English Composition Trivia Test! Quiz
-
There were to/too/two many books to/too/two read and not enough time to read them.
-
To, too
-
Too, to
-
Two, too
-
To, two
-
Two, to
-
Do you think you have a good understanding of the English language and think you can successfully write grammatically correct sentences? Below is a composition trivia test that is designed to help test out how skilled you are. Check out each question and get to see how high you score. All the best, and keep practicing!
Quiz Preview
- 2.
What's wrong with this sentence? We should abolish the death penalty. Many respected people, such as actor Guy Handsome, have publicly stated their opposition to it.
-
Actor should be capitalized.
-
"Abolish" is not used properly.
-
Mr. Handsome's opinion does not necessarily make something true.
-
Nothing.
Correct Answer
A. Mr. Handsome's opinion does not necessarily make something true.Explanation
The given correct answer explains that the sentence is flawed because it implies that Mr. Handsome's opinion automatically makes the statement true, which is not necessarily the case. It highlights the logical fallacy of appealing to authority, where the opinion of a respected individual is used as evidence to support a claim without considering other factors or evidence.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
What's wrong with this sentence? President Jones raised taxes, and then the rate of violent crime went up. Jones is responsible for the rise in crime.
-
Should be "rised taxes"
-
Unsupported connection between the raising of taxes and the crime rate.
-
Comma should come after Jones.
-
Nothing.
Correct Answer
A. Unsupported connection between the raising of taxes and the crime rate.Explanation
The correct answer is "Unsupported connection between the raising of taxes and the crime rate." The sentence suggests that President Jones is responsible for the rise in crime solely based on the fact that he raised taxes. However, this is an unsupported connection as there is no evidence or logical explanation provided to establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship between tax increase and crime rate.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
What's wrong with this sentence? Guns are like hammers--they're both tools with metal parts that could be used to kill someone. And yet, it would be ridiculous to restrict the purchase of hammers--so restrictions on purchasing guns are equally ridiculous.
-
There should not be a comma after yet.
-
The similarities between guns and hammers do not have anything to do with the main concern of gun safety.
-
Ridiculous is not used properly.
-
Nothing.
Correct Answer
A. The similarities between guns and hammers do not have anything to do with the main concern of gun safety.Explanation
The sentence suggests that because guns and hammers have similarities as tools, restrictions on purchasing guns are equally ridiculous as restricting the purchase of hammers. However, the correct answer states that the similarities between guns and hammers do not have anything to do with the main concern of gun safety. This means that comparing the two tools based on their similarities is irrelevant when discussing the issue of gun safety and restrictions on purchasing guns.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
What's wrong with this sentence? Jerusalem is representing the neighborhood in which the Disciples and Apostles lived.
-
"is representing" should be represents.
-
Neighborhood should be capitalized.
-
A comma should come after Jerusalem.
-
Nothing.
Correct Answer
A. "is representing" should be represents.Explanation
The verb "is representing" should be changed to "represents" because it is more appropriate to use the simple present tense to describe a general fact or a permanent situation. In this case, the sentence is discussing the neighborhood in which the Disciples and Apostles lived, which is a permanent situation. Therefore, the correct verb form to use is "represents."Rate this question:
-
- 6.
What's wrong with this sentence? Animal experimentation reduces our respect for life. If we don't respect life, we are likely to be more and more tolerant of violent acts like war and murder. Soon our society will become a battlefield in which everyone constantly fears for their lives. It will be the end of civilization. To prevent this terrible consequence, we should make animal experimentation illegal right now.
-
Animal experimentation does not actually lead to war or murder.
-
"To prevent this terrible consequence" should come after "right now."
-
Civilization should be capitalized.
-
Nothing.
Correct Answer
A. Animal experimentation does not actually lead to war or murder.Explanation
The given correct answer states that animal experimentation does not actually lead to war or murder. The passage suggests that if we do not respect life, we will become more tolerant of violent acts like war and murder. However, there is no evidence or logical connection provided to support this claim. Therefore, the correct answer points out the lack of causation between animal experimentation and war/murder.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
What's wrong with this sentence? The seriousness of punishment should match the seriousness of the crime. Right now, the punishment for drunk driving may simply be fine. But drunk driving is a very serious crime that can kill innocent people. So the death penalty should be the punishment for drunk driving.
-
It makes drunk driving more serious than it is.
-
It assumes the innocence of humanity.
-
It makes the death penalty seem like the only proper punishment.
-
Nothing.
Correct Answer
A. It makes the death penalty seem like the only proper punishment.Explanation
The given correct answer is that the statement "The seriousness of punishment should match the seriousness of the crime" makes the death penalty seem like the only proper punishment. This is because the statement suggests that the punishment for drunk driving should be the death penalty, which is an extreme and controversial form of punishment. This assumption overlooks other potential punishments that could be effective in addressing drunk driving, such as license suspension, mandatory rehabilitation programs, or stricter fines and penalties.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
What's wrong with this sentence? The movement of the Holy Spirit is not a force that can be controlled and that is something hard to promote.
-
"the holy Spirit is not a force" is awkward.
-
"is not a force that can be controlled" is awkward.
-
"and that is something hard to promote." is awkward.
-
Nothing.
Correct Answer
A. "and that is something hard to promote." is awkward.Explanation
The correct answer is "and that is something hard to promote." is awkward. This phrase is grammatically correct, but it sounds awkward because it is not clear what is meant by "promote" in this context. The sentence suggests that promoting the movement of the Holy Spirit is difficult, but it does not clarify what exactly is meant by "promote" in relation to the Holy Spirit.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 21, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Mar 21, 2023Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Jan 04, 2009Quiz Created by
Rmurphy
Back to top