Bioethics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Are great! I would buy them over normal foods!
Ehhh...I don't know if they are safe....I want to know exactly what genes are in the food.
Are morally and ethically wrong. Humans were not meant to do this to living organisms!
There is nothing wrong with creating healthier meats and more efficient farm animals. Animal rights are not that important. They are going to be killed anyway.
They can be modified only so that it does not negatively affect the health of the animal. Cloning should not be done to increase productivity.
No modification is permissible under any circumstance. Not only is it a breach of animal integrity, but it is morally wrong. We can not change God's creations with science.
Yes. It will help the human race survive and increase the productivity of many processes.
Modification is okay, but synthesis is a whole new bag of worms. Humans were not made to create life.
Modification or Synthesis is absolutely wrong and unacceptable.
Bacteria=plants=animals
Bacteria, plants, animals
NONE ARE ACCEPTABLE!
Very acceptable. It will help increase productivity and improve society!
It should be used with caution and not for productivity's sake.
Not at all acceptable under any circumstance.
Yes! The sustainability of the human race depends on it!
If used properly and with extreme caution, it could be very beneficial.
NO. It will lead to the downfall of the human race as superweeds, genetically modified super-bacteria, and synthetic organisms take over. WE WILL FACE GOD'S WRATH!
A visionary
Too optimistic, he should proceed with more caution
Venturing into very scary places.
Are more happy when blind. Therefore, its okay to engineer them that way.
Are an example of animal modification abuse that violates animal rights laws.
ABSOLUTELY TWISTED, SICK, AND WRONG.
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.