Philosophical Assessment Of Knowledge
-
Philosophy is Greek for:
-
Love of Wisdom
-
Desire of Knowledge
-
First Two
-
None of the Above
-
Roundabout summary of all material covered in the first three weeks of class. The notes to create this quiz were provided by Jim Stover, Philosophy Professor at Wheeling Jesuit University.
Quiz Preview
- 2.
What is the study of the nature of ultimate reality?
-
Epistemology
-
Ethics
-
Aesthetics
-
Metaphysics
-
Logic
Correct Answer
A. MetaphysicsExplanation
Metaphysics deals with such questions as: What is real? What is the nature of what exists? What is being?Rate this question:
-
- 3.
What is the study of the theory of knowledge?
-
Metaphysics
-
Epistemology
-
Ethics
-
Aesthetics
-
Logic
Correct Answer
A. EpistemologyExplanation
It asks questions like: What is the nature of knowledge? How do I acquire knowledge? What is truth?Rate this question:
-
- 4.
What is the study of arguments and proper reasoning?
-
Metaphysics
-
Epistemology
-
Ethics
-
Aesthetics
-
Logic
Correct Answer
A. LogicExplanation
It attempts to answer questions like: What is the nature of arguments? What are the laws of right reasoning? How do we discern which arguments are good and which are not good?Rate this question:
-
- 5.
What is the study of how we should act?
-
Metaphysics
-
Epistemology
-
Ethics
-
Aesthetics
-
Logic
Correct Answer
A. EthicsExplanation
It asks such questions as: What is right and wrong? Are we obligated to help others? What is good?Rate this question:
-
- 6.
What is the study of art and beauty?
-
Metaphysics
-
Epistemology
-
Ethics
-
Aesthetics
-
Logic
Correct Answer
A. AestheticsExplanation
It asks questions like: What is art? What is beauty?Rate this question:
-
- 7.
_________ is the belief that the highest knowledge comes from reason.
Correct Answer
rationalismExplanation
Rationalism is the belief that the highest knowledge comes from reason. This means that rationalists prioritize logical thinking and rationality as the primary sources of knowledge and understanding. They believe that through logical deduction and reasoning, one can arrive at truths about the world and reality. Rationalists often reject the idea of relying on sensory experience or intuition as the basis for knowledge, instead emphasizing the power of reason and intellect. This belief in the supremacy of reason distinguishes rationalism from other epistemological theories.Rate this question:
- 8.
_________ is the belief that the highest knowledge comes from experience.
Correct Answer
empiricismExplanation
Empiricism is the belief that the highest knowledge comes from experience. This philosophical theory asserts that knowledge is derived from sensory perception and observation, rather than innate ideas or reasoning alone. Empiricists argue that knowledge is built upon empirical evidence and the accumulation of experiences. They emphasize the importance of experimentation, observation, and the scientific method in understanding the world. Empiricism stands in contrast to rationalism, which posits that knowledge can be obtained through reason and logical deduction.Rate this question:
- 9.
Who came up with the story about the prisoners in the cave and made major contributions to rationalism?
-
Plato
-
Stalin
-
Kant
Correct Answer
A. PlatoExplanation
Plato is the correct answer because he is the philosopher who came up with the story about the prisoners in the cave, known as "The Allegory of the Cave." This story is a metaphor for the human condition and the journey to enlightenment. Plato also made major contributions to rationalism, which is the philosophical belief that reason is the primary source of knowledge and truth. His works, such as "The Republic," explored the nature of reality, knowledge, and the ideal society.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
Which is not a criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms?
-
Third Man Argument
-
How can forms in the world of forms be more real than the forms that exist on Earth?
-
Modern science would have its way with his theory.
-
How could we ever gain knowledge of the forms apart from particulars?
-
How can you relate the form of good to human behavior?
-
Plato was a crazy man and everyone called him the local drunk.
Correct Answer
A. Plato was a crazy man and everyone called him the local drunk. -
- 11.
Why do we need universals?
-
For objects of intellect (particular dog universal dog)
-
To provide subject matter for the sciences
-
To ground predication (this apple is red)
-
All of the Above
Correct Answer
A. All of the AboveExplanation
Universals are needed for various reasons. Firstly, in the realm of intellect, universals allow us to understand the concept of a particular object, such as a specific dog, by recognizing its universal characteristics. Secondly, universals provide subject matter for the sciences, enabling us to study and categorize different phenomena. Lastly, universals are essential for grounding predication, as they allow us to make statements about specific objects, like saying "this apple is red." Therefore, all of the above reasons highlight the importance of universals in different aspects of knowledge and understanding.Rate this question:
-
- 12.
The Principle of Parsimony:
-
Use the most simple explanation for things
-
Not sure if we need to know this
Correct Answer
A. Use the most simple explanation for thingsExplanation
The principle of parsimony suggests that when explaining something, it is best to use the simplest explanation possible. This means that unnecessary complexities or assumptions should be avoided, and the explanation should be straightforward and concise. By using the most simple explanation, we can avoid overcomplicating things and make it easier for others to understand. This principle is often applied in various fields, such as science, philosophy, and problem-solving, to ensure clarity and efficiency in explanations.Rate this question:
-
- 13.
Which is false about Extreme Realism?
-
It's the idea Plato held
-
The theory that there is a single universal reality outside the mind, which corresponds with each universal idea in the mind. (World of Ideas)
-
Idealists believe in extreme realism
-
Plato rejected extreme realism
Correct Answer
A. Plato rejected extreme realismExplanation
Plato rejected extreme realism refers to the fact that Plato did not support the idea of extreme realism. Extreme realism suggests that there is a single universal reality outside the mind that corresponds with each universal idea in the mind. However, Plato's philosophy was more aligned with idealism, which believes that reality is based on the mind and ideas. Therefore, the statement that Plato rejected extreme realism is true.Rate this question:
-
- 14.
Plato's student Aristotle and St. Thomas believed that:
-
The concept of universal ideas exists only in the mind, but is abstracted from sensible real things. (Moderate Realism)
-
Nominalism
-
Universal ideas exist in the mind, distinct from sense images, but do not correspond to any objective common element existing outside the mind in things
Correct Answer
A. The concept of universal ideas exists only in the mind, but is abstracted from sensible real things. (Moderate Realism)Explanation
Plato's student Aristotle and St. Thomas believed in Moderate Realism, which states that the concept of universal ideas exists only in the mind but is abstracted from sensible real things. This means that universal ideas, such as justice or beauty, are not directly present in the physical world but are derived from our perception and understanding of the world around us. These ideas are not merely subjective or arbitrary, but they have a basis in the external world and can be understood and studied through reason and observation.Rate this question:
-
- 15.
What is Conceptualism?
-
Universal ideas exist in the mind, distinct from sense images, but do not correspond to any objective common element existing outside the mind in things
-
A belief held by Peter Abelard
-
All of the Above
Correct Answer
A. All of the AboveExplanation
The correct answer is "All of the Above." Conceptualism refers to the belief that universal ideas exist in the mind and are distinct from sense images. It also states that these ideas do not correspond to any objective common element existing outside the mind in things. Additionally, it is mentioned that Peter Abelard holds this belief. Therefore, all the given options accurately describe the concept of Conceptualism.Rate this question:
-
- 16.
What is the opposite of realism?
-
Conceptualism
-
Nominalism
-
Nothing is opposite of realism
Correct Answer
A. NominalismExplanation
Nominalism is a direct opposition to realism. Only particular things exist. General names or terms are applied to particular things which resemble each other, but there is no independently existing universal. Ockham and Berkeley held this view.Rate this question:
-
- 17.
Which is not a major source of knowledge?
-
Appeal to Authority
-
Appeal to Sense Perception
-
Appeal to Reason
-
Appeal to Communication
-
Appeal to Intuition
Correct Answer
A. Appeal to CommunicationExplanation
Appeal to Communication is not a major source of knowledge because it refers to relying on the testimony or statements of others as a basis for acquiring knowledge. While communication can provide information and perspectives, it is not a direct source of knowledge like sense perception, reason, or intuition. These other options involve personal experiences, logical thinking, and internal understanding, which are considered more reliable and direct sources of knowledge.Rate this question:
-
- 18.
Fit the following definition with one of the terms below.-testimony as a source
-
Appeal to Authority
-
Appeal to Sense Perception
-
Appeal to Reason
-
Appeal to Intuiton
Correct Answer
A. Appeal to AuthorityExplanation
This is a popular way for gaining knowledge about the past.
This is required for things we cannot investigate ourselves.
This can be problematic if we abandon our own judgment to blind authority.Rate this question:
-
- 19.
Fit the following definition with one of the terms below.-the senses as a source
-
Appeal to Authority
-
Appeal to Sense Perception
-
Appeal to Reason
-
Appeal to Intuiton
Correct Answer
A. Appeal to Sense PerceptionExplanation
This empirical approach is especially recognized in the marvelous discoveries of modern sciences (through controlled observations and experiments).Rate this question:
-
- 20.
Fit the following definition with one of the terms below.-thinking as a source
-
Appeal to Authority
-
Appeal to Sense Perception
-
Appeal to Reason
-
Appeal to Intuiton
Correct Answer
A. Appeal to ReasonExplanation
We get knowledge primarily by comparing ideas with ideas.
Example: If A is greater than B and B is greater than C, then A is greater than C.
The Principle of Identity (All A is A)
The Principle of Excluded Middle (Either A or not A)
The Principle of Noncontradiction (Not both A and not A)Rate this question:
-
- 21.
Fit the following definition with one of the terms below.-insight as a source
-
Appeal to Authority
-
Appeal to Sense Perception
-
Appeal to Reason
-
Appeal to Intuiton
Correct Answer
A. Appeal to IntuitonExplanation
An immediate feeling of certainty is intuition.Rate this question:
-
- 22.
Which is a major perspective on Epistemology?
-
Skepticism
-
Rationalism
-
Empiricism
-
The Kantan Critique
-
All of the Above
Correct Answer
A. All of the AboveExplanation
The major perspectives on Epistemology include skepticism, rationalism, empiricism, and the Kantan Critique. Skepticism questions the possibility of knowledge and the reliability of our beliefs. Rationalism emphasizes the role of reason and logic in acquiring knowledge. Empiricism emphasizes the importance of sensory experience and observation in acquiring knowledge. The Kantan Critique, also known as transcendental idealism, is a philosophical perspective developed by Immanuel Kant that seeks to reconcile rationalism and empiricism. Therefore, the correct answer is "All of the Above" as all these perspectives are significant in the study of Epistemology.Rate this question:
-
- 23.
Match the following definition with a term below.-a denial of the possibility of some or all knowledge
-
Skepticism
-
Rationalism
-
Empiricism
-
The Kantian Critique
Correct Answer
A. SkepticismExplanation
Problems with skepticism, self-reference and practicality.Rate this question:
-
- 24.
Match the following definition with a term below.-the view that knowledge is derived primarily from reason
-
Skepticism
-
Rationalism
-
Empiricism
-
The Kantian Critique
Correct Answer
A. RationalismExplanation
Rationalism is the correct answer because it aligns with the definition given - the view that knowledge is derived primarily from reason. Rationalism emphasizes the role of reason and logical thinking in acquiring knowledge, suggesting that knowledge can be obtained through rational thought and deduction rather than relying solely on sensory experience or empirical evidence. This contrasts with empiricism, which emphasizes the importance of sensory experience in acquiring knowledge. The other options, skepticism and the Kantian Critique, do not match the given definition.Rate this question:
-
- 25.
Match the following definition with a term below.-the view that knowledge is derived mostly from sense experience
-
Skepticism
-
Rationalism
-
Empiricism
-
The Kantian Critique
Correct Answer
A. EmpiricismExplanation
All important knowledge is a posteriori.Rate this question:
-
- 26.
Match the following definition with a term below.-combines empiricism and rationalism-rejects the empiricist's blank slate idea-replaces concept of innate ideas with structures or intuitions
-
Skepticism
-
Rationalism
-
Empiricism
-
The Kantian Critique
Correct Answer
A. The Kantian CritiqueExplanation
The Kantian Critique combines empiricism and rationalism, rejects the empiricist's blank slate idea, and replaces the concept of innate ideas with structures or intuitions.Rate this question:
-
- 27.
Who were skeptics?
-
Pyrrho of Elis
-
Sextus Empiricus
-
David Hume
-
All but Plato
-
Plato
Correct Answer
A. All but PlatoExplanation
The skeptics were a philosophical school that emerged in ancient Greece. They were known for their skepticism towards the possibility of attaining certain knowledge. Pyrrho of Elis and Sextus Empiricus were prominent skeptics who argued that our senses can be deceptive and that we should suspend judgment on all matters. David Hume, a Scottish philosopher, also had skeptical views, particularly regarding causality and the limits of human knowledge. On the other hand, Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher, was not a skeptic. He believed in the existence of absolute truths and the possibility of attaining knowledge through reason. Therefore, the correct answer is "All but Plato."Rate this question:
-
- 28.
The idea that I alone exist is:
-
Empiricism
-
Solipsism
-
Another -ism
-
Skepticism
Correct Answer
A. SolipsismExplanation
Solipsism is the belief that only one's own mind is sure to exist. It is the philosophical idea that one can only be certain of their own existence and everything else, including other people and the external world, may be just an illusion or figment of their imagination. This belief denies the existence of an external reality beyond one's own mind. Solipsism is a radical form of skepticism that challenges the notion of objective reality and raises questions about the nature of knowledge and perception.Rate this question:
-
- 29.
According to rationalists, the most important kind of knowledge is:
-
A priori
-
A posteriori
Correct Answer
A. A prioriExplanation
Rationalists believe that the most important kind of knowledge is a priori. This means that knowledge is gained through reason and logic, independent of experience or observation. A priori knowledge is considered to be innate, universal, and necessary. Rationalists argue that this type of knowledge is more reliable and certain than a posteriori knowledge, which is acquired through sensory experience. They believe that a priori knowledge provides a foundation for understanding the world and can lead to truths that are independent of individual perspectives or cultural differences.Rate this question:
-
- 30.
Pick one or more options that describe a priori knowledge.
-
From what comes before
-
From what comes after
-
With reference to experience
-
Without reference to experience
-
Reason from ground to consequence
-
Reason from consequence to ground
-
This is the effect of that cause
-
Every event has a cause
-
Analytic (true by definition)
-
Synthetic (true by experience)
-
Laws of the natural sciences
-
Laws of Logic
-
Certainty
-
Probability
Correct Answer(s)
A. From what comes before
A. Without reference to experience
A. Reason from ground to consequence
A. Every event has a cause
A. Analytic (true by definition)
A. Laws of Logic
A. CertaintyExplanation
A priori knowledge refers to knowledge that is independent of experience and is known to be true by definition or through logical reasoning. It is based on what comes before, meaning it is derived from previous knowledge or prior reasoning. It involves reasoning from ground to consequence, where conclusions are drawn based on logical deductions. A priori knowledge also includes the understanding that every event has a cause and is not dependent on specific experiences. It is analytic, meaning it is true by definition, and is governed by the laws of logic. It provides certainty rather than probability in terms of its truthfulness.Rate this question:
-
- 31.
Pick one or more options that describe a posteriori knowledge.
-
From what comes before
-
From what comes after
-
With reference to experience
-
Without reference to experience
-
Reason from ground to consequence
-
Reason from consequence to ground
-
This is the effect of that cause
-
Every event has a cause
-
Analytic (true by definition)
-
Synthetic (true by experience)
-
Laws of the natural sciences
-
Laws of Logic
-
Certainty
-
Probability
Correct Answer(s)
A. From what comes after
A. With reference to experience
A. Reason from consequence to ground
A. This is the effect of that cause
A. Synthetic (true by experience)
A. Laws of the natural sciences
A. ProbabilityExplanation
A posteriori knowledge refers to knowledge that is based on experience or empirical evidence. "From what comes after" suggests that knowledge is derived from observing the consequences or outcomes of events. "With reference to experience" indicates that knowledge is obtained through personal or collective experiences. "Reason from consequence to ground" suggests that knowledge is gained by examining the effects and inferring the causes. "This is the effect of that cause" implies that knowledge is based on understanding the cause-and-effect relationship between events. "Synthetic (true by experience)" indicates that knowledge is acquired through empirical observation. "Laws of the natural sciences" refers to knowledge derived from scientific principles and observations. "Probability" suggests that knowledge is based on the likelihood or chance of events occurring.Rate this question:
-
- 32.
From the list below, eliminate the one that isn't an empiricist.
-
Locke
-
Berkeley
-
Socrates
-
Hume
Correct Answer
A. SocratesExplanation
Socrates should be eliminated from the list because he is not an empiricist. Empiricism is a philosophical belief that knowledge is primarily gained through sensory experience and observation. Socrates, on the other hand, is known for his rationalist approach to knowledge, emphasizing the use of reason and logical argumentation. He believed in the existence of innate knowledge and the importance of introspection and self-examination. Therefore, Socrates does not align with the principles of empiricism and should be eliminated from the list.Rate this question:
-
- 33.
A necessary condition for knowledge is:
-
If it is something of which something else cannot be without
-
If it is something which is alone said to guarantee or be enough that something is the case
Correct Answer
A. If it is something of which something else cannot be withoutExplanation
This answer suggests that a necessary condition for knowledge is something that cannot be without something else. In other words, in order for knowledge to exist, there must be something else that is also present. This implies that knowledge is dependent on other factors or conditions, and cannot exist in isolation.Rate this question:
-
- 34.
A sufficient condition for knowledge is:
-
If it is something of which something else cannot be without
-
If it is something which is alone said to guarantee or be enough that something is the case
Correct Answer
A. If it is something which is alone said to guarantee or be enough that something is the caseExplanation
The answer states that a sufficient condition for knowledge is when something is alone said to guarantee or be enough that something is the case. This means that if something is able to provide enough evidence or assurance that something else is true, then it can be considered as knowledge. This explanation implies that knowledge requires a strong level of certainty or proof in order to be valid.Rate this question:
-
- 35.
What is true about truth?
-
It is a necessary condition in order to have knowledge
-
It is a sufficient condition for having knowledge
-
It is not a necessary condition in order to have knowledge
-
It is not a sufficient condition for having knowledge
Correct Answer(s)
A. It is a necessary condition in order to have knowledge
A. It is not a sufficient condition for having knowledgeExplanation
Truth is a necessary condition in order to have knowledge because knowledge is based on true beliefs. In order for something to be considered knowledge, it must correspond to reality and be true. However, truth alone is not sufficient for having knowledge. Knowledge also requires justification or evidence to support the truth claim. Simply believing something to be true does not necessarily make it knowledge. Therefore, while truth is necessary for knowledge, it is not enough on its own.Rate this question:
-
- 36.
What applies to belief?
-
It is necessary in order to have knowledge
-
It is not sufficient for knowledge since you can have wrong beliefs
-
Your beliefs can be false
-
Belief shows commitment, not truth
-
Belief aims at the truth, but does not always arrive at it
Correct Answer(s)
A. It is necessary in order to have knowledge
A. It is not sufficient for knowledge since you can have wrong beliefs
A. Your beliefs can be false
A. Belief shows commitment, not truth
A. Belief aims at the truth, but does not always arrive at itExplanation
Belief is necessary in order to have knowledge because without belief, there would be no foundation for acquiring knowledge. However, belief is not sufficient for knowledge since one can have wrong beliefs. Beliefs can be false, meaning that they do not align with reality. Belief shows commitment to a certain idea or proposition, but it does not guarantee its truthfulness. Finally, belief aims at the truth, but it does not always arrive at it, as beliefs can be influenced by biases, limited information, or other factors that may hinder the attainment of absolute truth.Rate this question:
-
- 37.
What applies to justification?
-
When combined with truth and belief, knowledge is ALWAYS achieved
-
To say a belief is justified means you must have good reasons for associating this belief with truth
-
Gettier's problem confirms the second choice and involves justification.
Correct Answer(s)
A. To say a belief is justified means you must have good reasons for associating this belief with truth
A. Gettier's problem confirms the second choice and involves justification.Explanation
The answer suggests that in order for a belief to be justified, there must be good reasons to associate it with truth. Gettier's problem is mentioned as confirmation of this idea, as it involves the concept of justification. This implies that justification requires more than just belief and truth, but also the presence of good reasons.Rate this question:
-
- 38.
What is the Coherence Theory?
-
The test of consistency
-
A belief is true if it is consistent with our other beliefs
-
Most held by idealists
-
All of the Above
Correct Answer
A. All of the AboveExplanation
The Coherence Theory is a theory that states that a belief is considered true if it is consistent with our other beliefs. This means that for a belief to be considered true, it should align with and not contradict our existing beliefs. The Coherence Theory is often associated with idealists, who believe in the importance of internal consistency and logical coherence in forming beliefs. Therefore, the correct answer is "All of the Above" as it includes all the statements mentioned, which are related to the Coherence Theory.Rate this question:
-
- 39.
Idealism is the idea that what is real exists in our minds or thoughts, rather than in material objects.
-
True
-
False
Correct Answer
A. TrueExplanation
Idealism is a philosophical belief that asserts that reality is primarily determined by our thoughts and perceptions, rather than by material objects. It suggests that the world we experience is a product of our own minds. Therefore, the statement "Idealism is the idea that what is real exists in our minds or thoughts, rather than in material objects" accurately represents the concept of idealism, making the answer "True".Rate this question:
-
- 40.
Who asked the famous "if a tree falls in the woods" question?
Correct Answer
Illus
ill
illisExplanation
Proper spelling is Illus.Rate this question:
- 41.
Check all facts about the Coherence Theory.
-
Truth results from the consistency between judgments
-
Truth results from correspondence between our judgments and facts
-
The idea of consistency or harmony could explain how some things are both accepted and not accepted as true at different times.
Correct Answer(s)
A. Truth results from the consistency between judgments
A. The idea of consistency or harmony could explain how some things are both accepted and not accepted as true at different times.Explanation
Truth does not results from correspondence between our judgments and facts.Rate this question:
-
- 42.
Which is not a problem with the Coherency Theory?
-
Degrees of truth seems problematic
-
Degrees of truth seem probable
-
To have coherence we seem to already presume truth
-
What about coherently false systems?
-
Fiction can give coherence, but not truth
-
Confusing how I tell what's true with what it is to be true
-
Consistency does not necessarily entail factual consistency
Correct Answer
A. Degrees of truth seem probableExplanation
The Coherency Theory suggests that the truth of a statement or belief is determined by its coherence with other statements or beliefs. It argues that a belief is true if it is consistent and coherent with the rest of our beliefs. The statement "Degrees of truth seem probable" does not pose a problem for the Coherency Theory because it aligns with the idea that truth can be measured on a spectrum or in degrees, rather than being an absolute concept. Therefore, it is not a problem with the Coherency Theory.Rate this question:
-
- 43.
Which apply to the Pragmatic Theory?
-
The test of utility
-
Truth is the same thing as utility or usefulness
-
For a belief to be true, it must be useful.
-
Truths are beliefs which work
-
Held by Empiricists
Correct Answer(s)
A. The test of utility
A. Truth is the same thing as utility or usefulness
A. For a belief to be true, it must be useful.
A. Truths are beliefs which workExplanation
The Pragmatic Theory holds that the utility or usefulness of a belief is the test for its truth. According to this theory, truth and utility are the same thing, and for a belief to be considered true, it must be useful. Additionally, the theory suggests that truths are beliefs that work or have practical value. This theory is commonly associated with Empiricists who emphasize the importance of practicality and usefulness in determining the truth of a belief.Rate this question:
-
- 44.
What isn't wrong with the Pragmatic Theory?
-
One can think of a belief as working well but not being true
-
True beliefs typically work well, but only because they are true
-
The Coherence Theory disproves this theory
-
Some beliefs work well for some people and not others
Correct Answer
A. The Coherence Theory disproves this theoryExplanation
The given correct answer states that the Coherence Theory disproves the Pragmatic Theory. This implies that there is something wrong with the Pragmatic Theory, as it is contradicted or invalidated by the Coherence Theory. However, the explanation does not provide any further details or reasoning as to why the Coherence Theory disproves the Pragmatic Theory.Rate this question:
-
- 45.
What describes the Correspondence Theory?
-
Truth does not depend on our judgments
-
We can sometimes be wrong
-
Something is true if it represents the way things really are
-
Generally accepted by realists
-
Knowledge is unattainable
-
This quiz took me two hours to make...
Correct Answer(s)
A. Truth does not depend on our judgments
A. We can sometimes be wrong
A. Something is true if it represents the way things really are
A. Generally accepted by realistsExplanation
The Correspondence Theory of truth states that something is true if it accurately corresponds to the way things really are. This means that truth is not dependent on our personal judgments or beliefs. Additionally, the theory acknowledges that humans can sometimes be wrong in their understanding or perception of reality. The Correspondence Theory is generally accepted by realists, who believe that there is an objective reality that exists independently of our thoughts or interpretations.Rate this question:
-
- 46.
The following statements strengthen the Correspondence Theory.-How do we get outside our experience to compare out ideas with reality?-Some ideas have no objects outside the area of human thought.
-
True
-
False
Correct Answer
A. FalseExplanation
These statements are the problems with this theory.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 19, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Mar 19, 2023Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Feb 01, 2011Quiz Created by
Ch3d14
Back to top