Cognitive Assessment Final Study Quiz.
VCI: Similarities, Vocabulary, Information
PRI: Block Design, Matrix Reasoning, Comprehension
WMI: Digit Span, Letter-Number Sequencing
PSI: Symbol Search, Coding
Nonverbal Routing,Nonverbal tasks, Verbal Routing, Verbal tasks
Nonverbal Routing, Verbal Routing, Nonverbal tasks, Verbal tasks
Verbal Routing, Nonverbal Routing, Verbal tasks, Nonverbal tasks
Verbal Routing, Nonverbal Routing, Nonverbal tasks, Verbal tasks
When the child provides an answer that correctly encompasses one part of a two part answer
When you think the child knows the right answer but they worded their initial answer poorly
When the testing book tells you to
11 years, 6 months, 28 days
11 years, 6 months, 29 days
11 years, 5 months, 28 days
11 years, 5 months, 29 days
None really, it's atheoretical. It was just developed around the idea that more than just 'g' should be studied, like motivation and frustration tolerance
The Cattell-Horn model of multifaceted intelligence
It's just the combined alpha + beta Army tests, with a standardization for children
Gardner's multiple intelligences
0 scores on three consecutive questions
0 scores on both trials of an item
0 scores on four out of five consecutive questions
0 or 1 scores on four consecutive questions
Vocabulary is the highest, Cancellation is the lowest
Picture Concepts is the highest, Cancellation is the lowest
Vocabulary is the highest, Arithmetic is the lowest
Picture Concepts is the highest, Arithmetic is the lowest
WISC
SB5
WJIII
If something is statistically significant, it is also clinically significant, and vice versa.
If something is statistically significant, it is clinically significant.
If something is clinically significant, it is statistically significant.
If something is statistically significant, it is not clinically significant.
Digit span
Matrix Reasoning
Vocabulary
Picture Concepts
Create hypotheses about performance on the WISC
Support existing hypotheses about performance on the WISC
Higher for younger kids than older kids.
Higher for older kids than younger kids.
Same for both younger and older kids.
It's not very interesting, and heavily verbally loaded
It has difficulties assessing intelligence at the lowest and highest extremes
It has some factor analytic problems that prevent it from giving a particularly detailed profile
Too few shiny race cars
Cancellation
Information
Picture Completion
Arithmetic
Picture Concepts
It measures the consistency over time or situation
It's measurable using the split-half procedure
It's measurable via test-retest format
It's measurable using alternate forms
WISC performance is highly correlated to academic success
WISC performance has a very high test-retest coefficient
Factor analysis shows clusters with appropriate subtests in their appropriate index scores
WISC performance has a very high split-half coefficient
WISC
SB5
WJIII
None really, it's atheoretical. It was just developed around the idea that more than just 'g' should be studied, like motivation and frustration tolerance
The Cattell-Horn model of multifaceted intelligence
It's just the combined alpha + beta Army tests, with a standardization for children
Gardner's multiple intelligences
Something is statistically significant
Something is diagnostically significant
Something is clinically significant
Something is comparatively significant
FSIQ: 40-160
Subtest: 1-19
Index score: 40-160
If an examinee starts on the Nonverbal 3, and gets nothing correct on the Quantitative Reasoning task on that level, you should finish the other tasks on that level and then go to Level 2 for Quantitative reasoning
If an examinee starts on the Nonverbal 3, and gets nothing correct on the Quantitative Reasoning task on Level 4, you should finish the other tasks on that level and then go to Level 3 for Quantitative reasoning
If an examinee starts on the Nonverbal 3, and gets nothing correct on the Quantitative Reasoning task on that level, you should immediately go to Level 2 for Quantitative reasoning
If an examinee starts on the Nonverbal 3, and gets nothing correct on the Quantitative Reasoning task on Level 4, you should immediately go to Level 2 for Quantitative reasoning
WISC
SB5
WJIII
Sit across from child for WISC, SB5, and WJIII
Sit across from the child for WISC, SB5, and next to the child for WJIII
Sit across from the child for WISC, and next to the child for SB5 and WJIII
Sit next to the child for WISC, SB5, and WJIII
Representative
Recent
Stable
Appropriate
To get a more informed profile about the examinee
If one of the core subtests is spoiled
If the examinee exhibits unusually low frustration tolerance or unusually high distractedness during a subtest
If the examinee fails the qualifying items on a subtest
If the VCI and PRI are very far apart
If the WMI and VCI are very far apart
If the child has significant attention problems that would significantly skew their PSI score
If the GIA score is more than 8 points different from the FSIQ
Criterion-related validity
Content validity
Concurrent validity
Reliability validity
>.70 means you can make group decisions
>.85 means you can use it for screening
>.90 means you can make individual decisions based on it
>.95 means you can make individual decisions based on the measure's subtests
WISC uses weighted sampling to achieve representation
SB5 uses weighted sampling to achieve representation
WJIII uses weighted sampling to achieve representation
WJIII has separate norms for people with college educations
To make sure you don't enter answers in the wrong column
Because it's possible to analyze the content of all responses
Because otherwise the child will know when they get questions right/wrong
Because otherwise the examiner will get confused about whether the answer was right/wrong
Gc - crystallized knowledge
Glr - long-term retrieval
Gv - visual processing
Gf - fluid reasoning
Gsm - short term memory
Gf and Gq were measured because they load highest on 'g'
Gc, Gq, and Gsm were measured because they predict school success the best
Gf, Gc, and Gq were measured because they are most associated with higher order thinking
Ga was added for historical reasons so it could be compared to prior tests
Content validity
Criterion validity
Construct validity
Cookie validity
WISC
SB5
WJIII
None really, it's atheoretical. It was just developed around the idea that more than just 'g' should be studied, like motivation and frustration tolerance
The Cattell-Horn model of multifaceted intelligence
It's just the combined alpha + beta Army tests, with a standardization for children
Gardner's multiple intelligences
Gc - crystallized knowledge
Gsm - short term memory
Glr - long term retrieval
Gt - processing time/speed
Ga - auditory processing
All of them have been found to be valid and reliable, so you can draw conclusions based on 10 factors.
Only the index scores were found to be valid and reliable, so you can draw conclusions based on 5 factors.
Only the verbal/nonverbal split was found to be valid and reliable, so you can draw conclusions based on 2 factors.
None of it was found to be reliable, including FSIQ, so the test is not a good measure of intelligence for anyone but the mentally retarded and gifted.
WISC, but not SB5 or WJIII
SB5, but not WISC or WJIII
WJIII, but not WISC or SB5
SB5 and WJIII, but not WISC
It measures the consistency over time or situation
It's measurable via test-retest format
It's measurable using alternate forms
It's measurable using a split-half procedure
It's not very interesting, and heavily verbally loaded
It has difficulties assessing intelligence at the lowest and highest extremes
It has some factor analytic problems that prevent it from giving a particularly detailed profile
Too few shiny race cars
It's not very interesting, and heavily verbally loaded
It has difficulties assessing intelligence at the lowest and highest extremes
It has some factor analytic problems that prevent it from giving a particularly detailed profile
Too few shiny race cars
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 21, 2022 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
Could You Pass This Cognitive Assessment Test? Trivia Quiz
Companies and corporate bodies use Cognitive Assessment Test to gauge the ability of both their existing and new employees. Cognitive Assessment Test will test your ability,...
Questions:
10 |
Attempts:
838 |
Last updated:
Mar 21, 2023
|
Wonderlic Personnel Test! Practice Questions! Trivia Quiz
This Wonderlic Personnel Test practice quiz assesses cognitive abilities through a series of challenging questions. It tests problem-solving, logical reasoning, and comprehension...
Questions:
50 |
Attempts:
9301 |
Last updated:
Mar 22, 2023
|
General Assessment Test
This test is used to gain a knowledge point of how you learn and how you apply your cognitive ability.
Questions:
20 |
Attempts:
2233 |
Last updated:
Mar 22, 2023
|
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.