Hira Standard Online Quiz

HIRA Standard is applicable for all the above options, which include employees, contractors, and visitors. The HIRA Standard refers to the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Standard, which is a systematic process used to identify potential hazards and assess the associated risks in a workplace or any other environment. It is crucial to apply this standard to all individuals present in a given area, including employees, contractors, and visitors, to ensure their safety and minimize the risk of accidents or incidents. Therefore, the correct answer is "All the above."

This statement suggests that when control measures are more effective, their impact will be longer-lasting. In other words, if control measures are successful in managing or reducing a certain problem or issue, the effects of those measures will be sustained for a longer period of time. This implies that the effectiveness of control measures directly correlates with the duration of their impact.

The given statement is true. A hazard refers to any source, situation, or act that has the potential to cause harm or injury to humans or negatively impact their health. It can be a physical, chemical, biological, or psychological factor that poses a risk to individuals. Identifying and managing hazards is crucial to ensure the safety and well-being of individuals in various settings, such as workplaces, homes, and public spaces.

The statement accurately defines risk as the combination of the likelihood of a hazardous event or exposure and the severity of the resulting injury or illness. This definition highlights the importance of considering both the probability and the potential consequences of a risk when assessing its overall level. Therefore, the answer is true.

Risk assessment is a crucial process that helps identify and evaluate potential risks in a workplace. To ensure a comprehensive assessment, multiple sources of information are considered. Inputs from previous accidents provide valuable insights into the types of risks that have occurred in the past. Inputs from the Safety Portal offer access to relevant safety guidelines, regulations, and best practices. Additionally, physically walking around the workplace allows for the identification of potential hazards that may not be evident from other sources. Therefore, all of the above options contribute to a thorough risk assessment.

During risk assessment, it is crucial to consider human behavior, capabilities, and other human factors. This is because human actions and limitations can significantly impact the likelihood and severity of risks. Understanding how people may react in certain situations, their physical and cognitive abilities, and other human factors can help in identifying and mitigating potential risks effectively. By considering these aspects, organizations can develop appropriate strategies and measures to minimize risks and ensure the safety and well-being of individuals involved.

To implement Management of Change (MOC), the organization should consider all of the above options. MOC is a systematic approach to identify and manage potential hazards and risks associated with any changes in activities or processes within an organization. By identifying hazards and assessing associated risks, the organization can effectively plan and implement necessary measures to mitigate any potential negative impacts. Additionally, considering changes in the activity prior to introducing MOC ensures that all potential risks are thoroughly evaluated and addressed. Therefore, considering hazards, associated risks, and changes in activity are all crucial steps in successfully implementing MOC.

An RPN number refers to a Risk Prioritization Number. This number is used to prioritize risks based on their severity and likelihood of occurrence. It helps in identifying and addressing the most critical risks first, allowing organizations to allocate resources effectively and mitigate potential threats to their operations.

The OHS hazards and associated risks document should include all of the mentioned items. This means that the document should contain a list of process/activities, a HIRA (Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment) register, prioritization of significant OHS risks, and revision sheets/document amendment records. Including all of these elements in the document ensures that all relevant information regarding hazards and risks in the workplace is properly documented and managed.

Asphyxiation is the risk related to confined spaces. Confined spaces often have limited oxygen supply and can contain hazardous gases or chemicals that can displace the oxygen. This can lead to a lack of oxygen in the air, causing asphyxiation or suffocation. It is important to have proper ventilation and safety measures in place when working in confined spaces to prevent this risk.

Using LED in place of tube light is not included in the engineering controls because it is a substitution or replacement of one type of lighting with another, rather than a control measure that is designed to eliminate or reduce the hazard at its source. Engineering controls typically involve the design or modification of equipment or processes to minimize the risk of exposure to hazards. In this case, using LED lights may provide energy efficiency benefits, but it does not directly address the hazard or provide a control mechanism for it.

Ergonomics is the study of designing and arranging objects and environments to fit the capabilities and limitations of the human body. Pulling, pushing, and posture all relate to ergonomics as they involve the movement and positioning of the body while performing tasks. However, slip, trip, and fall do not directly relate to ergonomics as they are more related to environmental factors and hazards rather than body mechanics and efficiency.

The TML HIRA Standard provides the methods for the Risk Assessments for compliance to OHSAS 18001:2007. This means that the standard outlines the procedures and guidelines that organizations should follow in order to assess and manage risks related to occupational health and safety. By adhering to the TML HIRA Standard, organizations can ensure that they are in compliance with the requirements of OHSAS 18001:2007, which is an internationally recognized standard for occupational health and safety management systems.

The correct answer is "Proactive." This means that the methodology of HIRA (Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment) involves taking preventative measures and anticipating potential hazards or risks before they occur. It focuses on identifying and addressing potential issues in advance, rather than waiting for them to happen and reacting afterwards. This approach helps to minimize the impact of hazards and prevent accidents or incidents from occurring.

The statement is defining the term "Domino Concern" as operations and processes that can increase risks and create potential emergency conditions. It is stating that this definition is true.

JSA stands for Job Safety Analysis. It is a process that helps identify and evaluate potential hazards associated with a particular job or task. It involves breaking down the job into steps, identifying potential hazards, and determining the best way to perform the job safely. Since routine activities are repetitive and familiar to workers, a JSA may not be required as the hazards associated with these activities are already known and can be easily managed. Therefore, JSA is not necessary for routine activities that do not require it.

The correct answer is Likelihood X Severity. In risk assessment, the likelihood refers to the probability or chance of an event or hazard occurring, while severity refers to the potential impact or harm that could result from that event or hazard. Multiplying these two factors together helps to quantify the overall risk associated with a particular situation or scenario. By considering both the likelihood and severity, organizations can prioritize and allocate resources to effectively manage and mitigate risks.

The criteria for HIRA review includes assessing incident or accident or ill health, changes in existing control, raw material substitution, and change of chemicals. However, the existing job which is not changed is not a criteria for HIRA review.

The probability of occurrence of a hazardous event is often referred to as "likelihood." This term represents the chance or probability of a hazardous event happening. It is used to assess and quantify the potential risks associated with the event. The likelihood helps in determining the level of risk and the necessary preventive measures or mitigation strategies that need to be implemented.

HIRA, which stands for Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment, is a process that involves identifying potential hazards and assessing the associated risks. It requires input from different perspectives and areas of expertise. A cross-functional team is composed of individuals from different departments or disciplines, bringing diverse knowledge and skills to the table. In the context of HIRA, a cross-functional team is ideal as it can provide a comprehensive analysis of hazards and risks from various angles, ensuring a more thorough and accurate assessment. Safety, operator, and line manager may also contribute to the HIRA process, but involving a cross-functional team ensures a more holistic approach.

The plant reviews the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIRA) within a period of 6 months. This suggests that the plant regularly assesses and evaluates its compliance with HIRA regulations every half-year. This periodic review ensures that the plant stays up to date with any changes or updates to HIRA requirements and maintains a high standard of data security and privacy in accordance with the law.

The given options are all methods for hazard identification as per the HIRA Standard, except for conducting a feedback survey. Walking around the workplace, reviewing records of worksheet inspection, and checking manufacturer's instructions are all proactive measures to identify potential hazards. However, conducting a feedback survey is not specifically mentioned as a method for hazard identification in the given options.

Job rotation is not the correct action plan for intolerable risk because job rotation involves moving employees between different roles or tasks to provide variety and reduce the risk of overexposure to specific hazards. However, when a risk is considered intolerable, it means that it is unacceptable and cannot be reduced to an acceptable level. In such cases, prohibition of work or implementing hierarchy controls with unlimited resources may be more appropriate actions to ensure the safety and well-being of employees.

When a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), Standard Maintenance Procedure (SMP), or Work Instruction Sheet (WIS) is not available or when the conditions stated in these documents have changed, it is considered a non-routine activity. In such cases, employees may need to deviate from the standard procedures and adapt to the new conditions or create a new procedure altogether. This type of activity requires flexibility and problem-solving skills as it is not part of the regular or predictable tasks.

ALARP stands for "As Low as Reasonably Practicable." This concept is commonly used in risk assessment and management to ensure that risks are reduced to a level that is reasonably achievable, taking into account factors such as cost, time, and resources. It emphasizes finding a balance between reducing risks to an acceptable level and the practicality of implementing risk control measures. By striving to achieve ALARP, organizations can minimize the likelihood and severity of potential hazards while still considering the feasibility and practicality of risk reduction measures.

The correct answer is "Risk stability." In order to calculate Risk Priority Number (RPN), we need to consider the product of Likelihood (L) and Severity (S). However, among the given options, "Risk stability" is not considered as a component of severity. Therefore, it is not included in the calculation of RPN.

not-available-via-ai

The RPN range of 131-250 comes under SUBSTANTIAL RISK.

The severity of an incident is determined by the scale of harm, the level of harm, and the number of people affected. This means that the severity takes into account the extent of the harm caused, the intensity or seriousness of the harm, and the number of individuals impacted by the incident. These factors collectively contribute to the overall severity assessment of the incident.

The RPN (Risk Priority Number) is calculated by multiplying the severity, occurrence, and detection numbers. In this scenario, the severity is 5 (due to the person getting injured), the occurrence is 2 (since it happened once last year), and the detection is 4 (since it was not detected before the incident occurred). Multiplying these numbers together gives us a RPN of 80.

The given answer, "Within the Nearby Plant," is not a parameter under the Scale of risk. The Scale of risk typically includes parameters such as within the SHOP, Work Area only, and Outside Plant Premises. The nearby plant is not mentioned as a parameter, hence it is not a part of the Scale of risk.

The RPN number is calculated by multiplying the values of Likelihood, Scale of Risk, Level of Harm, and Number of People affected. In this case, the values are 4, 2, 4, and 2 respectively. Multiplying these values together gives us a RPN number of 64.

The scoring range used for Risk Assessment is 2 to 5.

The overriding criteria in this question refers to the factors that take precedence or have the highest importance. In this case, the criteria that come under overriding are Domino Concern (DC), Legislative Concern (LC), and Emergency. These factors are given more weight or priority compared to the other options listed.

In the context of HIRA (Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment), "Unacceptable risk" is a term used to describe a level of risk that is deemed unacceptable and must be mitigated or controlled. Therefore, among the options provided, "Moderate" and "Substantial" are not considered part of "Unacceptable risk."