Virginia Plan, New Jersey Plan, And Great Compromise

The Virginia plan, proposed by James Madison, aimed to create a strong national government with a bicameral legislature based on population size. This plan favored larger states as they would have more representation and influence in the government compared to smaller states. Therefore, it is true that the Virginia plan was angled toward the larger states.

The Great Compromise refers to the agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention in 1787, which resolved the debate between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan proposed a bicameral legislature with representation based on population, favoring larger states. On the other hand, the New Jersey Plan called for equal representation for all states, regardless of size. The Great Compromise combined elements of both plans, creating a bicameral legislature with the House of Representatives based on population and the Senate with equal representation for all states. Therefore, the statement that the Great Compromise gave both sides what they wanted is true.

The statement contradicts the actual structure of the Legislative Branch. In the United States, the Legislative Branch consists of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Therefore, the correct answer is False, as there were originally two houses in the Legislative Branch.

The Virginia plan actually proposed that the number of representatives in the House of Representatives would be based on the population of the state, not the size. This meant that larger states would have more representatives, giving them more influence in the legislative process. This was a point of contention during the Constitutional Convention, as smaller states feared being overshadowed by the larger ones. Ultimately, a compromise known as the Great Compromise was reached, which created a bicameral legislature with representation based on both population (in the House) and equal representation for all states (in the Senate).