions that used these and other ostensibly more sophisticated risk management strategies.” – Bill Ackman, Pershing Square
“There are only two subjects that matter in investing; valuation and markets. I would get rid of options pricing, modern portfolio theory and efficient market hypothesis” – Warren Buffett comments to IMD Business School in Lausanne, Switzerland