Supreme Court Case Check In For You!
(30).webp "Supreme Court Case Check In For You! - Quiz")
Are you a lawyer or law school student studying about supreme court cases specifically? Then this is the quiz for you. Get to understand all the diction and procedures below. Answer the questions to find out how much you know.
- 1.
Which precedent was established by the Supreme Court Case of Marbury vs. Madison?
- A.
The federal government has the power to regulate trade among the states
- B.
Federal courts can determine the constitutionality of a law
- C.
The state governments lack the authority to regulate federal business
- D.
State courts lack the authority to regulate federal court decisions
Correct Answer
B. Federal courts can determine the constitutionality of a lawExplanation
The Supreme Court Case of Marbury vs. Madison established the precedent that federal courts have the power to determine the constitutionality of a law. This case, decided in 1803, was significant because it was the first time the Supreme Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional. This established the principle of judicial review, which allows the courts to interpret the Constitution and strike down laws that are found to be in violation of it. This decision solidified the role of the judiciary as a check on the other branches of government and has had a lasting impact on the balance of power in the United States.Rate this question:
-
- 2.
*Marbury vs. Madison, 1803*McCullough vs. Maryland, 1819*Gibbons vs. Ogden, 1824 These three Supreme Court decisions are similar in that each ruling-
- A.
Increased the power of the federal government
- B.
Provided guidelines for regulating commerce
- C.
Shifted more power to the states
- D.
Created a higher demand for the National Bank
Correct Answer
A. Increased the power of the federal governmentExplanation
These three Supreme Court decisions, Marbury vs. Madison, McCullough vs. Maryland, and Gibbons vs. Ogden, all contributed to increasing the power of the federal government. In Marbury vs. Madison, the Court established the power of judicial review, allowing the Court to declare laws unconstitutional. McCullough vs. Maryland affirmed the constitutionality of the establishment of a national bank, thereby expanding federal power. Gibbons vs. Ogden clarified the federal government's authority to regulate interstate commerce. Overall, these rulings strengthened the authority and scope of the federal government, consolidating power at the national level.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
The case Marbury v. Madison was a landmark Supreme Court decision because it
- A.
Established the power of the Supreme Court to declare a law unconstitutional
- B.
Increased the power of the Federalists in the legislative branch
- C.
Resulted in an increase in the number of Supreme Court justices
- D.
Reinforced the power of the Bill of Rights
Correct Answer
A. Established the power of the Supreme Court to declare a law unconstitutionalExplanation
The case Marbury v. Madison was a landmark Supreme Court decision because it established the power of the Supreme Court to declare a law unconstitutional. This decision, made by Chief Justice John Marshall, set the precedent for judicial review, which is the power of the courts to review and potentially invalidate laws or actions that are found to be unconstitutional. This ruling solidified the role of the Supreme Court as the final arbiter of the constitutionality of laws and established the principle of checks and balances within the American government.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
What was a significant effect of Supreme Court decisions under Chief Justice John Marshall(1801–1835)?
- A.
The extension of slavery was limited.
- B.
The president’s use of the veto power was restricted.
- C.
The states were given more control over interstate commerce
- D.
The powers of the federal government were increased.
Correct Answer
D. The powers of the federal government were increased.Explanation
During Chief Justice John Marshall's tenure, the Supreme Court made several landmark decisions that expanded the powers of the federal government. Marshall's court established the principle of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison, giving the Supreme Court the power to declare laws unconstitutional. In McCulloch v. Maryland, the court upheld the constitutionality of the Bank of the United States, affirming the federal government's authority to create and regulate institutions. These decisions strengthened the federal government's authority and established it as the final arbiter of constitutional interpretation.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
What was one result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)?
- A.
The power of the federal government over interstate commerce was strengthened.
- B.
The rights of accused individuals were expanded.
- C.
The Court declined to hear cases involving disputes between states.
- D.
The power of the judicial branch was limited.
Correct Answer
A. The power of the federal government over interstate commerce was strengthened.Explanation
In the Supreme Court case Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Court ruled that the federal government had the power to regulate interstate commerce. This decision strengthened the power of the federal government over interstate commerce, affirming that it had the authority to regulate trade between states. This decision was significant in establishing the federal government's role in regulating commerce and promoting national economic unity.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
The decisions of the Supreme Court in McCulloch vs. Maryland (1819) and Gibbons vs. Ogden (1824) are important because they-
- A.
Clarified constitutional limits on the right to bear arms
- B.
Denied slaves the right to sue in federal courts
- C.
Increased the power of the federal government over the states
- D.
Upheld funding for the Erie Canal
Correct Answer
C. Increased the power of the federal government over the statesExplanation
The decisions of the Supreme Court in McCulloch vs. Maryland (1819) and Gibbons vs. Ogden (1824) increased the power of the federal government over the states. In McCulloch vs. Maryland, the court ruled that the federal government had the authority to establish a national bank, even though it was not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. This decision affirmed the doctrine of implied powers, which allowed the federal government to take actions necessary to carry out its enumerated powers. In Gibbons vs. Ogden, the court upheld the federal government's power to regulate interstate commerce, establishing that the federal government's authority in this area superseded state laws. These decisions expanded the scope of federal power and limited the power of the states.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is…” – Marbury v. Madison, 1803 This statement expresses the Supreme Court’s claim that-
- A.
Courts must abide by a strict interpretation of the Constitution
- B.
Federal laws must be approved by the courts before they can take effect
- C.
The judicial branch must have a role in the amendment process
- D.
The power of judicial review belongs to the courts
Correct Answer
D. The power of judicial review belongs to the courtsExplanation
The statement from Marbury v. Madison, 1803 expresses the Supreme Court's claim that the power of judicial review belongs to the courts. Judicial review is the power of the courts to review and potentially invalidate laws or government actions that are deemed unconstitutional. This statement affirms that it is the role and duty of the judicial department to interpret the law, including determining the constitutionality of laws, and to have the final say in what the law is.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
In the Supreme Court Case, Worcester vs. Georgis, who did the Supreme Court side with, and what was President Jackson's response?
- A.
The Supreme Court sided with Worcester and the Cherokee, and Jackson applauded the decision
- B.
The Supreme Court sided with Georgia, and Jackosn applauded the decision
- C.
The Supreme Court sided with Worcester and the Cherokee, and Jackosn ignored the ruling
- D.
The Supreme Court sided with Georgia, and Jackson ignored the ruling
Correct Answer
C. The Supreme Court sided with Worcester and the Cherokee, and Jackosn ignored the rulingExplanation
In the Supreme Court Case, Worcester vs. Georgia, the Supreme Court sided with Worcester and the Cherokee, stating that the state of Georgia did not have the authority to regulate the Cherokee Nation. However, President Jackson ignored the ruling and proceeded with the forced removal of the Cherokee people from their lands, known as the Trail of Tears.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Mar 15, 2024Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Mar 30, 2015Quiz Created by
Theresa Conrad
Back to top