Do you know what psychological research methods are? Try this quiz on psychological research methods to see how much you know. This revision quiz is mainly for Scottish higher psychology. This quiz will not only test your knowledge but enhance it, too, with a lot of new facts and terms. All the best for a perfect score on this quiz. See moreDo share the quiz or quiz results with others interested in psychology.
True
False
Rate this question:
Theory
Hypothesis
Method
Sample
Practice
Interpretation of results
Conclusion
Revise theory if necessary
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
Being sure that views can be applied to the whole population e.g. results from 10 people cannot be applied to whole population.
Making a general summary of an experiment.
Summing up the views of most psychologists.
All of the above
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
Participant
Audio
Visual
Situational/environmental
Investigator
Rate this question:
Generalisation, replication, validity
Ethical adherence, controlled conditions, replication
Replication, accurate reporting, controlled conditions
None of the above
Rate this question:
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
Rate this question:
Random sampling
Stratified random sampling
Quota sampling
Systematic sampling
Opportunity sampling
Self-selected/volunteer sampling
Rate this question:
Random sampling
Self-selected/volunteer sampling
Stratified random sampling
Quota sampling
Systematic sampling
Opportunity sampling
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
Shows clear cause and effect
Helps experiment seem more authentic to participants
Easy to control extraneous variables
Objective nature ensures validity
Ensures participant compliance
More ethical
Allows easy replication
Rate this question:
Low ecological validity
Hard to attract participants
Control of all random variables is impossible
Risk of demand characteristics / Hawthorne effect
Hard to find suitable place for experiment
Possible sampling bias
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
Takes place in fields
Greater ecological validity
Demand characteristics minimised
Easier to attract participants
Avoids sampling bias – more representative sampling
Rate this question:
Random sampling
Self-selected/volunteer sampling
Opportunity sampling
Stratified random sampling
Quota sampling
Systematic sampling
Rate this question:
Hard to keep order with participants
Less control of extraneous variables
Difficult to replicate
Harder to document
Possible ethical concerns over consent, privacy etc
Rate this question:
Field experiment
Quasi / natural experiment
Laboratory experiment
None of the above
Rate this question:
Participants undergo only one condition of the experiment. Randomly assigned to experimental or control group. Good when there are only two groups. Doesn’t take participant variables in each group into account.
Participants are matched with someone with the same/similar score in a pre-decided test for example. Or someone who displays a similar particular personality trait. Identical twins are ultimate matched pairs. They are then split between two conditions in an experiment. This removes order effects and gives greater accuracy than independent measure design.
Participants experience all conditions of an experiment one after the other, they are split into same number of groups as there are conditions in the experiment. They are therefore tested against themselves. Good for eliminating participant variables.
None of the above
Rate this question:
Participants undergo only one condition of the experiment. Randomly assigned to experimental or control group. Good when there are only two groups. Doesn’t take participant variables in each group into account.
Participants experience all conditions of an experiment one after the other, they are split into same number of groups as there are conditions in the experiment. They are therefore tested against themselves. Good for eliminating participant variables. Counterbalancing is required.
Participants are matched with someone with the same/similar score in a pre-decided test for example. Or someone who displays a similar particular personality trait. Identical twins are ultimate matched pairs. They are then split between two conditions in an experiment. This removes order effects and gives greater accuracy than independent measure design.
None of the above
Rate this question:
Participants experience all conditions of an experiment one after the other, they are split into same number of groups as there are conditions in the experiment. They are therefore tested against themselves. Good for eliminating participant variables. Counterbalancing is required.
Participants are matched with someone with the same/similar score in a pre-decided test for example. Or someone who displays a similar particular personality trait. Identical twins are ultimate matched pairs. They are then split between two conditions in an experiment. This removes order effects and gives greater accuracy than independent measure design.
Participants undergo only one condition of the experiment. Randomly assigned to experimental or control group. Good when there are only two groups. Doesn’t take participant variables in each group into account.
None of the above
Rate this question:
Boredom factor
Counterbalancing
Experimenter effect
None of the above
Rate this question:
Must be used with REPEATED MEASURE DESIGN EXPERIMENTS. Participants are split into same number of groups as there are conditions in the experiment and they then perform these in alternating order e.g. Group A, condition 4; Group B condition 2; Group C, condition 1; Group D, condition 3 etc. The groups then swap round. This aims to combat order effects e.g. boredom effect and practice effect.
Participant performs better in subsequent conditions of same experiment.
Participant’s behaviour is affected by the fact that they have already been through one or more condition of the same experiment. Meaning they may be more or less likely to behave in a certain way.
All of the above
Rate this question:
Participant performs better in subsequent conditions of same experiment.
Must be used with REPEATED MEASURE DESIGN EXPERIMENTS. Participants are split into same number of groups as there are conditions in the experiment and they then perform these in alternating order e.g. Group A, condition 4; Group B condition 2; Group C, condition 1; Group D, condition 3 etc. The groups then swap round. This aims to combat order effects e.g. boredom effect and practice effect.
Participant’s behaviour is affected by the fact that they have already been through one or more condition of the same experiment. Meaning they may be more or less likely to behave in a certain way.
All of the above
Rate this question:
Cheap, quick, easy
Rules out individual differences
No order effects
Good for experiments where participants are misled or surprised
Slower for participants
Rate this question:
Less control over participant variables
A lot of participants needed to make up groups
Participant differences can effect data
All of the above
Rate this question:
Eliminates individual differences of participants
Quickest design
More fun for participants
More data with small sample
Rate this question:
Field experiment
Quasi / natural experiment
Laboratory experiment
None of the above
Rate this question:
Participants undergo only one condition of the experiment. Randomly assigned to experimental or control group. Good when there are only two groups. Doesn’t take participant variables in each group into account.
Participants are matched with someone with the same/similar score in a pre-decided test for example. Or someone who displays a similar particular personality trait. Identical twins are ultimate matched pairs. They are then split between two conditions in an experiment. This removes order effects and gives greater accuracy than independent measure design.
Participants experience all conditions of an experiment one after the other, they are split into same number of groups as there are conditions in the experiment. They are therefore tested against themselves. Good for eliminating participant variables.
None of the above
Rate this question:
Cannot be used when participants HAVE to be different e.g. men and women
Hard to measure
Problem of order effects means a need for counterbalancing
All of the above
Rate this question:
Participants undergo only one condition of the experiment. Randomly assigned to experimental or control group. Good when there are only two groups. Doesn’t take participant variables in each group into account.
Participants experience all conditions of an experiment one after the other, they are split into same number of groups as there are conditions in the experiment. They are therefore tested against themselves. Good for eliminating participant variables. Counterbalancing is required.
Participants are matched with someone with the same/similar score in a pre-decided test for example. Or someone who displays a similar particular personality trait. Identical twins are ultimate matched pairs. They are then split between two conditions in an experiment. This removes order effects and gives greater accuracy than independent measure design.
All of the above
Rate this question:
Good for misleading experiments
Minimal problems with individual differences
No order effects
All of above
Rate this question:
Participants experience all conditions of an experiment one after the other, they are split into same number of groups as there are conditions in the experiment. They are therefore tested against themselves. Good for eliminating participant variables. Counterbalancing is required.
Participants are matched with someone with the same/similar score in a pre-decided test for example. Or someone who displays a similar particular personality trait. Identical twins are ultimate matched pairs. They are then split between two conditions in an experiment. This removes order effects and gives greater accuracy than independent measure design.
Participants undergo only one condition of the experiment. Randomly assigned to experimental or control group. Good when there are only two groups. Doesn’t take participant variables in each group into account.
All of the above
Rate this question:
Can never be sure that participants are perfectly matched
Almost impossible to find twins
A lot of participants needed to make up two groups
None of the above
Rate this question:
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Jan 27, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.