Fs145: Immigration Law - Midterm Examination On The Laws Of Philippine Citizenship
Hello FS145 student!
In these modern times, state-declared special non-working days, like today, cannot hinder us from conducting an exam in FS145: Immigration Law, as previously scheduled. Today, you are about to take your MidTerm Examination on the Laws of Philippine Citizenship, on-line.
But different from having the exam on-site, you may open your notes and materials when answering this on-line exam. However, please note that this exam is time-limited, you only have forty-five (45) minutes to answer the exam.
This exam is open and available only on Saturday, January 28, 2017 from 10:00 a. M. To 2:00 p. M. Read more
Note:You are only allowed one attempt to answer this exam. The questions shuffle, as well as the choices, if any. So, should you attempt to cheat by taking the exam together, at the same time and copy each other's answer, note that the questions your classmate is answering, will be different from the questions and choices you are taking. With the time limit, you are simply wasting time just figuring out the order and sequence of the exam. If you are serious about learning (and graduating), I urge you to work on this on-line exam on your own. You cannot go back or forward (skip) questions, so before proceeding to the next question, check and double-check your answer because after you click 'NEXT' you cannot go back to those questions again, and change your answers. Be careful and thorough, but do not forget the time limit. Negative marking is also
- 1.
In a law article by Atty. James Benedict F. Panopio, entitled ‘Philippine Citizenship, Dual Citizenship and Dual Allegiance’, he concluded that, “Dual citizenship may be a vehicle for opportunism and exploitation by unscrupulous Filipino foreigners.” In 500 characters or less, clearly illustrate and explain why Atty. Panopio arrived at abovementioned conclusion. Cite examples or situations. Do you agree with the statement? Why or why not? Give a concise and detailed answer.
- 2.
Refers to the result of concurrent application of the different laws of two or more states; a person is simultaneously considered a citizen by the said states.
- A.
Dual allegiance
- B.
Dual citizenship
- C.
Naturalization
- D.
En masse Filipinization
Correct Answer
B. Dual citizenshipExplanation
Dual citizenship refers to the result of concurrent application of the different laws of two or more states, where a person is simultaneously considered a citizen by the said states. This means that an individual holds citizenship in two or more countries at the same time. Dual citizenship can be acquired through various means, such as birth, descent, marriage, or naturalization. It allows individuals to enjoy the rights and privileges of both countries, including the ability to live, work, and vote in either country.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
The Dual Citizenship law has amended Commonwealth Act No. 63, which provided that acquisition of foreign citizenship is a ground for the loss of Philippine citizenship.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
A. TrueExplanation
The statement is true because the Dual Citizenship law has indeed amended Commonwealth Act No. 63, which previously stated that acquiring foreign citizenship would result in the loss of Philippine citizenship. With the amendment, individuals can now hold dual citizenship, allowing them to retain their Philippine citizenship even if they acquire foreign citizenship.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
Citizenship imposes duty of allegiance to the political community.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
A. TrueExplanation
Citizenship requires individuals to show loyalty and allegiance to their political community. This means that citizens are expected to support and defend their country, obey its laws, and contribute to the well-being of the community. The duty of allegiance is a fundamental aspect of citizenship, as it helps to maintain social cohesion and ensure the functioning of the political system. Therefore, the statement that citizenship imposes duty of allegiance to the political community is true.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
Jus soli is acquisition of citizenship on the basis of blood relationship.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
B. FalseExplanation
Jus soli is actually the acquisition of citizenship based on the location of birth, rather than blood relationship. This means that if a person is born in a particular country, they automatically become a citizen of that country, regardless of their parents' citizenship. So, the correct answer is False.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
Under the 1935 Constitution, citizenship can be acquired and lost by marriage.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
A. TrueExplanation
Under the 1935 Constitution, citizenship can be acquired and lost by marriage. This means that if a person marries a citizen of another country, they can acquire the citizenship of that country. On the other hand, if a person marries a foreigner and renounces their own citizenship, they can lose their citizenship. This provision in the 1935 Constitution recognizes the impact of marriage on citizenship status and allows for changes in citizenship based on marital relationships.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
Under the 1987 Constitution, citizenship can be acquired and lost by marriage.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
B. FalseExplanation
Under the 1987 Constitution, citizenship cannot be acquired or lost by marriage. Citizenship can be acquired through birth, naturalization, or by operation of law, but marriage alone does not grant or revoke citizenship. Marriage may have implications for residency or immigration status, but it does not directly affect one's citizenship. Therefore, the statement is false.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
Dual allegiance is inimical to national interest.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
A. TrueExplanation
Dual allegiance refers to a situation where an individual holds loyalty to two different nations or entities. This can create conflicts of interest and divided loyalties, which can be detrimental to the national interest of a country. When individuals have dual allegiance, they may prioritize the interests of one nation over the other, leading to potential security risks or compromised decision-making. Therefore, it can be argued that dual allegiance is indeed inimical (harmful) to national interest.Rate this question:
-
- 9.
Dual citizenship is inimical to national interest.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
B. FalseExplanation
The statement suggests that dual citizenship is not inimical to national interest, meaning that it does not harm or go against the country's best interests. This implies that having dual citizenship can actually be beneficial or neutral for the nation.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
Administrative naturalization process can be applied by any foreigner.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
B. FalseExplanation
The explanation for the given correct answer is that the administrative naturalization process is not available to any foreigner. This process is specifically for individuals who are married to a citizen of the country or have served in the military. It is not a general process that can be applied by any foreigner. Therefore, the statement is false.Rate this question:
-
- 11.
A foreigner who has been a resident of the Philippines for 30 years is exempted from filing declaration of intention one year prior to the petition to the Office of the Solicitor General.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
B. FalseExplanation
The statement is false because according to the given information, a foreigner who has been a resident of the Philippines for 30 years is exempted from filing a declaration of intention one year prior to the petition to the Office of the Solicitor General.Rate this question:
-
- 12.
A foreigner married to a Filipina woman can immediately file for naturalization after 1 month residency in the Philippines.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
B. FalseExplanation
This statement is false. According to the Philippine law, a foreigner married to a Filipina woman can only file for naturalization after being a resident of the Philippines for at least 10 years. Therefore, the correct answer is false.Rate this question:
-
- 13.
________ citizenship is conferred on the wife of naturalized husband, and minor children of naturalized person.
Correct Answer
DerivativeExplanation
Derivative citizenship is granted to the wife of a naturalized husband and the minor children of a naturalized person. This means that when a person becomes a citizen through the process of naturalization, their spouse and children also gain citizenship automatically. This is known as derivative citizenship because it is derived from the citizenship of the naturalized individual.Rate this question:
- 14.
The ________ confers citizenship among its people, in its territory.
Correct Answer
StateExplanation
The word "state" in this context refers to a political entity or a governing body that has the authority to confer citizenship to individuals within its territory. It is responsible for defining the rights and obligations of its citizens and providing them with legal protection. The state exercises control over its territory and has the power to grant or revoke citizenship based on its own laws and regulations.Rate this question:
- 15.
Citizenship can be acquired by birth, either by adopting the principle of ________, where citizenship is determined at birth based on blood relationship; or the principle of ________, where citizenship is determined based on place of birth. In the Philippines, we adopt the principle of ________. These citizens who are designated their citizenship at birth are called ________
Correct Answer
jus sanguinis, jus sangguinis
jus soli, jus loci
jus sanguinis, jus sangguinis
natural born citizens, natural-born citizens, natural born, natural-bornExplanation
In the Philippines, citizenship is determined at birth based on blood relationship, which is known as jus sanguinis. This means that individuals acquire citizenship if they have a blood relationship to a Filipino citizen. On the other hand, citizenship can also be determined based on place of birth, known as jus soli. This means that individuals acquire citizenship if they are born within the territory of the Philippines. Therefore, in the Philippines, citizenship can be acquired by either jus sanguinis or jus soli. Individuals who are designated their citizenship at birth based on these principles are called natural-born citizens.Rate this question:
- 16.
Which of the following are citizens of the Philippines?
- A.
Those born before January 15, 1973, of Filipino mothers, who elect Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age of majority
- B.
Those born before January 16, 1973, of Filipino mothers, who elect Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age of majority
- C.
Those born before January 17, 1973, of Filipino mothers, who elect Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age of majority
- D.
Those born before January 18, 1973, of Filipino mothers, who elect Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age of majority
Correct Answer
C. Those born before January 17, 1973, of Filipino mothers, who elect Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age of majorityExplanation
According to the given information, individuals who were born before January 17, 1973, to Filipino mothers and who choose to acquire Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age of majority are considered citizens of the Philippines.Rate this question:
-
- 17.
Loss of citizenship is considered in the following, EXCEPT:
- A.
Naturalization in a foreign country
- B.
Expatriation
- C.
Being found by final judgment to be deserter of the AFP
- D.
Marriage by a Filipino woman to an alien and express renunciation of Filipino citizenship
Correct Answer
A. Naturalization in a foreign countryExplanation
Loss of citizenship can occur in several ways, such as through expatriation, being found to be a deserter of the AFP, or through marriage by a Filipino woman to an alien with express renunciation of Filipino citizenship. However, naturalization in a foreign country does not automatically result in the loss of citizenship. Naturalization refers to the process of acquiring citizenship in a foreign country, but it does not necessarily mean that one has to give up their original citizenship. Therefore, naturalization in a foreign country is not considered as a factor leading to loss of citizenship.Rate this question:
-
- 18.
Citizenship is reacquired by any of the following, EXCEPT
- A.
Under Republic Act No. 9225
- B.
By naturalization
- C.
By repatriation
- D.
By direct act of the Chief Executive
Correct Answer
D. By direct act of the Chief ExecutiveExplanation
Citizenship can be reacquired under Republic Act No. 9225, by naturalization, and by repatriation. However, it cannot be reacquired by a direct act of the Chief Executive. This means that the Chief Executive, such as the President, does not have the power to grant or restore citizenship directly. The process of reacquiring citizenship must follow the provisions set out in the law, such as through naturalization or repatriation.Rate this question:
-
- 19.
Luis, born in 1988, to a Chinese father and a Filipino mother married 1985. His father became naturalized Filipino citizen when Luis was already 19 years old. Eventually, he studied law and allowed by the Supreme Court to take the bar examinations, subject to his submission of his proof of citizenship which he did not comply with. He subsequently passed the bar exam and was able to take oath and sign the roll of attorneys. For a long time, he was able to practice his legal profession until one Philip filed with the Supreme Court for disbarment against Luis. Based on the facts presented herein above, how should the Supreme Court rule?
- A.
Disbar Atty. Luis on the ground that he is not a Filipino citizen because he was no longer a minor when his father acquired Philippine citizenship through naturalization.
- B.
Dismiss the case filed by Philip on the ground that Atty. Luis was a natural-born Filipino citizen without need of any act to perfect his citizenship, his mother being a Filipino citizen.
- C.
Disbar Atty. Luis on the ground that he is not a natural-born Filipino citizen, for failure to elect Filipino citizenship upon reaching the age of majority.
- D.
Dismiss the case filed by Philip on the ground that Atty. Luis can still practice law, as a naturalized Filipino citizen.
Correct Answer
B. Dismiss the case filed by Philip on the ground that Atty. Luis was a natural-born Filipino citizen without need of any act to perfect his citizenship, his mother being a Filipino citizen.Explanation
The Supreme Court should dismiss the case filed by Philip on the ground that Atty. Luis was a natural-born Filipino citizen without the need for any act to perfect his citizenship. This is because his mother is a Filipino citizen, which automatically makes him a natural-born Filipino citizen. The fact that his father acquired Philippine citizenship through naturalization when Luis was already 19 years old does not affect his status as a natural-born Filipino citizen.Rate this question:
-
- 20.
Luis, born in 1972, to a Chinese father and a Filipino mother married 1965. His father became naturalized Filipino citizen when Luis was already 19 years old. Eventually, he studied law and allowed by the Supreme Court to take the bar examinations, subject to his submission of his proof of citizenship which he did not comply with. He subsequently passed the bar exam and was able to take oath and sign the roll of attorneys. For a long time, he was able to practice his legal profession until one Philip filed with the Supreme Court for disbarment against Luis. Based on the facts presented herein above, how should the Supreme Court rule?
- A.
Disbar Atty. Luis on the ground that he is not a Filipino citizen because he was no longer a minor when his father acquired Philippine citizenship through naturalization.
- B.
Dismiss the case filed by Philip on the ground that Atty. Luis was a natural-born Filipino citizen without need of any act to perfect his citizenship, his mother being a Filipino citizen.
- C.
Disbar Atty. Luis on the ground that he is not a natural-born Filipino citizen, for failure to elect Filipino citizenship upon reaching the age of majority.
- D.
Dismiss the case filed by Philip on the ground that Atty. Luis can still practice law, as a naturalized Filipino citizen.
Correct Answer
C. Disbar Atty. Luis on the ground that he is not a natural-born Filipino citizen, for failure to elect Filipino citizenship upon reaching the age of majority.Explanation
The Supreme Court should disbar Atty. Luis on the ground that he is not a natural-born Filipino citizen, for failure to elect Filipino citizenship upon reaching the age of majority. Despite his father becoming a naturalized Filipino citizen, Luis did not comply with the requirement of submitting proof of his citizenship. As a result, he cannot be considered a natural-born Filipino citizen and is therefore ineligible to practice law.Rate this question:
-
- 21.
In 1986, Z was born to a Filipino mother and a Swedish father. She was naturalized as a US citizen. She recently reacquired Philippine citizenship under RA9225. She has taken an oath of allegiance to the Philippines and registered this with the Local Civil Registrar. May Z vote in the Philippines?
- A.
Yes. She has complied with the requirement of an oath of allegiance and registering the same with Local Civil Registrar.
- B.
Yes. Her reacquisition of citizenship under RA9225 made her reacquire her old natural-born Filipino status.
- C.
No. She must also renounce her US citizenship as an additional requirement.
- D.
No. She is not a natural-born Filipino.
Correct Answer
B. Yes. Her reacquisition of citizenship under RA9225 made her reacquire her old natural-born Filipino status.Explanation
The correct answer is that Z can vote in the Philippines because her reacquisition of citizenship under RA9225 allowed her to regain her old natural-born Filipino status. This means that she is eligible to exercise her right to vote in the country.Rate this question:
-
- 22.
In 1986, Z was born to a Filipino mother and a Swedish father. She was naturalized as a US citizen. She recently reacquired Philippine citizenship under RA9225. She has taken an oath of allegiance to the Philippines and registered this with the Local Civil Registrar. May Z run as senator in the Philippines?
- A.
Yes. She has complied with the requirement of an oath of allegiance and registering the same with Local Civil Registrar.
- B.
Yes. Her reacquisition of citizenship under 9225 made her reacquire her old natural-born Filipino status.
- C.
No. She must also renounce her US citizenship as an additional requirement.
- D.
No. She is not a natural-born Filipino.
Correct Answer
C. No. She must also renounce her US citizenship as an additional requirement.Explanation
No. She must also renounce her US citizenship as an additional requirement. Although Z has reacquired her Philippine citizenship under RA9225 by taking an oath of allegiance and registering it with the Local Civil Registrar, she is still considered a dual citizen. In order to run as a senator in the Philippines, she must first renounce her US citizenship as an additional requirement.Rate this question:
-
- 23.
The old citizenship law which provides that acquisition of foreign citizenship is a ground for loss of Philippine citizenship.
- A.
Republic Act No. 9225
- B.
Commonwealth Act No. 613
- C.
Commonwealth Act No. 63
- D.
Republic Act No. 63
Correct Answer
C. Commonwealth Act No. 63Explanation
Commonwealth Act No. 63 is the correct answer because it is the law that includes provisions on the acquisition and loss of Philippine citizenship. This law specifically states that acquiring foreign citizenship is a ground for the loss of Philippine citizenship. Republic Act No. 9225, on the other hand, is the law that allows dual citizenship in the Philippines, so it does not support the given statement. Commonwealth Act No. 613 and Republic Act No. 63 do not specifically address the acquisition of foreign citizenship as a ground for loss of Philippine citizenship.Rate this question:
-
- 24.
Republic Act No. 9225 is also known as --
- A.
Citizenship and Naturalization Act of 2003
- B.
Citizenship Retention and Reacquisition Act of 2003
- C.
Citizenship Retention and Naturalization Act of 2003
- D.
Citizenship Retention and Reacquisition Act of 2005
Correct Answer
B. Citizenship Retention and Reacquisition Act of 2003Explanation
Republic Act No. 9225 is commonly referred to as the Citizenship Retention and Reacquisition Act of 2003. This act allows natural-born Filipinos who have acquired foreign citizenship to retain or reacquire their Philippine citizenship. It provides a legal framework for dual citizenship, allowing individuals to enjoy the rights and privileges of being a Filipino citizen while also being a citizen of another country. The act was enacted in 2003, hence the inclusion of the year in the title.Rate this question:
-
- 25.
Refers to personal and more or less permanent membership in a political community
- A.
Nationality
- B.
Citizenship
- C.
Naturalization
- D.
Immigration
Correct Answer
B. CitizenshipExplanation
Citizenship refers to personal and more or less permanent membership in a political community. It is the legal status of being a citizen of a particular country, entailing rights, privileges, and responsibilities. Citizenship is acquired either by birth or through a legal process called naturalization. It signifies a person's allegiance and loyalty to their country and grants them various rights, such as the right to vote and access to social benefits. It is different from nationality, which refers to a person's belonging to a particular nation or ethnic group, and immigration, which is the act of moving to another country to settle permanently.Rate this question:
-
- 26.
Refers to the authorized movement or entries into sojourns within and exits of foreigners from the territory of a state.
- A.
Nationality
- B.
Citizenship
- C.
Naturalization
- D.
Immigration
Correct Answer
D. ImmigrationExplanation
Immigration refers to the authorized movement or entries into sojourns within and exits of foreigners from the territory of a state. This term specifically relates to the process of individuals entering a new country to establish permanent residence. It involves complying with the legal requirements and regulations set by the destination country for foreigners to live and work there. Immigration is a significant aspect of population dynamics and plays a crucial role in shaping the cultural, social, and economic landscape of a nation.Rate this question:
-
- 27.
The following are rights exclusively enjoyed by a citizen, EXCEPT:
- A.
Suffrage
- B.
To exploit natural resources
- C.
To own a condominium unit
- D.
To own a taxi franchise
Correct Answer
C. To own a condominium unitExplanation
The rights listed in the question are examples of rights exclusively enjoyed by a citizen. The right to suffrage refers to the right to vote in elections, which is a fundamental right of citizens in a democratic society. The right to exploit natural resources may be regulated by the government and is often restricted to citizens. The right to own a taxi franchise is a business opportunity that may be limited to citizens or residents of a particular country. However, the right to own a condominium unit is not exclusively enjoyed by citizens, as non-citizens can also own property in many countries.Rate this question:
-
- 28.
Refers to the legal act of adopting an alien and clothing him with the privilege of a citizen.
- A.
Nationality
- B.
Citizenship
- C.
Naturalization
- D.
Immigration
Correct Answer
C. NaturalizationExplanation
Naturalization refers to the legal act of adopting an alien and clothing him with the privilege of a citizen. This process allows individuals who were not born in a particular country to become citizens of that country. It involves fulfilling certain requirements, such as residency, language proficiency, and passing a citizenship test. Once naturalized, individuals gain the same rights and responsibilities as natural-born citizens, including the right to vote and hold public office. Therefore, naturalization is the correct answer in this context.Rate this question:
-
- 29.
A was born to a Filipino mother and father in United States of America. In Philippine jurisdiction, which statement is correct?
- A.
A is half Filipino, half American
- B.
A is not a Filipino
- C.
A is a natural born Filipino citizen
- D.
A is American
Correct Answer
C. A is a natural born Filipino citizenExplanation
Since A was born to a Filipino mother and father in the United States of America, A is considered a natural born Filipino citizen according to Philippine jurisdiction. This is because Philippine law recognizes citizenship based on jus sanguinis (right of blood), meaning that citizenship is determined by the nationality of the parents rather than the place of birth. Therefore, even though A was born in the United States, their Filipino parentage grants them Filipino citizenship.Rate this question:
-
- 30.
A was born in United States of America to American parents. In Philippine jurisdiction, which statement is correct?
- A.
A is half Filipino, half American
- B.
A is not a Filipino
- C.
A is a natural born Filipino citizen
- D.
A is American
Correct Answer
B. A is not a FilipinoExplanation
Based on the information provided, A was born in the United States of America to American parents. Therefore, A is not a Filipino because being a Filipino citizen requires being born in the Philippines or having at least one Filipino parent.Rate this question:
-
- 31.
A was born in the Philippines to American parents. In Philippine jurisdiction, which statement is correct?
- A.
A is half Filipino, half American
- B.
A is not a Filipino
- C.
A is a natural born Filipino citizen
- D.
A is American
Correct Answer
B. A is not a FilipinoExplanation
Since A was born in the Philippines to American parents, A does not automatically acquire Filipino citizenship. In the Philippines, the principle of jus sanguinis (right of blood) is followed, which means that citizenship is primarily based on the nationality of one's parents. Therefore, A would be considered an American citizen, not a Filipino citizen.Rate this question:
-
- 32.
Refers to the result of concurrent application of the different laws of two or more states; a person is simultaneously considered a citizen by the said states.
- A.
Dual allegiance
- B.
Dual citizenship
- C.
Naturalization
- D.
En masse Filipinization
Correct Answer
B. Dual citizenshipExplanation
The correct answer is dual citizenship. Dual citizenship refers to the result of concurrent application of the different laws of two or more states, where a person is simultaneously considered a citizen by the said states. This means that an individual holds citizenship in two or more countries at the same time, allowing them to enjoy the rights and privileges of each citizenship. Dual citizenship can be acquired through various means, such as birth, descent, or naturalization.Rate this question:
-
- 33.
Refers to the situation in which a person simultaneously owes, by some positive act, loyalty to two or more states.
- A.
Dual allegiance
- B.
Dual citizenship
- C.
Naturalization
- D.
En masse Filipinization
Correct Answer
A. Dual allegianceExplanation
Dual allegiance refers to the situation in which a person simultaneously owes, by some positive act, loyalty to two or more states. This means that the individual has a legal obligation or duty to be loyal to multiple countries. It can occur when a person holds citizenship in more than one country or when they have strong ties or obligations to multiple nations. Dual allegiance can pose challenges in terms of legal rights, obligations, and conflicts of interest, as the individual may be torn between their loyalties to different countries.Rate this question:
-
- 34.
Collective change of nationality as discussed in Tecson vs COMELEC
- A.
Dual allegiance
- B.
Dual citizenship
- C.
Naturalization
- D.
En masse Filipinization
Correct Answer
D. En masse FilipinizationExplanation
En masse Filipinization refers to the collective change of nationality, as discussed in Tecson vs COMELEC. It involves a large group of individuals becoming Filipino citizens simultaneously. This process is different from naturalization, which is the individual acquisition of citizenship, and dual citizenship, which allows a person to hold citizenship in two countries. Dual allegiance refers to the situation where a person owes loyalty to two different countries, which is generally discouraged. Therefore, the correct answer, en masse Filipinization, best fits the description of a collective change of nationality discussed in the given context.Rate this question:
-
- 35.
An individual may be compelled to retain his original nationality even if he has already renounced or forfeited it under the laws of the second state whose nationality he has aacquired.
- A.
Doctrine of edible allegiance
- B.
Doctrine of indelible allegiance
- C.
Doctrine of allegiance
- D.
Doctrine of state continuity
Correct Answer
B. Doctrine of indelible allegianceExplanation
The correct answer is "Doctrine of indelible allegiance." This doctrine states that an individual may still be required to retain their original nationality, even if they have already renounced or forfeited it under the laws of the second state whose nationality they have acquired. This means that the original nationality cannot be completely erased or forgotten, and certain obligations or responsibilities may still apply to the individual based on their original nationality.Rate this question:
-
- 36.
Ten (10) years qualification requirement for judicial naturalization may be reduced to five (5) years in the following instances, EXCEPT --
- A.
If he was born in the Philippines
- B.
If he established a business
- C.
If he was engaged as a teacher
- D.
If he is married to a Filipino woman
Correct Answer
B. If he established a businessExplanation
The correct answer is "If he established a business." This means that the ten-year qualification requirement for judicial naturalization may be reduced to five years in all of the given instances except if he established a business.Rate this question:
-
- 37.
A foreigner applying for judicial naturalization in the Philippines shall become a naturalized Filipino citizen upon-
- A.
Promulgation of the decision
- B.
After Oath taking
- C.
After passing the two year probationary period
- D.
Upon issuance of a Certificate of Naturalization
Correct Answer
D. Upon issuance of a Certificate of NaturalizationExplanation
A foreigner applying for judicial naturalization in the Philippines will become a naturalized Filipino citizen upon the issuance of a Certificate of Naturalization. This means that once the certificate is officially granted to the individual, they will be considered a naturalized citizen of the Philippines. The other options mentioned, such as promulgation of the decision, oath taking, and the two-year probationary period, are not the specific points at which the individual becomes a naturalized citizen.Rate this question:
-
- 38.
The following are grounds for denaturalization, EXCEPT:
- A.
Leaving the country within the 5 year period
- B.
Establishment of residence in another country within 5 year period
- C.
Invalid declaration of intention
- D.
Acted as a dummy
Correct Answer
A. Leaving the country within the 5 year periodExplanation
The grounds for denaturalization include establishment of residence in another country within the 5-year period, invalid declaration of intention, and acting as a dummy. However, leaving the country within the 5-year period is not a ground for denaturalization.Rate this question:
-
- 39.
Administrative naturalization is available to --
- A.
Chin, a Chinese national, residing and having a profitable business in the Philippines
- B.
Joe, who was born in America, married Maria and residing in the Philippines since the 1970s
- C.
Chen, who was born in the Philippines to a Chinese father and Filipino mother and residing in the Philippines since birth
- D.
John, who was born in the Philippines to foreigner parents and residing in the Philippines since birth.
Correct Answer
D. John, who was born in the Philippines to foreigner parents and residing in the Philippines since birth.Explanation
The correct answer is John, who was born in the Philippines to foreigner parents and residing in the Philippines since birth. This is because administrative naturalization is available to individuals who have been residing in the Philippines for a certain period of time. John meets this requirement as he has been living in the Philippines since birth. Additionally, being born in the Philippines to foreigner parents may also make him eligible for administrative naturalization.Rate this question:
-
- 40.
The Administrative agency tasked to administer proceedings and grant citizenship to aliens born and residing in the Philippines is called ________
Correct Answer
Special Committee on NaturalizationExplanation
The correct answer is "Special Committee on Naturalization." This administrative agency is responsible for overseeing the process of granting citizenship to aliens who are born and residing in the Philippines. They handle the proceedings and make decisions regarding naturalization applications.Rate this question:
- 41.
As a matter of law, foundlings are as a class, natural born citizens.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
A. TrueExplanation
This statement suggests that according to the law, foundlings are considered natural born citizens. This means that individuals who are abandoned or left as infants and do not know their biological parents are still granted the same citizenship rights as those who are born to citizen parents. This could be based on the principle of jus soli (right of soil) or jus sanguinis (right of blood), which determine citizenship based on place of birth or ancestry respectively.Rate this question:
-
- 42.
Denaturalization is not a ground for loss of ctizenship
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
B. FalseExplanation
Denaturalization refers to the process of revoking someone's citizenship. Therefore, denaturalization is indeed a ground for loss of citizenship. Hence, the correct answer is False.Rate this question:
-
- 43.
As they have to elect Filipino citizenship upon reaching the age of majority, citizens under paragraph 3, Section 1, Article IV of the 1987 Constitution are naturalized citizens.
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
B. FalseExplanation
The statement is false because citizens under paragraph 3, Section 1, Article IV of the 1987 Constitution are not naturalized citizens. They are actually considered natural-born citizens, as they acquire Filipino citizenship automatically upon reaching the age of majority. Naturalized citizens, on the other hand, are individuals who acquire citizenship through a legal process after fulfilling certain requirements.Rate this question:
-
- 44.
A former Filipino, who lost their citizenship for whatever reason, may reacquire it pursuant to RA 9225
- A.
True
- B.
False
Correct Answer
B. FalseExplanation
The statement is false because RA 9225, also known as the Citizenship Retention and Reacquisition Act of 2003, allows former natural-born Filipino citizens who have lost their citizenship to reacquire it. Therefore, the correct answer would be true.Rate this question:
-
- 45.
________ refers to the informal membership in a nation, based on heritage, race, and culture.
Correct Answer
NationalityExplanation
Nationality refers to the informal membership in a nation, based on heritage, race, and culture. It is the status of belonging to a particular country and being recognized as a citizen of that country. Nationality is often determined by factors such as birthplace, ancestry, and cultural affiliation. It is a way of identifying with a specific nation and sharing common traditions, values, and customs with fellow citizens.Rate this question:
- 46.
The 1935 Constitution became a valid constitution on ________. (Give complete date, using this format mm/dd/yyyy)
Correct Answer
07/04/1946Explanation
The 1935 Constitution became a valid constitution on July 4, 1946.Rate this question:
- 47.
________ refers to one of the elements of a state which declares the nation free from external control and forces.
Correct Answer
Sovereignty, IndependenceExplanation
Sovereignty refers to the supreme power or authority of a state to govern itself without interference from external forces. It implies that the state has the right to make decisions and enforce laws within its territory. Independence, on the other hand, refers to the state's freedom from external control or influence. It signifies that the state is not subject to the authority or rule of another nation. Both sovereignty and independence are essential elements that declare a nation's freedom from external control and forces.Rate this question:
- 48.
Let us say you are working for the Bureau of Immigration or the Department of Foreign Affairs, and you need to determine whether or not the person in front of you is a Filipino citizen, what will you check?Check as many as applicable.
- A.
His/her birth certificate
- B.
His/her passport
- C.
Court Decision on his/her citizenship
- D.
Certificate of Naturalization
- E.
The person's physical features
- F.
The language he/she speaks
- G.
School Records
- H.
Employment Records
- I.
Alien Certificate of Registration
- J.
Visa
- K.
His/her parents' birth certificate
Correct Answer(s)
A. His/her birth certificate
B. His/her passport
C. Court Decision on his/her citizenship
D. Certificate of Naturalization
K. His/her parents' birth certificateExplanation
To determine whether or not the person is a Filipino citizen, you would check their birth certificate, passport, court decision on their citizenship, certificate of naturalization, and their parents' birth certificate. These documents provide evidence of their citizenship status and can be used to verify their Filipino citizenship.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Mar 21, 2023Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Jan 24, 2017Quiz Created by
Catherine Halcomb
Back to top