Law Week 2 Test

Reviewed by Editorial Team
The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Carlos Romero
C
Carlos Romero
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 3 | Total Attempts: 1,439
| Attempts: 320 | Questions: 75
Please wait...
Question 1 / 75
0 %
0/100
Score 0/100
1. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Explanation

The 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution states that any powers that are not specifically given to the federal government by the Constitution, and are also not prohibited to the states, are reserved for the states or the people. This means that any powers not explicitly granted to the federal government are left to the states to exercise. The 10th Amendment serves as a reminder of the division of powers between the federal government and the states, and helps to maintain a balance of power in the United States.

Submit
Please wait...
About This Quiz
Law Week 2 Test - Quiz

The 'Law Week 2 Test' assesses knowledge on key constitutional amendments, historical governance events, and foundational documents of the United States. It aims to enhance understanding of the... see morenation's legal framework and its historical context, relevant for students of law and American history. see less

2. House of Representatives contains ______________ members

Explanation

The House of Representatives contains 435 members. This number is fixed and does not change. Each member represents a congressional district, and the total number of districts in the United States is 435. This ensures that each state is proportionally represented based on its population. Therefore, the correct answer is 435.

Submit
3. A Voluntary Contact is never a:

Explanation

A voluntary contact is a situation where a police officer approaches an individual in a non-coercive manner to ask questions or engage in conversation. It is not considered a seizure because the person is free to leave or end the interaction at any time without any legal consequences. A seizure, on the other hand, occurs when a person's freedom of movement is restricted by the police, such as through physical force or the display of authority. Therefore, a voluntary contact cannot be considered a seizure.

Submit
4. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated,

Explanation

The correct answer is the 4th Amendment. The 4th Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by prohibiting law enforcement from conducting searches without a warrant or probable cause. It ensures that people have the right to privacy and that their personal property cannot be searched or seized without proper justification. This amendment is an essential part of protecting citizens' civil liberties and preventing government intrusion.

Submit
5. Persons present during execution of a search warrant can be detained?

Explanation

During the execution of a search warrant, it is possible for persons present to be detained. This is because when a search warrant is being carried out, law enforcement officers have the authority to detain individuals who are present at the location if they have reasonable suspicion that those individuals may pose a threat to the safety of the officers or if they believe those individuals may be involved in criminal activity. Detaining individuals during the execution of a search warrant helps to maintain the safety and integrity of the search process.

Submit
6. Factors that may impact use of force during a stop include all the following except:

Explanation

The factors that may impact the use of force during a stop include the seriousness of the crime, strength of facts, and facts pointing to armed and dangerous individuals. However, the nervousness of a police officer is not a relevant factor that should impact the use of force. Nervousness alone should not be a justification for the use of force, as it may lead to unnecessary and excessive force being used. The use of force should be based on objective factors such as the severity of the situation and the level of threat posed by the individual.

Submit
7. The area around a home that is placed in the home's "umbrella" of 4th Amendment protection.

Explanation

Curtilage refers to the area immediately surrounding a home that is considered part of the home's premises and is protected by the 4th Amendment. This includes areas such as the front yard, backyard, and any other areas that are closely connected to the home and are used for intimate activities. Unlike open fields, which are not protected by the 4th Amendment and can be searched without a warrant, curtilage is given the same level of protection as the home itself. Therefore, a search of the curtilage generally requires a warrant, unless an exception to the warrant requirement applies.

Submit
8. Factors that, standing alone, may justify a stop include the following except:

Explanation

The correct answer is race. This means that race alone cannot be used as a justification for a stop. Factors such as personal knowledge of the suspect, the suspect's statements, and hand to hand movement can be considered as valid justifications for a stop, but race should not be used as a determining factor.

Submit
9. Powers granted to the federal government by the Constitution:

Explanation

The correct answer is "All the Enumerated." The powers granted to the federal government by the Constitution are referred to as enumerated powers. These powers are specifically listed in the Constitution and include the power to wage war, regulate interstate commerce, tax and spend, and more.

Submit
10. Restriction against Excessive Bail

Explanation

The 8th Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the imposition of excessive bail, as well as cruel and unusual punishment. It ensures that individuals are not subjected to unreasonable bail amounts that they cannot afford, which would violate their rights to due process and equal protection under the law. This amendment serves as a safeguard against the potential abuse of power by the criminal justice system, ensuring that individuals are not unfairly punished or burdened while awaiting trial.

Submit
11. Which is NOT a type of police contact with a citizen:

Explanation

Standing on a street corner is not a type of police contact with a citizen because it does not involve any direct interaction or engagement between the police and the citizen. It is a passive observation or presence of the police in a public space, which does not necessarily involve any communication or action towards a specific individual. In contrast, voluntary contacts, investigative stops, and arrests all involve active engagement by the police with a citizen, either through conversation, questioning, or physical restraint.

Submit
12. The Legislative Branch is defined in the 

Explanation

The correct answer is Article 1. The Legislative Branch is defined in Article 1 of the United States Constitution. This article establishes the powers and structure of the legislative branch, which consists of the Congress. It outlines the qualifications and responsibilities of members of Congress, as well as the process for creating and passing laws. Article 1 also grants specific powers to Congress, such as the power to levy taxes, regulate commerce, and declare war.

Submit
13. Where probable cause exists, police are authorized to make warrant-less arrests:

Explanation

When probable cause exists, police are authorized to make warrant-less arrests for all felonies and for misdemeanors that occur in the officer's presence. This means that if the police have reasonable grounds to believe that a person has committed a felony or if they witness a misdemeanor being committed, they can make an arrest without obtaining a warrant. This allows law enforcement to take immediate action in situations where there is a clear violation of the law and ensures that individuals are held accountable for their actions.

Submit
14. The 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments are known as the

Explanation

The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments are known as the Reconstruction Amendments because they were enacted during the period of Reconstruction in the United States after the Civil War. These amendments aimed to address the issues of slavery, citizenship, and voting rights for African Americans. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery, the 14th Amendment granted equal protection under the law and citizenship to all people born or naturalized in the US, and the 15th Amendment prohibited the denial of voting rights based on race or color. Together, these amendments played a crucial role in rebuilding and reshaping the nation after the Civil War.

Submit
15. Test of Reasonable Expectation of Privacy

Explanation

The test of reasonable expectation of privacy involves two criteria. Firstly, it examines whether the person has a subjective expectation of privacy, meaning they believe that their privacy is protected in a certain situation. Secondly, it considers whether this expectation is objectively reasonable and aligns with societal norms. In order for an expectation of privacy to be considered reasonable, it must meet both criteria. Therefore, the correct answer is options 1 and 2.

Submit
16. Are police required to read the rights verbatim from a rights advisement card?

Explanation

Police are not required to read the rights verbatim from a rights advisement card. While it is common practice for police to read the Miranda rights to suspects, they are not legally obligated to recite the rights word-for-word from a card. The important aspect is that the suspect understands their rights, and police can convey the rights in their own words as long as the meaning remains the same. The Supreme Court has ruled that as long as the suspect is informed of their rights and voluntarily waives them, the manner in which the rights are conveyed is not crucial.

Submit
17. "An officer's sense of touch may provide probable cause to seize an item of contraband during a frisk, but only if the nature of the object is immediately apparent to the officer during the frisk."

Explanation

The Plain Feel Doctrine allows an officer to seize an item of contraband during a frisk if the nature of the object is immediately apparent to the officer through their sense of touch. This means that if an officer feels an object during a frisk and can immediately determine that it is contraband, they are allowed to seize it based on probable cause. This doctrine is a limitation of the frisk procedure and is an exception to the exclusionary rule, which generally prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Submit
18. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed,...

Explanation

The 6th Amendment guarantees the accused in a criminal prosecution the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where the crime was committed. This means that individuals have the right to a trial that is timely and open to the public, ensuring transparency and accountability in the judicial process. It also ensures that the trial is held in the same jurisdiction where the crime occurred, allowing the accused to be judged by a jury of their peers who are familiar with the local circumstances.

Submit
19. Suspicion-less investigative stops and frisks are.... preemptively unreasonable

Explanation

Suspicion-less investigative stops and frisks are considered preemptively unreasonable because they involve detaining and searching individuals without any reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. This goes against the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Therefore, it is true that suspicion-less investigative stops and frisks are preemptively unreasonable.

Submit
20. A state actor is NOT

Explanation

A private security guard/loss prevention is not considered a state actor because they are not directly affiliated with a governmental body. While they may work in collaboration with law enforcement agencies, they do not have the same authority or legal standing as individuals who are acting on behalf of a governmental body. State actors typically have the power to enforce laws and exercise governmental authority, which private security guards do not possess.

Submit
21. Prior to an Investigative Stop... 

Explanation

Prior to an investigative stop, police must have reasonable suspicion. This means that they must have a specific and articulable reason to believe that a person is engaged in criminal activity or about to engage in criminal activity. This requirement is based on the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. Reasonable suspicion is a lower standard than probable cause, which is required for a full arrest or search. It allows police to briefly detain and question a person in order to investigate further and determine if there is enough evidence to establish probable cause.

Submit
22. Powers granted to the federal government by the Constitution by which Amendment

Explanation

The 10th Amendment grants powers to the federal government as outlined in the Constitution. This amendment states that any powers not specifically given to the federal government are reserved for the states or the people. It acts as a safeguard to prevent the federal government from overstepping its boundaries and encroaching on the rights and powers of the states and the people.

Submit
23. A good faith mistake invalidates a search warrant. Maryland v Garrison (1987)

Explanation

In the case of Maryland v Garrison (1987), the Supreme Court held that a good faith mistake does not necessarily invalidate a search warrant. The Court ruled that as long as the mistake was made in good faith and was objectively reasonable, the evidence obtained from the search could still be admissible. Therefore, the correct answer is False, as a good faith mistake does not automatically invalidate a search warrant.

Submit
24. The Executive Branch

Explanation

The correct answer is "Elected by the Electoral College." The explanation for this is that the Executive Branch, as stated in Article 1, is elected by the Electoral College. This means that the President and Vice President are not directly elected by the people, but rather by electors who are chosen by the people. These electors then cast their votes for the President and Vice President based on the popular vote in their respective states. This system was established by the Founding Fathers as a compromise between electing the President through a popular vote and having Congress select the President.

Submit
25. When is Miranda Required?

Explanation

Miranda rights are required at "custodial interrogation." This means that when a person is in police custody and is being questioned by law enforcement, they must be informed of their Miranda rights. These rights include the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present during questioning. The purpose of Miranda rights is to ensure that individuals are aware of their constitutional rights and are not coerced into giving self-incriminating statements. Therefore, Miranda rights are not required upon arrest, before an investigatory stop, or before a voluntary contact.

Submit
26. Most prevalent government system in the world today is

Explanation

The most prevalent government system in the world today is the unitary system. In this system, power is concentrated in a central government, which holds authority over subnational units such as states or provinces. This system allows for uniform laws and policies to be implemented across the entire country, promoting national unity and cohesion. It also ensures that decisions can be made quickly and efficiently, as there is no need for extensive negotiation or coordination between different levels of government. Many countries, including France, Japan, and the United Kingdom, have adopted this system.

Submit
27. A search warrant gives authorization to search persons present?

Explanation

A search warrant does not give authorization to search persons present. Instead, it grants the authority to search specific locations or premises, such as a house, vehicle, or office space. While a search warrant allows law enforcement to search for and seize evidence within the designated area, it does not grant them the power to search individuals unless they have probable cause or a separate warrant specifically authorizing a person search. Therefore, the statement "A search warrant gives authorization to search persons present" is false.

Submit
28. If police illegally obtain evidence, but can show that it would have been legally discovered at a later time anyway, the evidence is admissible. 

Explanation

The Inevitable Discovery Doctrine states that if the police can demonstrate that evidence would have been legally discovered at a later time, even if it was initially obtained illegally, then the evidence is admissible in court. This doctrine allows for the admission of evidence that would have inevitably been discovered through legal means, regardless of any illegal methods used to obtain it initially.

Submit
29. Suspicion-less investigative stops and frisks are

Explanation

Suspicion-less investigative stops and frisks refer to situations where law enforcement officers detain and search individuals without having any specific suspicion of criminal activity. These stops and frisks are considered preemptively unreasonable because they violate the Fourth Amendment's requirement of reasonable suspicion before conducting such searches. The term "preemptively" suggests that these actions are considered unreasonable even before they are carried out, as they lack the necessary legal justification.

Submit
30. Federal Criminal Code

Explanation

The correct answer is Title 18 USC. This is because Title 18 of the United States Code (USC) is the federal criminal code, which covers a wide range of criminal offenses at the federal level. It includes provisions on crimes such as fraud, bribery, money laundering, and organized crime, among others. Therefore, Title 18 USC is the most appropriate choice when considering the federal criminal code.

Submit
31.  All but which are considered seizures within the meaning of the 4th Amendment.

Explanation

Voluntary contact is not considered a seizure within the meaning of the 4th Amendment. This is because a seizure, in the context of the 4th Amendment, refers to a situation where a person's freedom of movement is restrained by law enforcement. Voluntary contact implies that the individual willingly engaged with law enforcement and was not subject to any form of coercion or restraint. Therefore, it does not fall under the category of seizures that are protected by the 4th Amendment.

Submit
32. A _____________________ is used to record the names of individuals who remain after hours.

Explanation

A visitor register is used to record the names of individuals who remain after hours. It serves as a log to keep track of visitors who are present in a facility outside of regular operating hours. This helps to ensure security and accountability by documenting the presence of individuals who may have access to the premises during non-business hours.

Submit
33. Government must show a special need for the search, that is unrelated to law enforcement.

Explanation

The correct answer is Administrative Searches. Administrative searches refer to searches conducted by government officials for purposes other than law enforcement, such as ensuring compliance with regulations or maintaining public safety. In order to conduct an administrative search, the government must demonstrate a special need that is unrelated to law enforcement. This means that the search must serve a specific purpose that goes beyond typical law enforcement activities, such as protecting public health or preventing harm to individuals.

Submit
34. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41 requires a 

Explanation

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41 requires a 14-day expiration date on warrants. This means that once a warrant is issued, it is only valid for a period of 14 days. After this time, the warrant expires and law enforcement officials cannot use it to conduct a search or make an arrest. This requirement ensures that warrants are not indefinitely valid and helps protect individuals' rights by preventing unnecessary and prolonged searches or arrests.

Submit
35. Due Process was extended to the States by:

Explanation

The 14th Amendment extended Due Process to the States. This amendment, ratified in 1868, ensures that no state can deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. It was enacted in response to the Civil War and aimed to protect the rights of newly freed slaves. The 14th Amendment has been interpreted by the courts to incorporate many of the protections in the Bill of Rights, including Due Process, making it applicable to state governments as well.

Submit
36. Burden of Proof 

Explanation

The term "burden of proof" refers to the responsibility of the prosecution in a criminal case to prove the guilt of the accused. "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt" is the highest standard of proof in criminal cases, requiring the prosecution to present evidence that is so convincing that there is no reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors about the defendant's guilt. This standard ensures that the accused is not wrongfully convicted and protects their constitutional right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. "Beyond Reasonable Suspicion" and "Probable Cause" are lower standards of proof, while "Mere Suspicion" is not a recognized legal standard.

Submit
37. How long is reasonable to detain persons during a search warrant?

Explanation

The correct answer is that two to three hours have been deemed reasonable to detain persons during a search warrant. This time frame allows law enforcement officers enough time to conduct a thorough search and gather evidence while also respecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals being detained. It strikes a balance between the need for thorough investigation and the need to prevent unnecessary and prolonged detention.

Submit
38. Grants Arrest Authority to VA Police

Explanation

38 U.S.C. Section 902 grants arrest authority to VA Police. This means that under this section of the law, VA Police officers have the legal power to arrest individuals who are suspected of committing a crime within the jurisdiction of the Department of Veterans Affairs. This grant of authority is essential for the VA Police to carry out their duties effectively and maintain the safety and security of VA facilities and the people within them.

Submit
39. Congress has the authority to enact laws that are convenient, useful, or conducive to carrying out an enumerated power.

Explanation

The Necessary and Proper Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause, grants Congress the power to make laws that are necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers. This clause is found in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. It gives Congress the flexibility to enact laws that are convenient, useful, or conducive to the exercise of its enumerated powers. This allows Congress to adapt and address new situations or challenges that may arise, ensuring that it can effectively carry out its responsibilities.

Submit
40. Federal Gov't gets its power from

Explanation

The Constitution is the correct answer because it is the foundational document that outlines the powers and limitations of the federal government. It establishes the framework for the government and grants specific powers to different branches, such as Congress. The Constitution is considered the supreme law of the land and serves as a source of authority for the federal government. Without the Constitution, the federal government would not have the legal basis for its power and actions.

Submit
41. Time between unlawful action (by police) and discovery of evidence, Example: Bad Interrogation occurs, suspect leaves and comes back two days later and confesses to crime due to guilty conscience. 

Explanation

The Inadequate Causal Connection Doctrine suggests that there is a lack of direct cause and effect relationship between the unlawful action (bad interrogation) and the discovery of evidence (confession). In this case, the suspect left and came back two days later to confess due to a guilty conscience, which indicates that the confession was not a direct result of the unlawful action. Therefore, the Inadequate Causal Connection Doctrine would apply in this situation.

Submit
42. Warrant Arrests Inside the Home

Explanation

The correct answer is that police are allowed to enter a suspect's home to execute an arrest warrant when there is reason to believe the suspect is home. This is because in certain circumstances, such as when there is a reasonable belief that the suspect may pose a danger to others or may attempt to escape, the police are permitted to enter a suspect's home without a search warrant. However, this is subject to limitations and must be based on specific and credible information.

Submit
43. Habeas Corpus is defined in:

Explanation

Habeas Corpus is defined in Article 1 Section 9. This section of the Constitution states that "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." Habeas Corpus is a legal principle that protects individuals from unlawful detention and ensures that they have the right to challenge their imprisonment before a court of law. This definition is important in safeguarding individual liberties and preventing arbitrary detention by the government.

Submit
44. Even where an unreasonable search or seizure results in evidence, if the evidence is also discovered in a separate way, without of police misconduct, it will be admissible.

Explanation

The Independent Source Doctrine states that if evidence is discovered through an independent and untainted source, it can still be admissible in court, even if it was initially obtained through an unreasonable search or seizure. This means that if the evidence is later discovered through a separate and lawful means, without any involvement of police misconduct, it can still be used as evidence in court proceedings. This doctrine helps to ensure that evidence obtained illegally does not automatically become inadmissible if it can be shown that it would have been discovered through legal means anyway.

Submit
45. When does a seizure occur?  When in view of all of the circumstances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person in that situation would not "feel free to decline the officer's requests or otherwise terminate the encounter." 

Explanation

A seizure occurs when a person acquiesces or there has been an attempt at physical restraint (even if unsuccessful). This means that a seizure can happen if the person willingly complies with the officer's requests or if there is an unsuccessful attempt to physically restrain them. In both cases, the person's freedom to decline the officer's requests or terminate the encounter is compromised, leading to a seizure.

Submit
46. The motor vehicle exception allows an officer to search a vehicle without a search warrant

Explanation

The motor vehicle exception allows an officer to search a vehicle without a search warrant as long as he or she has probable cause to believe that evidence or contraband is located in the vehicle. This means that if the officer has a reasonable belief, based on facts and circumstances, that there is evidence of a crime or illegal items in the vehicle, they can conduct a search without obtaining a warrant first. This exception recognizes the mobility of vehicles and the need for law enforcement to act quickly to prevent the destruction of evidence.

Submit
47. Sections of Title 38 that govern VA Police UNIFORM ALLOWANCE

Explanation

The correct answer is Section 903. This section of Title 38 specifically pertains to the uniform allowance for VA Police. It provides guidelines and regulations regarding the provision of uniforms to VA Police officers, including the amount of allowance they are entitled to and any conditions or requirements that need to be met in order to receive it.

Submit
48. Sections of Title 38 that govern VA Police ENFORCEMENT AND ARREST AUTHORITY OF DEPARTMENT POLICE

Explanation

The correct answer is Section 902. This section likely contains specific provisions related to the enforcement and arrest authority of the Department Police under Title 38. It may outline the powers, responsibilities, and limitations of the VA Police in carrying out their duties. Without further information, it is difficult to provide a more detailed explanation.

Submit
49. To form a more perfect union ...

Explanation

The correct answer is "The Pre-Amble to the Constitution" because the phrase "To form a more perfect union" is found in the preamble of the United States Constitution. The preamble serves as an introduction to the Constitution and outlines the goals and purposes of the document. It emphasizes the importance of unity and creating a stronger and more perfect union among the states. Therefore, the correct answer is the Pre-Amble to the Constitution.

Submit
50. The touchstone of the use of deadly force is

Explanation

The correct answer is necessity. This means that the use of deadly force is justified only when it is necessary to prevent serious injury or death. It is not enough to have a probable suspicion of a felony or to simply follow the force policy. The key factor is whether the force used is necessary in the given situation.

Submit
51. Which is NOT a factor that may be used to articulate reasonable suspicion to frisk for weapons

Explanation

Officer safety is not a factor that may be used to articulate reasonable suspicion to frisk for weapons. While officer safety is an important consideration, it is not a specific factor that can justify a frisk for weapons. Reasonable suspicion to frisk for weapons may be based on factors such as observing a bulge in clothing, knowledge of a suspect's criminal record or reputation for violence, or being in a high crime neighborhood. However, officer safety alone is not sufficient to justify a frisk for weapons.

Submit
52. All the listed options are prerequisites for the Plain View Exception except

Explanation

The Plain View Exception allows law enforcement officers to seize evidence without a warrant if they are lawfully present, the item is in plain view, and there is no further intrusion or manipulation. The officer obtaining consent to look is not a prerequisite for the Plain View Exception because if the officer already has consent, they would not need to rely on the Plain View Exception to seize the evidence.

Submit
53. There is NO Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in all but which below

Explanation

Dog sniffs from the open areas surrounding a home are the only option listed that do not fall under the category of "no reasonable expectation of privacy." Trash, pen registers, and public behavior are all areas where individuals generally do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. However, dog sniffs from the open areas surrounding a home could potentially be considered a violation of privacy, as they involve the intrusion of a person's property by a third party. Therefore, this option is the exception to the others listed.

Submit
54. Supreme Court has jurisdiction all the following EXCEPT:

Explanation

The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over bankruptcy cases, disputes involving patents, and cases related to admiralty and maritime law. However, it does not have jurisdiction over disputes between residents of different states where the matter in controversy exceeds $100,000. This means that if two individuals from different states are involved in a legal dispute and the amount in question is less than $100,000, the Supreme Court does not have the authority to hear the case.

Submit
55. Sections of Title 38 that govern VA Police AUTHORITY TO PRESCRIBE RULES FOR CONDUCT AND PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS

Explanation

The correct answer is Section 901 because it states that the authority to prescribe rules for conduct and penalties for violations is governed by this section. This means that Section 901 outlines the rules and regulations that VA Police must follow and the penalties that can be imposed for any violations of these rules.

Submit
56. The 4th Amendment requires that a warrant: Choose INCORRECT choice:

Explanation

The 4th Amendment requires that a warrant be based upon probable cause, not reasonable suspicion. Reasonable suspicion is a lower standard of suspicion that allows law enforcement officers to briefly detain someone for further investigation. Probable cause, on the other hand, is a higher standard that requires a reasonable belief that a crime has been or is being committed, and is necessary for obtaining a search warrant. Therefore, the incorrect choice is "Be based upon Reasonable Suspicion."

Submit
57. Which is an Example of a voluntary contacts:

Explanation

This is an example of a voluntary contact because it involves a person voluntarily providing their ID to be examined and returned. There are no demands, use of force, or Miranda rights being invoked, indicating that the contact is voluntary rather than coercive.

Submit
58. An arrested person is 

Explanation

The correct answer is "is Seized within the meaning of the 4th Amendment and in Custody within the meaning of the 5th Amendment." This means that the person has been apprehended or taken into custody by law enforcement, which falls under the protection of the 4th Amendment. Additionally, they are considered to be in custody, which refers to being deprived of freedom of movement, and this falls under the protection of the 5th Amendment.

Submit
59. The First Continental Congress was established ...

Explanation

The First Continental Congress was established in 1774. This congress was a meeting of delegates from twelve of the thirteen American colonies, with the purpose of addressing grievances against British rule and asserting the rights of the colonies. They discussed various issues, including the Intolerable Acts imposed by the British government. The Congress marked an important step towards unity among the colonies and laid the foundation for the American Revolution.

Submit
60. Articles of Confederation were ratified?

Explanation

The Articles of Confederation were ratified in 1781. This was the first constitution of the United States, serving as the governing document during the American Revolution and the early years of the country. It established a weak central government with limited powers, as the states wanted to maintain their sovereignty. However, it soon became clear that the Articles were ineffective in addressing the nation's needs, leading to the drafting and ratification of the United States Constitution in 1787 and 1788.

Submit
61. Actus Reus

Explanation

The correct answer is "Voluntary act or omission to act + Social Harm." This is because actus reus refers to the physical act or omission that is required for a crime to be committed. It includes both voluntary acts and omissions to act. In addition, the act or omission must cause social harm, meaning that it has a negative impact on society. Both of these elements, the voluntary act or omission and the social harm, must be present in order for an act to be considered a crime.

Submit
62. Which is NOT a component of the 4th Amendment Analysis Process - Unreasonable Search and Seizure

Explanation

The given answer, "Is there Reasonable Suspicion for a Search Warrant," is not a component of the 4th Amendment Analysis Process - Unreasonable Search and Seizure. The 4th Amendment analysis process includes determining if the action constitutes a search, if there was a warrant, and if there was a state action. Reasonable suspicion for a search warrant is not part of this analysis process.

Submit
63. The Assimilative Crimes Act - Title 18 U.S.C. p 13, will be used when ...

Explanation

The correct answer states that the facility must be under Exclusive or Concurrent jurisdiction, meaning that the crime must have occurred within a jurisdiction that is either exclusively federal or shared between federal and state authorities. Additionally, the answer states that there must be no specific federal law defining the offense committed, which implies that the crime falls under the jurisdiction of state law. In such cases, the Assimilative Crimes Act can be used to apply state law to the offense. The answer also mentions that the local U.S. Attorney will be consulted when considering the use of the Assimilative Crimes Act, indicating the importance of legal consultation in determining the appropriate application of the act.

Submit
64. Local police have no power of arrest or investigation. They may only come on property to serve subpoenas or summons.

Explanation

The given statement states that local police have no power of arrest or investigation and can only come on property to serve subpoenas or summons. This implies that local police do not have the authority to enforce the law or conduct investigations, suggesting that their jurisdiction is limited. Therefore, the correct answer is "Exclusive Jurisdiction," as it indicates that the police's jurisdiction is restricted to specific tasks and does not include general law enforcement or investigative powers.

Submit
65. A criminal statute must be sufficiently definite to give notice of the required conduct to one who would avoid its penalties, and to guide the judge in its application and the lawyer in defending one charged with its violation. Few words possess the precision of mathematical symbols.

Explanation

The explanation for the correct answer, "Definiteness," is that a criminal statute must be clear and specific in its language in order to provide notice to individuals about what conduct is prohibited. It should also provide guidance to judges in applying the law and to lawyers in defending individuals who are charged with violating the statute. The statement further emphasizes that mathematical symbols possess a high level of precision, highlighting the importance of clarity and definiteness in criminal statutes.

Submit
66. The federal government has no measure of a State's authority on property, thus the local police may respond, arrest, and investigate as if the property were privately owned.  VA police may only arrest for violations of Federal law (with the exception of the Assimilative Crimes Act) and VA regulations.

Explanation

not-available-via-ai

Submit
67. Warrant-less arrests outside of the home and supported by probable cause are presumptively reasonable

Explanation

The statement is true because warrant-less arrests conducted outside of the home and backed by probable cause are generally considered reasonable. This means that law enforcement officers can make an arrest without obtaining a warrant if they have a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed and the person being arrested is the perpetrator. However, it is important to note that this presumption of reasonableness can be challenged if there is evidence of misconduct or violations of constitutional rights.

Submit
68. The new nation is named "The United States of America."

Explanation

The correct answer is The Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States, adopted in 1781. It established a weak central government and gave more power to the individual states. However, it proved to be ineffective in governing the nation and was eventually replaced by the Constitution.

Submit
69. The law prohibits specific behavior such as driving under the influence of solicitation to commit murder.

Explanation

Conduct crimes refer to criminal offenses that involve specific actions or behaviors, rather than the end result or harm caused by those actions. In this context, the law prohibits specific behavior, such as driving under the influence of solicitation to commit murder. This means that the focus is on the conduct itself, rather than the actual outcome or harm caused. Therefore, the answer "Conduct crimes" is appropriate in this scenario.

Submit
70. Laws must give a person of ordinary intelligence reasonable opportunity to know what is prohibited so that he may act accordingly.

Explanation

Vagueness is the correct answer because it refers to the lack of clarity or precision in a law or legal requirement. In this context, it means that laws should be clear and specific enough for an average person to understand what actions are prohibited. This allows individuals to make informed decisions and act accordingly, without the risk of unknowingly breaking the law due to vague or ambiguous language.

Submit
71. All the listed are  potential consequences for affecting a warrant-less arrest without probable cause. Except

Explanation

Dismissal under USC 18 Section 903 is not a potential consequence for affecting a warrant-less arrest without probable cause. USC 18 Section 903 pertains to the dismissal of charges in cases where a defendant has been previously convicted and is subsequently charged with a different offense. In the context of a warrant-less arrest without probable cause, the potential consequences include a Bivens Claim, suppression of evidence obtained during a search incident to the bad arrest, and criminal sanction under 18 U.S.C. 242.

Submit
72. We the People ... 

Explanation

The correct answer is "Preamble to the Constitution" because it is the opening statement of the United States Constitution, which introduces the purpose and principles of the document. It outlines the goals of the government, such as establishing justice, ensuring domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and securing the blessings of liberty. The Preamble sets the tone for the Constitution and serves as a guiding principle for the interpretation and implementation of its provisions.

Submit
73. According to Garrity v. NJ which is NOT true

Explanation

According to Garrity v. NJ, employees may not be prosecuted as long as the evidence used against them does not include compelled statements ("Use Immunity") or any evidence derived from those statements ("Derivative Use Immunity"). This means that if employees are forced to make statements during an administrative investigation, those statements cannot be used against them in a subsequent criminal proceeding. Additionally, an employer cannot use the threat of dismissal to coerce employees into waiving their constitutional rights. If employees' answers are immunized from use in a future criminal proceeding and they still refuse to answer, they can be dismissed.

Submit
74. A frisk is lawful where the officer has independent probable cause that the suspect is armed and dangerous.

Explanation

A frisk is not lawful solely based on the officer's independent probable cause that the suspect is armed and dangerous. A frisk, also known as a pat-down search, is only lawful if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the suspect is armed and poses a threat to the officer's safety or the safety of others. Probable cause is a higher standard than reasonable suspicion, so the statement is false.

Submit
75. Not based on "good faith" of the officer

Explanation

Reasonable suspicion is the correct answer because it is a legal standard that allows law enforcement officers to briefly detain an individual if they have specific and articulable facts that lead them to believe that the person may be involved in criminal activity. Unlike "good faith," which refers to the officer's intentions or beliefs, reasonable suspicion is based on objective evidence and can be used as a basis for further investigation or search. It is a lower standard than probable cause, which requires more concrete evidence to believe that a crime has been committed. The exception clause and voluntary contact are not directly related to the concept of "good faith" or the legal standard of reasonable suspicion.

Submit
View My Results

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 21, 2023 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Mar 21, 2023
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Jan 17, 2019
    Quiz Created by
    Carlos Romero
Cancel
  • All
    All (75)
  • Unanswered
    Unanswered ()
  • Answered
    Answered ()
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor...
House of Representatives contains ______________ members
A Voluntary Contact is never a:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,...
Persons present during execution of a search warrant can be detained?
Factors that may impact use of force during a stop include all the...
The area around a home that is placed in the home's...
Factors that, standing alone, may justify a stop include the following...
Powers granted to the federal government by the Constitution:
Restriction against Excessive Bail
Which is NOT a type of police contact with a citizen:
The Legislative Branch is defined in the 
Where probable cause exists, police are authorized to make...
The 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments are known as the
Test of Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
Are police required to read the rights verbatim from a ...
"An officer's sense of touch may provide probable cause to...
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a...
Suspicion-less investigative stops and frisks are.... preemptively...
A state actor is NOT
Prior to an Investigative Stop... 
Powers granted to the federal government by the ...
A good faith mistake invalidates a search warrant. Maryland v Garrison...
The Executive Branch
When is Miranda Required?
Most prevalent government system in the world today is
A search warrant gives authorization to search persons present?
If police illegally obtain evidence, but can show that it would have...
Suspicion-less investigative stops and frisks are
Federal Criminal Code
 All but which are considered seizures within the meaning of the...
A _____________________ is used to record the names of individuals who...
Government must show a special need for the search, that is unrelated...
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41 requires a 
Due Process was extended to the States by:
Burden of Proof 
How long is reasonable to detain persons during a search warrant?
Grants Arrest Authority to VA Police
Congress has the authority to enact laws that are convenient, useful,...
Federal Gov't gets its power from
Time between unlawful action (by police) and discovery of evidence,...
Warrant Arrests Inside the Home
Habeas Corpus is defined in:
Even where an unreasonable search or seizure results in evidence, if...
When does a seizure occur?  When in view of all of the...
The motor vehicle exception allows an officer to search a vehicle...
Sections of Title 38 that govern VA Police UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
Sections of Title 38 that govern VA Police ...
To form a more perfect union ...
The touchstone of the use of deadly force is
Which is NOT a factor that may be used to articulate reasonable...
All the listed options are prerequisites for the Plain View Exception...
There is NO Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in all but which below
Supreme Court has jurisdiction all the following EXCEPT:
Sections of Title 38 that govern VA Police ...
The 4th Amendment requires that a warrant: Choose INCORRECT choice:
Which is an Example of a voluntary contacts:
An arrested person is 
The First Continental Congress was established ...
Articles of Confederation were ratified?
Actus Reus
Which is NOT a component of the 4th Amendment Analysis Process -...
The Assimilative Crimes Act - Title 18 U.S.C. p 13, will be used when...
Local police have no power of arrest or investigation. They may only...
A criminal statute must be sufficiently definite to give notice of the...
The federal government has no measure of a State's authority on...
Warrant-less arrests outside of the home and supported by probable...
The new nation is named "The United States of America."
The law prohibits specific behavior such as driving under the...
Laws must give a person of ordinary intelligence reasonable...
All the listed are  potential consequences for affecting a...
We the People ... 
According to Garrity v. NJ which is NOT true
A frisk is lawful where the officer has independent probable cause...
Not based on "good faith" of the officer
Alert!

Advertisement