Edwards, Lineberry Chp. 5
-
The Civil Rights Act did all of the following EXCEPT
-
Create the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
-
Deny federal funding to businesses and schools that practiced racial discrimination
-
Prevent racial discrimination in housing
-
Prohibit racial discrimination in hotels, in restaurants, and on public transportation
-
Outlaw job discrimination
-
This quiz titled 'Edwards, Lineberry Chp. 5' explores significant aspects of civil rights in the U. S., including landmark Supreme Court decisions, legislative impacts, and ongoing debates like affirmative action. It assesses understanding of historical and contemporary civil rights issues, crucial for students of law and political science.
Quiz Preview
- 2.
Which of the following generalizations accurately describe the advancement of civil rights in the twentieth century?I. The Fourteenth Amendment served as the foundation on which the Supreme Court based many of its decisions regarding civil rightsII. The national government has opted to pursue civil rights at the expense of limited governmentIII. The Supreme Court typically finds laws that racial classifications are unconstitutionalIV. The Supreme Court has outlawed all laws that classify citizens by race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity and disability
-
II only
-
IV only
-
I and II only
-
III and IV only
-
I, II, and III only
Correct Answer
A. I, II, and III onlyExplanation
The correct answer is I, II, and III only. This is because statement I is accurate as the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal protection under the law, has been used as the basis for many Supreme Court decisions on civil rights. Statement II is also accurate as the national government has often taken action to protect civil rights, even if it means expanding its power. Statement III is accurate as the Supreme Court has consistently found laws that use racial classifications to be unconstitutional. However, statement IV is incorrect as the Supreme Court has not outlawed all laws that classify citizens by race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, and disability.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
The Equal Rights Amendment has not become a part of the Constitution because
-
It was not ratified by enough states
-
The Senate voted against it after the House had passed it
-
The women's rights movement has focused primarily on preserving protectionist laws
-
The Supreme Court found it unconstitutional
-
Feminists decried it for neglecting to take a firm position on women's rights
Correct Answer
A. It was not ratified by enough statesExplanation
The Equal Rights Amendment has not become a part of the Constitution because it was not ratified by enough states.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
Opponents of affirmative action claim that it
-
Violates the First Amendment freedom of speech
-
Fails to sufficiently compensate minorities for past discrimination
-
Encourages reverse discrimination
-
Excuses the federal government from having to enforce civil rights
-
Favors certain minority groups over other minority groups
Correct Answer
A. Encourages reverse discriminationExplanation
The correct answer suggests that opponents of affirmative action argue that it encourages reverse discrimination. This means that they believe affirmative action policies, which aim to provide opportunities for historically disadvantaged groups, end up discriminating against other groups, particularly white individuals. Critics argue that these policies prioritize certain minority groups over others and may lead to unfair treatment based on race or ethnicity.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
Which of the following statements accurately describes the relationship between Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education?
-
Plessy reinforced the advancement of civil rights begun by the Supreme Court in Brown
-
The Supreme Court overturned its decision in Plessy with its Brown ruling
-
Both Plessy and Brown extended voting rights to disenfranchised African Americans in the South
-
Both Plessy and Brown made desegregation in public schools compulsory
-
The Supreme Court extended the precedent established in Plessy with its Brown decision
Correct Answer
A. The Supreme Court overturned its decision in Plessy with its Brown rulingExplanation
The correct answer states that the Supreme Court overturned its decision in Plessy with its Brown ruling. This means that the decision made in Plessy v. Ferguson, which upheld racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine, was reversed by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education. Brown v. Board of Education declared that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, marking a significant shift in civil rights and the fight against racial discrimination.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
Which of the following grups has focused on ensuring civil rights for Hispanic Americans and Latinos?
-
MALDEF
-
AIM
-
NAACP
-
EEOC
-
ADA
Correct Answer
A. MALDEFExplanation
MALDEF, or the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, has focused on ensuring civil rights for Hispanic Americans and Latinos. They advocate for the protection of the rights and opportunities of Hispanic individuals through litigation, advocacy, and educational programs. MALDEF has been involved in various landmark cases and policy initiatives aimed at combating discrimination and promoting equal rights for the Hispanic community.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
Where is the guarantee of "equal protection of the laws" found?
-
In the Bill of Rights
-
In the Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu v. United States
-
In the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education
-
In the Fourteenth Amendment
-
In the preamble to the Constitution
Correct Answer
A. In the Fourteenth AmendmentExplanation
The guarantee of "equal protection of the laws" is found in the Fourteenth Amendment. This amendment, ratified in 1868, ensures that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. It was specifically enacted to protect the civil rights of newly freed slaves after the Civil War, but has since been interpreted to apply to all individuals, regardless of race, gender, or other protected characteristics. The Fourteenth Amendment has been a cornerstone of civil rights jurisprudence and has been used to strike down discriminatory laws and practices.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
In which of the followng cases did the Supreme Court first declare gender discrimination unconstitutional?
-
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton
-
Reed v. Reed
-
Stanton v. Stanton
-
Craig v. Boren
-
Dothard. v. Rawlinson
Correct Answer
A. Reed v. ReedExplanation
Reed v. Reed is the correct answer because it was the first case in which the Supreme Court declared gender discrimination unconstitutional. In this case, the Court ruled that a state law that preferred males over females as administrators of estates violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This landmark decision set a precedent for future cases involving gender discrimination and paved the way for greater gender equality in the United States.Rate this question:
-
- 9.
All of the following were methods used by Southern states to reduce the electoral voice of African Americans EXCEPT
-
Tests about the Constitution
-
White primaries
-
Literacy tests
-
Poll taxes
-
The Fifteenth Amendment
Correct Answer
A. The Fifteenth AmendmentExplanation
The Fifteenth Amendment granted African American men the right to vote, so it cannot be considered a method used by Southern states to reduce their electoral voice. The other options - tests about the Constitution, white primaries, literacy tests, and poll taxes - were all tactics employed by Southern states to disenfranchise African Americans and limit their political power.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
In the case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Court
-
Refused to allow the admission of Bakke to University of California-Davis
-
Ruled that nursing schools cannot discriminate against men in their admissions procedures
-
Ordered that University of California-Davis could not use race as a criterion for admission
-
Was united in its decision
-
Ruled that a public university could not set aside a quota of spots for particular groups
Correct Answer
A. Ruled that a public university could not set aside a quota of spots for particular groupsExplanation
The Court's ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke stated that a public university could not set aside a quota of spots for particular groups. This means that the University of California-Davis was not allowed to reserve a certain number of spots for specific racial or ethnic groups. The Court deemed this practice as unconstitutional and a form of discrimination.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 20, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Mar 20, 2023Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Jul 20, 2010Quiz Created by
Kyancy
Back to top