Applies only if the seller is a merchant.
Applies only if it is in writing and signed by the seller.
Provides that the seller deliver the goods free from any lien of which the buyer lacked knowledge when the contract was made.
Provides that the seller cannot disclaim the warranty if the sale is made to a bona fide purchaser for value.
Rate this question:
Buyer may use the goods but NOT sell them.
Seller is liable for the expenses incurred by the buyer in returning the goods to the seller.
Title to the goods remains with the seller.
Risk of loss for the goods passed to the buyer.
Rate this question:
Pass to Parco when they are identified in the contract.
Pass to Parco when they are shipped.
Remain with Parco until the goods are returned to Lace.
Revert to Lace when they are rejected by Parco.
Rate this question:
Unenforceable because it is too indefinite.
Unenforceable because it lacks mutuality of obligation.
Unenforceable because of lack of consideration.
Valid and enforceable.
Rate this question:
The method of shipping the goods.
The contract's shipping terms.
Title to the goods.
How the goods were lost.
Rate this question:
The warranty must be in writing.
The warranty arises when the buyer relies on the seller's skill in selecting the goods purchased.
The warranty cannot be disclaimed.
The warranty arises as a matter of law when the seller ordinarily sells the goods purchased.
Rate this question:
No, because the clerk was NOT aware that the clock belonged to West.
No, because Grill is a merchant to whom goods had been entrusted.
Yes, because Grill could NOT convey good title to the clock.
Yes, because the clerk was negligent in selling the clock.
I only.
II only.
Both I and II.
Neither I nor II.
Rate this question:
The 5,000 kilowatt term contained in the specifications does NOT constitute a warranty.
The disclaimer effectively negated any and all warranty protection claimed by Target.
The description language (5,000 kilowatt) contained in the specifications is an express warranty and has NOT been effectively disclaimed.
The parol evidence rule will prevent Target from asserting the 5,000 kilowatt term as a warranty.
Rate this question:
The saw is of an average fair quality.
The saw is fit for the ordinary purposes for which it is used.
The saw is capable of cutting the trees in Rita's backyard.
Is unenforceable because it is NOT in writing.
Rate this question:
Provides that the seller cannot disclaim the warranty if the sale is made to a bona fide purchaser for value.
Provides that the seller deliver the goods free from any lien of which the buyer lacked knowledge when the contract was made.
Applies only if it is in writing and signed by the seller.
Applies only if the seller is a merchant.
Rate this question:
I only.
III only.
I and III only.
I, II, and III.
Rate this question:
There was NO meeting of the minds.
The contract was unconscionable.
The quantity was NOT definite and certain enough.
Mayker ordered amounts of oil unreasonably greater than its normal requirements.
Deliver the goods to the buyer's place of business.
Hold conforming goods and give the buyer whatever notification is reasonably necessary to enable the buyer to take delivery.
Deliver all goods called for in the contract to a common carrier.
Set aside conforming goods for inspection by the buyer before delivery.
Rate this question:
Yes, because this was an output contract.
Yes, because both price and quantity terms were omitted.
No, because quantity cannot be omitted for a contract to be enforceable.
No, because the omission of price and quantity terms prevents the formation of a contract.
Rate this question:
Both the buyer and seller must be merchants.
The buyer must be purchasing the goods for resale.
Risk of loss for the goods passes to the buyer when the goods are accepted after the trial period.
Title to the goods passes to the buyer on delivery of the goods to the buyer.
Rate this question:
The agreement of the parties.
Whether the goods are perishable.
Who has title at the time of the loss.
The terms of applicable insurance policies.
Rate this question:
Bell, since Bell has title to the goods.
Major, because the order was NOT a signed writing.
Bell, since the shipping terms were FOB Bell's place of business.
Major, since they shipped goods which failed to conform to the contract.
Rate this question:
Union, because the risk of loss passes only when Quick receives the typewriters.
Union, because both parties are merchants.
Quick, because title to the typewriters passed to Quick at the time of shipment.
Quick, because the risk of loss passes when the typewriters are delivered to the carrier.
Rate this question:
Passed to Bond at Wool's tender of delivery.
Passed to Bond at hte time the contract was formed and payment was made.
Remained with Wool, because the parties agreed on a later time of delivery.
Remained with Wool, because Bond had not yet received the painting.
Rate this question:
The auctioneer may withdraw the goods at any time prior to completion of the sale unless the goods are put up without reserve.
A bidder may retract his bid before the completion of the sale only if the auction is without reserve.
A bidder's retraction of his bid will revive the prior bid if the sale is with reserve.
In a sale with reserve, a bid made while the hammer is falling automatically reopens the bidding.
Rate this question:
Tendered to the buyer.
Identified to the contract.
Accepted by the buyer.
Paid for.
Rate this question:
When the goods are delivered to the first carrier for transmission to the buyer.
When the goods are tendered to the buyer.
At the conclusion of the execution of the contract.
At the time the goods are identified to the contract.
Rate this question:
Are identified to the contract.
Are placed on the seller's loading dock.
Are delivered to the carrier.
Reach the buyer's loading dock.
Rate this question:
Wolfe, because Wolfe had title to the table at the time of the loss.
Aston, unless Wolfe is a merchant.
Wolfe, unless Aston breached the contract.
Aston, because Wolfe had NOT yet taken possession of the table.
Rate this question:
The shipping terms.
The agreement of the parties.
Who has title to the goods.
Who has possession of the goods.
Rate this question:
Reasonable implication based upon the seller's acts.
Description of the goods which is made part of the basis of the contract.
Expression of the value of the goods.
Statement of seller's opinion.
Rate this question:
Both I and II.
Neither I nor II.
I only.
II only.
Rate this question:
The contract is unenforceable because of indefiniteness.
The place for delivery must be designated by the parties within five days or the contract is voidable.
The seller's place of business is the proper place for delivery.
The buyer's place of business is the proper place for delivery.
Rate this question:
Usage of trade.
Fitness for a particular purpose.
Merchantability.
Conformity of goods to sample.
Rate this question:
The seller is required to arrange for the buyer to pick up the conforming goods at a specified destination.
The seller is required to tender delivery of conforming goods at a specified destination.
The seller is required to tender delivery of conforming goods at the buyer's place of business.
The seller is required to tender delivery of conforming goods to a carrier who delivers to a destination specified by the buyer.
Rate this question:
Title and risk of loss are shared equally between the buyer and the seller.
Title remains with the seller until the buyer approves or accepts the goods, but risk of loss passes to the buyer immediately following delivery fo the goods to the buyer.
Title and risk of loss remain with the seller until the buyer pays for the goods.
Title and risk of loss rest with the buyer until the goods are returned to the seller.
Rate this question:
Statements made by the seller became part of the basis of the bargain.
Sale was made by a merchant in the regular course of business.
Statements made by the seller were in writing.
Seller intended to create a warranty.
Rate this question:
The cost of the goods exclusive of insurance and freight.
The cost of the goods plus freight but exclusive of insurance.
The cost of the goods plus insurance but exclusive of freight.
The cost of the goods, freight, and insurance.
Rate this question:
The time for shipment is within a reasonable time.
The time for shipment must be agreed upon.
The time for shipment is within 3 months.
The contract fails for indefiniteness.
Rate this question:
The contract with Gotham was neither assignable nor delegable.
Mara is now released from any further obligation to perform the Gotham contract.
Mara has effectively assigned to Sands its rights and delegated its duties under the terms of the contract with Gotham.
In the event Sands breached the contract with Gotham, Mara has NO liability.
Rate this question:
Pulse has title but NO insurable interest.
Star has title and an insurable interest.
Pulse has title and an insurable interest.
Star has title but NO insurable interest.
Rate this question:
Fit for all purposes for which the buyer intends to use the goods.
Adequately packaged and labeled.
Sold by a merchant.
In conformity with any promises or affirmations of fact made on the container or label.
Rate this question:
Ram's shipment is an acceptance of Handy's offer.
Ram's shipment is a counteroffer.
Handy's order must be accepted by Ram in writing before Ram ships the socket sets.
Handy's order can only be accepted by Ram shipping conforming goods.
Rate this question:
Smith is obligated to deliver the computer to Peters' home.
Peters is entitled to inspect the computer before paying for it.
Peters may NOT pay for the computer using a personal check unless Smith agrees.
Smith is NOT entitled to payment until 30 days after Peters receives the computer.
Rate this question:
If Martin pays upon delivery, he is entitled to a 2% discount.
The contract being silent on the place of delivery, Martin has the right to expect delivery at his place of business.
Although the price has some degree of uncertainty, the contract is enforceable.
Because the goods involved are tangible, specific performance is a remedy available to Martin.
Rate this question:
A contract was formed on May 2.
Lace's revocation effectively terminated its offer on May 25.
Lace's revocation was ineffective because the offer could NOT be revoked before June 1.
No contract was formed because lace received Parco's acceptance after June 1.
Rate this question:
Regardless of whether the parts were conforming, Deck will bear the loss because the contract was a shipment contract.
If the parts were nonconforming, Deck had the right to reject them, but the risk of loss remains with Deck until Cey takes possession of the parts.
If the parts were conforming, risk of loss does NOT pass to Deck until a reasonable period of time after they are delivered to Deck.
If the parts were nonconforming, Cey will bear the risk of loss, even though the contract was a shipment contract.
Rate this question:
Risk of loss and title passed to Barr.
Risk of loss and title remain with Sand.
Risk of loss passed to Barr but title remains with Sand.
Risk of loss remains with Sand but title passed to Barr.
Rate this question:
Who has title to the goods.
The shipping terms.
The credit terms.
The fact that a breach has occurred.
Rate this question:
I and III only.
I, II, and III only.
II and III only.
I only.
Rate this question:
I only.
II only.
Either I and II.
Neither I nor II.
Rate this question:
Deceiving Donnegal as to his identity at the time of the purchase.
Giving Donnegal his check which was later dishonored.
Obtaining the goods from Donnegal by fraud, punishable as larceny under criminal law.
Purchasing goods which had been previously stolen from Donnegal.
Rate this question:
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Jul 22, 2024 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.