How Well Do You Know T.L.O Versus New Jersey?

T.L.O. was initially escorted to the principal's office because she was caught smoking in the bathroom.

After suspecting T.L.O. of Marijuana use, Choplick took further action by searching her bag again. During this search, he discovered evidence that suggested T.L.O. was involved in marijuana dealing. As a responsible authority figure, Choplick promptly contacted T.L.O.'s mother and the police, providing them with the incriminating evidence for further investigation and appropriate action.

The reasoning behind why the evidence provided by Choplick was attained in a way that violated the 4th amendment is that Choplick needed a search warrant to search T.L.O. The 4th amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, and a search conducted without a warrant is generally considered unreasonable unless there are specific exceptions. In this case, Choplick did not have a search warrant, which means that the search of T.L.O.'s purse was conducted in violation of her constitutional rights.

Choplick initially searched T.L.O.'s purse because she had been caught smoking and he was looking for cigarettes.

T.L.O. unsuccessfully appealed her conviction in the Juvenile Court and the Appellate Division.

Choplick's observation of cigarette rolling papers in TLO's bag suggests that TLO might be using marijuana. Rolling papers are commonly associated with the act of rolling and smoking cigarettes or other substances, including marijuana. Therefore, the presence of rolling papers in TLO's bag could be seen as an indication of marijuana use.

not-available-via-ai

The New Jersey Supreme Court's verdict on T.L.O.'s case was that the evidence used in the case was found in an illegal search and could not be relied on in court. As a result, the Court repealed previous convictions against T.L.O. based on this decision.

The correct answer is that the Supreme Court decides that the search was reasonable and that in the future, a school search's legal status would have to be determined case by case using a reasonableness standard. This means that the court found the search conducted by the school to be justified and lawful. However, it also established that each school search in the future would need to be assessed individually to determine its legality based on a standard of reasonableness.

The Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of Middlesex County brought delinquency charges against T.L.O. using the evidence supplied by Choplick.