The 'Business Law MCQ Exam: Quiz!' assesses understanding of key legal concepts in business transactions. It covers conditions precedent, the Statute of Frauds, contract enforceability, and implications of unilateral mistakes, providing practical insights for learners in business law.
Jill will win because this writing is not sufficient under the Statute of Frauds.
Jack will win because the writing is sufficient under the Statute of Frauds.
Jill will win because this is a formal contract.
Jack will win because the Statute of Frauds does not apply to this situation.
Rate this question:
Void
Enforceable
Voidable
Unenforceable
Implied
Rate this question:
An implied-in-fact contract
An implied-in-law contract
An express contract
No contract
Rate this question:
CitiBank wins because the mistake is so serious that enforcing the bid would be unconscionable.
CitiBank wins because it would be unjust to allow the winning bit to benefit the high bidder by $350,000.
CitiBank loses because of the legal theory of Bilateral Mistake.
CitiBank loses because it made a Unilateral Mistake.
Rate this question:
An Offeree's Rejection is Effective When: Received by the offeror An Offeror's Renovation is Effective When: Sent by the offeror
An Offeree's Rejection is Effective When: Sent by the offeree An Offeror's Renovation is Effective When: Received by the offeree
An Offeree's Rejection is Effective When: Sent by the offeree An Offeror's Renovation is Effective When: Sent by the offeror
An Offeree's Rejection is Effective When: Received by the offeror An Offeror's Renovation is Effective When: Received by the offeree
Rate this question:
Jenna wins because a contract was formed when she said she would buy the vase.
Jenna wins because the vase was unique.
Owen wins because he rejected Jenna's offer.
Owen wins because the contract was not written.
Rate this question:
Of "Legally Sufficient Value"
A "Bargained-for-Exchange"
Of "Cash Money" only
All of the above
A and B only
Rate this question:
Wins, since the Statute of Frauds requires all commercial contracts to be in writing
Wins, since the Statute of Frauds requires that all contracts for the sale of goods over $500 be in writing
Loses since there is no fraud involved in this transaction
Loses since they ordered specially manufactured goods which were of no real value to anyone else
Loses since "Printin' On Tees" should have realized the Humane Society wouldn't allow ANT racing by drunk college student
Rate this question:
Specific
Substantial
Sequestered
Salient
Rate this question:
Yes; it was an agreement made in contemplation of marriage.
No, the agreement was not in writing.
Yes, so long as the terms were reasonably specific or ascertainable
No; the agreement is contrary to public policy.
Rate this question:
Wins his lawsuit against the City because the City's actions were negligent
Wins his lawsuit against the City because he relied on the City's publicly announced plan to build the Tennis Center
Loses the lawsuit against he City because he was an incidental beneficiary of the City's plan to build the Tennis Center
Loses the lawsuit against the City because "detrimental reliance" doesn't apply to public contracts
Rate this question:
Promissory estoppel
Part performance
A novation
A jurat of acknowledgement
Como esta usted
Rate this question:
Not be enforceable because the contract was ambiguous
Not be enforceable because the rock stars are supposed to only look drunk, not be drunk
Be enforceable because this was a unilateral mistake
Be enforceable because this was an Accord
Rate this question:
Creditor
Mortgagor
Borrower
Guarantor
Rate this question:
For almost a thousand years courts have not enforced such contracts
"Gift" contracts tend to have a dramatic economic effect on the economy
A person's word is their bond
"Gift" contracts don't help the economy; they are merely a transfer of wealth
Rate this question:
Be able to disaffirm the contract and get his $20,000 back since he was a minor and returned the wrecked car
Be able to disaffirm the contract but only get $200 back
Won't be able to disaffirm his contract since his conduct was wanton
Will win a lawsuit against Fast Eddie for dealing with a minor
Rate this question:
Covenant
Condition subsequent
Condition precedent
Implied condition
Rate this question:
The same as no performance at all
Simply less than average performance
Performance which is almost complete
None of the above
Rate this question:
Void
Voidable
A violation of the Statute of Frauds
Valid and enforceable, assuming all the elements of a contract are present
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 21, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.