Ch. 1-7, 9
Agree with senator smith
A good decision requires both viewpoints
We should agree with senator Jones
There are no tradeoffs between equity and efficiency
The price you pay for the ticket and the value of your time
Neither the price of the ticket nor the value of your time
The value of your time, but not the price you pay for the ticket
The price you pay for the ticket, but not the value of your time
The price each good is sold at, but not the quantity sold
Both the quantity and supply of the good
Neither the quantity or the price at which it's sold
The quantity, but not the price it's sold at
Many sellers, each seller can set the price of the product
Only one seller, many buyers
Many sellers that compete in a way that some sellers are being forced out of the market
So many buyers and sellers that each has a negligable impact on the product's price
An increase in supply, decrease in price
A decrease in demand, decreasing price
A decrease in supply, increasing price
An increase in demand, increasing price
Beef producers, concerned about health, produce less beef
Customers, concerned with their health, decrease demand for beef, lowering the equilibrium price, making it less attractive to produce
Protestors have made it hard for buyers & sellers to meet in the marketplace
Gov't officials, concerned about health, ordered producers to produce less beef
The study of how the allocation of resources affect economic well-being
Measure of how much buyers & sellers respond to changes in market conditions
The maximum amount that a buyer will pay for a good
The value of everything a seller must give up to produce a good
Negative income elasticities of demand
More elastic demands
Price elasticities of demand that are unit elastic
Less elastic demands
4% decrease in quantity demanded
0.4% decrease in quantity demanded
40% decrease in quantity demanded
2.5% decrease in quantity demanded
Greater the price elasticity of demand at that point
Closer the price elasticity of demand will be to the slope of the curve
Greater the absolute value of the change in total revenue when there's a movement from that point upword and to the left along the demand curve
Smaller the price elasticity of demand at that point
Support
Floor
Subsidy
Celing
Burden of both taxes falls more heavily on the buyers than the sellers
Noodle burden falls more heavily on the buyers, and the cigarette burden falls more on the buyers
Burden of noodles falls more on the sellers, and cigarette burden falls more on the buyers
Burden of both taxes falls more heavily on the sellers
Force producers of luxury goods to reduce employment
Prevent wealthy people from buying luxuries
Raise revenue from the wealthy
Limit exports of luxury goods to other countries
More on the poor
More on the rich
More on the middle class
Equally on the rich, middle class, and the poor
The cross-price elasticity of demand is 1.0 and X & Y are compliments
The cross-price elasticity of demand is 1.0 and X & Y are substitutes
The cross-price elasticity of demand is -1.0 and X & Y are substitutes
The cross-price elasticity of demand is -1.0 and X & Y are compliments
Good for farmers because it raises prices for their products but bad for consumers because it raises food prices
Good for farmers because it raises prices for their products and also good for consumers because more output is available for consumption
Bad for farmers because total revenue will fall and bad for consumers because farmers will increase the food price to get revenue
Bad for farmers because total revenue will fall but good for consumers because prices of food will fall
When the price of a good falls, the supply of the good rises
When the price of a good rises, the quantity supplied rises
When the price of a good rises, the supply falls
When the price of a good falls, the quantity supplied rises
Equilibrium price decreases, but the imact on equilibrium quantity would be ambiguous
Equilibrium price increases, but the imact on equilibrium quantity would be ambiguous
Equilibrium price decreases, but the imact on equilibrium price would be ambiguous
Equilibrium price increases, but the imact on equilibrium price would be ambiguous
Prices will rise
Prices will fall
Price will stay the same
The price change will be ambiguous
Price will fall and the effect on quantity is ambiguous
Price will rise and the effect on quantity is ambiguous
Quantity will fall and the effect on price is ambiguous
Quantity will rise and the effect on price is ambiguous
Higher wages for carpenters, higher wood prices, increases in consumer incomes, higher apartment rents, and increases in population and expectations of higher house prices in the future
Lower wages for carpenters, lower wood prices, increases in consumer incomes, higher apartment rents, and increases in population and expectations of higher house prices in the future
Lower wages for carpenters, higher wood prices, decreases in consumer incomes, higher apartment rents, and decreases in population and expectations of higher house prices in the future
Higher wages for carpenters, lower wood prices, decreases in consumer incomes, lower apartment rents, and decreases in population and expectations of lower house prices in the future
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.