V. Duty Of Competence

Reviewed by Editorial Team
The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By TestMax
T
TestMax
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 4 | Total Attempts: 1,011
| Attempts: 198 | Questions: 109
Please wait...
Question 1 / 109
0 %
0/100
Score 0/100
1. Attorney agreed to represent Able, a client, in bringing a lawsuit. Attorney and Able executed Attorney's preprinted retainer form that provides, in part: \The client agrees to pay promptly Attorney's fees for services. In addition the client and Attorney agree to release each other from any and all liability arising from the representation. The client agrees that Attorney need not return the client's file prior to receiving the client's executed release. Attorney agrees to return the client's file promptly upon receipt of all fees owed and of the client's executed release.\" During their initial meeting Attorney recommended that Able consult independent counsel before signing the retainer agreement but Able chose not to do so. Attorney reasonably believes that his fee is fair and that the quality of his work will be competent. Is Attorney's retainer agreement with Able proper?"

Explanation

Under MR 1.8(h), a lawyer may not limit liability prospectively unless the client is independently represented in making such an agreement.

Submit
Please wait...
About This Quiz
Professional Ethics Quizzes & Trivia

This quiz evaluates knowledge in legal ethics, focusing on scenarios involving duty of competence, professional conduct, and ethical responsibilities in various legal contexts.

2. Attorney Alpha was retained by Client to represent Client in defense of an action brought against Client by Plaintiff. In order to obtain ample time for settlement negotiations, Alpha immediately requested and obtained from opposing counsel, Attorney Beta, a stipulation extending Client's time to answer the complaint until ten days after receipt of written demand from Beta. Four months later, no settlement had been reached, and on May 1, Beta wrote Alpha demanding that an answer be filed within ten days. When no answer was filed by May 15, Beta had a default judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff. Alpha was away on a two-month vacation when Beta's letter was received in her office. When Alpha returned on June 15, she promptly moved to have the default set aside and her motion was granted. Is Alpha subject to discipline?

Explanation

A lawyer must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client [MR 1.3]. Under MR 1.3, cmts. [2-4], a lawyer should especially attend to: (1) controlling workload, (2) avoiding unreasonable delay and procrastination, (3) filing within the statute of limitations, and (4) carrying representation through to completion and ensuring clients know when representation ends.

Here, Alpha went on vacation, and did not assign anyone to handle Client's pending case.

Submit
3. Alpha & Beta is a large firm that employs over 100 lawyers. Attorney Gamma was recently admitted to practice and was hired as a new associate of Alpha & Beta. Gamma was working late one night when he received a telephone call from his cousin Able. Able said that he was calling from the police station where he had just been arrested for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. He was permitted to make only one phone call, and Gamma was the only lawyer he knew. Gamma responded that he had no criminal law experience and that Alpha & Beta did not handle criminal cases. Nevertheless, Able pleaded with Gamma to come to the police station and see what he could do to get Able out on bail. Gamma replied that he would do what he could. Gamma went to the police station and using what information he recalled from his criminal law and procedure courses attempted to get Able released on bail. However, as a result of his inexperience, Gamma was unable to secure Able's release that night. The next morning, Gamma found an experienced criminal lawyer for Able, who obtained Able's release within one hour. Was Gamma's conduct proper?

Explanation

Under MR 1.1, cmt. [1], factors used to assess the sufficiency of a lawyer's knowledge and skill include whether it is feasible to refer the matter to, or associate or consult with, a lawyer of established competence in the field. In an emergency, a lawyer may give advice or assistance to a client in need, even if he lacks the skill or knowledge ordinarily required, and referral to or consultation with another lawyer is impractical [MR 1.1, cmt. [3]]. The lawyer should limit emergency assistance to that reasonably necessary under the circumstances [Id.].

Here, Gamma received a telephone call from Able late at night from a police station. It was not feasible for Gamma to consult with another lawyer at night. Able was arrested at the police station, and provided with just one phone call. Though Gamma lacked experience in criminal law, it was an emergency situation because Able wanted to be released.

Submit
4. Leaving an airport, Attorney, who primarily practices criminal law, shared a cab with Doctor, a medical doctor. The cab was involved in a collision, and Doctor was seriously injured, while Attorney was only shaken up. Attorney accompanied Doctor to the hospital in the ambulance. Doctor believed that she was dying and asked Attorney to prepare a simple will for her. Attorney told Doctor, "I have never prepared a will, but hope that I can remember the basics from law school." Attorney then complied with Doctor's request. Doctor signed the will, and the two paramedics in the ambulance signed as witnesses. Was it proper for Attorney to prepare the will?

Explanation

"Under MR 1.1, cmt. [1], factors used to assess the sufficiency of a lawyer's knowledge and skill include whether it is feasible to refer the matter to, or associate or consult with, a lawyer of established competence in the field. In an emergency, a lawyer may give advice or assistance to a client in need, even if she lacks the skill or knowledge ordinarily required, and referral to or consultation with another lawyer is impractical [MR 1.1, cmt. [3]]. The lawyer should limit emergency assistance to that reasonably necessary under the circumstances [Id.].

In this case, it was proper for Attorney to assist Doctor in drafting and executing a will even though Attorney lacked competence because he had never prepared a will before. Doctor, however, believed she was dying so this was an emergency situation. Furthermore, there were no other attorneys available for Attorney to feasibly refer to, or associate or consult with. As such, it was proper for the Attorney to prepare the will.
"

Submit
5. Attorney represented Buyer in a real estate transaction. Due to Attorney's negligence in drafting the purchase agreement, Buyer was required to pay for a survey that should have been paid by Seller, the other party to the transaction. Attorney fully disclosed this negligence to Buyer, and Buyer suggested that he would be satisfied if Attorney simply reimbursed Buyer for the entire cost of the survey. Although Buyer might have recovered additional damages if a malpractice action were filed, Attorney reasonably believed that the proposed settlement was fair to Buyer. Accordingly, in order to forestall a malpractice action, Attorney readily agreed to make the reimbursement. Attorney drafted a settlement agreement, and it was executed by both Attorney and Buyer. Was Attorney's conduct proper?

Explanation

"Under MR 1.8(h)(1), an attorney may not settle a pending or potential malpractice claim with a client without advising the client in writing to seek independent legal counsel and giving the client time to do so.

Here, Attorney's conduct was proper if Attorney if Attorney advised Buyer in writing that Buyer should seek independent representation before entering into the settlement agreement.
"

Submit
6. An attorney, a member of the state legislature, is allowed to engage in private practice under state law. The attorney represents a plaintiff in a personal injury case. The attorney reasonably believes that the trial of the case will last at least two weeks. When the case was first scheduled for trial, the attorney requested a continuance, truthfully stating, \As the court knows I am a member of the legislature which will be going into special session next week. Because of my legislative duties I must be in the state capitol for the duration of the session.\"The defendant objected to the continuance but the court granted it. Is the attorney subject to discipline?"

Explanation

A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client. Occasional postponement for personal reasons is ok. In this case, since the attorney's statements to the court regarding the reason for the continuance were truthful, the attorney would not be subject to discpline.

Submit
7. Attorney Alpha represents Wife in a marriage dissolution proceeding that involves bitterly contested issues of property division and child custody. Husband is represented by Attorney Beta. After one day of trial, Husband, through Beta, made a settlement offer. Because of Husband's intense dislike for Alpha, the proposed settlement requires that Alpha agree not to represent Wife in any subsequent proceeding, brought by either party, to modify or enforce the provisions of the decree. Wife wants to accept the offer, and Alpha believes that the settlement offer made by Husband is better than any award Wife would get if the case went to judgment. Is it proper for Alpha to agree that Alpha will not represent Wife in any subsequent proceeding?

Explanation

"A lawyer is prohibited from making an agreement in which a restriction on the lawyer's right to practice is part of the settlement of a client controversy [MR 5.6(b)].

In this case, the proposed settlement is not proper because it restricts Alpha's right to represent Wife in the future.
"

Submit
8. Attorney represented Plaintiff, who was the plaintiff in litigation that was settled, with Plaintiff's approval, for $25,000. Attorney received a check in that amount from Defendant, payable to Attorney's order. Attorney endorsed and deposited the check in Attorney's Clients' Trust Account. Attorney promptly notified Plaintiff and billed Plaintiff $5,000 for legal fees. Plaintiff disputed the amount of the fee and wrote Attorney, stating, "I will agree to pay $3,000 as a reasonable fee for the work you did, but I will not pay anything more than that." It is proper for Attorney to: I. retain the entire $25,000 in Attorney's Clients' Trust Account until the fee dispute is settled. II. send Plaintiff $20,000, transfer $3,000 to Attorney's office account, and retain $2,000 in Attorney's Clients' Trust Account until the dispute is settled. III. send Plaintiff $20,000 and transfer $5,000 to Attorney's office account.

Explanation

"In general, a lawyer must hold funds and property of clients or third parties separate from the lawyer's own property [MR 1.15(a)]. When two or more persons (one of whom may be the lawyer) claim interest in the client's property, the lawyer must keep it separate until the dispute is resolved. However, the lawyer must promptly distribute all portions of the property not in dispute [MR 1.5(e)].

II is proper because Plaintiff agreed to pay Attorney $3,000 so Attorney is able to transfer these earned fees to Attorney's office account. However, Attorney billed Plaintiff $5,000 so $2,000 is in dispute and must be retained in the Clients' Trust Account until the dispute is resolved. Attorney, however, must also distribute to Plaintiff the remaining $20,000 that is not in dispute.
"

Submit
9. Plaintiff, who is not a lawyer, is representing himself in small claims court in an action to recover his security deposit from his former landlord. Plaintiff told Attorney, a close friend who lived near him, about this case, but did not ask Attorney for any advice. Attorney said, "I'll give you some free advice. It would help your case if the new tenants would testify that the apartment was in good shape when they moved in, and, contrary to the allegation of your former landlord, it was not, in fact, repainted for them." Plaintiff followed Attorney's advice and won his case. Is Attorney subject to discipline for assisting Plaintiff in preparing for his court appearance?

Explanation

A lawyer may counsel non-lawyers who wish to proceed pro se [MR 5.5, cmt. [3]]. Attorney is not subject to discipline for giving legal advice to Plaintiff because Plaintiff is representing himself.

Submit
10. Four years ago, Alpha was a judge in a state court of general jurisdiction and heard the civil case of Plaintiff against Defendant in which Plaintiff prevailed and secured a judgment for $50,000 which was sustained on appeal. Since then Alpha has resigned from the bench and returned to private practice. Defendant has filed suit to enjoin enforcement of the judgment on the grounds of extrinsic fraud in its procurement. Plaintiff has now asked Alpha to represent Plaintiff in defending the suit to enjoin enforcement. Is it proper for Alpha to accept the representation of Plaintiff in this matter?

Explanation

"A lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing [MR 1.12(a)].

Here, Alpha may not represent Plaintiff in a suit to enjoin enforcement of a judgment Alpha participated personally and substantially as a judge.
"

Submit
11. Attorney served two four-year terms as the governor of State immediately prior to reopening his law office in State. Attorney printed and mailed an announcement of his return to private practice to members of the bar, persons who had previously been his clients, and personal friends whom he had never represented. The printed announcement stated that Attorney had reopened his law office, gave his address and telephone number, and added that he had been governor of State for the past eight years. Is Attorney subject to discipline for the announcement?

Explanation

MR 7.1, which covers lawyer advertising, forbids only false or misleading communications. The communication is an advertisement, and is neither false nor misleading.

Submit
12. Attorney placed Associate, recently admitted to the bar, in complete charge of the work of the paralegals in Attorney's office. That work consisted of searching titles to real property, an area in which Associate had no familiarity. Attorney instructed Associate to review the searches prepared by the paralegals, and thereafter to sign Attorney's name to the required certifications of title if Associate was satisfied that the search accurately reflected the condition of the title. This arrangement enabled Attorney to lower office operating expenses. Attorney told Associate that Associate should resolve any legal questions that might arise and not to bother Attorney because Attorney was too busy handling major litigation. Is it proper for Attorney to assign Associate this responsibility?

Explanation

Partners and supervising attorneys must make reasonable efforts to establish internal policies and procedures to provide reasonable assurance all attorneys in their employ comply with ethical rules [MR 5.1, cmt. [2]]. The precise measures required to fulfill the obligations depend on the structure and work of the firm, but should include procedures designed to detect and resolve conflicts of interest, identify dates by which actions must be taken in pending matters so deadlines are not missed, account for client funds and property, and ensure inexperienced lawyers are properly supervised. MR 5.1 requires Attorney to supervise Associate, an inexperienced lawyer. It is improper for Attorney to assign Associate responsibility to review the work of paralegals when Associate is not competent in the area of law.

Submit
13. The law firm of Able & Baker agreed to represent Client in various business matters. The written retainer agreement called for Client to pay Able & Baker's hourly rates of $180 per hour for a partner's time and $110 per hour for an associate's time. The representation proceeded. Able & Baker submitted monthly bills, which Client paid promptly. After two years, Able & Baker decided to increase their hourly rates by $10. Able & Baker thereafter billed Client at their new rates, but did not specifically inform Client of the increase. Client continued to pay monthly bills promptly. Are Able & Baker subject to discipline?

Explanation

A lawyer must promptly communicate any fee changes to the client [MR 1.5(b)]. Able & Baker increased the hourly rates without telling Client about the changes. Though the new rates were reflected in the invoices, Able & Baker needed to promptly communicate the changes to Client.

Submit
14. Attorney's standard retainer contract in divorce cases provides for the payment of a fee of one-third of the amount of alimony or property settlement secured by Attorney. Attorney declines to represent clients who do not agree to this arrangement. Is Attorney's standard retainer contract proper?

Explanation

"A contingent fee requires the client to pay a fee (or a bonus) only if there is a favorable outcome [MR 1.5(c)]. A lawyer may accept a contingency fee except in criminal cases when representing a defendant, or in domestic relations cases [MR 1.5(d)].

Here, Attorney's retainer contract for a divorce case, a matter of domestic relations, requires a client to pay only if Attorney secures alimony or property in a settlement. The contract involves a contingent fee. The contract provides for payment of a one-third fee based on the amount of alimony or property settlement.
"

Submit
15. Attorney has been representing Client in a matter in litigation. During protracted pretrial proceedings, Client complained bitterly about the time and expense involved and insisted that Attorney take steps to terminate the pretrial proceedings. Attorney believes that to do so would jeopardize Client's interests and has so informed Client. Attorney believes that the case cannot be adequately prepared for trial without further pretrial proceedings that will require an additional six months' delay and involve further expense. Client insists that Attorney forego any further pretrial proceedings and set the case for trial at the earliest available date. There are several other competent lawyers who are willing to undertake the representation. Is it proper for Attorney to ask leave of the court to withdraw?

Explanation

A lawyer is permitted to withdraw from representing a client under MR 1.16(b) if the client insists upon taking action the lawyer considers repugnant or with which the lawyer fundamentally disagrees.

Here, Attorney may ask the court for withdrawal because Client complained bitterly about the time and expense involved and insisted Attorney take steps to terminate pretrial proceedings when Attorney believes to do so would jeopardize Client's interests and so informed Client. Attorney believes the case cannot be adequately prepared for trial without further pretrial proceedings.

Submit
16. The judicial district in which Judge sits has a rule that allows litigants two postponements as a matter of right. After that, a litigant who moves for a postponement must convince the presiding judge that a postponement is appropriate. Judge routinely grants additional post-ponements because, in her view, "What harm is done if one of the litigants wants a postponement? The worst that can happen is that the parties have more time to negotiate and thus are more likely to settle." Are Judge's actions proper?

Explanation

A judge should hear and decide matters assigned except those in which the judge is disqualified [CJC 2.7].

Here, Judge should not grant postponements as a routine. Unless a litigant who moves for a postponement convinces the presiding judge that a postponement is appropriate, Judge should hear and decide the matter.

Submit
17. Two years ago, Attorney was employed by State's Department of Transportation (DOT) to search title to several tracts of land. Attorney has not been employed by DOT during the last year. Recently, DOT instituted proceedings to condemn a tract, owned by Owner, for a new highway route. Owner asked Attorney to represent her in obtaining the highest amount of compensation for the condemnation. Owner's tract is one of the tracts on which Attorney searched title two years ago. Attorney remembers that Engineer, a DOT engineer, once drafted a confidential memorandum advising against running a new highway across Owner's land because of potential adverse environmental impact. Because of this information, Attorney believes it is possible to prevent the condemnation of Owner's land or to increase the settlement amount. It is proper for Attorney to:

Explanation

MR 1.11(a)(1) provides that a lawyer who was formerly employed by a government agency may not later represent a client "in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially" as a public employee, unless the government agency consents. Having participated personally and substantially in an early stage of the condemnation matter by conducting a title search on Owner's property, Attorney may not now represent Owner in opposing or seeking additional damages for the condemnation. Under MR 1.11(a)(2) and MR 1.9(c), a lawyer who was formerly employed by the government must not reveal information relating to a former representation. Attorney may not disclose the information learned while working at the DOT about the adverse environmental impact.

Submit
18. Attorney represented Plaintiff in an action against several defendants. The retainer agreement provided that Plaintiff would pay all costs and expenses of litigation and would, on demand, reimburse Attorney for any costs or expenses advanced by Attorney. After serving process on two defendants, Attorney had difficulty locating and serving the remaining defendants. Plaintiff approved the hiring of an investigator to locate and serve the defendants, and Attorney advanced the costs for the investigator. When Attorney asked Plaintiff for reimbursement, Plaintiff refused to pay. Attorney then told Plaintiff that Attorney would do no more work on the case until Attorney was reimbursed for the amount advanced. Thereafter, one of the defendants filed a counterclaim that required a responsive pleading within thirty days. Because Attorney had not been paid, Attorney permitted the time to respond to the counterclaim to expire without filing a responsive pleading, and a default was entered on the counterclaim. Later, Plaintiff reimbursed Attorney for the costs Attorney had advanced, and Attorney was successful in having the default on the counterclaim set aside. The case was tried, and Plaintiff prevailed on Plaintiff's complaint, and the counterclaimant recovered nothing. Is Attorney subject to discipline for not initially filing a responsive pleading to the counterclaim?

Explanation

A lawyer must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client [MR 1.3]. Under MR 1.3, cmts. [2-4], a lawyer should especially attend to: (1) controlling workload, (2) avoiding unreasonable delay and procrastination, (3) filing within the statute of limitations, and (4) carrying representation through to completion and ensuring clients know when representation ends. A lawyer may terminate a client representation under MR 1.16(b) when a client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer's services (e.g. payment of fees) and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled. The court's approval or notice will likely be required if the lawyer is representing the client in pending litigation. Upon terminating representation, the lawyer must take steps to protect the client's interests. The lawyer must give the client reasonable time and notice to retain other counsel.

Here, Attorney may withdraw for Plaintiff's refusal to pay, but must seek permission of the tribunal to do so because there is pending litigation. Attorney is permitted to withdraw if Plaintiff has adequate time to find another lawyer to prepare for, and represent Plaintiff in, the litigation.

Submit
19. Judge, prior to her recent appointment to the federal court, had been an outspoken and effective opponent of the racial segregation policies of Gov, a foreign country. As part of its worldwide tour, Gov's national soccer team scheduled a soccer match with a team in this country. Several civil rights groups have applied to Judge for an order enjoining the playing of the proposed match. The matter is now pending. Only legal issues are presented. Judge, after painstaking consideration, has privately concluded that she cannot decide the legal questions without bias against the representatives of Gov's government. However, no one has made a motion to disqualify Judge. Must Judge recuse herself in the pending matter?

Explanation

A judge may recuse herself from a proceeding on her own initiative. Under CJC 2.11(A), a judge must disqualify herself in a proceeding in which her partiality may reasonably be questioned, including where the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or a party's lawyer. Here, if Judge does not believe she can be impartial, she must disqualify herself.

Submit
20. Client telephoned Attorney, who had previously represented Client. Client described a problem on which he needed advice and made an appointment for the following week to discuss the matter with Attorney. Prior to the appointment, Attorney performed 5 hours of preliminary research on Client's problem. At the end of the appointment, Client agreed that Attorney should pursue the matter, agreed to a fee of $100 per hour, and gave Attorney a check for $5,000 to cover the 5 hours already worked and as an advance on further fees and expenses. Attorney gave the check to the office bookkeeper with the directions to "Deposit the check in the Clients' Trust Account and immediately transfer $3,000 to our General Office Account to cover the 5 hours of research already conducted plus the 25 additional hours I'll spend on it next week." At that time, Attorney reasonably believed that Attorney would spend 25 additional hours on the case. The bookkeeper followed these directions. The next week, Attorney worked diligently on the matter for 23 hours. Reasonably believing that no significant work remained to be done on the matter, Attorney directed the bookkeeper to transfer $200 from the General Office Account to the Clients' Trust Account. Attorney then called Client and made an appointment to discuss the status of the matter. Is Attorney subject to discipline?

Explanation

MR 1.15(c) requires a lawyer to "deposit into a client trust account legal fees and expenses that have been paid in advance, to be withdrawn by the lawyer only as fees are earned or expenses incurred." Since Attorney had earned only $500, for five hours of work, at the time of receiving Client's check, only $500 should have been withdrawn from the trust account and placed in the General Office Account.

Submit
21. Candidate, a member of the bar, is a candidate for judicial office in an election. Candidate personally asked several of his friends to contribute $1,000 each to kick off his campaign. After Candidate's friends made the contributions, Candidate, who was elated by the support, formed a committee to collect more contributions. Candidate then turned over the contributions to the committee and began campaigning in earnest. Is Candidate subject to discipline?

Explanation

Under CJC 4.1(A), a judge or judicial candidate may not personally solicit or accept campaign contributions other than through a campaign committee as authorized by CJC 4.4. Here, Candidate personally asked several of his friends to contribute $1,000 each to kick off his campaign.

Submit
22. Judge Alpha has recently resigned from the state trial court bench. While she was a judge and supervising activity in cases pending before Judge Beta, who was on vacation, Alpha entered an administrative order changing the courtroom in which the case of Able v. Baker was to be tried. After trial and appeal, the case was remanded for a new trial. The plaintiff in Able v. Baker has now decided to change lawyers and has asked Alpha to try the case. Will Alpha be subject to discipline if she tries this case on behalf of the plaintiff?

Explanation

Under MR 1.12(a), except as stated in MR 1.12(d), a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing. Alpha may represent the plaintiff under MR 1.12(a) because Alpha did not participate substantially in the matter while an acting judge. Alpha merely entered an incidental administrative order unrelated to the merits of the lawsuit.

Submit
23. Although licensed to practice law in State, Attorney Alpha does not practice law but works as an investment broker. Alpha could have elected inactive status as a member of the bar, but chose not to do so. Recently, in connection with a sale of worthless securities, Alpha made materially false representations to Victim, an investment customer. Victim sued Alpha for civil fraud, and a jury returned a verdict in Victim's favor. Alpha did not appeal. Is Alpha subject to discipline?

Explanation

Under MR 8.4(c), it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Misconduct need not rise to the level of a crime. Here, in connection with a sale of worthless securities, Alpha engaged in dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation when Alpha made materially false representations to Victim, an investment customer.

Submit
24. Client was an experienced oil and gas developer. Client asked Attorney for representation in a suit to establish Client's ownership of certain oil and gas royalties. Client did not have available the necessary funds to pay Attorney's reasonable hourly rate for undertaking the case. Client proposed instead to pay Attorney an amount in cash equal to 20% of the value of the proceeds received from the first year royalties Client might recover as a result of the suit. Attorney accepted the proposal and took the case. Is Attorney subject to discipline?

Explanation

A contingent fee requires the client to pay a fee (or a bonus) only if there is a favorable outcome [MR 1.5(c)]. A lawyer may accept a contingency fee except in criminal cases when representing a defendant, or in domestic relations cases [MR 1.5(d)]. Here, Client proposed to pay Attorney an amount in cash equal to 20% of the value of the proceeds received from the first year royalties Client might recover as a result of the suit. This was a contingent fee Attorney could properly accept under MR 1.5.

Submit
25. Attorney represented Client in a personal injury action against the driver of the car in which Client was injured while a passenger. The personal injury action was settled, and Attorney received a check in the amount of $10,000 payable to Attorney. Attorney deposited the check in her Clients' Trust Account. One day later, Attorney received a letter from Bank, which had heard of the settlement of the personal injury lawsuit. Bank informed Attorney that Client had failed to make his monthly mortgage payments for the last three months and demanded that Attorney immediately release $900 of the proceeds of the settlement to Bank or Bank would institute mortgage foreclosure proceedings against Client. Attorney informed Client of Bank's letter. Client responded: "I don't care what Bank does. The property is essentially worthless, so let Bank foreclose. If Bank wants to sue me, I'll be easy enough to find. I don't think they'll even bother. You just take your legal fees and turn the rest of the proceeds over to me." Is Attorney subject to discipline if she follows Client's instructions?

Explanation

A lawyer owes a duty to safekeep property to the client, and third parties with legitimate interests, such as a client's creditor who has a lien on funds recovered from a personal injury action, and placed in the lawyer's trust account. A lawyer should protect third-party claims against wrongful interference by the client, and not disburse money to the client, unless sufficient funds remain to satisfy the third party's claim. Here, Attorney is not subject to discipline for following Client's instructions because Bank has not commenced any foreclosure proceedings for the past due mortgage payments. Bank does not have any legitimate interests in the personal injury proceeds.

Submit
26. Three lawyers, Alpha, Beta, and Delta, formed a partnership to practice law with offices in both State First and State Second. Alpha is admitted to practice only in State First. Beta is admitted to practice only in State Second, and Delta is admitted to practice in both States First and Second. The following letterhead is on stationery used by their offices in both states: Alpha, Beta, and Delta Attorneys at Law 100 State Street City, State First (200) 555-5555 200 Bank Building City, State Second (202) 555-5555 Attorney Alpha Admitted to practice only in State First Attorney Beta Admitted to practice only in State Second Attorney Delta Admitted to practice in States First and Second Are the members of the partnership subject to discipline?

Explanation

Law firms with offices in more than on jurisdiction are permitted to use the same name or designation in each jurisdiction, as long as communications in each state identify the partners not licensed to practice in the state [MR 7.5(b)]. Here, the members of the partnership properly designate the states they are admitted.

Submit
27. Judge is one of three trustees of a trust for the educational benefit of her grandchildren. The trust owns 5,000 shares of stock in Big Oil Company. The stock has been selling for the past year at $10 per share. Big Oil is suing Oil Refining Company for breach of an oil refining agreement, and the case is assigned to Judge for trial. Judge believes that she can be fair and impartial. Must Judge disqualify herself from the case?

Explanation

Under CJC 2.11(A), a judge must disqualify herself in a proceeding in which her impartiality may reasonably be questioned, including where the judge knows that the judge, the judge?s spouse or domestic partner, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse or domestic partner of such person, has more than a de minimus interest that could be substantially affected by the proceeding. "Economic interest," under CJC terminology, means ownership of more than a de minimis legal or equitable interest. Except for situations in which the judge participates in the management of such a legal or equitable interest, or the interest could be substantially affected by the outcome of a proceeding before a judge, it does not include: (1) an interest in the individual holdings within a mutual or common investment fund, (2) an interest in securities held by an educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organization in which the judge or the judge's spouse, domestic partner, parent, or child serves as a director, an officer, an advisor, or other participant, (3) a deposit in a financial institution or deposits or proprietary interests the judge may maintain as a member of a mutual savings association or credit union, or similar proprietary interests, or (4) an interest in the issuer of government securities held by the judge.

Here, Judge is one of three trustees of a trust for the educational benefit of her grandchildren, relatives within the third degree. The trust owns 5,000 shares of stock in Big Oil Company. The stock has been selling for the past year at $10 per share. The shares have an estimated value of $50,000. Because the trust has more than a de minimus financial interest in Big Oil Company, Judge must disqualify herself.

Submit
28. For many years, Attorney has served as outside counsel to Corp, a corporation. Shortly after a change in management, Attorney discovered what she reasonably believed to be a material misstatement in a document she had drafted that Attorney was about to file on Corp's behalf with a government agency. Attorney advised Corp's Board of Directors that filing the document was probably criminal. However, the Board disagreed that there was any material misstatement and directed Attorney to proceed with the filing. When Attorney indicated her intention to resign, Corp argued that a resignation at this time would send a signal that there was a problem with the filing. Corp urged Attorney to continue the representation, but offered to use inhouse counsel to complete the work on the filing. Although she does not know for certain that filing the document is illegal, Attorney reasonably believes that it is. In any event, Attorney is personally uncomfortable with the representation and wants to withdraw. May Attorney withdraw from her representation of Corp?

Explanation

A lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if: (1) withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the client, (2) the client persists in a course of action involving the lawyer's services that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent, (3) the client has used the lawyer's services to perpetrate a crime or fraud, (4) the client insists upon taking action that the lawyer considers repugnant or with which the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement, (5) the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer's services and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled, (6) the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer or has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client, or (7) other good cause for withdrawal exists [MR 1.16(b)].

Here, Attorney discovered what she reasonably believed to be a material misstatement in a document she had drafted that Attorney was about to file on Corp's behalf with a government agency. Corp's Board disagreed there was any material misstatement and directed Attorney to proceed with the filing. Attorney may withdraw under MR 1.16(b) because Corp?s Board persists in a course of action involving Attorney's services that Attorney reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent

Submit
29. Attorney represented Client on a minor personal injury claim against Driver, an uninsured motorist. Attorney represented Client on a 30% contingent fee basis. Pursuant to a negotiated settlement in the amount of $2,000, Driver agreed to send Attorney a $100 check, made payable to Attorney, in each of the ensuing twenty months. Which of the following dispositions of each monthly check would be proper for Attorney? I. Deposit the check into her office account and immediately write Client a check for $70 from that account. II. Deposit the check into a separate account established for Client and immediately request Client to pay Attorney $30. III. Deposit the check into a trust account in which funds belonging to all Attorney's clients are deposited and immediately write Client a check for $70 and herself a check for $30 from that account.

Explanation

In general, a lawyer must hold funds and property of clients or third persons separate from the lawyer's own property [MR 1.15(a)]. Upon receiving funds or other property in which a client or third person has an interest, the lawyer must promptly notify the client or third person [MR 1.15(d)]. A lawyer must deliver promptly to the client or third person any funds or other property the client or third person is entitled to receive and, upon request by the client or third person, must promptly render a full accounting regarding such property [Id.].

I is not proper because Attorney should not deposit the check into an office account. Upon receiving funds in which Client has an interest, Attorney must hold the funds separate from Attorney's own property. II is proper because Attorney does not commingle funds in which Client has an interest with Attorney's own property. III is proper because Attorney does not commingle funds in which Client has an interest with Attorney's own property, and Attorney promptly delivers Client's funds to Client, and earned fees to Attorney.

Submit
30. Judge needed to obtain a loan to be secured by a second mortgage on his house. Bank offered him a loan at a very favorable interest rate. The vice-president at Bank told Judge: "Frankly, we normally don't give such a large loan when the security is a second mortgage, and your interest rate will be 2% less than we charge our other customers. But we know that your salary is inadequate, and we are giving you special consideration." Is it proper for Judge to accept the loan?

Explanation

Under CJC 3.13, a judge may accept loans from lending institutions in their regular course of business, if the same opportunities and benefits or loans are made available on the same terms to similarly situated persons who are not judges. Here, Bank offered loan terms to Judge not available to persons who were not judges so it would be improper for the Judge to accept the loan.

Submit
31. Law Firm has 300 lawyers in 10 states. It has placed the supervision of all routine administrative and financial matters in the hands of Admin, a nonlawyer. Admin is paid a regular monthly salary and a year-end bonus of 1% of Law Firm's net income from fees. Organizationally, Admin reports to Attorney, who is the managing partner of Law Firm. Attorney deals with all issues related to Law Firm's supervision of the practice of law. Is it proper for Attorney to participate in Law Firm's use of Admin's services in this fashion?

Explanation

"Under MR 5.4(a), a lawyer or law firm shall not share legal fees with a non-lawyer, except that: (1) an agreement by a lawyer with the lawyer's firm, partner, or associate may provide for the payment of money, over a reasonable period of time after the lawyer's death, to the lawyer's estate or to one or more specified persons, (2) a lawyer who purchases the practice of a deceased, disabled, or disappeared lawyer may, pursuant to the provisions of MR 1.17, pay to the estate or other representative of that lawyer the agreed-upon purchase price, (3) a lawyer or law firm may include non-lawyer employees in a compensation or retirement plan, even though the plan is based in whole or in part on a profit-sharing arrangement, and (4) a lawyer may share court-awarded legal fees with a nonprofit organization that employed, retained or recommended employment of the lawyer in the matter. Under MR 5.4(d), a lawyer shall not practice with or in the form of a professional corporation or association authorized to practice law for a profit, if: (1) a non-lawyer owns any interest therein, except that a fiduciary representative of the estate of a lawyer may hold the stock or interest of the lawyer for a reasonable time during administration, (2) a non-lawyer is a corporate director or officer thereof or occupies the position of similar responsibility in any form of association other than a corporation, or (3) a non-lawyer has the right to direct or control the professional judgment of a lawyer.

Here, as long as Admin does not control the professional judgment of lawyers in the firm, use of Admin?s services is proper. Though Admin's compensation comes from the law firm's earned legal fees, it is not regarded as sharing fees.
"

Submit
32. Attorney experienced several instances when clients failed to pay their fees in a timely manner, but it was too late in the representation to withdraw without prejudicing the clients. To avoid a recurrence of this situation, Attorney has drafted a stipulation of consent to withdraw if fees are not paid according to the fee agreement. She proposes to have all clients sign the stipulation at the outset of the representation. Is it proper for Attorney to use the stipulation to withdraw from representation whenever a client fails to pay fees?

Explanation

Under MR 1.17(b), a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if: (1) withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the client, (2) the client persists in a course of action involving the lawyer's services that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent, (3) the client has used the lawyer's services to perpetrate a crime or fraud, (4) the client insists upon taking action that the lawyer considers repugnant or with which the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement, (5) the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer's services and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled, (6) the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer or has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client, or (7) other good cause for withdrawal exists. The court's approval or notice will likely be required if a lawyer is representing a client in pending litigation. Even if there is good cause to terminate a representation, the lawyer may have to continue representing a client if ordered to do so by a court [MR 1.16(c)].

Here, it is not proper for Attorney to use the stipulation because even if a client does not pay fees when due, a court may not approve withdrawal if a client does not have adequate time to find another lawyer when there is pending litigation.

Submit
33. Attorney was retained by Defendant to represent him in a paternity suit. Aunt, Defendant's aunt, believed the suit was unfounded and motivated by malice. Aunt sent Attorney a check for $1,000 and asked Attorney to apply it to the payment of Defendant's fee. Aunt told Attorney not to tell Defendant of the payment because "Defendant is too proud to accept gifts, but I know he really needs the money." Is it proper for Attorney to accept Aunt's check?

Explanation

Under MR 1.8(f), a third party may pay for a client's representation only if: (1) the client gives informed consent, (2) there is no interference with the lawyer's independence of professional judgment or with the client-lawyer relationship, and (3) information relating to representation of a client is protected as required by MR 1.6. Here, Aunt is a third party payor. Attorney may accept Aunt's check if Attorney first informs Defendant and obtains Defendant's consent.

Submit
34. Attorney has a highly efficient staff of paraprofessional legal assistants, all of whom are graduates of recognized legal assistant educational programs. Recently, the statute of limitations ran against a claim of a client of Attorney's when a legal assistant negligently misplaced Client's file and suit was not filed within the time permitted by law. Which of the following correctly states Attorney's professional responsibility?

Explanation

Professional discipline and civil liability for legal malpractice are two possible consequences of incompetent or neglected legal work. A malpractice action differs from discipline as follows: (1) the forum is a civil court, not a disciplinary tribunal, (2) the lawyer's adversary is an injured plaintiff, not the state bar, and (3) the purpose is to compensate the injured plaintiff, not to punish the lawyer or protect the public against future wrongs relating to the same or similar misconduct. A lawyer is responsible for overseeing the work of non-lawyer assistants and is subject to discipline under MR 5.3(c)(2) if: (1) the lawyer orders or, with the knowledge of the specific conduct, ratifies the conduct involved, or (2) the lawyer is a partner or has comparable managerial authority in the law firm in which the person is employed, or has direct supervisory authority over the person, and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial action.

Here, the statute of limitations ran against a claim of a client of Attorney's when a legal assistant, a non-lawyer, negligently misplaced Client's file. The missing of the statute of limitations may result in injury to Client so Attorney may be subject to civil liability. If Attorney failed to supervise the legal assistant, Attorney may be subject to discipline under MR 5.3(c)(2).

Submit
35. Attorney and Client entered into a written retainer and hourly fee agreement that required Client to pay $5,000 in advance of any services rendered by Attorney and which required Attorney to return any portion of the $5,000 that was not earned. The agreement further provided that Attorney would render monthly statements and withdraw her fees as billed. The agreement was silent as to whether the $5,000 advance was to be deposited in Attorney's Clients' Trust Account or in a general account. Attorney deposited the entire fund in her Clients' Trust Account, which also contained the funds of other persons which had been entrusted to Attorney. Thereafter, Attorney rendered monthly progress reports and statements for services to Client after services were rendered, showing the balance of Client's fee advance. However, Attorney did not withdraw any of the $5,000 advance until one year later when the matter was concluded to Client's complete satisfaction. At that time, Attorney had billed Client reasonable legal fees of $4,500. Attorney wrote two checks on her Clients' Trust Account: one to herself for $4,500, which she deposited in her general office account, and one for $500 to Client. Was Attorney's conduct proper?

Explanation

A lawyer may collect a fee in advance in the form of a retainer, but unless the advance payment is a true retainer to reserve services, the lawyer must return any unearned portion. In general, a lawyer must hold funds and property of clients or third parties separate from the lawyer's own property [MR 1.15(a)]. The lawyer may withdraw from the client trust account only fees earned or expenses incurred [MR 1.15(c)].

Here, Attorney left in the Clients' Trust Account earned fees, and did not withdraw them for a year. This was a commingling of Client funds with Attorney's own personal property.

Submit
36. Attorney Alpha, a member of the bar, placed a printed flyer in the booth of each artist exhibiting works at a county fair. The face of the flyer contained the following information: "I, Alpha, am an attorney, with offices in 800 Bank Building, telephone (555) 555-5555. I have a J.D. degree from State Law School and an M.A. degree in fine arts from State University. My practice includes representing artists in negotiating contracts between artists and dealers and protecting artists' interests. You can find me in the van parked at the fair entrance." All factual information on the face of the flyer was correct. There was a retainer agreement on the back of the flyer. At the entrance to the fair, Alpha parked a van with a sign that read "Alpha-Attorney at Law." For which, if any, of the following is Alpha subject to discipline? I. Placing copies of the flyer in the booth of each artist. II. Including a retainer agreement on the back of the flyer. III. Parking the van with the sign on it at the fair entrance.

Explanation

A lawyer may collect a fee in advance in the form of a retainer, but unless the advance payment is a true retainer to reserve services, the lawyer must return any unearned portion. Advertising is permitted as long as the communication is not misleading and in accordance with MR 7.1 [MR 7.2]. MR 7.1 permits a lawyer to use any form of public communication about the lawyer's services that is not false or misleading. A lawyer may advertise through written, recorded, or electronic communication, including public media [MR 7.2(a)]. All ads must include the name and office address of at least one attorney or law firm [MR 7.2(c)]. Under MR 7.3(a), a lawyer shall not by in-person, live telephone or real-time electronic contact solicit professional employment from a prospective client when a significant motive for the lawyer's doing so is the lawyer's pecuniary gain, unless the person contacted: (1) is a lawyer, or (2) has a family, close personal, or prior professional relationship with the lawyer.

I is proper because Alpha's placement of the flyers in the booths is advertising, not solicitation. There is no in-person contact. The flyers contain Alpha's name and address. The information in the flyers is not false or misleading. II is proper because Alpha may collect a fee in advance in the form of a retainer. III is proper because the van with the sign is advertising. The sign contains Alpha's name, and is not false or misleading.

Submit
37. Attorneys Alpha and Beta had been political opponents. Alpha was elected to the state legislature after a bitter race in which Beta had managed the campaign of Alpha's opponent. Alpha had publicly blamed Beta at that time for what Alpha reasonably believed were illegal and unethical campaign practices and later had publicly objected to Beta's appointment as a judge. Alpha represented Client in a widely publicized case tried in Judge Beta's court. At the conclusion of the trial, Beta ruled against Alpha's client. Alpha then held a press conference and said, "All that you reporters have to do is check your files and you will know what I think about Judge Beta's character and fitness." Is Alpha subject to discipline for making this statement?

Explanation

A lawyer may not make a statement the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial office [MR 8.2]. A lawyer's assessment of judges and judicial candidates is relied on in evaluating such persons' professional or personal fitness for judicial or legal office. A false statement or opinion that is not candid can unfairly undermine public confidence in the administration of justice [MR 8.2, cmt. [1]].

Here, Alpha publicly blamed Beta for what Alpha reasonably believed were illegal and unethical campaign practices and later had publicly objected to Beta's appointment as a judge. Alpha did not make a false statement or opinion.

Submit
38. Judge, a judge in a criminal trial court of State, wishes to serve as guardian of her father, who has been declared incompetent. Accepting the responsibilities of the position would not interfere with the performance of Judge's official duties. Although the position in all likelihood would not involve contested litigation, it would be necessary for Judge to prepare and sign various pleadings, motions, and other papers and to appear in civil court on her father's behalf. Would it be proper for Judge to undertake this guardianship?

Explanation

Under CJC 3.8(A), a judge shall not accept appointment to serve in a fiduciary position, such as executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, attorney in fact, or other personal representative, except for the estate, trust, or person of a member of the judge's family, and then only if such service will not interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties. Here, undertaking the guardianship, a fiduciary position, is proper because it involves her father, a close family member, and the responsibilities of the position will not interfere with the performance of Judge's official duties.

Submit
39. An attorney is a general practitioner with extensive experience in personal injury litigation, including legal and medical malpractice. A man contacted the attorney by telephone and requested that the attorney represent the man in a legal malpractice case that the man wanted to file against the lawyer who handled the man's divorce. The attorney refused even to meet with the man, saying: "Look, I just finished renewing my own malpractice insurance policy, and I can't believe how high the premiums have gotten. I'm not taking on any new clients with legal malpractice cases." The man tried to contact several other lawyers, each of whom indicated that he or she would be happy to accept the representation but was too busy to take on any new matters at this time. Six months later the statute of limitations expired without the man filing his lawsuit. If the man can establish that a legal malpractice action against the divorce lawyer would have succeeded, is the attorney subject to civil liability for refusing to accept the representation?

Explanation

Lawyers in the United States are generally free to refuse service to any person for any reason. The attorney had no legal obligation to accept the man's case.

Submit
40. Alpha & Beta is a well-known law firm in City. Alpha & Beta had shown no interest in being retained by City to handle City's municipal bond work until recently, when it recruited Attorney Gamma from another firm in City. For years, Gamma's previous firm had done over 80% of City's bond work, and Gamma had been one of that firm's experts in the field. Soon after Gamma joined Alpha & Beta, Gamma reminded Beta, the managing partner, that the mayor was running for re-election. Citing his experience at his old firm, Gamma convinced Beta that no law firm could obtain any of City's municipal bond work without contributing to the mayor's campaign. Though none of the firm's partners personally supported the mayor, Beta responded by making such a contribution on behalf of Alpha & Beta. Soon after the mayor was reelected, Gamma received word that City wanted to retain Gamma and his new firm to work on a municipal bond issue. Gamma and the firm accepted the engagement. Is Gamma subject to discipline?

Explanation

A lawyer or firm must not accept a government legal engagement (i.e. employment a public official has the power to award), or an appointment by a judge if the lawyer or firm makes or solicits a political contribution for the purpose of obtaining such employment or appointment [MR 7.6, cmt. 1].

Here, Gamma convinced Beta that no law firm could obtain any of City's municipal bond work without contributing to the mayor's campaign. Beta made a contribution on behalf of Alpha & Beta. It was likely Beta made the contribution to obtain municipal bond work for Gamma, who previously worked on 80% of City?s bond work. None of the firm's partners personally supported the mayor, and prior to Gamma joining the firm, the firm not only did not handle City's bond work, but had no interest in doing so. Gamma violated MR MR 7.6 when Gamma accepted the City engagement knowing the firm contributed to the mayor's campaign for the purpose of obtaining or being considered for City's municipal bond work.

Submit
41. Five years ago, an attorney represented a seller in the sale of the seller's home. The attorney has not represented the seller since that time. Recently the attorney was approached by the seller's partner in a venture capital company formed two years ago. The partner and the seller have agreed to dissolve their partnership but cannot agree on the terms of the dissolution. The partner asked the attorney to sue the seller for an accounting of partnership assets. If the attorney accepts the representation, is the attorney subject to disqualification?

Explanation

A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter may not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client consents in writing after consultation [MR 1.9(a)]. The attorney may represent the seller's partner because the partnership dissolution is unrelated to the sale of the seller's home.
"

Submit
42. Client, a new client of Attorney, has asked Attorney to write a letter recommending Client's nephew for admission to the bar. Client has told Attorney that he has no direct contact with the nephew, but that Client's sister (the nephew's mother) has assured Client that the nephew is industrious and honest. Which of the following would be proper for Attorney? I. Write the letter on the basis of Client's assurance. II. Write the letter on the basis of Client's assurance if Attorney has no unfavorable information about the nephew. III. Make an independent investigation and write the letter only if Attorney is thereafter satisfied that the nephew is qualified.

Explanation

A lawyer should always keep up-to-date about changes in the law through continuing education and self-education [MR 1.1, cmt. [6]]. The CLE requirement may be met either by attending approved courses or completing any other CLE approved for credit. Self-study, teaching, writing for CLE publications, participation in educational activities involving the use of computer-based resources, and in-office law firm CLE efforts may also be considered for credit.

Submit
43. State does not require lawyers to participate in continuing legal education courses. Attorneys Alpha, Beta, and Gamma, all lawyers recently admitted to practice, formed a law partnership in State. As they considered what expenses the partnership would pay on behalf of each lawyer, a majority decided that the firm would not pay for continuing legal education courses since they were not required by State. Gamma, who wanted reimbursement for continuing legal education courses, angrily said, \Fine. I won't attend any continuing legal education courses.\" Is it proper for Gamma to refuse to attend any continuing legal education courses?"

Explanation

Applicants for admission to the bar, and lawyers in connection with a bar admission application or a disciplinary matter, must not knowingly make a false statement of material fact, fail to disclose a fact necessary to correct a misapprehension, or knowingly fail to respond to a lawful demand for non-confidential information [MR 8.1]. A lawyer who writes a letter of recommendation for a bar candidate or who is asked by bar authorities for information about a bar candidate is subject to the same rule [MR 8.1, cmt. [1]].

III is proper. Only after an independent investigation into nephew?s background can Attorney provide a personal opinion so as to not knowingly make a false material fact regarding nephew's qualifications.

Submit
44. Alpha is a member of the bar in State First and is also licensed as a stockbroker in State Second. In his application for renewal of his stockbroker's license in State Second, Alpha knowingly filed a false financial statement. Is Alpha subject to discipline in State First for so doing?

Explanation

Under MR 8.4(c), it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to engage in any conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Fraud means conduct that (1) is fraudulent under the substantive or procedural law of the applicable jurisdiction and (2) has a purpose to deceive. Here, Alpha?s willful filing of a false financial statement violates MR 8.4(c).

Submit
45. Attorney is a sole practitioner whose practice is largely in the areas of tax, wills, estates, and trusts. Attorney learned of a new Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regulation that probably affects the trust provisions in a will she prepared for Testatrix two years ago. Attorney has not represented Testatrix since she drew the will. Is Attorney subject to discipline if she calls Testatrix and advises her of the new IRS ruling and the need to revise the will?

Explanation

A lawyer has the right to solicit former clients for additional legal services [MR 7.3(a)].

Here, Attorney drew up a will for Testatrix and the recent tax law changes made it advisable to change the will. As such, Attorney has the right to initiate in person contact with a former client, and suggest updating the will.

Submit
46. Deft retained Attorney to appeal Deft's criminal conviction and to seek bail pending appeal. The agreed fee for the appearance on the bail hearing was $50 per hour. Attorney received $800 from Deft of which $300 was a deposit to secure Attorney's fee and $500 was for bail costs in the event that bail was obtained. Attorney maintained two office bank accounts: a "Fee Account," in which all fees were deposited and from which all office expenses were paid, and a "Clients' Fund Account." Attorney deposited the $800 in the "Clients' Fund Account" the week before the bail hearing. Attorney expended six hours of time on the bail hearing. The effort to obtain bail was unsuccessful. Dissatisfied, Deft immediately demanded return of the $800. It is now proper for Attorney to:

Explanation

When two or more persons (one of whom may be the lawyer) claim interest in the client?s property, the lawyer must keep it separate until the dispute is resolved. However, the lawyer must promptly distribute all portions of the property not in dispute [MR 1.15(e)].

Here, Attorney received $800 from Deft of which $300 was a deposit to secure Attorney?s fee and $500 was for bail costs in the event bail was obtained. The agreed fee for the appearance on the bail hearing was $50 per hour. Attorney expended six hours of time on the bail hearing. The effort to obtain bail was unsuccessful. Deft demanded return of $800. As such, Attorney must return the $500 undisputed amount, and keep the $300 disputed amount in the Clients? Fund Account until the parties resolve the dispute.

Submit
47. Judge Alpha has been assigned to try a criminal prosecution by State against Deft. Ten years previously, Alpha, while serving as a deputy attorney general in State, initiated an investigation of Deft for suspected criminal conduct. The investigation did not establish any basis for prosecution. None of the matters previously investigated is involved in or affects the present prosecution. Is it proper for Judge Alpha to try the case?

Explanation

Under CJC 2.11(A), a judge must disqualify herself in a proceeding in which her impartiality may reasonably be questioned, including where the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or a party?s lawyer.

Here, if Judge Alpha is prejudiced against Deft, it is not proper for Judge Alpha to try the case.

Submit
48. Attorney represented Landlord in a variety of matters over several years. Plaint, an elderly widow living on public assistance, filed suit against Landlord alleging that Landlord withheld without justification the security deposit on a rental unit that Plaint vacated three years ago. She brought the action for herself, without counsel, in small claims court. Attorney investigated the claim and learned that it was legally barred by the applicable statute of limitations, although Plaint's underlying claim was meritorious. Attorney told Landlord of the legal defense, but emphasized that Plaint's claim was just and that, in all fairness, the security deposit should be returned to Plaint. Attorney told Landlord: "I strongly recommend that you pay Plaint the full amount with interest. It is against your long-term business interests to be known in the community as a landlord who routinely withholds security deposits even though the tenant leaves the apartment in good condition. Paying the claim now will prevent future headaches for you." Was Attorney's conduct proper?

Explanation

In representing a client, lawyer must exercise independent professional judgment and render candid advice. In rendering advice, a lawyer may refer not only to law, but also to other considerations such as moral, economic, social, and political factors that may be relevant to the client?s situation [MR 2.1, cmt. [2]].

In this case, Attorney?s legal advice referred to legal and business interests of Landlord and, as such, there is nothing improper about Attorney?s conduct.

Submit
49. Attorney is a member of the bar and a salaried employee of the trust department of Bank. As part of his duties, he prepares a monthly newsletter concerning wills, trusts, estates, and taxes which Bank sends to all of its customers. The newsletter contains a recommendation to the customer to review his or her will in light of the information contained and, if the customer has any questions, to bring the will to Bank's trust department where the trust officer will answer any questions without charge. The trust officer is not a lawyer. If the trust officer is unable to answer the customer's questions, the trust officer refers the customer to Attorney. Is Attorney subject to discipline for the foregoing?

Explanation

Law–related services are services that might reasonably be performed in conjunction with and, in substance, are related to the provision of legal services and not prohibited as the unauthorized practice of law when provided by a non–lawyer [MR 5.7(b)]. Law–related services include providing title insurance, financial planning, accounting, trust services, real estate counseling, legislative lobbying, economic analysis, social work, psychological counseling, tax preparation, and patent, medical, or environmental consulting [MR 5.7, cmt. [9]]. A lawyer may not assist another person in the unauthorized practice of law [MR 5.5, cmt. [1]]. A bank may not provide legal services to its customers through a salaried lawyer because Banks are not authorized to practice law.

Here, the trust officer, a non–lawyer, may provide trust services, a law–related service, without Attorney being subject to discipline, but the newsletter Attorney prepares recommends customers to bring questions on wills to the trust officer. Answering questions on wills is not a law–related service but rather the practice of law. As such, Attorney is aiding Bank in the unauthorized practice of law.

Submit
50. Attorney wants to make it easier for her clients to pay their bills for her fees. Which of the following would be proper for Attorney? I. Accept bank credit cards in payment of Attorney's fees. II. Arrange for clients to obtain bank loans for the purpose of paying Attorney's fees. III. If a case is interesting, suggest that the client give Attorney publication rights concerning the case as partial payment of the fee.

Explanation

I and II are allowed because a lawyer may collect a fee through a credit card or by arranging a bank loan for a client. III is not allowed because a lawyer may not obtain or negotiate literary or media rights to a portrayal or account regarding a pending representation prior to the conclusion of the representation [MR 1.8(d)].

Submit
51. Attorney practices law in a state that has experienced a business recession and where several banks have failed and others are severely pressed to preserve their solvency. Attorney maintains a Clients' Trust Account in Bank and that account is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation against losses up to $100,000. Attorney also maintains his regular office account in the same bank and that account is insured to $100,000. During a particularly busy time, Attorney's bookkeeper told Attorney that the balance in the Clients' Trust Account had increased to $150,000. The bookkeeper noted that the office account had a balance of $30,000. Which of the following courses of action by Attorney would be proper? I. Leave the Clients' Trust Account as is if the balance is likely to decrease to less than $100,000 within the next ten days. II. Open another Clients' Trust Account in another bank and transfer some funds to the second Clients' Trust Account to maintain a fully insured balance in both accounts. III. Temporarily transfer $50,000 from the Clients' Trust Account to the office account so the balance in both accounts is fully within insured limits.

Explanation

The lawyer must safeguard, account for, client property. Property must be kept safe [MR 1.15].

Here, there is a risk of loss for $50,000 of clients' funds for not being insured with Bank. To prevent this loss, Attorney should open another Clients' Trust Account in another bank so the $50,000 is insured against risk of loss.

Submit
52. Law Firm, a professional corporation with five lawyer shareholders, employs twenty-five additional lawyers. Which of the following is(are) proper? I. Employees who are members of the bar are not made shareholders until they have been with Law Firm ten years. II. Manager, who is the office manager but not a member of the bar, is executive vice president of Law Firm. III. Widow, whose husband was a lawyer shareholder in Law Firm until his death two years ago, continues to hold husband's shares in Law Firm, distributed in his estate, until their child completes a law school education.

Explanation

There are no ethical standards that a law firm needs to follow when deciding when (if ever) a lawyer will become a shareholder of a corporate law firm.

Submit
53. Attorney, who was recently admitted to the bar, has been appointed by the court as counsel for Deft, an indigent defendant charged with a felony. After consulting with Deft and attempting for two days to prepare the case for trial, Attorney became convinced that he lacked the knowledge and experience to represent Deft effectively. Which of the following would be proper for Attorney? I. Request permission of the court to withdraw from representing Deft because Attorney knows that he is not competent to handle the case. II. Request the court to appoint experienced co-counsel and grant a continuance to enable co-counsel to prepare the case. III. Explain the circumstances to Deft and, if Deft consents, proceed to represent Deft alone to the best of Attorney's ability.

Explanation

"If the lawyer is not competent to handle the representation, she may: (1) decline or withdraw from representation, (2) take action to make herself competent to handle the representation, or (3) associate with competent counsel. The client's consent to representation when an attorney is not competent does not release the attorney from the duty of competence [MR 1.1]. Even if there is good cause to terminate a representation, the lawyer may have to continue representing a client if ordered to do so by a court [MR 1.16(c)].

I is correct because incompetence is good cause for Attorney to request permission of the court to withdraw.

II is correct because if Attorney is not competent, Attorney may associate with competent counsel.

III is incorrect, however, because Deft's consent to Attorney representing Deft to the best of Attorney's abilities does not release Attorney from the duty of competence.
"

Submit
54. While an assistant district attorney, Attorney Alpha was in charge of the presentation before a grand jury of evidence that led to an indictment charging thirty-two defendants with conspiracy to sell controlled drugs. Shortly after the grand jury returned the indictments, Alpha resigned as assistant district attorney and became an associate in the law office of Attorney Beta, a sole practitioner. At the time of such association, Beta was the attorney for Deft, one of the indicted co-defendants. Is it proper for Attorney Beta to continue to represent Deft?

Explanation

A lawyer cannot represent a private party against a government agency in a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially while working for the government, unless the government agency gives its consent, in writing, to the representation [MR 1.11(c)]. As a general rule, when one attorney is disqualified, the whole firm is also disqualified. This is called imputed disqualification [MR 1.10(a)]. Imputed disqualification is based on a presumption that all partners and associates in a firm know about all cases. As such, the knowledge of one lawyer working on a case is imputed to all the others while that lawyer is at the firm [MR 1.10, cmt. [3]].

Submit
55. Judge is presently serving on a state intermediate appellate court. This court, in opinions written by her, has decided several controversial cases in which the court has held that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not guarantee due process protection to state prison inmates who are disciplined by prison authorities for violating the prison's rules of conduct. Judge is now a candidate for election to a vacancy on the state supreme court. She is vigorously opposed by several organizations concerned with the conditions under which prisoners are incarcerated in the state's prison. Judge is scheduled to be interviewed on television and has been informed that questions will be asked of her concerning those decisions and her attitude on the subject of prisoners' rights. Which of the following is it proper for Judge to say during the interview? I. "I believe that the issues raised by the organizations opposing me are appropriate matters for legislative consideration." II. "In my opinion, incarceration for the commission of a crime carries with it a loss of civil liberties in prison discipline proceedings." III. "I am convinced I was right in those cases and will make the same decision in similar cases in the future."

Explanation

A judge or candidate for judicial office may not engage in political or campaign activity that is inconsistent with the independence, integrity, or impartiality of the judiciary [CJC Canon 4].

I acknowledges opposing views and does not insert any personal opinions.

Submit
56. Attorney was formerly employed by Insurance Company as a lawyer solely to handle fire insurance claims. While so employed she investigated a fire loss claim of Claimant against Insurance Company. Attorney is now in private practice. Assume the claim has not been settled and Claimant consults Attorney and asks Attorney either to represent him or refer him to another lawyer for suit on the claim. Which of the following would be proper for Attorney to do? I. Refuse to discuss the matter with Claimant. II. Represent Claimant. III. Refer Claimant to an associate in her law firm, provided Attorney does not share in any fee. IV. Give Claimant a list of lawyers who Attorney knows are competent and specialize in such claims.

Explanation

"A lawyer representing an organization represents the organization as an entity through its duly authorized constituents, but does not represent the individual employees. A lawyer must act in the best interests of the organization. A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter may not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client consents in writing after consultation [MR 1.9(a)]. As a general rule, when one attorney is disqualified from representing a client, the whole firm is disqualified. This is called imputed disqualification [MR 1.10(a)]. Imputed disqualification is based on the presumption all partners and associates in a firm know about all cases. The knowledge of one lawyer working on a case is imputed to all the others while that lawyer is at the firm [MR 1.10, cmt. [3]].

I and IV are proper because lawyers in the United States are generally free to refuse service to any person for any reason. A lawyer may refer clients to another lawyer.

II is not proper because as a former employee of Insurance Company, Insurance Company was Attorney?s former client. While an employee of Insurance Company, Attorney worked on the same matter, which is not settled, and the subject of Claimant's suit. Attorney may not represent Claimant, who has interests adverse to Insurance Company, unless Insurance Company consents in writing after consultation.

III is not proper because an associate in Attorney's firm is disqualified from representing Claimant based on imputed disqualification.
"

Submit
57. Attorney was formerly employed by Insurance Company as a lawyer solely to handle fire insurance claims. While so employed she investigated a fire loss claim of Claimant against Insurance Company. Attorney is now in private practice. Assume that the original claim was settled. One year after Attorney left the employ of Insurance Company, Claimant slipped and fell in Insurance Company's office. Claimant now asks Attorney to represent him or refer him to another lawyer for suit on the \slip and fall\" claim. Which of the following would be proper for Attorney to do? I. Refuse to discuss the matter with Claimant. II. Represent Claimant. III. Give Claimant a list of lawyers who Attorney knows are competent and specialize in such claims."

Explanation

"Lawyers in the United States are generally free to refuse service to any person for any reason. A lawyer may refer clients to another lawyer. A lawyer representing an organization represents the organization as an entity through its duly authorized constituents, but does not represent the individual employees. A lawyer must act in the best interests of the organization. A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter may not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client consents in writing after consultation [MR 1.9(a)].

I is proper, but II and III are also proper, so answer choice A is not the best choice.

II is proper because as a former employee of Insurance Company, Insurance Company was Attorney's former client. Attorney may not represent Claimant relating to the fire loss claim, which Attorney investigated, and where Claimant has interests adverse to Insurance Company, unless Insurance Company consents in writing after consultation. The fire loss claim, however, has been settled and Claimant is asking Attorney to represent Claimant in the "slip and fall" claim, not the same or a substantially related matter to any work Attorney did while employed by Insurance Company. Therefore, Attorney can represent Claimant.
"

Submit
58. Client has retained Attorney to represent Client in a contract suit. Attorney's retainer agreement provided that Attorney's fees would be based on a fixed hourly rate, payable at the end of each calendar month. Two months before trial, Client fell behind in the payment of Attorney's monthly billing for fees. Attorney included the following statement on Attorney's last billing to Client: "Your account is more than thirty days past due. If amounts due are not paid promptly in accordance with our agreement, I will terminate the representation. If you cannot pay the amount due, I will accept an assignment of your cause of action as security for your fee to me." Two weeks after the last billing, Attorney telephoned Client and told Client that Attorney would withdraw from representing Client if the bill was not paid within forty-eight hours or adequate security given for its payment. If the bill remains unpaid or unsecured after forty-eight hours, it would be proper for Attorney to: I. upon notice to Client, move the court for permission to withdraw. II. turn Client's file over to another experienced lawyer in town and notify Client that Attorney no longer represents Client. III. accept an assignment of Client's cause of action as security for Attorney's fee.

Explanation

Under MR 1.16(b), withdrawal is permitted if: (1) withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the client, (2) the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer's services (e.g. payment of fees), and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled, (3) the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer, or has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client, or (4) other good cause for withdrawal exists. Even if there is good cause to terminate a representation, the lawyer may have to continue representing a client if ordered to do so by a court [MR 1.16(c)]. The court's approval or notice will likely be required if the lawyer is representing the client in pending litigation.

Here, Attorney represents Client in a pending contract suit. Though, non–payment of bills may be good cause to withdraw, Attorney may need to give notice to Client that Attorney will obtain an order from the court to withdraw.

Submit
59. Attorney's advertisement in the local newspaper includes the following information, all of which is true: I. Attorney, B.A., magna cum laude, Eastern College; J.D., summa cum laude, State Law School; LL.M., Eastern Law School. II. My offices are open Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., but you may call my answering service twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. III. I speak modern Greek fluently. For which, if any, of these statements is Attorney subject to discipline?

Explanation

Advertising is permitted as long as the communication is not misleading and in accordance with MR 7.1 [MR 7.2]. MR 7.1 permits a lawyer to use any form of public communication about the lawyer's services that is not false or misleading. A lawyer may advertise through written, recorded, or electronic communication, including public media [MR 7.2(a)]. All ads must include the name and office address of at least one attorney or law firm [MR 7.2(c)].

Here, Attorney may advertise through the newspaper, a form of public media. The facts also state that the information in I, II, and III is true. I is proper because it provides Attorney's name and is not false or misleading. II and III are proper because the statements are not false or misleading.

Submit
60. The law firm of Alpha and Beta has a radio commercial which states: \Do you have a legal problem? Are you being sued? Consult Alpha and Beta licensed attorneys at law. Initial conference charge is $25 for one hour. Act now and protect your interests. Call at 1234 Main Street; telephone area code (101) 123-4567.\" Are Alpha and Beta subject to discipline for the commercial?"

Explanation

"Advertising is permitted as long as the communication is not misleading and in accordance with MR 7.1 [MR 7.2]. MR 7.1 permits a lawyer to use any form of public communication to advertise the lawyer's services as long as the advertisement is not false or misleading. A lawyer may advertise through written, recorded, or electronic communication, including public media [MR 7.2(a)]. All ads must include the name and office address of at least one attorney or law firm [MR 7.2(c)].

Here, Alpha and Beta may advertise through the radio, a form of public media. Answer choice C states, "if all the statements in the radio broadcast are true." This means none of the statements are false or misleading. The advertisement also provides the name and office address of at least one attorney or law firm. As such, Alpha and Beta would not be subject to discipline for the commercial if all the statements in the radio broadcast are true.
"

Submit
61. Attorney Alpha represents Client, the plaintiff in a medical malpractice case. Alpha's contract with Client provides for a contingent fee of 20% of the recovery by settlement and 30% if the case is tried, with a total fee not to exceed $50,000. Alpha associated Attorney Beta, a sole practitioner, in the case, with Client's written consent and after full disclosure of the fee agreement between Alpha and Beta. Beta is both a medical doctor and a lawyer and is well qualified by experience and training to try medical malpractice cases. The fee agreement between Alpha and Beta reads as follows: The total fee in this case is 20% of recovery by settlement and 30%, if tried, with a maximum fee of $50,000. Alpha will help with discovery and will be the liaison person with Client. Beta will prepare the case and try it if it is not settled. Alpha and Beta will divide the fee, 40% to Alpha and 60% to Beta. Are Alpha and Beta subject to discipline for their agreement for division of the fee?

Explanation

"Under MR 1.5(e), a fee can be divided between lawyers who are not in the same firm if, the: (1) division is in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer, (2) client agrees to the arrangement in writing, and (3) total fee is reasonable.

Here, two lawyers, Alpha and Beta, of different law firms, arranged to divide fees, with Client?s written consent. If the total fee is reasonable and the division of fee between Alpha and Beta is in proportion to actual work done by each, Alpha and Beta are not subject to discipline.
"

Submit
62. Attorney Alpha was retained by Client to incorporate Client's business, which previously had been operated as a sole proprietorship. Alpha noticed in Client's file copies of some correspondence from Client to Attorney Beta concerning the possibility of Beta's incorporating Client's business. Alpha questioned Client to make certain that any attorney-client relationship between Beta and Client had been terminated. Client told Alpha, "It certainly has been terminated. When I discussed the matter with Beta six months ago, he asked for a retainer of $1,000, which I paid him. He did absolutely nothing after he got the money, even though I called him weekly, and finally, last week when I again complained, he returned the retainer. But don't say anything about it because Beta is an old friend of my family." Is Alpha subject to discipline if she does not report her knowledge of Beta's conduct to the appropriate authority?

Explanation

"Generally, a lawyer cannot reveal information relating to the representation of a client, including information protected by the attorney–client privilege under applicable law [MR 1.6(a)]. A lawyer who has knowledge of a violation of the Rules that raises a question as to any lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer must inform the appropriate professional authority [MR 8.3(a)]. A report is not required where it would involve disclosure of confidential information otherwise protected by MR 1.6 [MR 8.3, cmt. [2]].

Here, Alpha discovered the misconduct by Beta from Client's files, information relating to the representation of a client. Alpha does not need to report Beta's violation of the Rules, unless Client agrees. Since Client told Alpha "But don?t say anything about it?," Client does not agree.
"

Submit
63. Alpha & Beta, a general partnership, is a litigation firm practicing in State. It hires new law school graduates as associates. These new lawyers are largely left to their own resources to practice law. Alpha & Beta accepts many small litigation matters and assigns them to the associates for training purposes. No senior partners are assigned to supervise this work. It is assumed that if an associate needs help on a case, he or she will seek the guidance of a more senior attorney. Client retained Alpha & Beta to pursue a claim for breach of contract against City. Associate, a first year associate, was assigned Client's case. Associate failed to comply with the applicable 30-day notice requirement for filing a complaint against City, and Client lost the chance to recover $5,000 owed to Client by City. When the complaint was dismissed for failure to comply with the notice requirement, Associate instead told Client that the case was dismissed on the merits. Which of the following statements are correct? I. The law firm of Alpha & Beta is subject to discipline for failure to supervise Associate. II. The individual partners of Alpha & Beta are subject to discipline for failure to make reasonable efforts to establish a system providing reasonable assurance that all lawyers in the firm comply with the rules of professional conduct. III. Associate, an unsupervised subordinate lawyer, is subject to discipline for making misrepresentations to Client. IV. Both the law firm of Alpha & Beta and Associate are subject to civil liability for Client's loss.

Explanation

"Partners and supervising attorneys must make reasonable efforts to establish internal policies and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that all attorneys in their employ comply with ethical rules [MR 5.1, cmt. [2]]. The precise measures required to fulfill these obligations depend on the structure and the work of the firm, but should include procedures designed to detect and resolve conflicts of interest, identify dates by which actions must be taken in pending matters so deadlines are not missed, account for client funds and property, and ensure inexperienced lawyers are properly supervised. Supervising attorneys are personally responsible for subordinates' ethical violations if they order or ratify the subordinates' work. A subordinate lawyer must follow the Rules even when acting under the directions of another person [MR 5.2]. An employer is vicariously liable for tortuous acts committed by its employee if the acts occur within the scope of employment. To be within the scope of employment, the conduct need not be actually authorized. A competent lawyer may act incompetently in a client representation, and be subject to civil liability for malpractice.

I is incorrect because there are no Rules requiring a law firm to supervise a lawyer. The Rules require the managing lawyers, individual partners, or direct supervising lawyers to supervise Associate.

II is correct because the Rules relating to a lawyer who directly supervises, or is a law firm partner or managing lawyer, requires the lawyer to make reasonable efforts to assure the subordinate lawyer adheres to the Rules [MR 5.1(b)].

III is correct because Associate's own ethical duties remain [MR 5.1, cmt. [8], MR 5.2].

IV is correct because the law firm, as Associate's employer, is vicariously liable for Client's loss. Associate is personally liable for Client's loss because Associate incompetently failed to comply with a notice requirement.
"

Submit
64. Attorney, who represented Plaintiff, received a check from Deft payable to Attorney's order in the sum of $10,000 in settlement of Plaintiff's claim against Deft. Plaintiff had previously paid Attorney a fee so no part of the $10,000 was owed to Attorney. Which of the following would be proper? I. Endorse the check and send it to Plaintiff II. Deposit the check in Attorney's personal bank account and send Attorney's personal check for $10,000 to Plaintiff III. Deposit the check in a Clients' Trust Account, advise Plaintiff, and forward a check drawn on that account to Plaintiff

Explanation

"pon receiving funds or other property in which a client or third person has interest, the lawyer must promptly notify the client or third person [MR 1.15(d)]. A lawyer must promptly deliver to the client or third person any funds or other property the client or third person is entitled to receive, and upon request by the client or third person, must promptly render a full accounting regarding such property [MR 1.15(d)]. In general, a lawyer must hold funds and property of clients or third persons in a client trust account, separate from the lawyer?s own property [MR 1.15(a)]. Complete records of all account funds and property in a client trust account must be kept by the lawyer for five years after representation. The lawyer may withdraw from the client trust account only fees earned or expenses incurred [MR 1.15(c)].


I is proper because no part of the $10,000 belongs to Attorney. Upon receiving $10,000 belonging to Client, Attorney must promptly notify and deliver these funds to Plaintiff.


II is not proper because Attorney must not commingle funds belonging to Client by depositing the funds in Attorney?s personal bank account.


III is also proper because Attorney deposits the $10,000 in a Clients? Trust Account, separate from Attorney?s own property, and forwards the funds drawn on the account to Plaintiff."

Submit
65. Attorney Alpha has tried many contested cases before Judge Gamma. Alpha believes the judge is lacking both in knowledge of the law and in good judgment and that Attorney Beta would make an excellent judge. Alpha wishes to defeat Judge Gamma and assist Beta in getting elected. Alpha intends to contribute $5,000 to Beta's campaign. Is it proper for Alpha to do so?

Explanation

"A judge or judicial candidate may not personally solicit or accept campaign contributions other than through a campaign committee as authorized by CJC 4.4. A judicial candidate may not personally solicit campaign contributions, except as expressly authorized, and may not personally accept campaign contributions [CJC 4.4, cmt. [1]].

As such, Alpha must give any contributions to Beta?s campaign committee.
"

Submit
66. Attorney Alpha was retained by Passenger, a passenger on a bus, who had been injured in a collision between the bus and a truck. Passenger paid Alpha a retainer of $1,000 and agreed further that Alpha should have a fee of 25% of any recovery before filing suit, 30% of any recovery after suit was filed but before judgment, and 35% of any recovery after trial and judgment. Alpha promptly called the lawyer for the bus company and told him she was representing Passenger and would like to talk about a settlement. Alpha made an appointment to talk to the lawyer for the bus company but did not keep the appointment. Alpha continued to put off talking to the lawyer for the bus company. Meanwhile, Passenger became concerned because she had heard nothing from Alpha. Passenger called Alpha's office but was told Alpha was not in and would not call back. Passenger was told not to worry because Alpha would look after her interests. After ten months had passed, Passenger went to Attorney Beta for advice. Beta advised Passenger that the statute of limitations would run in one week and, with Passenger's consent, immediately filed suit for Passenger. Alpha, upon Passenger's demand, refunded the $1,000 Passenger had paid. Is Alpha subject to discipline?

Explanation

"A lawyer must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client [MR 1.3]. Under MR 1.3, comments 2–4, a lawyer should especially attend to: (1) controlling workload, (2) avoiding unreasonable delay and procrastination, (3) filing within the statute of limitations, and (4) carrying representation through to completion and ensuring clients know when representation ends. Under MR 1.4(a), in communicating with clients, lawyers must keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter, and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation necessary for the representation [MR 1.1].

Here, Alpha put off talking to the bus company's lawyer, and did not communicate with Passenger on the status of the case. After ten months passed and the statute of limitations risked running, Passenger had to find another attorney, Beta, to file the suit.
"

Submit
67. Attorney is a candidate in a contested election for judicial office. Her opponent, Judge, is the incumbent and has occupied the bench for many years. The director of the state commission on judicial conduct, upon inquiry by Attorney, erroneously told Attorney that Judge had been reprimanded by the commission for misconduct in office. Attorney, who had confidence in the director, believed him. In fact, Judge had not been reprimanded by the commission; the commission had conducted hearings on Judge's alleged misconduct in office and, by a three to two vote, declined to reprimand Judge. Decisions of the commission, including reprimands, are not confidential. Is Attorney subject to discipline for publicly stating that Judge had been reprimanded for misconduct?

Explanation

"Under CJC 4.1(A), a judge or judicial candidate may not knowingly or with reckless disregard for the truth, make a false or misleading statement.

Here, Attorney made an inquiry into Judge's reprimand so there was no reckless disregard for the truth. Attorney reasonably relied on the director's information, and did not knowingly, or with reckless disregard for the truth, made a false or misleading statement.
"

Submit
68. Judge is presiding in a case that has, as its main issue, a complicated point of commercial law. The lawyers have not presented the case to Judge's satisfaction, and Judge believes she needs additional legal advice. Judge's former partner in law practice, Attorney, is an expert in the field of law that is at issue. Attorney has no interest in the case. Is it proper for Judge to consult Attorney?

Explanation

"Under CJC 2.9(A)(2), a judge may obtain the written advice of a disinterested expert on the law applicable to a proceeding before the judge, if the judge gives advance notice to the parties of the person to be consulted and the subject matter of the advice to be solicited, and affords the parties a reasonable opportunity to object and respond to the notice and to the advice received.

If Attorney has no interest in the case, Attorney is a disinterested expert. Judge may not consult Attorney unless Judge gives advance notice to the parties of Attorney and subject matter of the advice, and affords the parties reasonable opportunity to object and respond to the notice and the advice received.
"

Submit
69. Trustco, a trust company, entered into the following arrangement with Attorney, a lawyer newly admitted to the bar. Trustco would provide Attorney with free office space in the building in which Trustco had its offices. If a customer of Trustco contacted Trustco about a will, an officer of Trustco, who is not a lawyer, would advise the customer and help the customer work out the details of the will. The customer would be informed that the necessary documents would be prepared by Trustco's staff. The completed documents would be submitted by an officer of Trustco to the customer for execution. Attorney, in accordance with a memorandum from Trustco's trust officer detailing the plan, would prepare the necessary documents. Attorney would never meet with the customer and would not charge the customer for these services. Attorney would be free to engage in private practice, subject only to the limitation that Attorney could not accept employment adverse to Trustco. Is Attorney subject to discipline for entering into the arrangement with Trustco?

Explanation

"Law–related services are services that might reasonably be performed in conjunction with and, in substance, are related to the provision of legal services and not prohibited as the unauthorized practice of law when provided by a non–lawyer [MR 5.7(b)]. Law–related services include providing title insurance, financial planning, accounting, trust services, real estate counseling, legislative lobbying, economic analysis, social work, psychological counseling, tax preparation, and patent, medical, or environmental consulting [MR 5.7, cmt. [9]]. A lawyer may not assist another person in the unauthorized practice of law [MR 5.5, cmt. [1]].

Trustco may not provide legal services to its customers through a trust officer. Trustco is not authorized to practice law. The trust officer, a non–lawyer, may provide trust services, a law–related service, without Attorney being subject to discipline, but the services here relate to wills. Answering questions on wills is not a law–related service. By preparing the necessary documents for Trustco, Attorney facilitates Trustco in the unauthorized practice of law, though Attorney has no direct contact with customers.
"

Submit
70. Attorney represented Husband and Wife in the purchase of a business financed by contributions from their respective separate funds. The business was jointly operated by Husband and Wife after acquisition. After several years, a dispute arose over the management of the business. Husband and Wife sought Attorney's advice, and the matter was settled on the basis of an agreement drawn by Attorney and signed by Husband and Wife. Later, Wife asked Attorney to represent her in litigation against Husband based on the claim that Husband was guilty of fraud and misrepresentation in the negotiations for the prior settlement agreement. Is it proper for Attorney to represent Wife in this matter?

Explanation

"A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter may not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client consents in writing after consultation [MR 1.9(a)].

Husband and Wife are former clients of Attorney. Wife?s litigation relates to the same agreement Attorney drafted for Husband and Wife. Wife's interests are adverse to the interests of Husband. As such, Attorney may not represent Wife, unless Husband consents in writing after consultation.
"

Submit
71. Alpha and Beta are members of the bar in the same community but have never practiced together. Beta is a candidate in a contested election for judicial office. Beta is opposed by Delta, another lawyer in the community. Alpha believes Beta is better qualified than Delta for the judiciary and is supporting Beta's candidacy. Which of the following would be proper for Alpha? I. Solicit public endorsements for Beta's candidacy by other attorneys in the community who know Beta, including those who are likely to appear before Beta if Beta becomes a judge. II. Solicit contributions to Beta's campaign committee from other attorneys in the community, including those who are likely to appear before Beta if Beta becomes a judge. III. Publicly oppose the candidacy of Delta.

Explanation

To protect the integrity of the judiciary, a lawyer is specifically prohibited from making a statement s/he knows to be false, or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity, concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, adjudicative officer, public legal officer, or candidate for appointment to judicial or legal office [MR 8.2(a)]. A lawyer may not make a statement the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial office [MR 8.2]. A lawyer's assessment of judges and judicial candidates is relied on in evaluating such persons' professional or personal fitness for judicial or legal office. A false statement or opinion that is not candid can unfairly undermine public confidence in the administration of justice [MR 8.2, cmt. [1]]. Under MR 8.4, it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to engage in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. A judge or judicial candidate may not personally solicit or accept campaign contributions other than through a campaign committee as authorized under CJC 4.4.

I is proper because the activities are not prejudicial to the administration of justice.

II is proper because soliciting funds for Beta?s campaign is not prejudicial to the administration of justice. Beta may accept contributions through a campaign committee.

III is proper because Alpha may publicly oppose Delta's candidacy as long as Alpha does not make any statement Alpha knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of Delta.

Submit
72. Attorney advertises on the local television station. In the advertisements, a professional actor says: "Do you need a lawyer? Call Attorney—her telephone number is area code 555–555–5555. Her fees might be lower than you think." Attorney approved the prerecorded advertisement and is keeping in her office files a copy of the recording of the actual transmission and a record of when each transmission was made. Is the advertisement proper?

Explanation

"Advertising is permitted as long as the communication is not misleading and in accordance with MR 7.1 [MR 7.2]. MR 7.1 permits a lawyer to use any form of public communication about the lawyer's services that is not false or misleading. A statement is misleading if it contains a material misrepresentation of fact or law [MR 7.1]. A lawyer may advertise through written, recorded, or electronic communication, including public media [MR 7.2(a)]. All ads must include the name and office address of at least one attorney or law firm [MR 7.2(c)]. An unsubstantiated comparison of a lawyer's services or fees with the services or fees of other lawyers may be misleading if presented with specificity to lead a reasonable person to conclude the comparison can be substantiated [MR 7.1, cmt. [3]].

Here, the ad contained Attorney?s name in compliance with MR 7.2(c). Attorney could properly advertise on television according to MR 7.2(a). The statement by the actor on fees did not compare Attorney's fees with those of other lawyers. It was also not a statement of fact, but rather opinion.
"

Submit
73. Deft, who has been indicted for auto theft, is represented by Attorney. Prosecutor reasonably believes that Deft committed the offense, but, because of Deft's youth, it is in the interest of justice to permit Deft to plead guilty to the lesser offense of "joy-riding" in return for an agreement by Prosecutor to recommend probation. Prosecutor has so advised Attorney, but Attorney told Prosecutor she would not plea bargain and would insist on a jury trial. Attorney informed Deft of Prosecutor's offer and advised Deft not to accept it. Deft followed Attorney's advice. Attorney is a candidate for public office, and Prosecutor suspects that Attorney is insisting on a trial of the case to secure publicity for herself. Assume for the purposes of this question ONLY that Deft was tried, convicted, and sentenced to prison for two years. Must Prosecutor report to the disciplinary authority his suspicions about Attorney's conduct of the case?

Explanation

"The client has the ultimate authority to determine the purposes or objectives to be served by the representation. The objectives may include whether to enter a plea in a criminal case, after consulting with the lawyer [MR 1.2(a)]. The lawyer ordinarily has the right to determine the technical and legal tactical means by which the client?s objectives will be pursued, but has the obligation to consult with the client concerning those means [MR 1.2, cmt. [2]]. A lawyer who has knowledge of a violation of the Rules that raises a question as to any lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer must inform the appropriate professional authority [MR 8.3(a)].

Here, if Attorney refused to plea bargain because of personal motives, it would raise a question as to Attorney's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer. As such, if Prosecutor has knowledge that Attorney's refusal to plea bargain was due to personal motives, Prosecutor must report it to the disciplinary authority under MR 8.3(a).
"

Submit
74. Judge is a judge of the trial court in City. Judge has served for many years as a director of a charitable organization that maintains a camp for disadvantaged children. The organization has never been involved in litigation. Judge has not received any compensation for her services. The charity has decided to sponsor a public testimonial dinner in Judge's honor. As part of the occasion, the local bar association intends to commission and present to Judge her portrait at a cost of $4,000. The money to pay for the portrait will come from a "public testimonial fund" that will be raised by the City Bar Association from contributions of lawyers who are members of the association and who practice in the courts of City. Is it proper for Judge to accept the gift of the portrait?

Explanation

"A judge may not accept any gifts, loans, bequests, benefits, or other things of value, except a judge may accept a gift incident to a public testimonial [CJC 3.13].

Here, the portrait is incident to a public testimonial dinner so it is okay for the Judge to accept the gift of the portrait.
"

Submit
75. Attorney, who had represented Testator for many years, prepared Testator's will and acted as one of the two subscribing witnesses to its execution. The will gave 10% of Testator's estate to Testator's housekeeper, 10% to Testator's son and sole heir, Son, and the residue to charity. Upon Testator's death one year later, Executor, the executor named in the will, asked Attorney to represent him in probating the will and administering the estate. At that time Executor informed Attorney that Son had notified him that he would contest the probate of the will on the grounds that Testator lacked the required mental capacity at the time the will was executed. Attorney believes that Testator was fully competent at all times and will so testify, if called as a witness. The other subscribing witness to Testator's will predeceased Testator. Is it proper for Attorney to represent Executor in the probate of the will?

Explanation

MR 3.7(a) states a lawyer may not serve as an advocate at a trial in which the lawyer is likely to be a necessary witness relating to a contested issue.

Submit
76. Plaintiff and Defendant are next-door neighbors and bitter personal enemies. Plaintiff is suing Defendant over an alleged trespass. Each party believes, in good faith, in the correctness of his position. Plaintiff is represented by Attorney Alpha, and Defendant is represented by Attorney Beta. After Plaintiff had retained Alpha, he told Alpha "I do not want you to grant any delays or courtesies to Defendant or his lawyer. I want you to insist on every technicality." Alpha has served Beta with a demand to answer written interrogatories. Beta, because of the illness of his secretary, has asked Alpha for a five-day extension of time within which to answer them. Is Alpha subject to discipline if she grants Beta's request for a five-day extension?

Explanation

"The lawyer ordinarily has the right to determine the technical and legal tactical means by which the objectives of the client will be pursued, but the lawyer has the obligation to consult with the client concerning the means [MR 1.2, cmt. [2]]. A lawyer is not bound to press for every advantage that might be realized for a client and has discretion regarding the means by which a matter should be pursued [MR 1.3, cmt. [1]]. A lawyer's duty to act with reasonable promptness does not preclude the lawyer from agreeing to a reasonable request for a postponement that will not prejudice the client [MR 1.3, cmt. [3]].

Here, Alpha may grant the extension out of professional courtesy as long as it does not prejudice Plaintiff's rights. Alpha does not need to insist on everything technically as instructed by Plaintiff because Alpha has discretion on the means to accomplish Plaintiff's objectives.
"

Submit
77. Judge and Attorney were formerly law partners and during their partnership acquired several parcels of real property as co-tenants. After Judge was elected to the trial court in County, she remained a co-tenant with Attorney, but left the management of the properties to Attorney. Judge's term of office will expire soon and she is opposed for reelection by two members of the bar. Attorney, who has not discussed the matter with Judge, intends to make a substantial contribution to Judge's campaign for reelection. Judge is one of fifteen judges sitting as trial court judges in County. Is Attorney subject to discipline if Attorney contributes $10,000 to Judge's reelection campaign?

Explanation

"A judge or judicial candidate may not personally solicit or accept campaign contributions other than through a campaign committee as authorized by CJC 4.4.

As such, Attorney may contribute $10,000 to Judge's reelection campaign through a campaign committee.
"

Submit
78. Attorney Alpha currently represents Builder, a building contractor who is the plaintiff in a suit to recover for breach of a contract to build a house. Builder also has pending before the zoning commission a petition to rezone property Builder owns. Builder is represented by Attorney Beta in the zoning matter. Neighbor, who owns property adjoining that of Builder, has asked Alpha to represent Neighbor in opposing Builder's petition for rezoning. Neighbor knows that Alpha represents Builder in the contract action. Is it proper for Alpha to represent Neighbor in the zoning matter?

Explanation

"Under MR 1.7, a lawyer must not represent a client if the representation is directly adverse to another client or materially limited by the responsibilities to another client, a former client, a third party, or by the lawyer's own interests, unless (1) the lawyer reasonably believes she will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client, (2) the representation is not prohibited by law, (3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the same lawyer, and (4) each client gives informed consent in writing.

As such, Alpha may not represent Neighbor because there is a conflict of interest. The representation of Neighbor involves an assertion of a claim by Neighbor against Builder, and Alpha does not have consent from Neighbor or Builder.
"

Submit
79. Attorney, a sole practitioner, limits his practice to personal injury cases. Attorney regularly places an advertisement in local newspapers. The advertisement contains the following statement: "Practice limited to personal injury cases, including medical malpractice." After seeing one of Attorney's advertisements, Baker approached Attorney for representation in a medical malpractice case. After a 30-minute interview Attorney told Baker: "I'm sorry, but I am very busy and your case appears to be very complicated. I would be happy to refer you to another lawyer who regularly practices in that field and who may have more room in her schedule. You should see another lawyer promptly before the statute of limitations expires and you lose your right to bring the lawsuit." Although Attorney did not charge Baker for the interview, Baker was upset at the waste of 30 minutes of her time. Baker did not contact another lawyer until eight months later, when she learned that the statute of limitations on her claim had expired six months after her interview with Attorney. In fact, Baker had a meritorious medical malpractice claim. Is Attorney subject to civil liability?

Explanation

"Lawyers in the United States are generally free to refuse service to any person for any reason. MR 1.18 details duties to prospective clients.

In this case, Attorney talked to Baker, a prospective client, declined the representation, gave Baker another lawyer?s name, and urged him to contact that lawyer on a timely basis. Attorney did not owe Baker any other duty.
"

Submit
80. Alpha and Beta practiced law under the firm name of Alpha and Beta. When Beta died, Alpha did not change the firm name. Thereafter, Alpha entered into an arrangement with another attorney, Gamma. Gamma pays Alpha a certain sum each month for office space and use of Alpha's law library and for secretarial services, but Alpha and Gamma each has his own clients, and neither participates in the representation of the other's clients or shares in fees paid. On the entrance to the suite of offices shared by Alpha and Gamma are the words "Law Firm of Alpha, Beta, and Gamma." Is Alpha subject to discipline?

Explanation

"MR 7.1 prohibits false or misleading communications about a lawyer?s practice. MR 7.5(d) prohibits lawyers from stating or implying that they practice in a partnership or other organization when that is not the fact.

The sign at the entrance to the suite of offices represents to the public that Alpha and Gamma practice together in a single law firm and is prohibited by MR 7.5(d) and MR 7.1.
"

Submit
81. Attorney was employed as a lawyer by the state Environmental Control Commission (ECC) for ten years. During the last two years of her employment, Attorney spent most of her time in the preparation, trial, and appeal of a case involving the discharge by Deftco of industrial effluent into a river in the state. The judgment in the case, which is now final, contained a finding of a continuing and knowing discharge of a dangerous substance into a major stream by Deftco and assessed a penalty of $25,000. The governing statute also provides for private actions for damages by persons injured by the discharge of the effluent. Attorney recently left the employment of ECC and went into private practice. Three landowners have brought private damage actions against Deftco. They claim their truck farms were contaminated because they irrigated them with water that contained effluent from dangerous chemicals discharged by Deftco. Deftco has asked Attorney to represent it in defense of the three pending actions. Is Attorney subject to discipline if she represents Deftco in these actions?

Explanation

A former government lawyer can join a firm that has clients with direct conflicts with the government agency, and about which the attorney possesses protected information [MR 1.11(a)]. The lawyer is prohibited from representing a client in connection with a matter in which the lawyer has personally and substantially participated as a public officer or employee [MR 1.11(a)].

Attorney worked for ECC for ten years, and for two years personally and substantially participated in the preparation, trial, and appeal of the Deftco case.

Submit
82. Attorney Alpha is skilled in trying personal injury cases. Alpha accepted the representation of Plaintiff in a personal injury case on a contingent fee basis. While preparing the case for trial, Alpha realized that the direct examination and cross-examination of the medical experts would involve medical issues with which Alpha was not familiar and, as a consequence, Alpha might not be able to represent Plaintiff competently. Without informing Plaintiff, Alpha consulted Beta, who is both a lawyer and a medical doctor and who is a recognized specialist in the care and treatment of injuries of the type sustained by Plaintiff. Alpha and Beta agreed that Beta would participate in the trial to the limited extent of conducting the direct examination and cross-examination of the medical experts and that Alpha would divide the fee in proportion to the services performed and the responsibility assumed by each. Was the arrangement between Alpha and Beta proper?

Explanation

If the lawyer is not competent to handle the representation, she may associate with competent counsel. Under MR 1.5(e), a fee can be divided between lawyers who are not in the same firm if, the: (1) division is in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer, (2) client agrees to the arrangement in writing, and (3) total fee is reasonable.

Here, two lawyers, Alpha and Beta, of different law firms, arranged to divide fees, without Plaintiff?s written consent.

Submit
83. Attorney Alpha has been employed as an assistant prosecutor in the district attorney's office during the time that an investigation of Deft was being conducted by that office. Alpha took no part in the investigation and had no knowledge of the facts other than those disclosed in the press. Two months ago, Alpha left the district attorney's office and formed a partnership with Attorney Beta. Last week, Deft was indicted for offenses allegedly disclosed by the prior investigation. Deft asked Alpha to represent him. Alpha declined to do so, but suggested Beta. Is Beta subject to discipline if Beta represents Deft?

Explanation

A former government lawyer can join a firm that has clients with direct conflicts with the government agency, and about which the attorney possesses protected information [MR 1.11(a)]. The lawyer is prohibited from representing a client in connection with a matter in which the lawyer has personally and substantially participated as a public officer or employee [MR 1.11(a)]. Other lawyers in the former government lawyer?s new firm may handle matters the former government lawyer participated in while in public service (1) if the former government lawyer is effectively screened from participation in the matter, (2) if the former government lawyer is not apportioned any part of the fee, and (3) written notice is promptly given to the government agency to enable it to ascertain compliance with MR 1.11.

As such, Alpha is not disqualified from representing Deft because Alpha took no part in the investigation and had no knowledge of the facts other than those disclosed in the press.

Submit
84. Attorney represents Client, the plaintiff in a civil action that was filed a year ago and is about to be set for trial. Client informed Attorney that he could be available at any time during the months of October, November, and December. In discussing possible trial dates with opposing counsel and the court clerk, Attorney was advised that a trial date on October 5 was available and that the next available trial date would be December 10. Without first consulting Client, Attorney requested the December 10 trial date because she was representing Deft, the defendant in a felony criminal trial that was set for October 20 and she wanted as much time as possible to prepare for that trial. Was it proper for Attorney to agree to the December trial date without obtaining Client's consent?

Explanation

A lawyer's duty to act with reasonable promptness does not preclude the lawyer from agreeing to a reasonable request for a postponement that will not prejudice the client [MR 1.3, cmt. [3]]. The lawyer ordinarily has the right to determine the technical and legal tactical means by which the objectives of the client representation will be pursued, but she has the obligation to consult with the client concerning those means [MR 1.2, cmt. [2]].

Here, Attorney has discretion to agree to the December trial date because the decision relates to a technical and legal tactic. Client also informed Attorney of availability in December. As such, as long as Client is not prejudiced by the delay, Attorney does not need Client?s consent.

Submit
85. Able, Baker, and Carter had been indicted for the armed robbery of the cashier of a grocery store. Together, Able and Baker met with Attorney and asked Attorney to represent them. Attorney then interviewed Able and Baker separately. Each told Attorney that the robbery had been committed by Carter while Able and Baker sat in Carter's car outside the store, that Carter had said he needed some cigarettes, and that each knew nothing of Carter's plan to rob the cashier. Attorney agreed to represent both Able and Baker. One week prior to the trial date, Able told Attorney that he wanted to plea bargain and that he was prepared to turn state's evidence and testify that Baker had loaned Carter the gun Carter used in the robbery. Able also said that he and Baker had shared in the proceeds of the robbery with Carter. It is proper for Attorney to:

Explanation

Under MR 1.16(a)(1), an attorney must seek judicial permission to withdraw from the representation to avoid violating MR 1.7.

In this case, Attorney has a conflict of interest under MR 1.7 and may not continue to represent both clients. If Attorney negotiates a plea bargain for Able, Attorney will be prejudicing Baker, whereas if Attorney fails to negotiate the plea bargain, she will be prejudicing Able.

Submit
86. While presiding over the trial of a highly publicized antitrust case, ABCO v. DEFO, Judge received in the mail a lengthy letter from Attorney, a local lawyer. The letter discussed the law applicable to ABCO v. DEFO. Judge knew that Attorney did not represent either party. Judge read the letter and, without mentioning its receipt to the lawyers in the pending case, filed the letter in his general file on antitrust litigation. Later, after reading the trial briefs in ABCO v. DEFO, Judge concluded that Attorney's letter better explained the law applicable to the case pending before him than either of the trial briefs. Judge followed Attorney's reasoning in formulating his decision. Was it proper for Judge to consider Attorney's letter?

Explanation

A judge may obtain the advice of a disinterested expert on the law applicable to the proceeding before the judge if the judge gives notice to the parties of the person consulted and the subject matter of the advice solicited, and affords the parties a reasonable opportunity to object or respond to the advice received [CJC 2.9(A)(2)].

In this case, before relying on Attorney's letter, Judge did not notify the parties of the person consulted or the subject matter of the advice solicited nor did Judge provide the parties with an opportunity to respond. As such, it was improper for the Judge to consider Attorney's letter.

Submit
87. Attorney's recorded radio advertisement stated: "For a fee of $600 Attorney will represent a party to a divorce that does not result in a court trial of a contested issue of fact." Attorney had the advertisement prerecorded and approved by the appropriate bar agency for broadcast. Attorney retained a recording of the actual transmission in her office. Client, who had previously agreed with her husband to an uncontested dissolution of their marriage, heard the broadcast and called on Attorney in Attorney's office. Client told Attorney that she had heard the broadcast and asked Attorney to represent her. Attorney agreed to represent Client. Because of the nature of the parties' property, Attorney spent more time on the tax aspects of the case than Attorney anticipated. The time expended by Attorney, if charged at a reasonable hourly rate, would have resulted in a fee of $2,000. After the decree was entered, Attorney billed Client for $2,000. Is Attorney subject to discipline?

Explanation

"Regardless of the means used to make a lawyer's services known, any statements about services should be truthful [MR 7.1, cmt. [1]]. Furthermore, when developments occur during representation that render an earlier estimate of fees substantially inaccurate, such as changed circumstances, or other good cause, a revised estimate should be provided to the client.

Here, Attorney advertised a $600 fee, and charged more than what was advertised without providing the client with a revised estimate. As such, Attorney is subject to discipline.
"

Submit
88. Acton, a certified public accountant, has proposed to Attorney, a recognized specialist in the field of tax law, that Acton and Attorney form a partnership for the purpose of providing clients with tax-related legal and accounting services. Both Acton and Attorney have deserved reputations of being competent, honest, and trustworthy. Acton further proposes that the announcement of the proposed partnership, the firm stationery, and all public directory listings clearly state that Acton is a certified public accountant and that Attorney is a lawyer. Is Attorney subject to discipline if he enters into the proposed partnership with Acton?

Explanation

"A lawyer may not form a partnership or other business entity with a non-lawyer if any of the business' activities consist of the practice of law [MR 5.4(b)], or practice with, or in the form of a professional corporation or association authorized to practice law for a profit, if a non–lawyer owns an interest therein [MR 5.4(d)], or a non–lawyer has the right to direct or control the professional judgment of a lawyer.

Here, the proposed partnership would deliver legal services, so Attorney would be subject to discipline if he enters into this partnership with Acton, a non–lawyer.
"

Submit
89. Attorney Alpha is recognized as an expert in securities regulation law. Corp, a corporation, retained Alpha's law firm to qualify Corp's stock for public sale. After accepting the matter, Alpha decided that he preferred to spend his time on cases with larger fee potential, so he assigned responsibility for the Corp matter to Attorney Beta, an associate in Alpha's office who had recently been admitted to the bar. Beta protested to Alpha that he, Beta, knew nothing about securities regulation law and that he had too little time to prepare himself to handle the Corp matter competently without substantial help from Alpha. Alpha responded, "I don't have time to help you. Everyone has to start somewhere." Alpha directed Beta to proceed. Was Alpha's conduct proper in this matter?

Explanation

"Fundamental skills necessary for competence that even newly admitted attorneys should have include the ability to analyze precedent, evaluate evidence, draft legal documents, and identify legal issues and problems [MR 1.1, cmt. 2]]. Partners and supervising attorneys must make reasonable efforts to ensure inexperienced lawyers are properly supervised [MR 5.1, cmt. [2].

Here, Alpha left Beta to proceed with the securities matter alone, without supervision. As a newly admitted attorney, Beta may have fundamental skills necessary for competence, but Beta had no training or prior experience in securities law. Therefore, Alpha's conduct was not proper in this matter.
"

Submit
90. Attorney represents Bank in its commercial loan transactions. Corp has applied to Bank for a loan of $900,000 to be secured by a lien on Corp's inventory. The inventory, consisting of small items, constantly turns over. The security documents are complex and if improperly drawn could result in an invalid lien. Bank has approved the loan on the condition that Attorney prepare the necessary security instruments and that Corp pay Attorney's fees. This arrangement is customary in the city in which Attorney's law office and Bank are located. It is obvious to Attorney that he can adequately represent the interests of both Corp and Bank. After Corp and Bank consulted with other lawyers, each consented in writing to the representation. Is it proper for Attorney to prepare the security documents under these circumstances?

Explanation

"A lawyer must not represent a client if the representation is directly adverse to another client or materially limited by the responsibilities to another client, a former client, a third party, or by the lawyer's own interests, unless (1) the lawyer reasonably believes she will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client, (2) the representation is not prohibited by law, (3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the same lawyer, and (4) each client gives informed consent in writing [MR 1.7].

Here, Attorney has a conflict of interest under MR 1.7(a) arising out of the representation of two clients in the same transaction—Bank, the lender, and Corp, the borrower. MR 1.7(b) allows Attorney to represent both clients with informed consent, confirmed in writing, because Attorney reasonably believes he can competently and diligently represent both.
"

Submit
91. Attorney, recently admitted to practice, opened an office near a residential neighborhood and published the following advertisement in the local newspaper. COUPON Get Acquainted With Your Neighborhood Lawyer A. Attorney Suite 2 - 1100 Magnolia Avenue Sunshine City, State 01000 Telephone: (555) 555-5555 In order to acquaint you with our services, we are offering a one-hour consultation to review your estate plans, including your wills, trusts, and similar documents, all at the nominal cost of $25 to anyone presenting this coupon. Call now for an appointment. Is Attorney subject to discipline?

Explanation

"Advertising is permitted as long as the communication is not misleading and in accordance with MR 7.1 [MR 7.2]. MR 7.1 permits a lawyer to use any form of public communication about the lawyer's services that is not false or misleading. A lawyer may advertise through written, recorded, or electronic communication, including public media [MR 7.2(a)]. All ads must include the name and office address of at least one attorney or law firm [MR 7.2(c)].

Here, Attorney may advertise through the newspaper, a form of public media. The statement includes Attorney's name and address. Therefore, as long as the statement is not false or misleading (i.e. Attorney provides the services described for the fee stated), Attorney is not subject to discipline.
"

Submit
92. Attorney and Broker, a licensed real estate broker, entered into an agreement whereby Broker was to recommend Attorney to any customer of Broker who needed legal services, and Attorney was to recommend Broker to any client of Attorney who wished to buy or sell real estate. Attorney's practice is limited almost entirely to real estate law. Is Attorney subject to discipline for entering into the agreement with Broker?

Explanation

"Under MR 7.2(b), a lawyer shall not give anything of value to a person for recommending the lawyer's services except that a lawyer may (1) pay the reasonable costs of advertisements or communications permitted by MR 7.2, (2) pay the usual charges of a legal service plan or a not–for–profit or qualified lawyer referral service. A qualified lawyer referral service is a lawyer referral service that has been approved by an appropriate regulatory authority (3) pay for a law practice in accordance with Rule 1.17; and (4) refer clients to another lawyer or a non–lawyer professional pursuant to an agreement not otherwise prohibited under the Rules that provides for the other person to refer clients or customers to the lawyer, if (a) the reciprocal referral agreement is not exclusive, and (b) the client is informed of the existence and nature of the agreement.

In this case, Attorney enters into a referral agreement with Broker, a non–lawyer. The facts are not clear on Attorney compensating Broker, but under MR 7.2(b) Attorney may not give anything of value for the recommendations from Broker. However, recommending to Broker any client of Attorney who wishes to buy or sell real estate is something of value so Attorney would be subject to discipline for entering into this agreement with Broker.
"

Submit
93. Judge, prior to her appointment to the probate court, was a partner in Law Firm. Law Firm had an extensive probate practice. At the time of Judge's appointment, Law Firm had pending before the court to which Judge was appointed numerous matters in which requests were being made for allowances for attorney's fees. When Judge left Law Firm, she was paid a cash settlement. She has no further financial interest in any matter handled by Law Firm. Judge is now being asked to rule on these requests for allowances for attorney's fees. Is it proper for Judge to rule on these requests?

Explanation

"A judge should not allow family, social, political, financial, or other interests or relationships influence judicial conduct or judgment [CJC 2.4(B)]. A judge should not abuse the prestige of her office to advance the personal or economic interests of the judge or others, or allow others to do so [CJC 1.3]. A judge should keep herself informed of personal and fiduciary economic interests, and should make a reasonable effort to inform herself of the personal economic interests of a spouse or domestic partner and minor children residing in her household [CJC 2.11(B)]. A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety because she must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny [CJC 1.2, cmt. [2]]. Under CJC 2.11(A), a judge must disqualify herself in a proceeding in which impartiality may reasonably be questioned, including where, the judge: (1) has personal knowledge of the disputed facts in the controversy, or (2) served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy, or was associated with a lawyer who participated substantially as a lawyer in the matter during such association.

Here, Judge is disqualified from ruling on the requests pursuant to CJC 2.11. Judge was a partner in Law Firm. As a partner with the firm, Judge likely had personal knowledge on the pending attorney's fees matter, or associated with a lawyer who participated substantially. Ruling on the requests may create an appearance of impropriety under CJC 1.2 even though Judge was paid a cash settlement and her ruling would not affect her personally.
"

Submit
94. Attorney, representing Client, with Client's approval settled a claim against Defendant for $60,000. The settlement agreement provided that one-half would be paid by Insco, Defendant's primary insurance carrier, and one-half by Sureco, a co-insurer. Attorney's agreed fee was 30% of the amount of the settlement. Attorney received Insco's check for $30,000 and a letter from Sureco advising that its check would be sent in two weeks. Attorney promptly advised Client and deposited the $30,000 in her Clients' Trust Account. Client demanded that Attorney send him the entire $30,000 and take her fee out of the funds to be received from Sureco. Which of the following would now be proper for Attorney? I. Send Client $30,000. II. Send Client $21,000 and retain $9,000 in her Clients' Trust Account. III. Send Client $21,000 and transfer $9,000 to her personal account.

Explanation

"In general, a lawyer must hold funds and property of clients or third parties separate from the lawyer's own property [MR 1.15(a)]. When two or more persons (one of whom may be the lawyer) claim interest in the client's property, the lawyer must keep it separate until the dispute is resolved. However, the lawyer must promptly distribute all portions of the property not in dispute [MR 1.5(e)].

I is proper because if the total settlement is $60,000, the total owed to Client is $42,000. Attorney's fees are $18,000 (.30 * $60,000 = $18,000). The $30,000 belongs to Client.

II is proper because only one of the insurance companies paid. If the other insurance company does not pay, the amount of the settlement is $30,000. If Attorney sends the entire $30,000 to Client, Attorney may end up not getting any fees if Sureco does not pay. The $9,000 (.30 * $30,000) is in dispute so it is proper for Attorney to keep it in the Clients' Trust Account.

III is not proper because the $9,000 is in dispute. As such, Attorney may not transfer $9,000 to her personal account until the dispute is resolved.
"

Submit
95. Attorney is employed by Client, a fugitive from justice under indictment for armed robbery. Attorney, after thorough legal research and investigation of the facts furnished by Client, reasonably believes the indictment is fatally defective and should be dismissed as a matter of law. Attorney advised Client of his opinion and urged Client to surrender. Client told Attorney that she would not surrender. Attorney informed the district attorney that he represented Client and that he counseled Client to surrender, but that Client refused to follow his advice. Attorney has not advised Client on how to avoid arrest and prosecution and does not know where Client is hiding. Is Attorney subject to discipline if he continues to represent Client?

Explanation

"Under MR 1.2(d), a lawyer may not knowingly counsel or assist a client in illegal conduct.

In this case, however, Attorney has not assisted in Client's illegal conduct as Attorney has not advised Client on how to avoid arrest/prosecution and the Attorney does not know where Client is hiding.
"

Submit
96. Attorney in his capacity as part-time assistant county attorney represented County in a criminal non-support proceeding against Husband. This proceeding concluded with an order directing Husband to pay or be jailed. Husband refused to pay. Attorney, pursuant to applicable rules, is permitted to maintain a private law practice. Wife has discovered some assets of Husband. Attorney now has accepted employment from Wife to maintain a civil action against Husband to recover out of those assets arrearages due to Wife under Wife's support decree. Attorney did not obtain consent from the county attorney or from Husband to represent Wife in the civil action. Is Attorney subject to discipline for accepting employment in Wife's civil action against Husband?

Explanation

"A former government lawyer is prohibited from representing a client in connection with a matter in which the lawyer has personally and substantially participated as a public officer or employee [MR 1.11(a)]. A lawyer who had personal involvement will be disqualified even if the new representation is not adverse to the government.

Here, Attorney was a former government lawyer because Attorney worked as a part–time assistant county attorney. Attorney represented County in a criminal non–support proceeding against Husband. The civil action between Wife and Husband was related to the criminal case in which Attorney personally and substantially participated so Attorney would be subject to discipline for accepting employment in Wife's civil action against Husband.
"

Submit
97. Delta, a lawyer, has just joined the Law Offices of Alpha and Beta, a professional corporation engaged solely in the practice of law. Delta is a salaried associate and is not a member or shareholder of the professional corporation. Alpha's spouse, Veep, who is not a lawyer, is vice-president of the corporation and office manager. All of the other officers are lawyers in the firm. All of the corporate shares are held by lawyers in the corporation, except for ten shares held by the executor under the will of a lawyer-member who died one month previously and whose will is now being probated. Delta knows that Veep is an officer and not a lawyer. Is Delta subject to discipline?

Explanation

"Under MR 5.4(d), a lawyer may not practice with or in the form of a professional corporation or association authorized to practice law for profit if a non–lawyer is a corporate officer or occupies a position of similar responsibility in any form of association other than a corporation.

Here, Delta is subject to discipline because Veep, a non–lawyer, is an officer of a professional corporation engaged in the practice of law.
"

Submit
98. Attorney is representing Plaintiff in a paternity suit against Defendant. Both Plaintiff and Defendant are well-known public figures, and the suit has attracted much publicity. Attorney has been billing Plaintiff at an agreed hourly fee for his services. Recently, Plaintiff told Attorney, "I'm going broke paying you. Why don't you let me assign you all media rights to books, movies, or television programs based on my suit as full payment for all services you will render me between now and the conclusion of the suit?" Attorney replied, "I'll consider it, but first you should seek independent advice about whether such an arrangement is in your own best interests. Why don't you do so and call me next week." Is Attorney subject to discipline if he agrees to Plaintiff's offer?

Explanation

"A lawyer may not obtain or negotiate literary or media rights to a portrayal or account regarding a pending representation prior to the conclusion of the representation [MR 1.8(d)]. However, it is permissible to obtain as a fee a percentage of independent literary material that is the subject of the representation.

In this case, Attorney may not agree to Plaintiff's offer because the paternity suit is still pending.
"

Submit
99. Four years ago, Attorney represented Husband and Wife, both high school teachers, in the purchase of a new home. Since then, Attorney prepared their tax returns and drafted their wills. Recently, Husband called Attorney and told her that he and Wife had decided to divorce, but wanted the matter to be resolved amicably. Husband stated that they were planning to file and process their own divorce case, utilizing the state's new streamlined divorce procedure, applicable in "no-fault" cases where there are no minor children. Husband asked if Attorney would agree to work with them to prepare a financial settlement agreement that could be presented to the divorce court, reminding Attorney that the couple's assets were modest and that they wanted to "split it all down the middle." After considering the risks of a conflict of interest arising in this limited representation, Attorney wrote to the couple separately, and advised each that he or she might be better off with separate lawyers, but that Attorney would assist with the financial settlement agreement, charging an hourly fee of $140 per hour, provided that they were in complete agreement and remained so. Attorney advised that if a conflict developed, or if either party was dissatisfied or uncomfortable about continuing with the joint representation, Attorney would withdraw and would not represent either party from that point forward, forcing them to start all over again with separate lawyers. Finally, Attorney cautioned Husband and Wife that Attorney would be representing both of them equally, would not and could not favor one or the other, and that their separate communications to her could not be kept confidential from the other party. Both Husband and Wife signed their individual copy of the letter, consenting to the joint representation, and returned them to Attorney. Was it proper for Attorney to accept the representation on these terms?

Explanation

"Under MR 1.7, a lawyer must not represent a client if the representation is directly adverse to another client or materially limited by the responsibilities to another client, a former client, a third party, or by the lawyer's own interests, unless (1) the lawyer reasonably believes she will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client, (2) the representation is not prohibited by law, (3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the same lawyer, and (4) each client gives informed consent in writing. A lawyer may limit the scope of the representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances, and if the client gives informed consent [MR 1.2(c), cmt. [7]].

Here, the representation was proper because it was reasonable for Attorney to believe Attorney was able to provide competent and diligent representation to both Husband and Wife. The representation did not involve the assertion of a claim by Husband against Wife because the parties used the state's divorce procedure applicable to "no–fault" cases, wanted to resolve the matter amicably, and wanted to "split it all down the middle." They engaged Attorney to assist with a financial settlement agreement, not litigation. The clients' consent was informed and in writing.
"

Submit
100. Attorney, who is corporate counsel for Company, is investigating a possible theft ring in the parts department of Company. Attorney knows that Employee has worked in the parts department for a long time and believes that Employee is a suspect in the thefts. Attorney believes that if Employee were questioned, Employee would not answer truthfully if she knew the real purpose of the questions. Attorney plans to question Employee and falsely tell her that she is not a suspect and that her answers to the questions will be held in confidence. Is Attorney subject to discipline if she so questions Employee?

Explanation

"Under MR 8.4, it is impermissible for a lawyer to engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.

In this case, Attorney plans to falsely tell Employee she is not a suspect in theft, and that her answers to questions will be held in confidence. As such, Attorney would be subject to discipline if she so questions Employee.
"

Submit
101. Manufacturer sued Partco for Partco's breach of warranty regarding machine components furnished by Partco. Judge, who presided at the nonjury trial, sent Clerk, her law clerk, to Manufacturer's plant to observe the machine that was malfunctioning due to the allegedly defective parts. Clerk returned and told Judge that the machine was indeed malfunctioning and that Engineer, an employee of Manufacturer, had explained to Clerk how the parts delivered by Partco caused the malfunction. There was testimony at the trial that supported what Clerk learned on his visit. Judge rendered a judgment for Manufacturer. Was Judge's conduct proper?

Explanation

"A judge should not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications concerning a pending or impending proceeding. Ex parte communication means a communication concerning a pending or impending matter, between counsel or an unrepresented party and the court when opposing counsel or an unrepresented party is not present, or any other communication made to the judge outside the presence of the parties or their lawyers. A judge may consult with court personnel whose function is to aid the judge in carrying out the judge?s adjudicative responsibilities, or with other judges, provided the judge makes all reasonable efforts to avoid receiving from court personnel, or other judges, factual information not part of a case record. A judge may not investigate facts in a matter independently, and may consider only the evidence presented and any facts that may properly be judicially noticed [CJC 2.9(C)].

Here, Judge, who presided at the nonjury trial, sent Clerk, her law clerk, to Manufacturer's plant to observe the machine that was malfunctioning. Judge initiated or considered ex parte communications concerning a pending proceeding. Judge used Clerk to investigate facts in a matter independently and used Clerk's research in rendering judgment. As such, Judge's conduct was improper.
"

Submit
102. Attorney regularly represented Client. When Client planned to leave on a world tour, Client delivered to Attorney sufficient money to pay Client's property taxes when they became due. Attorney placed the money in Attorney's Clients' Trust Account. When the tax payment date arrived, Attorney was in need of a temporary loan to close the purchase of a new personal residence. Because the penalty for late payment of taxes was only 2% while the rate for a personal loan was 6%, Attorney withdrew Client's funds from the Clients' Trust Account to cover Attorney's personal check for the closing. Attorney was confident that Client would not object. Ten days later, after the receipt of a large fee previously earned, Attorney paid Client's property taxes and the 2% penalty, fully satisfying Client's tax obligation. After Client returned, Attorney told Client what Attorney had done, and Client approved Attorney's conduct. Is Attorney subject to discipline?

Explanation

"Client funds must be held for safekeeping in an account that is separate from the lawyer's funds and may be used only in accordance with the client's instructions, not for the lawyer's personal benefit.

In this case, Attorney was required to use the funds for Client's designated purpose to pay taxes when they became due, not for other purposes.
"

Submit
103. Attorney entered into a written retainer agreement with Deft, who was the defendant in a criminal case. Deft agreed in writing to transfer title to Deft's automobile to Attorney if Attorney successfully prevented Deft from going to prison. Later, the charges against Deft were dismissed. Is Attorney subject to discipline for entering into this retainer agreement?

Explanation

"MR 1.5(d)(2) provides a lawyer may not represent a defendant in a criminal case on a contingent fee basis.

In this case, Deft's payment of a fee (title to an automobile) was contingent on a successful outcome in the criminal case.
"

Submit
104. Attorney represents ten plaintiffs who were injured when a train operated by Railroad was derailed. Railroad has offered Attorney a $500,000 lump sum settlement for the ten plaintiffs. Attorney has determined a division of the $500,000 among the ten plaintiffs with the amount paid each plaintiff dependent on the nature and extent of that person's injuries. Attorney believes the division is fair to each plaintiff. Railroad will not settle any of the claims unless all are settled. Attorney has told each plaintiff the total amount Railroad is prepared to pay, the amount that the individual will receive, and the basis on which that amount was calculated. Attorney has not told any plaintiff the amount to be received by any other plaintiff. Attorney believes that if Attorney reveals to each plaintiff the amount of each settlement, there is danger that some plaintiffs will think that they are not getting enough in relation to the amounts others will receive and the entire settlement will be upset. Each of the plaintiffs has agreed to his or her settlement. Is Attorney subject to discipline if Attorney effects such a settlement?

Explanation

"Before any settlement offer or plea bargain is made or accepted on behalf of multiple clients, the lawyer must inform each client about all the material terms of the settlement, including what the other clients will receive or pay if the settlement or plea offer is accepted [MR 1.8(g)].

Here, the facts provide an aggregate settlement of the clients' claims. MR 1.8(g) requires Attorney to obtain the clients' informed consent, after disclosing "the existence and nature of all the claims" and "the participation of each person in the settlement."
"

Submit
105. The following advertisement appeared in a daily newspaper in a state in which both parties are members of the bar: A. ALPHA, M.D., J.D. and B. BETA, J.D. Attorneys at Law 1000 "A" Street, City, State, 00000 Telephone (555) 555-5555. Are Alpha and Beta subject to discipline?

Explanation

"Regardless of the means used to make a lawyer's services known, any statements should be truthful [MR 7.1, cmt. [1]]. A lawyer may advertise through written, recorded, or electronic communication, including public media [MR 7.2(a)]. All ads must include the name and office address of at least one attorney or law firm [MR 7.2(c)].

Here, the parties advertise legal services through a newspaper, a form of public media. The ad states at least one attorney's name and the office address. As such, if the parties possess the degrees stated in the ad (i.e. the ad is truthful), Alpha and Beta are not subject to discipline.
"

Submit
106. Judge, a state court judge, has presided over the pretrial proceedings in a case involving a novel contract question under the Uniform Commercial Code. During the pretrial proceedings, Judge has acquired considerable background knowledge of the facts and law of the matter and, therefore, is particularly well qualified to preside at the trial. Shortly before the trial date, Judge discovered that his brother owns a substantial block of stock in the defendant corporation. He determined that his brother's financial interests would be substantially affected by the outcome of the case. Although Judge believed he would be impartial, he disclosed to the parties, on the record, his brother's interest. Is it proper for Judge to hear the case?

Explanation

"Under CJC 2.11(A), a judge must disqualify herself in a proceeding in which impartiality may reasonably be questioned, including where: (1) the judge has personal knowledge of the disputed facts in controversy, or (2) the judge knows the judge, the judge's spouse or domestic partner, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse or domestic partner of such a person is: (a) a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, general partner, managing member, or trustee of a party, (b) acting as a lawyer in the proceeding, (c) has more than a de minimis interest that could be substantially affected by the proceeding, or (d) likely to be a material witness in the proceeding. Instead of withdrawing, a judge who might be disqualified for a reason other than bias or prejudice (which parties cannot agree to waive), may (1) disclose on the record the basis of the potential disqualification, and (2) ask the parties and their lawyers to consider, outside of the presence of the judge, whether to waive the disqualification. If the parties and their lawyers all agree that the judge should not be disqualified, then the judge may participate in the proceeding. This agreement must be incorporated into the record of the proceeding.

Here, Judge's brother, a person within the third degree to Judge, owns substantial stock (more than a de minimis interest) in the defendant corporation. Judge must disqualify himself in the proceeding, but since he disclosed on the record the basis of the potential disqualification, Judge may hear the case if all the parties and their lawyers independently, outside of the Judge's presence, agree in writing, to waive the disqualification.
"

Submit
107. Attorney is a candidate for a judicial office that has been occupied by Incumbent for six years. Attorney has conducted a thorough investigation of Incumbent's personal and professional life. Assume all factual statements are accurate. Which of the following statements is it proper for Attorney to make during the campaign? I. "Incumbent has been reversed by the appellate courts more than any other judge in the state during the preceding two years." II. "Incumbent was publicly censured by the state Judicial Qualification Commission on one occasion for his overbearing conduct in court." III. "Incumbent was given a poor rating for judicial temperament in a county bar association poll." IV. "During the previous year, the average sentence in armed robbery cases tried in Incumbent's court was 3.5 years, and in murder cases was 8.2 years. If I am elected, I won't be soft on crime."

Explanation

"Under 4.1(A), a judge or judicial candidate may not (1) knowingly or with reckless disregard for the truth, make a false or misleading statement, (2) make any statement that would reasonably be expected to affect the outcome or impair the fairness of a matter pending or impending in any court, or (3) in connection with cases, controversies, or issues likely to come before the court, make pledges, promises, or commitments that are inconsistent with the impartial performance of the adjudicative duties of judicial office.

I, II, and III are proper because they are all accurate factual statements. IV is not proper because in connection with criminal cases, controversies, or issues likely to come before the court, Attorney makes a pledge, promise, or commitment, which is inconsistent with impartial performance of adjudicative duties of judicial office.
"

Submit
108. The state bar association has offered Judge and her spouse free transportation and lodging to attend its institute on judicial reform. Judge is expected to deliver a banquet speech. Is it proper for Judge to accept this offer?

Explanation

"A judge may participate in activities sponsored by organizations or governmental entities concerned with the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice, and those sponsored by or on behalf of educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organizations not conducted for profit, including appearing or speaking at, receiving an award or other recognition at, being featured on the program of, and permitting her title to be used in connection with an event of such an organization or entity, provided the participation does not reflect adversely on the judge's independence, integrity, or impartiality [CJC 3.7(A)].

Here, it is proper for Judge to accept the offer from the state bar association because the activity is devoted to the improvement of law.
"

Submit
109. Attorney is representing Client, the plaintiff in a personal injury case, on a contingent fee basis. Client is without resources to pay for the expenses of the investigation and the medical examinations necessary to prepare for trial. Client asked Attorney to pay for these expenses. Attorney declined to advance the funds but offered to guarantee Client's promissory note to a local bank in order to secure the funds needed to cover those expenses. Client has agreed to reimburse Attorney in the event Attorney incurs liability on the guaranty. Is Attorney subject to discipline if she guarantees Client's promissory note?

Explanation

"A lawyer may collect a fee through a credit card or by arranging a bank loan for a client. The lawyer may take an interest-bearing promissory note for a fee. A contingent fee requires the client to pay a fee (or a bonus) only if there is a favorable outcome [MR 1.5(c)]. A lawyer may accept a contingency fee except in criminal cases when representing a defendant, or in domestic relations cases [MR 1.5(d)]. A lawyer may advance court costs and other expenses of litigation, the repayment of which may be contingent on the outcome of the matter [MR 1.8(e)(1)]. Under such an arrangement, if the client does not prevail in the case, the lawyer absorbs the costs and expenses.

Here, Attorney can represent Client in a personal injury case on a contingent fee basis according to MR 1.5(d). Attorney may also arrange for a bank loan to advance the expenses for trial preparation, so Attorney is not subject to discipline if she guarantees Client?s promissory note.
"

Submit
View My Results

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Apr 4, 2023 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Apr 04, 2023
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Mar 25, 2014
    Quiz Created by
    TestMax
Cancel
  • All
    All (109)
  • Unanswered
    Unanswered ()
  • Answered
    Answered ()
Attorney agreed to represent Able, a client, in bringing a lawsuit....
Attorney Alpha was retained by Client to represent Client in defense...
Alpha & Beta is a large firm that employs over 100 lawyers....
Leaving an airport, Attorney, who primarily practices criminal law,...
Attorney represented Buyer in a real estate transaction. Due to...
An attorney, a member of the state legislature, is allowed to engage...
Attorney Alpha represents Wife in a marriage dissolution proceeding...
Attorney represented Plaintiff, who was the plaintiff in litigation...
Plaintiff, who is not a lawyer, is representing himself in small...
Four years ago, Alpha was a judge in a state court of general...
Attorney served two four-year terms as the governor of State...
Attorney placed Associate, recently admitted to the bar, in complete...
The law firm of Able & Baker agreed to represent Client in various...
Attorney's standard retainer contract in divorce cases provides...
Attorney has been representing Client in a matter in litigation....
The judicial district in which Judge sits has a rule that allows...
Two years ago, Attorney was employed by State's Department of...
Attorney represented Plaintiff in an action against several...
Judge, prior to her recent appointment to the federal court, had been...
Client telephoned Attorney, who had previously represented Client....
Candidate, a member of the bar, is a candidate for judicial office in...
Judge Alpha has recently resigned from the state trial court bench....
Although licensed to practice law in State, Attorney Alpha does not...
Client was an experienced oil and gas developer. Client asked Attorney...
Attorney represented Client in a personal injury action against the...
Three lawyers, Alpha, Beta, and Delta, formed a partnership to...
Judge is one of three trustees of a trust for the educational benefit...
For many years, Attorney has served as outside counsel to Corp, a...
Attorney represented Client on a minor personal injury claim against...
Judge needed to obtain a loan to be secured by a second mortgage on...
Law Firm has 300 lawyers in 10 states. It has placed the supervision...
Attorney experienced several instances when clients failed to pay...
Attorney was retained by Defendant to represent him in a paternity...
Attorney has a highly efficient staff of paraprofessional legal...
Attorney and Client entered into a written retainer and hourly fee...
Attorney Alpha, a member of the bar, placed a printed flyer in the...
Attorneys Alpha and Beta had been political opponents. Alpha was...
Judge, a judge in a criminal trial court of State, wishes to serve as...
An attorney is a general practitioner with extensive experience in...
Alpha & Beta is a well-known law firm in City. Alpha & Beta...
Five years ago, an attorney represented a seller in the sale of the...
Client, a new client of Attorney, has asked Attorney to write a letter...
State does not require lawyers to participate in continuing legal...
Alpha is a member of the bar in State First and is also licensed as a...
Attorney is a sole practitioner whose practice is largely in the areas...
Deft retained Attorney to appeal Deft's criminal conviction and to...
Judge Alpha has been assigned to try a criminal prosecution by State...
Attorney represented Landlord in a variety of matters over several...
Attorney is a member of the bar and a salaried employee of the trust...
Attorney wants to make it easier for her clients to pay their bills...
Attorney practices law in a state that has experienced a business...
Law Firm, a professional corporation with five lawyer shareholders,...
Attorney, who was recently admitted to the bar, has been appointed by...
While an assistant district attorney, Attorney Alpha was in charge of...
Judge is presently serving on a state intermediate appellate court....
Attorney was formerly employed by Insurance Company as a lawyer solely...
Attorney was formerly employed by Insurance Company as a lawyer solely...
Client has retained Attorney to represent Client in a contract suit....
Attorney's advertisement in the local newspaper includes the...
The law firm of Alpha and Beta has a radio commercial which states: ...
Attorney Alpha represents Client, the plaintiff in a medical...
Attorney Alpha was retained by Client to incorporate Client's...
Alpha & Beta, a general partnership, is a litigation firm...
Attorney, who represented Plaintiff, received a check from Deft...
Attorney Alpha has tried many contested cases before Judge Gamma....
Attorney Alpha was retained by Passenger, a passenger on a bus, who...
Attorney is a candidate in a contested election for judicial office....
Judge is presiding in a case that has, as its main issue, a...
Trustco, a trust company, entered into the following arrangement with...
Attorney represented Husband and Wife in the purchase of a business...
Alpha and Beta are members of the bar in the same community but have...
Attorney advertises on the local television station. In the...
Deft, who has been indicted for auto theft, is represented by...
Judge is a judge of the trial court in City. Judge has served for many...
Attorney, who had represented Testator for many years, prepared...
Plaintiff and Defendant are next-door neighbors and bitter personal...
Judge and Attorney were formerly law partners and during their...
Attorney Alpha currently represents Builder, a building contractor who...
Attorney, a sole practitioner, limits his practice to personal injury...
Alpha and Beta practiced law under the firm name of Alpha and Beta....
Attorney was employed as a lawyer by the state Environmental Control...
Attorney Alpha is skilled in trying personal injury cases. Alpha...
Attorney Alpha has been employed as an assistant prosecutor in the...
Attorney represents Client, the plaintiff in a civil action that was...
Able, Baker, and Carter had been indicted for the armed robbery of the...
While presiding over the trial of a highly publicized antitrust case,...
Attorney's recorded radio advertisement stated: ...
Acton, a certified public accountant, has proposed to Attorney, a...
Attorney Alpha is recognized as an expert in securities regulation...
Attorney represents Bank in its commercial loan transactions. Corp has...
Attorney, recently admitted to practice, opened an office near a...
Attorney and Broker, a licensed real estate broker, entered into an...
Judge, prior to her appointment to the probate court, was a partner in...
Attorney, representing Client, with Client's approval settled a...
Attorney is employed by Client, a fugitive from justice under...
Attorney in his capacity as part-time assistant county attorney...
Delta, a lawyer, has just joined the Law Offices of Alpha and Beta, a...
Attorney is representing Plaintiff in a paternity suit against...
Four years ago, Attorney represented Husband and Wife, both high...
Attorney, who is corporate counsel for Company, is investigating a...
Manufacturer sued Partco for Partco's breach of warranty regarding...
Attorney regularly represented Client. When Client planned to leave on...
Attorney entered into a written retainer agreement with Deft, who was...
Attorney represents ten plaintiffs who were injured when a train...
The following advertisement appeared in a daily newspaper in a state...
Judge, a state court judge, has presided over the pretrial proceedings...
Attorney is a candidate for a judicial office that has been occupied...
The state bar association has offered Judge and her spouse free...
Attorney is representing Client, the plaintiff in a personal injury...
Alert!

Advertisement